[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M7AP7W41MBZJK98D12WD0ZSH":3,"skill-same:01M7AP7W41MBZJK98D12WD0ZSH":48},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":19,"linkOnly":20,"markdownContent":21,"markdownBody":22,"frontMatter":23,"refName":24,"commitSha":25,"skillDirectory":26,"forksCount":27,"repositoryHtmlUrl":28,"repositoryHomepageUrl":29,"ownerHtmlUrl":30,"ownerBlogUrl":31,"ownerDescription":32,"updatedAt":33,"install":34,"resources":47},"01M7AP7W41MBZJK98D12WD0ZSH","objective-risk-calculus",null,"Objective evaluation and calculation of interpersonal social risk: the Social Risk Index formula (Rs = E * H * C \u002F (I * A * S)), scoring rubrics for all six parameters, the six empirical behavioral observation vectors, and social threat typology across physical, financial, reputational, relational, and spiritual domains.","the-vibey-project\u002Fvibey","the-vibey-project","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F329298758?v=4","01M7AJHGZ9722CTJ4JNQZVRH0Q","the vibey project","01M7AJHGZVMG2K7TGXQ6XFHVG3",5,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fthe-vibey-project\u002Fvibey\u002Fblob\u002Fdevelop\u002Fsrc\u002Fvibey_tools\u002Fskills\u002Fplugins\u002Findividual-social-philosophy\u002Fskills\u002Fobjective-risk-calculus\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],"2026-11-15 14:19:17",false,"---\nname: objective-risk-calculus\ndescription: \"Objective evaluation and calculation of interpersonal social risk: the Social Risk Index formula (Rs = E * H * C \u002F (I * A * S)), scoring rubrics for all six parameters, the six empirical behavioral observation vectors, and social threat typology across physical, financial, reputational, relational, and spiritual domains.\"\n---\n\n# Objective Social Risk Calculus\n\n## 1. The Social Risk Index ($R_s$)\n\nTo evaluate interpersonal exposure objectively, social risk is formalized as:\n\n$$R_s = \\frac{E \\cdot H \\cdot C}{I \\cdot A \\cdot S}$$\n\nEach variable is rated along an integer scale from 1 to 10:\n\n### Numerator (Threat and Vulnerability Exposure)\n* **$E \\in [1, 10]$ (Exposure Level)**: The depth and sensitivity of access granted to the counterpart (confidential information, financial access, physical vulnerability, strategic plans).\n* **$H \\in [1, 10]$ (Hazard Severity)**: The maximum potential damage that could occur if the counterpart defects (reputational destruction, career ruin, legal exposure, financial ruin, physical harm).\n* **$C \\in [1, 10]$ (Adversarial Capacity)**: The counterpart's socio-political power, intelligence, connections, vengefulness, and capacity to inflict harm upon becoming hostile.\n\n### Denominator (Trust and Structural Constraints)\n* **$I \\in [1, 10]$ (Demonstrated Integrity)**: The counterpart's historically verified record of honesty, debt payment, and discretion under pressure across prolonged observation.\n* **$A \\in [1, 10]$ (Incentive Alignment)**: The degree to which the counterpart's utility function and self-interest benefit from your flourishing.\n* **$S \\in [1, 10]$ (Structural Accountability)**: External checks that deter defection (written contracts, independent witnesses, ecclesiastical oversight, mutual reputational exposure).\n\n### Risk Score Interpretation Thresholds\n* **$R_s \\ge 3.0$**: **Critical Danger Zone**. Immediate defensive posture; zero private disclosure; establish legal, institutional, and spatial buffers.\n* **$1.0 \\le R_s \u003C 3.0$**: **Guarded Engagement**. Standard peripheral engagement; maintain polite affability, strict boundaries, and ongoing verification.\n* **$R_s \u003C 1.0$**: **Secure Relational Space**. Progressive testing and mutual vulnerability remain appropriate.\n\n## 2. The Six Empirical Observation Vectors\n\nEvaluate counterparts across six objective behavioral vectors:\n\n### Vector 1: Speech Governance (The Gossip and Slander Metric)\n* *The Principle*: How an individual speaks of third parties in their absence indicates how they will speak of you in your absence ([Proverbs 16:28](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.biblegateway.com\u002Fpassage\u002F?search=Proverbs+16%3A28&version=ESV); [Sirach 19:8](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.biblegateway.com\u002Fpassage\u002F?search=Sirach+19%3A8&version=RSVCE); *Summa Theologiae* II-II, q. 74).