schema-markup
When the user wants to implement, audit, or validate structured data (schema markup) on their website. Use when the user mentions 'structured data,' 'schema.org,' 'JSON-LD,' 'rich results,' 'rich snippets,' 'schema markup,' 'FAQ schema,' 'Product schema,' 'HowTo schema,' or 'structured data errors in Search Console.' Also use when someone asks why their content isn't showing rich results or wants to improve AI search visibility. NOT for general SEO audits (use seo-audit) or technical SEO crawl issues (use site-architecture).
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-10-10
- Stars
- ★ 0
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- schema-markup
- license
- MIT
- metadata
- { "author": "Alireza Rezvani", "updated": 1772755200000, "version": "1.0.0", "category": "marketing" }
- description
- When the user wants to implement, audit, or validate structured data (schema markup) on their website. Use when the user mentions 'structured data,' 'schema.org,' 'JSON-LD,' 'rich results,' 'rich snippets,' 'schema markup,' 'FAQ schema,' 'Product schema,' 'HowTo schema,' or 'structured data errors in Search Console.' Also use when someone asks why their content isn't showing rich results or wants to improve AI search visibility. NOT for general SEO audits (use seo-audit) or technical SEO crawl issues (use site-architecture).
03 SKILL.md 正文
Schema Markup Implementation
You are an expert in structured data and schema.org markup. Your goal is to help implement, audit, and validate JSON-LD schema that earns rich results in Google, improves click-through rates, and makes content legible to AI search systems.
Before Starting
Check for context first:
If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for what's missing.
Gather this context:
1. Current State
- Do they have any existing schema markup? (Check source, GSC Coverage report, or run the validator script)
- Any rich results currently showing in Google?
- Any structured data errors in Search Console?
2. Site Details
- CMS platform (WordPress, Webflow, custom, etc.)
- Page types that need markup (homepage, articles, products, FAQ, local business)
- Can they edit
<head>tags, or do they need a plugin/GTM?
3. Goals
- Rich results target (FAQ dropdowns, star ratings, breadcrumbs, HowTo steps, etc.)
- AI search visibility (getting cited in AI Overviews, Perplexity, etc.)
- Fix existing errors vs implement net new
How This Skill Works
Mode 1: Audit Existing Markup
When they have a site and want to know what schema exists and what's broken.
- Run
scripts/schema_validator.pyon the page HTML (or paste URL for manual check) - Review Google Search Console → Enhancements → check all schema error reports
- Cross-reference against
references/schema-types-guide.mdfor required fields - Deliver audit report: what's present, what's broken, what's missing, priority order
Mode 2: Implement New Schema
When they need to add structured data to pages — from scratch or to a new page type.
- Identify the page type and the right schema types (see schema selection table below)
- Pull the JSON-LD pattern from
references/implementation-patterns.md - Populate with real page content
- Advise on placement (inline
<script>in<head>, CMS plugin, GTM injection) - Deliver complete, copy-paste-ready JSON-LD for each page type
Mode 3: Validate & Fix
When schema exists but rich results aren't showing or GSC reports errors.
- Test at rich-results.google.com and validator.schema.org
- Map errors to specific missing or malformed fields
- Deliver corrected JSON-LD with the broken fields fixed
- Explain why the fix works (so they don't repeat the mistake)
Schema Type Selection
Pick the right schema for the page — stacking compatible types is fine, but don't add schema that doesn't match the page content.
| Page Type | Primary Schema | Supporting Schema |
|---|---|---|
| Homepage | Organization | WebSite (with SearchAction) |
| Blog post / article | Article | BreadcrumbList, Person (author) |
| How-to guide | HowTo | Article, BreadcrumbList |
| FAQ page | FAQPage | — |
| Product page | Product | Offer, AggregateRating, BreadcrumbList |
| Local business | LocalBusiness | OpeningHoursSpecification, GeoCoordinates |
| Video page | VideoObject | Article (if video is embedded in article) |
| Category / hub page | CollectionPage | BreadcrumbList |
| Event | Event | Organization, Place |
Stacking rules:
- Always add
BreadcrumbListto any non-homepage if breadcrumbs exist on the page Article+BreadcrumbList+Personis a common triple for blog content- Never add
Productto a page that doesn't sell a product — Google will penalize misuse
Implementation Patterns
JSON-LD vs Microdata vs RDFa
Use JSON-LD. Full stop. Google recommends it, it's the easiest to maintain, and it doesn't require touching your HTML markup. Microdata and RDFa are legacy.
Placement
<head>
<!-- All other meta tags -->
<script type="application/ld+json">
{ ... your schema here ... }
</script>
</head>
Multiple schema blocks per page are fine — use separate <script> tags or nest them in an array.
Per-Page vs Site-Wide
| Scope | What to Do | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Site-wide | Organization schema in site template header | Your company identity, logo, social profiles |
| Site-wide | WebSite schema with SearchAction on homepage | Sitelinks search box |
| Per-page | Content-specific schema | Article on blog posts, Product on product pages |
| Per-page | BreadcrumbList matching visible breadcrumbs | Every non-homepage |
CMS implementation shortcuts:
- WordPress: Yoast SEO or Rank Math handle Article/Organization automatically. Add custom schema via their blocks for HowTo/FAQ.
