[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M7BVJS9YAD09V5S061HTMART":3,"skill-same:01M7BVJS9YAD09V5S061HTMART":45},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":19,"linkOnly":20,"markdownContent":21,"markdownBody":22,"frontMatter":23,"refName":25,"commitSha":26,"skillDirectory":27,"forksCount":14,"repositoryHtmlUrl":28,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":29,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":30,"install":31,"resources":44},"01M7BVJS9YAD09V5S061HTMART","figure-it-out",null,"Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work a human reviews after stepping away. Scales rigor to the task, runs a hypothesis loop, and logs decisions. Use for \u002Ffigure-it-out or 'figure it out'.","quotegoat-ux\u002Fbleat","quotegoat-ux","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F279744457?v=4","01M7BVHCY3V27VFM64ZVC9RRKG","Justin Alvarado","01M7BVHCYQ0A0KV5BE406H99D7",0,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fquotegoat-ux\u002Fbleat\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002Fbleat\u002Fskills\u002Ffigure-it-out\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],"2026-11-15 14:19:17",false,"---\nname: figure-it-out\ndescription: \"Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work a human reviews after stepping away. Scales rigor to the task, runs a hypothesis loop, and logs decisions. Use for \u002Ffigure-it-out or 'figure it out'.\"\nmenu-description: design a rigorous, auditable playbook for a task no bundled playbook fits\n---\n\n# Figure it out\n\nWhen the task matches no playbook, design one. The deliverable before any code is the workflow itself: a sequence of phases that scales rigor to the task, runs the scientific method, and leaves a decision trail a human can audit after stepping away.\n\n## Start\n\nOpen a todolist whose first item is to read the Principles section of the **just-bleat-it** skill. Then add the phases below as todos.\n\n## Phase A: Frame\n\nGround first, then commit. Don't start the run until you can state:\n\n- The definition of done as a falsifiable predicate (the **prove-it-works** principle skill).\n- Scope, quantified: rough units and effort, plus the blockers grounding surfaced.\n- The rigor level, biased high. One-way doors and high blast radius get more. Reversible low-stakes steps get less. Rigor is gates and artifacts, not \"try harder\".\n\nPresent the framing and tradeoffs before committing to a long run. Reversible work proceeds (the **never-block-on-the-human** principle skill), but a multi-hour run earns one checkpoint.\n\n## Phase B: Design the workflow\n\nDecompose into atomic, independently-landable units. Sequence riskiest-unknown-first. Scaffold and verification come before features (the **foundational-thinking** principle skill).\n\n- Build the verification harness before the work, with the baseline captured from the pre-change state, so the check reads as \"old value vs new value\".\n- For one-way-door design decisions, run the **architect** skill (it runs **arena**). Skip it for mechanical work whose shape is already concrete. A second arena over a settled design is over-engineering (the **laziness-protocol** principle skill).\n- Decide what fans out. Parallelize only across seams, and give each worker its own worktree or branch (the **separate-before-serializing-shared-state** principle skill). Don't over-fan. Pick each subagent's reasoning level for the job, per the Subagents section of the **just-bleat-it** skill.\n- Write the designed phase list down. That list is what the human reviews.\n\nThen execute the design. Add its steps to the todolist as concrete items between the Phase C and Phase D entries. Run each under the Phase C loop discipline, and weave the Phase D log through them, a row as each step lands, rather than saving the whole trail for the end.\n\n## Phase C: Run the loop\n\nEach unit is an experiment. State the hypothesis, make the smallest change, measure against the predicate on the real artifact, keep it if it advanced, revert it if it didn't. Apply the **sequence-verifiable-units** principle skill, verifying each unit before starting the next instead of batching checks at the end.\n\n- Verify by inspecting the artifact, never a self-report. When something passes too easily, suspect the observation method before the system.\n- Pair delegated work with a judge. If a worker games the gate, reset and harden the contract. If the gate itself is wrong, fix the gate in its own change rather than routing around it.\n- A verdict is VERIFIED, NOT VERIFIED, or INCONCLUSIVE. Inconclusive is not a pass. Don't hide a negative.\n\n## Phase D: Keep the audit trail\n\nLog the run via the **show-me-your-work** skill. figure-it-out's work is usually ambitious enough to commit the trail so the reviewer can read it in the PR. The trail plus the diff is what lets the human come back and trust the work.\n\n## Phase E: Verify and hand back\n\nCheck the whole against the Phase A predicate on the real product, not just the harness. Encode any recurring correction as a gate, a lint rule, a check, or a script (the **encode-lessons-in-structure** principle skill).\n\n**Reply:** the playbook you designed, the rigor level and why, the decision-trail path, what's verified against the predicate, and what's still open.\n","# Figure it out\n\nWhen the task matches no playbook, design one. The deliverable before any code is the workflow itself: a sequence of phases that scales rigor to the task, runs the scientific method, and leaves a decision trail a human can audit after stepping away.\n\n## Start\n\nOpen a todolist whose first item is to read the Principles section of the **just-bleat-it** skill. Then add the phases below as todos.\n\n## Phase A: Frame\n\nGround first, then commit. Don't start the run until you can state:\n\n- The definition of done as a falsifiable predicate (the **prove-it-works** principle skill).\n- Scope, quantified: rough units and effort, plus the blockers grounding surfaced.\n- The rigor level, biased high. One-way doors and high blast radius get more. Reversible low-stakes steps get less. Rigor is gates and artifacts, not \"try harder\".\n\nPresent the framing and tradeoffs before committing to a long run. Reversible work proceeds (the **never-block-on-the-human** principle skill), but a multi-hour run earns one checkpoint.\n\n## Phase B: Design the workflow\n\nDecompose into atomic, independently-landable units. Sequence riskiest-unknown-first. Scaffold and verification come before features (the **foundational-thinking** principle skill).\n\n- Build the verification harness before the work, with the baseline captured from the pre-change state, so the check reads as \"old value vs new value\".