\n* *Observation*: Sharing other people's confidential struggles, mocking former friends, or conducting whisper campaigns (*susurratio*) caps integrity at $I \\le 3$.\n\n### Vector 2: Pressure Response (The Adversity Metric)\n* *The Principle*: True character reveals itself under scarcity, fatigue, and status threat ([Sirach 6:8-10](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.biblegateway.com\u002Fpassage\u002F?search=Sirach+6%3A8-10&version=RSVCE)).\n* *Observation*: When resources become constrained or reputations are challenged, observe whether they accept responsibility or scapegoat others to preserve their standing.\n\n### Vector 3: Inner Ring Susceptibility (The Status and Sycophancy Metric)\n* *The Principle*: The craving for insider status corrupts moral integrity (C.S. Lewis, *The Inner Ring*).\n* *Observation*: Flattering authority figures, abandoning lower-status associates when elites enter the room, or altering convictions to gain admission to elite cliques indicates high susceptibility.\n\n### Vector 4: Cross-Context Consistency (The Character Metric)\n* *The Principle*: Integrity is wholeness and consistency across time and space.\n* *Observation*: High integrity displays the same person in church, at work, at home, on social media, and when under the influence of alcohol or stress. Radical shifts indicate an opportunistic persona.\n\n### Vector 5: Asymmetric Leverage Geometry (The Incentive Metric)\n* *The Principle*: Understand the counterpart's underlying interest before relying on their counsel ([Sirach 37:8](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.biblegateway.com\u002Fpassage\u002F?search=Sirach+37%3A8&version=RSVCE)).\n* *Observation*: Determine whether this person gains financially, socially, or professionally from your degradation. When their gain correlates with your loss, incentive alignment sits at $A \\le 2$.\n\n### Vector 6: Reaction to Boundaries (The Entitlement Metric)\n* *The Principle*: Moral persons respect personal sovereignty; exploiters view boundaries as aggression.\n* *Observation*: When presented with an unequivocal, polite \"No,\" observe whether they respond with composure and respect, or with passive-aggressive guilt, anger, and boundary-pushing. Entitlement reactions cap $I \\le 3$.\n\n## 3. Threat Typology\n\nInterpersonal harm manifests across five distinct vectors:\n1. **Physical**: Bodily harm, assault, sexual boundary violations, physical intimidation.\n2. **Financial and Material**: Embezzlement, unpaid debts, theft, sabotage of livelihood.\n3. **Reputational**: Slander (*detractio*), gossip (*susurratio*), character assassination, public humiliation.\n4. **Relational**: Poisoning alliances, alienating children or family, turning mutual friends into adversaries.\n5. **Spiritual and Moral**: Enticement into unethical behavior, destruction of faith, exploitation through religious guilt.\n","# Objective Social Risk Calculus\n\n## 1. The Social Risk Index ($R_s$)\n\nTo evaluate interpersonal exposure objectively, social risk is formalized as:\n\n$$R_s = \\frac{E \\cdot H \\cdot C}{I \\cdot A \\cdot S}$$\n\nEach variable is rated along an integer scale from 1 to 10:\n\n### Numerator (Threat and Vulnerability Exposure)\n* **$E \\in [1, 10]$ (Exposure Level)**: The depth and sensitivity of access granted to the counterpart (confidential information, financial access, physical vulnerability, strategic plans).\n* **$H \\in [1, 10]$ (Hazard Severity)**: The maximum potential damage that could occur if the counterpart defects (reputational destruction, career ruin, legal exposure, financial ruin, physical harm).\n* **$C \\in [1, 10]$ (Adversarial Capacity)**: The counterpart's socio-political power, intelligence, connections, vengefulness, and capacity to inflict harm upon becoming hostile.