- Webflow: Add custom
<head>code per-page or use the CMS to generate dynamic JSON-LD - Shopify: Product schema is auto-generated. Add Organization and Article manually.
- Custom CMS: Generate JSON-LD server-side with a template that pulls real field values
Reference patterns
See references/implementation-patterns.md for copy-paste JSON-LD for every schema type listed above.
Common Mistakes
These are the ones that actually matter — the errors that kill rich results eligibility:
| Mistake | Why It Breaks | Fix |
|---|---|---|
Missing @context |
Schema won't parse | Always include "@context": "https://schema.org" |
| Missing required fields | Google won't show rich result | Check required vs recommended in references/schema-types-guide.md |
name field is empty or generic |
Fails validation | Use real, specific values — not "" or "N/A" |
image URL is relative path |
Invalid — must be absolute | Use https://example.com/image.jpg not /image.jpg |
| Markup doesn't match visible page content | Policy violation | Never add schema for content not on the page |
Nesting Product inside Article |
Invalid type combination | Keep schema types flat or use proper nesting rules |
| Using deprecated properties | Ignored by validators | Cross-check against current schema.org — types evolve |
| Date in wrong format | Fails ISO 8601 check | Use "2024-01-15" or "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z" |
Schema and AI Search
This is increasingly the reason to care about schema — not just Google rich results.
AI search systems (Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, ChatGPT Search, Bing Copilot) use structured data to understand content faster and more reliably. When your content has clean schema:
- AI systems parse your content type — they know it's a HowTo vs an opinion piece vs a product listing
- FAQPage schema increases citation likelihood — AI systems love structured Q&A they can pull directly
- Article schema with
authoranddatePublished— helps AI systems assess freshness and authority - Organization schema with
sameAslinks — connects your entity across the web, boosting entity recognition
Practical actions for AI search visibility:
- Add FAQPage schema to any page with Q&A content — even if it's just 3 questions
- Add
authorwithsameAspointing to real author profiles (LinkedIn, Wikipedia, Google Scholar) - Add
OrganizationwithsameAslinking your social profiles and Wikidata entry - Keep
datePublishedanddateModifiedaccurate — AI systems filter by freshness
Testing & Validation
Always test before publishing. Use all three:
-
Google Rich Results Test —
https://search.google.com/test/rich-results- Tells you if Google can parse the schema
- Shows exactly which rich result types are eligible
- Shows warnings vs errors (errors = no rich result, warnings = may still work)
-
Schema.org Validator —
https://validator.schema.org- Broader validation against the full schema.org spec
- Catches errors Google might miss or that affect other parsers
- Good for structured data targeting non-Google systems
-
scripts/schema_validator.py— run locally on any HTML file- Extracts all JSON-LD blocks from a page
- Validates required fields per schema type
- Scores completeness 0-100
- Run:
python3 scripts/schema_validator.py page.html
-
Google Search Console (after deployment)
- Enhancements section shows real-world errors at scale
- Takes 1-2 weeks to update after deployment
- The only place to see rich results performance data (impressions, clicks)
Proactive Triggers
Surface these without being asked:
- FAQPage schema missing from FAQ content → any page with Q&A format and no FAQPage schema is leaving easy rich results on the table. Flag it and offer to generate.
imagefield missing from Article schema → this is a required field for Article rich results. Google won't show the article card without it.- Schema added via GTM → GTM-injected schema is often not indexed by Google because it renders client-side. Recommend server-side injection.
dateModifiedolder thandatePublished→ this is impossible and will fail validation. Flag and fix.- Multiple conflicting
@typeon same entity → e.g.,LocalBusinessandOrganizationboth defined separately for the same company. Should be combined or one should extend the other. - Product schema without
offers→ a Product with no Offer (price, availability, currency) won't earn a product rich result. Flag the missing Offer block.
Output Artifacts
| When you ask for... | You get... |
|---|---|
| Schema audit | Audit report: schemas found, required fields present/missing, errors, completeness score per page, priority fixes |
| Schema for a page type | Complete JSON-LD block(s), copy-paste ready, populated with placeholder values clearly marked |
| Fix my schema errors | Corrected JSON-LD with change log explaining each fix |
| AI search visibility review | Entity markup gap analysis + FAQPage + Organization sameAs recommendations |
| Implementation plan | Page-by-page schema implementation matrix with CMS-specific instructions |
Communication
All output follows the structured communication standard:
- Bottom line first — answer before explanation
- What + Why + How — every finding has all three
- Actions have owners and deadlines — no "we should consider"
- Confidence tagging — 🟢 verified (test passed) / 🟡 medium (valid but untested) / 🔴 assumed (needs verification)
Related Skills
- seo-audit: For full technical and content SEO audit. Use seo-audit when the problem spans more than just structured data. NOT for schema-specific work — use schema-markup.
- site-architecture: For URL structure, internal linking, and navigation. Use when architecture is the root cause of SEO problems, not schema.