\n- For one-way-door design decisions, run the **architect** skill (it runs **arena**). Skip it for mechanical work whose shape is already concrete. A second arena over a settled design is over-engineering (the **laziness-protocol** principle skill).\n- Decide what fans out. Parallelize only across seams, and give each worker its own worktree or branch (the **separate-before-serializing-shared-state** principle skill). Don't over-fan. Pick each subagent's reasoning level for the job, per the Subagents section of the **just-bleat-it** skill.\n- Write the designed phase list down. That list is what the human reviews.\n\nThen execute the design. Add its steps to the todolist as concrete items between the Phase C and Phase D entries. Run each under the Phase C loop discipline, and weave the Phase D log through them, a row as each step lands, rather than saving the whole trail for the end.\n\n## Phase C: Run the loop\n\nEach unit is an experiment. State the hypothesis, make the smallest change, measure against the predicate on the real artifact, keep it if it advanced, revert it if it didn't. Apply the **sequence-verifiable-units** principle skill, verifying each unit before starting the next instead of batching checks at the end.\n\n- Verify by inspecting the artifact, never a self-report. When something passes too easily, suspect the observation method before the system.\n- Pair delegated work with a judge. If a worker games the gate, reset and harden the contract. If the gate itself is wrong, fix the gate in its own change rather than routing around it.\n- A verdict is VERIFIED, NOT VERIFIED, or INCONCLUSIVE. Inconclusive is not a pass. Don't hide a negative.\n\n## Phase D: Keep the audit trail\n\nLog the run via the **show-me-your-work** skill. figure-it-out's work is usually ambitious enough to commit the trail so the reviewer can read it in the PR. The trail plus the diff is what lets the human come back and trust the work.\n\n## Phase E: Verify and hand back\n\nCheck the whole against the Phase A predicate on the real product, not just the harness. Encode any recurring correction as a gate, a lint rule, a check, or a script (the **encode-lessons-in-structure** principle skill).\n\n**Reply:** the playbook you designed, the rigor level and why, the decision-trail path, what's verified against the predicate, and what's still open.\n",{"name":5,"description":7,"menu-description":24},"design a rigorous, auditable playbook for a task no bundled playbook fits","main","f499b102d6b17c905e2c9e27992b2670bf2a2ee0","plugins\u002Fbleat\u002Fskills\u002Ffigure-it-out","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fquotegoat-ux\u002Fbleat","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fquotegoat-ux","2026-11-11 05:16:43",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":32,"prompt":42,"zipAvailable":43},[33,36,39],{"tool":34,"command":35},"npx","npx skills add quotegoat-ux\u002Fbleat --skill figure-it-out",{"tool":37,"command":38},"bunx","bunx skills add quotegoat-ux\u002Fbleat --skill figure-it-out",{"tool":40,"command":41},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add quotegoat-ux\u002Fbleat --skill figure-it-out","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fquotegoat-ux\u002Fbleat\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002Fbleat\u002Fskills\u002Ffigure-it-out\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[46,53,60,67,74,81],{"skillNo":47,"name":48,"nameZh":6,"description":49,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":50,"categories":51,"keywords":52,"publishedAt":19},"01M7BVQ7YDABHNMZJXDTPEASX5","why","Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, product analytics warehouse) in parallel, then returns a cited read on decisions and tradeoffs. Use how for runtime behavior.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fquotegoat-ux\u002Fbleat\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002Fbleat\u002Fskills\u002Fwhy\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":54,"name":55,"nameZh":6,"description":56,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":57,"categories":58,"keywords":59,"publishedAt":19},"01M7BVQ652PNKM7P3GJNNGAGZT","what-did-i-get-done","Summarize authored commits over a user-specified time period into a concise update","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fquotegoat-ux\u002Fbleat\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002Fbleat\u002Fskills\u002Fwhat-did-i-get-done\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":61,"name":62,"nameZh":6,"description":63,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":64,"categories":65,"keywords":66,"publishedAt":19},"01M7BVQ4T0C5BVKRFD8KFKQMEY","unslop","Cut AI tells from any writing.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fquotegoat-ux\u002Fbleat\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002Fbleat\u002Fskills\u002Funslop\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":68,"name":69,"nameZh":6,"description":70,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":71,"categories":72,"keywords":73,"publishedAt":19},"01M7BVQ324D14NMF7K9H9WAVXF","typescript-best-practices","TypeScript best practices. Use when reading or editing any .ts or .tsx file.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fquotegoat-ux\u002Fbleat\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002Fbleat\u002Fskills\u002Ftypescript-best-practices\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":75,"name":76,"nameZh":6,"description":77,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":78,"categories":79,"keywords":80,"publishedAt":19},"01M7BVQ0041D0YMD9DBCRAW18C","thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review","Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fquotegoat-ux\u002Fbleat\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002Fbleat\u002Fskills\u002Fthermo-nuclear-code-quality-review\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":82,"name":83,"nameZh":6,"description":84,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":85,"categories":86,"keywords":87,"publishedAt":19},"01M7BVPWB83H4QB9DDBE3NJKKH","technical-writing","Layered technical-writing standard: Diátaxis structure, Google developer style sentences, STE instruction rules, Global English syntax. Use for \u002Ftechnical-writing or when writing or reviewing docs, RFCs, readmes, PR descriptions, or commit messages.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fquotegoat-ux\u002Fbleat\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fplugins\u002Fbleat\u002Fskills\u002Ftechnical-writing\u002FSKILL.md",[],[]]