\n\n### Denominator (Trust and Structural Constraints)\n* **$I \\in [1, 10]$ (Demonstrated Integrity)**: The counterpart's historically verified record of honesty, debt payment, and discretion under pressure across prolonged observation.\n* **$A \\in [1, 10]$ (Incentive Alignment)**: The degree to which the counterpart's utility function and self-interest benefit from your flourishing.\n* **$S \\in [1, 10]$ (Structural Accountability)**: External checks that deter defection (written contracts, independent witnesses, ecclesiastical oversight, mutual reputational exposure).\n\n### Risk Score Interpretation Thresholds\n* **$R_s \\ge 3.0$**: **Critical Danger Zone**. Immediate defensive posture; zero private disclosure; establish legal, institutional, and spatial buffers.\n* **$1.0 \\le R_s \u003C 3.0$**: **Guarded Engagement**. Standard peripheral engagement; maintain polite affability, strict boundaries, and ongoing verification.\n* **$R_s \u003C 1.0$**: **Secure Relational Space**. Progressive testing and mutual vulnerability remain appropriate.\n\n## 2. The Six Empirical Observation Vectors\n\nEvaluate counterparts across six objective behavioral vectors:\n\n### Vector 1: Speech Governance (The Gossip and Slander Metric)\n* *The Principle*: How an individual speaks of third parties in their absence indicates how they will speak of you in your absence ([Proverbs 16:28](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.biblegateway.com\u002Fpassage\u002F?search=Proverbs+16%3A28&version=ESV); [Sirach 19:8](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.biblegateway.com\u002Fpassage\u002F?search=Sirach+19%3A8&version=RSVCE); *Summa Theologiae* II-II, q. 74).\n* *Observation*: Sharing other people's confidential struggles, mocking former friends, or conducting whisper campaigns (*susurratio*) caps integrity at $I \\le 3$.\n\n### Vector 2: Pressure Response (The Adversity Metric)\n* *The Principle*: True character reveals itself under scarcity, fatigue, and status threat ([Sirach 6:8-10](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.biblegateway.com\u002Fpassage\u002F?search=Sirach+6%3A8-10&version=RSVCE)).\n* *Observation*: When resources become constrained or reputations are challenged, observe whether they accept responsibility or scapegoat others to preserve their standing.\n\n### Vector 3: Inner Ring Susceptibility (The Status and Sycophancy Metric)\n* *The Principle*: The craving for insider status corrupts moral integrity (C.S. Lewis, *The Inner Ring*).\n* *Observation*: Flattering authority figures, abandoning lower-status associates when elites enter the room, or altering convictions to gain admission to elite cliques indicates high susceptibility.\n\n### Vector 4: Cross-Context Consistency (The Character Metric)\n* *The Principle*: Integrity is wholeness and consistency across time and space.\n* *Observation*: High integrity displays the same person in church, at work, at home, on social media, and when under the influence of alcohol or stress. Radical shifts indicate an opportunistic persona.\n\n### Vector 5: Asymmetric Leverage Geometry (The Incentive Metric)\n* *The Principle*: Understand the counterpart's underlying interest before relying on their counsel ([Sirach 37:8](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.biblegateway.com\u002Fpassage\u002F?search=Sirach+37%3A8&version=RSVCE)).\n* *Observation*: Determine whether this person gains financially, socially, or professionally from your degradation. When their gain correlates with your loss, incentive alignment sits at $A \\le 2$.\n\n### Vector 6: Reaction to Boundaries (The Entitlement Metric)\n* *The Principle*: Moral persons respect personal sovereignty; exploiters view boundaries as aggression.\n* *Observation*: When presented with an unequivocal, polite \"No,\" observe whether they respond with composure and respect, or with passive-aggressive guilt, anger, and boundary-pushing. Entitlement reactions cap $I \\le 3$.\n\n## 3. Threat Typology\n\nInterpersonal harm manifests across five distinct vectors:\n1. **Physical**: Bodily harm, assault, sexual boundary violations, physical intimidation.