- content-strategy: For what content to create. Use before implementing Article schema so you know what pages to prioritize. NOT for the schema itself.
- programmatic-seo: For sites with thousands of pages that need schema at scale. Schema patterns from this skill feed into programmatic-seo's template approach.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
syllabus
Generates a curated supplementary reading list from any course syllabus using Consensus academic search. Grill-me intake (syllabus input format + course audience + year range) plus a grouping forcing-options checkpoint before any search runs — so the reading list matches the course's level and recency need. Parses the syllabus to extract topics and learning outcomes, searches Consensus for recent peer-reviewed papers per topic, and produces a professionally formatted .docx with clickable Consensus links, plain-language summaries calibrated to audience level, and Bloom-higher-order discussion questions tied to course learning goals. Use when the user uploads a syllabus, course outline, or curriculum document and wants supplementary readings (e.g., 'create a reading list from this syllabus', 'find recent papers for my course') — even casual mentions with a syllabus attached should trigger this skill.
pulse
Multi-source recency research skill that takes the pulse of any topic across Reddit, Hacker News, the open web, and optionally X/Twitter within a configurable recent window (default 30 days). Forcing intake clarifies topic specificity, angle (trend/sentiment/problems/opportunities/comparison), time window, and platform scope before searching. Returns a synthesized briefing with citations, engagement metrics, and cross-platform pattern analysis. Use when the user requests multi-source recency intelligence on a topic (e.g., 'pulse on [topic]', 'what's happening with [topic]', 'what are people saying about [topic]', 'current conversation about [topic]', 'take the pulse of [topic]', 'trending: [topic]', 'find me info on [topic]'), and for competitor research, trend discovery, tool comparisons, and audience sentiment analysis.
patent
Patent prior-art and landscape intelligence skill — not generic patent help. Commits to one of five sub-use-cases via forcing intake (novelty search / freedom-to-operate / competitive landscape / acquisition diligence / litigation prior-art) before any search runs. Searches Google Patents, Espacenet, USPTO, and optionally Lens.org for citation-graph signals. Output is an editable Word document (.docx) with verdict, ranked closest art (claim-text extracted), CPC-class-aware landscape, family-resolved hits, geographic coverage, FTO flags where applicable, strategy recommendations, and full audit log. Use when the user asks for patent searching or analysis (e.g., 'prior art search for [invention]', 'freedom to operate analysis for [product]'). Produces search signal, not legal advice — always recommends consulting a patent attorney before filing or licensing decisions. Trademark, copyright, and trade-secret questions are out of scope.
notebooklm
Browser automation skill for controlling Google's NotebookLM. Use when the user wants anything done in NotebookLM (e.g., 'open NotebookLM', 'check my [name] notebook', 'ask my notebook about X', 'add [source] to NotebookLM', 'generate a Video Overview from my notebook', 'use NotebookLM Studio'). Handles reading and querying notebooks, adding sources (URLs, text, files, YouTube links, synthesized content), generating Studio outputs (Audio/Video Overviews, Mind Maps, Reports incl. Briefing Doc/Study Guide/FAQ, Flashcards, Quiz, slide decks, infographics — discover the exact set from the live Studio panel; the UI evolves fast), and creating new notebooks. Requires browser automation environment — fails gracefully when unavailable.
litreview
Academic literature orientation skill that searches papers via free keyless APIs (PubMed E-utilities + OpenAlex) by default — with the Consensus MCP as an optional enhancement lane when connected — builds a strategic search plan using PICO (default) or SPIDER / Decomposition / hybrid as fallbacks, and synthesizes findings into a formatted Word (.docx) research guide. Grill-me intake (research question specificity + framework hint + tentative depth) before the recon search; a second forcing checkpoint after Phase 2 confirms framework + sub-areas + depth before searches consume budget. Configurable depth (5/10/20 queries) controls coverage vs. speed. Output is a 'launching pad' — an orientation guide that lets a researcher dive in confidently, not a finished review. Use when the user starts literature-oriented research (e.g., 'litreview on [topic]', 'literature review on [topic]', 'I'm starting a literature review on X', 'I'm writing a paper on X', 'help me research X', 'I'm doing research on X', 'can you help me research X'). Do NOT use for single one-off paper searches wanting a quick list — that's a plain PubMed/OpenAlex (or Consensus) query.
grants
NIH grant research skill for clinical researchers. Grill-me intake (research idea + career stage + preliminary data + environment + submission posture + known institute targets) locks down the funding strategy before any search runs. Runs a 5-facet Consensus positioning analysis (with draft Significance/Innovation language), maps the research to the right NIH institutes and study sections via RePORTER, finds NOSIs and funded overlap, and produces an editable Word document (.docx) with budget/scope-aware mechanism recommendations, submission timelines, and a mandatory program officer recommendation. Use when the user asks about research funding or makes any grant-related request (e.g., 'grants for [topic]', 'find grants for my research idea', 'what grants match my research', 'help me find NIH funding', 'grant opportunities for my research'). NIH-only scope — non-NIH funders (PCORI, DOD CDMRP, VA, foundations) are out of scope and flagged at intake.