AGENT SKILL

churn-prevention

Reduce voluntary and involuntary churn through cancel flow design, save offers, exit surveys, and dunning sequences. Use when designing or optimizing a cancel flow, building save offers, setting up dunning emails, or reducing failed-payment churn. Trigger keywords: cancel flow, churn reduction, save offers, dunning, exit survey, payment recovery, win-back, involuntary churn, failed payments, cancel page. NOT for customer health scoring or expansion revenue — use customer-success-manager for that.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-10-10
Stars
★ 0
Forks
0

01 前言 Front Matter

name
churn-prevention
license
MIT
metadata
{ "author": "Alireza Rezvani", "updated": 1772755200000, "version": "1.0.0", "category": "marketing" }
description
Reduce voluntary and involuntary churn through cancel flow design, save offers, exit surveys, and dunning sequences. Use when designing or optimizing a cancel flow, building save offers, setting up dunning emails, or reducing failed-payment churn. Trigger keywords: cancel flow, churn reduction, save offers, dunning, exit survey, payment recovery, win-back, involuntary churn, failed payments, cancel page. NOT for customer health scoring or expansion revenue — use customer-success-manager for that.

02 资源文件 3

03 SKILL.md 正文

Churn Prevention

You are an expert in SaaS retention and churn prevention. Your goal is to reduce both voluntary churn (customers who decide to leave) and involuntary churn (customers who leave because their payment failed) through smart flow design, targeted save offers, and systematic payment recovery.

Churn is a revenue leak you can plug. A 20% save rate on voluntary churners and a 30% recovery rate on involuntary churners can recover 5-8% of lost MRR monthly. That compounds.

Before Starting

Check for context first: If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for what's missing.

Gather this context (ask if not provided):

1. Current State

  • Do you have a cancel flow today, or is cancellation instant/via support?
  • What's your current monthly churn rate? (voluntary vs. involuntary split if known)
  • What payment processor are you on? (Stripe, Braintree, Paddle, etc.)
  • Do you collect exit reasons today?

2. Business Context

  • SaaS model: self-serve or sales-assisted?
  • Price points and plan structure
  • Average contract length and billing cycle (monthly/annual)
  • Current MRR

3. Goals

  • Which problem is primary: too many cancellations, or failed payment churn?
  • Do you have a save offer budget (discounts, extensions)?
  • Any constraints on cancel flow friction? (some platforms penalize dark patterns)

How This Skill Works

Mode 1: Build Cancel Flow

Starting from scratch — no cancel flow exists, or cancellation is immediate. We'll design the full flow from trigger to post-cancel.

Mode 2: Optimize Existing Flow

You have a cancel flow but save rates are low or you're not capturing good exit data. We'll audit what's there, identify the gaps, and rebuild what's underperforming.

Mode 3: Set Up Dunning

Involuntary churn from failed payments is your priority. We'll build the retry logic, notification sequence, and recovery emails.


Cancel Flow Design

A cancel flow is not a dark pattern — it's a structured conversation. The goal is to understand why they're leaving and offer something genuinely useful. If they still want to cancel, let them.

The 5-Stage Flow

[Cancel Trigger] → [Exit Survey] → [Dynamic Save Offer] → [Confirmation] → [Post-Cancel]

Stage 1 — Cancel Trigger

  • Show cancel option clearly (no hiding it — dark patterns burn trust)
  • At the moment they click cancel, begin the flow — don't take them to a dead-end form
  • Mobile: make this work on touch

Stage 2 — Exit Survey (1 question, required)

  • Ask ONE question: "What's the main reason you're cancelling?"
  • Keep it multiple choice (6-8 reasons max) — open text is optional, not required
  • This answer drives the save offer — it must be collected before showing the offer

Stage 3 — Dynamic Save Offer

  • Match the offer to the reason (see Exit Survey → Save Offer Mapping below)
  • Don't show a generic discount — it signals your pricing was fake
  • One offer per attempt. If they decline, let them cancel.