\n2. **Financial and Material**: Embezzlement, unpaid debts, theft, sabotage of livelihood.\n3. **Reputational**: Slander (*detractio*), gossip (*susurratio*), character assassination, public humiliation.\n4. **Relational**: Poisoning alliances, alienating children or family, turning mutual friends into adversaries.\n5. **Spiritual and Moral**: Enticement into unethical behavior, destruction of faith, exploitation through religious guilt.\n",{"name":5,"description":7},"develop","ae32736a1aabddabca5d2c96d665aa0ebc7d8700","src\u002Fvibey_tools\u002Fskills\u002Fplugins\u002Findividual-social-philosophy\u002Fskills\u002Fobjective-risk-calculus",3,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fthe-vibey-project\u002Fvibey","https:\u002F\u002Fthe-vibey-project.github.io\u002Fvibey\u002F","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fthe-vibey-project","https:\u002F\u002Fvibewithadam.matthewsteinberger.com","freedom for software engineers","2026-11-15 05:47:42",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":35,"prompt":45,"zipAvailable":46},[36,39,42],{"tool":37,"command":38},"npx","npx skills add the-vibey-project\u002Fvibey --skill objective-risk-calculus",{"tool":40,"command":41},"bunx","bunx skills add the-vibey-project\u002Fvibey --skill objective-risk-calculus",{"tool":43,"command":44},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add the-vibey-project\u002Fvibey --skill objective-risk-calculus","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fthe-vibey-project\u002Fvibey\u002Fblob\u002Fdevelop\u002Fsrc\u002Fvibey_tools\u002Fskills\u002Fplugins\u002Findividual-social-philosophy\u002Fskills\u002Fobjective-risk-calculus\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[49,56,63,70,77,84],{"skillNo":50,"name":51,"nameZh":6,"description":52,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":53,"categories":54,"keywords":55,"publishedAt":19},"01M7AT1FQJAE1FQYAMDTF490Y4","white-paper-writing","Use when writing white papers, technical reports, policy documents, thought leadership pieces, or any long-form authoritative document. Triggers on requests to write, structure, outline, or review white papers, technical reports, position papers, policy briefs, or evidence-driven arguments. Also use for B2B content marketing strategy, technical documentation requiring authority, academic-style reports, or any document that must educate while persuading. Use when someone asks \"how should I structure this\" for a long-form document.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fthe-vibey-project\u002Fvibey\u002Fblob\u002Fdevelop\u002Fsrc\u002Fvibey_tools\u002Fskills\u002Fplugins\u002Fwriting-craft\u002Fskills\u002Fwhite-paper-writing\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":57,"name":58,"nameZh":6,"description":59,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":60,"categories":61,"keywords":62,"publishedAt":19},"01M7AT16BJRJJKK2MASXRZS76G","prose-technical-mechanics","Use when editing or writing prose at a technical\u002Fmechanical level: choosing between Anglo-Saxon and Latinate diction, placing information in topic vs stress positions, writing periodic vs cumulative sentences, handling sentence rhythm, punctuation as logic, transitions, paragraph structure, or phonesthetics. Use when someone wants to understand WHY prose works or doesn't, not just surface-level style advice. Triggers on word choice, sentence structure, emphasis, rhythm, diction, or any deep writing mechanics question.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fthe-vibey-project\u002Fvibey\u002Fblob\u002Fdevelop\u002Fsrc\u002Fvibey_tools\u002Fskills\u002Fplugins\u002Fwriting-craft\u002Fskills\u002Fprose-technical-mechanics\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":64,"name":65,"nameZh":6,"description":66,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":67,"categories":68,"keywords":69,"publishedAt":19},"01M7AT0W9HT0ZZ9Y287NW99MR3","prose-mechanics","Use when writing, editing, or analyzing prose style; when trying to avoid generic AI-sounding writing; when applying specific prose styles such as journalistic, academic, narrative, KJV biblical, Hemingway plain, Latinate\u002FJamesian, Orwellian, Augustan, Victorian, Early Modern (Bacon, Browne, Milton), or free indirect discourse; or when coaching someone on writing voice and mechanics. Triggers on any request to improve, analyze, or write in a specific prose style, to fix \"AI-sounding\" writing, to make prose more vivid or concrete, to vary sentence rhythm, or to understand how a particular writer achieves their effects.