how
Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions ("where should this live", "which package owns this", "is this the right layer"). Explains subsystem architecture, runtime flow, onboarding mental models. Use why for motivation.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-11
- Stars
- ★ 0
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- how
- description
- Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions ("where should this live", "which package owns this", "is this the right layer"). Explains subsystem architecture, runtime flow, onboarding mental models. Use why for motivation.
- argument-hint
- [question]
- disable-model-invocation
- true
02 资源文件 2
- 参考文档references/explainer-prompt.md3.0 KB
- 参考文档references/explorer-prompt.md1.1 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
How
Explore the codebase to answer "how does X work?" questions. Produce architectural explanations at the level of a senior engineer onboarding onto a subsystem, enough to build a working mental model, not so much that it reads like annotated source code.
Every spawn is a subagent with subagent_type: "general-purpose". Read-only: the prompt says not to edit, write, or commit anything. Explorers use the how explorer line in ~/.claude/rules/models.md (default sonnet/high), and every explainer uses the how explainer line (default opus/xhigh). Set model and effort from that line's value per ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/workflow/engineering/references/model-roles.md, or from the default if the rule or the line is missing.
1. Assess complexity
If the scope is ambiguous, state your interpretation and explore. The user can redirect.
- Simple (a single module, a small utility, a narrow question such as "how does function X work"): no explorers. Spawn one explainer that explores and explains in one pass, built from
references/explainer-prompt.mdwithout the explorer-findings section. Go to step 4. - Complex (a subsystem spanning multiple files or services, a cross-cutting feature, a full architectural overview): go to step 2.
When in doubt, take the simple path.
2. Explore (complex only)
Decompose the question into 2 to 4 angles, each a distinct slice of the subsystem. Spawn all explorers in a single message, each with references/explorer-prompt.md and its angle filled in.
3. Synthesize (complex only)
Once all explorers have returned, spawn one explainer with references/explainer-prompt.md and every explorer's findings filled in.
4. Present
Present the explainer's output. Light edits for clarity or context from the conversation are fine. Do not substantially rewrite it.
Output format
The explanation uses the sections defined in references/explainer-prompt.md, dropping any that do not apply: Overview, Key Concepts, How It Works, Where Things Live, Gotchas.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
why
Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, product analytics warehouse) in parallel, then returns a cited read on decisions and tradeoffs. Use how for runtime behavior.
tdd
Use only when the user explicitly asks for TDD, a failing test, or a regression test, OR when the bug has an obvious cheap local test target. Skip when the test path is unclear, expensive, integration-heavy, or not requested.
swarm
Fan out N parallel workers, drain them, and return one report. Use for /swarm, 'swarm this', or parallel coverage, races, gauntlets, and exploration.
show-me-your-work
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result). Local by default; commit it when a reviewer needs the trail to trust the result. Use for /show-me-your-work, autonomous or multi-phase runs, or work a human reviews after stepping away.
interrogate
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart". Multiple LLM reviewers challenge changes from independent angles.
figure-it-out
Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work a human reviews after stepping away. Scales rigor to the task, runs a hypothesis loop, and logs decisions. Use for /figure-it-out or 'figure it out'.