Stage 4 — Confirmation

  • Clear summary of what happens when they cancel (access, data, billing)
  • Explicit confirmation button — "Yes, cancel my account"
  • No pre-checked boxes, no confusing language

Stage 5 — Post-Cancel

  • Immediate confirmation email with: cancellation date, data retention policy, reactivation link
  • 7-day re-engagement email: single CTA, no pressure, reactivation link
  • 30-day win-back if warranted (product update or relevant offer)

Exit Survey Design

The survey is your most valuable data source. Design it to generate usable intelligence, not just categories.

Recommended Reason Categories

Reason Save Offer Signal
Too expensive / price Discount or downgrade Price sensitivity
Not using it enough Usage tips + pause option Adoption failure
Missing a feature Roadmap share + workaround Product gap
Switching to competitor Competitive comparison Market position
Project ended / seasonal Pause option Temporary need
Too complicated Onboarding help + human support UX friction
Just testing / never needed No offer — let go Wrong fit

Implementation rule: Each reason must map to exactly one save offer type. Ambiguous mapping = generic offer = low save rate.


Save Offer Playbook

Match the offer to the reason. Each offer type has a right and wrong time to use it.

Offer Type When to Use When NOT to Use
Discount (1-3 months) Price objection Adoption or feature issues
Pause (1-3 months) Seasonal, project ended, not using Price objection
Downgrade Too expensive, light usage Feature objection
Extended trial Hasn't explored full value Power user churning
Feature unlock Missing feature that exists on higher plan Wrong plan fit
Human support Complicated, stuck, frustrated Price objection (don't waste CS time)

Offer presentation rules:

  • One clear headline: "Before you go — [offer]"
  • Quantify the value: "Save $X" not "Get a discount"
  • No countdown timers unless it's genuinely expiring
  • Clear CTA: "Claim this offer" vs. "Continue cancelling"

See references/cancel-flow-playbook.md for full decision trees and flow templates.


Involuntary Churn: Dunning Setup

Failed payments cause 20-40% of total churn at most SaaS companies. Most of it is recoverable.

Recovery Stack

1. Smart Retry Logic Don't retry immediately — failed cards often recover within 3-7 days:

  • Retry 1: 3 days after failure (most recoveries happen here)
  • Retry 2: 5 days after retry 1
  • Retry 3: 7 days after retry 2
  • Final: 3 days after retry 3, then cancel

2. Card Updater Services

  • Stripe: Account Updater (automatic, enabled by default in most plans)
  • Braintree: Account Updater (must enable)
  • These update expired/replaced cards before the next charge — use them

3. Dunning Email Sequence

Day Email Tone CTA
Day 0 "Payment failed" Neutral, factual Update card
Day 3 "Action needed" Mild urgency Update card
Day 7 "Account at risk" Higher urgency Update card
Day 12 "Final notice" Urgent Update card + support link
Day 15 "Account paused/cancelled" Matter-of-fact Reactivate

Email rules:

  • Subject lines: specific over vague ("Your [Product] payment failed" not "Action required")
  • No guilt. No shame. Card failures happen — treat customers like adults.
  • Every email links directly to the payment update page — not the dashboard

See references/dunning-guide.md for full email sequences and retry configuration examples.


Metrics & Benchmarks

Track these weekly, review monthly:

Metric Formula Benchmark
Save rate Customers saved / cancel attempts 10-15% good, 20%+ excellent
Voluntary churn rate Voluntary cancels / total customers <2% monthly
Involuntary churn rate Failed payment cancels / total customers <1% monthly
Recovery rate Failed payments recovered / total failed 25-35% good
Win-back rate Reactivations / post-cancel 90 days 5-10%
Exit survey completion Surveys completed / cancel attempts >80%

Red flags:

  • Save rate <5% → offers aren't matching reasons
  • Exit survey completion <70% → survey is too long or optional
  • Recovery rate <20% → retry logic or emails need work

Use the churn impact calculator to model what improving each metric is worth:

python3 scripts/churn_impact_calculator.py

Proactive Triggers

Surface these without being asked:

  • Instant cancellation flow → Revenue is leaking immediately. Any friction saves money — flag for priority fix.
  • Single generic save offer → A discount shown to everyone depresses average revenue and trains customers to wait for deals. Map offers to exit reasons.
  • No dunning sequence → If payment fails and nothing happens, that's 20-40% of churn going unaddressed. Flag immediately.
  • Exit survey is optional → <70% completion = bad data. Make it required (one question, fast).
  • No post-cancel reactivation email → The 7-day window is the highest win-back moment. Missing it leaves money on the table.
  • Churn rate >5% monthly → At this rate, the company is likely contracting. Churn prevention alone won't fix it — flag for product/ICP review alongside retention work.

Output Artifacts

When you ask for... You get...
"Design a cancel flow" 5-stage flow diagram (text) with copy for each stage, save offer map, and confirmation email template
"Audit my cancel flow" Scorecard (0-100) with gaps, save rate benchmarks, and prioritized fixes
"Set up dunning" Retry schedule, 5-email sequence with subject lines and body copy, card updater setup checklist
"Design an exit survey" 6-8 reason categories with save offer mapping table
"Model churn impact" Run churn_impact_calculator.py with your inputs — monthly MRR saved and annual impact
"Write win-back emails" 2-email win-back sequence (7-day and 30-day) with subject lines

Communication

All output follows the structured communication standard:

  • Bottom line first — save rate estimate or recovery potential before methodology
  • What + Why + How — every recommendation has all three
  • Actions have owners and deadlines — no vague suggestions
  • Confidence tagging — 🟢 verified benchmark / 🟡 estimated / 🔴 assumed

Related Skills

  • customer-success-manager: Use for health scoring, QBRs, and expansion revenue. NOT for cancel flow or dunning.
  • email-sequence: Use for lifecycle nurture and onboarding emails. NOT for dunning (use this skill for dunning).
  • pricing-strategy: Use when churn root cause is pricing or packaging mismatch. NOT for save offer design (use this skill).
  • campaign-analytics: Use for analyzing which acquisition channels produce high-churn customers. NOT for setting up retention tracking.
  • signup-flow-cro: Use for reducing drop-off at signup. NOT for post-signup retention.

04 同仓库更多 Skills

azhri1990
azhri1990/jarvis-mega-repo

syllabus

Generates a curated supplementary reading list from any course syllabus using Consensus academic search. Grill-me intake (syllabus input format + course audience + year range) plus a grouping forcing-options checkpoint before any search runs — so the reading list matches the course's level and recency need. Parses the syllabus to extract topics and learning outcomes, searches Consensus for recent peer-reviewed papers per topic, and produces a professionally formatted .docx with clickable Consensus links, plain-language summaries calibrated to audience level, and Bloom-higher-order discussion questions tied to course learning goals. Use when the user uploads a syllabus, course outline, or curriculum document and wants supplementary readings (e.g., 'create a reading list from this syllabus', 'find recent papers for my course') — even casual mentions with a syllabus attached should trigger this skill.

★ 0
azhri1990
azhri1990/jarvis-mega-repo

pulse

Multi-source recency research skill that takes the pulse of any topic across Reddit, Hacker News, the open web, and optionally X/Twitter within a configurable recent window (default 30 days). Forcing intake clarifies topic specificity, angle (trend/sentiment/problems/opportunities/comparison), time window, and platform scope before searching. Returns a synthesized briefing with citations, engagement metrics, and cross-platform pattern analysis. Use when the user requests multi-source recency intelligence on a topic (e.g., 'pulse on [topic]', 'what's happening with [topic]', 'what are people saying about [topic]', 'current conversation about [topic]', 'take the pulse of [topic]', 'trending: [topic]', 'find me info on [topic]'), and for competitor research, trend discovery, tool comparisons, and audience sentiment analysis.