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fthe-vibey-project\u002Fvibey\u002Fblob\u002Fdevelop\u002Fsrc\u002Fvibey_tools\u002Fskills\u002Fplugins\u002Fwriting-craft\u002Fskills\u002Fprose-mechanics\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":71,"name":72,"nameZh":6,"description":73,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":74,"categories":75,"keywords":76,"publishedAt":19},"01M7AT0KR635JX66X2X6F3E2CP","narrative-structure","Use when structuring stories, pitches, presentations, white papers, or any persuasive narrative; analyzing the hero's journey in fiction or non-fiction; applying StoryBrand for business communication; designing narrative arcs for thought leadership; or understanding Vogler, Snyder, Propp, or Campbell frameworks. Triggers on any narrative structure, storytelling, pitch structure, StoryBrand, hero's journey, three-act structure, Freytag, Save the Cat, narrative arc, or \"how should I structure this story\u002Fpitch\u002Fpresentation\" request.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fthe-vibey-project\u002Fvibey\u002Fblob\u002Fdevelop\u002Fsrc\u002Fvibey_tools\u002Fskills\u002Fplugins\u002Fwriting-craft\u002Fskills\u002Fnarrative-structure\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":78,"name":79,"nameZh":6,"description":80,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":81,"categories":82,"keywords":83,"publishedAt":19},"01M7AT0AKGW09NKKZDYBT8VRDE","legal-brief-writing","Use when writing legal briefs, motions, or any court filing; when analyzing judicial cognition and persuasion; when applying elite brief-writing techniques from Roberts, Clement, Kagan, Garner; or when structuring legal arguments for maximum persuasion. Also use for autistic\u002Fneurodivergent advocates who need to understand how their natural communication style maps to elite legal advocacy. Triggers on any legal writing, brief drafting, motion preparation, or legal argument structuring request.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fthe-vibey-project\u002Fvibey\u002Fblob\u002Fdevelop\u002Fsrc\u002Fvibey_tools\u002Fskills\u002Fplugins\u002Fwriting-craft\u002Fskills\u002Flegal-brief-writing\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":85,"name":86,"nameZh":6,"description":87,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":88,"categories":89,"keywords":90,"publishedAt":19},"01M7AT00VWPS4Q8B5VEMXX9NQT","journal-publishability-criteria","Use whenever a research paper, article or preprint is being written, revised, reviewed or published, and specifically before every publication of docs\u002Fpaper.md. Covers what legitimate journals actually gate on, in order of gating — the editor's desk screen (scope, novelty, package problems), what reviewers judge (methodological soundness, claims the evidence can carry, statistical and qualitative reporting), EQUATOR reporting guidelines, the ICMJE authorship criteria, COPE's view of text recycling, the near-universal generative-AI policy (no AI author, disclosure, author responsibility), TOP 2025 transparency standards, how to verify a journal is legitimate, submitting without an institution, and a pre-submission checklist. Triggers on requests to evaluate, review, prepare or submit a paper, to judge publishability, to write a declarations or data-availability section, to disclose AI use, or to check a journal.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fthe-vibey-project\u002Fvibey\u002Fblob\u002Fdevelop\u002Fsrc\u002Fvibey_tools\u002Fskills\u002Fplugins\u002Fwriting-craft\u002Fskills\u002Fjournal-publishability-criteria\u002FSKILL.md",[],[]]