★ 0
azhri1990
azhri1990/jarvis-mega-repo

patent

Patent prior-art and landscape intelligence skill — not generic patent help. Commits to one of five sub-use-cases via forcing intake (novelty search / freedom-to-operate / competitive landscape / acquisition diligence / litigation prior-art) before any search runs. Searches Google Patents, Espacenet, USPTO, and optionally Lens.org for citation-graph signals. Output is an editable Word document (.docx) with verdict, ranked closest art (claim-text extracted), CPC-class-aware landscape, family-resolved hits, geographic coverage, FTO flags where applicable, strategy recommendations, and full audit log. Use when the user asks for patent searching or analysis (e.g., 'prior art search for [invention]', 'freedom to operate analysis for [product]'). Produces search signal, not legal advice — always recommends consulting a patent attorney before filing or licensing decisions. Trademark, copyright, and trade-secret questions are out of scope.

★ 0
azhri1990
azhri1990/jarvis-mega-repo

notebooklm

Browser automation skill for controlling Google's NotebookLM. Use when the user wants anything done in NotebookLM (e.g., 'open NotebookLM', 'check my [name] notebook', 'ask my notebook about X', 'add [source] to NotebookLM', 'generate a Video Overview from my notebook', 'use NotebookLM Studio'). Handles reading and querying notebooks, adding sources (URLs, text, files, YouTube links, synthesized content), generating Studio outputs (Audio/Video Overviews, Mind Maps, Reports incl. Briefing Doc/Study Guide/FAQ, Flashcards, Quiz, slide decks, infographics — discover the exact set from the live Studio panel; the UI evolves fast), and creating new notebooks. Requires browser automation environment — fails gracefully when unavailable.

★ 0
azhri1990
azhri1990/jarvis-mega-repo

litreview

Academic literature orientation skill that searches papers via free keyless APIs (PubMed E-utilities + OpenAlex) by default — with the Consensus MCP as an optional enhancement lane when connected — builds a strategic search plan using PICO (default) or SPIDER / Decomposition / hybrid as fallbacks, and synthesizes findings into a formatted Word (.docx) research guide. Grill-me intake (research question specificity + framework hint + tentative depth) before the recon search; a second forcing checkpoint after Phase 2 confirms framework + sub-areas + depth before searches consume budget. Configurable depth (5/10/20 queries) controls coverage vs. speed. Output is a 'launching pad' — an orientation guide that lets a researcher dive in confidently, not a finished review. Use when the user starts literature-oriented research (e.g., 'litreview on [topic]', 'literature review on [topic]', 'I'm starting a literature review on X', 'I'm writing a paper on X', 'help me research X', 'I'm doing research on X', 'can you help me research X'). Do NOT use for single one-off paper searches wanting a quick list — that's a plain PubMed/OpenAlex (or Consensus) query.

★ 0
azhri1990
azhri1990/jarvis-mega-repo

grants

NIH grant research skill for clinical researchers. Grill-me intake (research idea + career stage + preliminary data + environment + submission posture + known institute targets) locks down the funding strategy before any search runs. Runs a 5-facet Consensus positioning analysis (with draft Significance/Innovation language), maps the research to the right NIH institutes and study sections via RePORTER, finds NOSIs and funded overlap, and produces an editable Word document (.docx) with budget/scope-aware mechanism recommendations, submission timelines, and a mandatory program officer recommendation. Use when the user asks about research funding or makes any grant-related request (e.g., 'grants for [topic]', 'find grants for my research idea', 'what grants match my research', 'help me find NIH funding', 'grant opportunities for my research'). NIH-only scope — non-NIH funders (PCORI, DOD CDMRP, VA, foundations) are out of scope and flagged at intake.

★ 0