[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M7AMYRR4J0H00VSDNSASSHM9":3,"skill-same:01M7AMYRR4J0H00VSDNSASSHM9":45},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":19,"linkOnly":20,"markdownContent":21,"markdownBody":22,"frontMatter":23,"refName":24,"commitSha":25,"skillDirectory":26,"forksCount":14,"repositoryHtmlUrl":27,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":28,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":29,"updatedAt":30,"install":31,"resources":44},"01M7AMYRR4J0H00VSDNSASSHM9","code-review-checklist",null,"Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability","GongYuanCaiJi\u002Fdsh-claude-code-templates","GongYuanCaiJi","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F129952120?v=4","01M7AK39Q4W3VPF7C1K8M58BFX","劉昱廷 Yu-Ting Liu","01M7AK39QPS2RAJKRQY0EPQJPZ",0,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGongYuanCaiJi\u002Fdsh-claude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fdevelopment\u002Fcode-review-checklist\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],"2026-11-15 14:19:17",false,"---\nname: code-review-checklist\ndescription: \"Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability\"\n---\n\n# Code Review Checklist\n\n## Overview\n\nProvide a systematic checklist for conducting thorough code reviews. This skill helps reviewers ensure code quality, catch bugs, identify security issues, and maintain consistency across the codebase.\n\n## When to Use This Skill\n\n- Use when reviewing pull requests\n- Use when conducting code audits\n- Use when establishing code review standards for a team\n- Use when training new developers on code review practices\n- Use when you want to ensure nothing is missed in reviews\n- Use when creating code review documentation\n\n## How It Works\n\n### Step 1: Understand the Context\n\nBefore reviewing code, I'll help you understand:\n- What problem does this code solve?\n- What are the requirements?\n- What files were changed and why?\n- Are there related issues or tickets?\n- What's the testing strategy?\n\n### Step 2: Review Functionality\n\nCheck if the code works correctly:\n- Does it solve the stated problem?\n- Are edge cases handled?\n- Is error handling appropriate?\n- Are there any logical errors?\n- Does it match the requirements?\n\n### Step 3: Review Code Quality\n\nAssess code maintainability:\n- Is the code readable and clear?\n- Are names descriptive?\n- Is it properly structured?\n- Are functions\u002Fmethods focused?\n- Is there unnecessary complexity?\n\n### Step 4: Review Security\n\nCheck for security issues:\n- Are inputs validated?\n- Is sensitive data protected?\n- Are there SQL injection risks?\n- Is authentication\u002Fauthorization correct?\n- Are dependencies secure?\n\n### Step 5: Review Performance\n\nLook for performance issues:\n- Are there unnecessary loops?\n- Is database access optimized?\n- Are there memory leaks?\n- Is caching used appropriately?\n- Are there N+1 query problems?\n\n### Step 6: Review Tests\n\nVerify test coverage:\n- Are there tests for new code?\n- Do tests cover edge cases?\n- Are tests meaningful?\n- Do all tests pass?\n- Is test coverage adequate?\n\n## Examples\n\n### Example 1: Functionality Review Checklist\n\n```markdown\n## Functionality Review\n\n### Requirements\n- [ ] Code solves the stated problem\n- [ ] All acceptance criteria are met\n- [ ] Edge cases are handled\n- [ ] Error cases are handled\n- [ ] User input is validated\n\n### Logic\n- [ ] No logical errors or bugs\n- [ ] Conditions are correct (no off-by-one errors)\n- [ ] Loops terminate correctly\n- [ ] Recursion has proper base cases\n- [ ] State management is correct\n\n### Error Handling\n- [ ] Errors are caught appropriately\n- [ ] Error messages are clear and helpful\n- [ ] Errors don't expose sensitive information\n- [ ] Failed operations are rolled back\n- [ ] Logging is appropriate\n\n### Example Issues to Catch:\n\n**❌ Bad - Missing validation:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nfunction createUser(email, password) {\n  \u002F\u002F No validation!\n  return db.users.create({ email, password });\n}\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**✅ Good - Proper validation:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nfunction createUser(email, password) {\n  if (!email || !isValidEmail(email)) {\n    throw new Error('Invalid email address');\n  }\n  if (!password || password.length \u003C 8) {\n    throw new Error('Password must be at least 8 characters');\n  }\n  return db.users.create({ email, password });\n}\n\\`\\`\\`\n```\n\n### Example 2: Security Review Checklist\n\n```markdown\n## Security Review\n\n### Input Validation\n- [ ] All user inputs are validated\n- [ ] SQL injection is prevented (use parameterized queries)\n- [ ] XSS is prevented (escape output)\n- [ ] CSRF protection is in place\n- [ ] File uploads are validated (type, size, content)\n\n### Authentication & Authorization\n- [ ] Authentication is required where needed\n- [ ] Authorization checks are present\n- [ ] Passwords are hashed (never stored plain text)\n- [ ] Sessions are managed securely\n- [ ] Tokens expire appropriately\n\n### Data Protection\n- [ ] Sensitive data is encrypted\n- [ ] API keys are not hardcoded\n- [ ] Environment variables are used for secrets\n- [ ] Personal data follows privacy regulations\n- [ ] Database credentials are secure\n\n### Dependencies\n- [ ] No known vulnerable dependencies\n- [ ] Dependencies are up to date\n- [ ] Unnecessary dependencies are removed\n- [ ] Dependency versions are pinned\n\n### Example Issues to Catch:\n\n**❌ Bad - SQL injection risk:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nconst query = \\`SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '\\${email}'\\`;\ndb.query(query);\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**✅ Good - Parameterized query:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nconst query = 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = $1';\ndb.query(query, [email]);\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**❌ Bad - Hardcoded secret:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nconst API_KEY = 'sk_live_abc123xyz';\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**✅ Good - Environment variable:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nconst API_KEY = process.env.API_KEY;\nif (!API_KEY) {\n  throw new Error('API_KEY environment variable is required');\n}\n\\`\\`\\`\n```\n\n### Example 3: Code Quality Review Checklist\n\n```markdown\n## Code Quality Review\n\n### Readability\n- [ ] Code is easy to understand\n- [ ] Variable names are descriptive\n- [ ] Function names explain what they do\n- [ ] Complex logic has comments\n- [ ] Magic numbers are replaced with constants\n\n### Structure\n- [ ] Functions are small and focused\n- [ ] Code follows DRY principle (Don't Repeat Yourself)\n- [ ] Proper separation of concerns\n- [ ] Consistent code style\n- [ ] No dead code or commented-out code\n\n### Maintainability\n- [ ] Code is modular and reusable\n- [ ] Dependencies are minimal\n- [ ] Changes are backwards compatible\n- [ ] Breaking changes are documented\n- [ ] Technical debt is noted\n\n### Example Issues to Catch:\n\n**❌ Bad - Unclear naming:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nfunction calc(a, b, c) {\n  return a * b + c;\n}\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**✅ Good - Descriptive naming:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nfunction calculateTotalPrice(quantity, unitPrice, tax) {\n  return quantity * unitPrice + tax;\n}\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**❌ Bad - Function doing too much:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nfunction processOrder(order) {\n  \u002F\u002F Validate order\n  if (!order.items) throw new Error('No items');\n  \n  \u002F\u002F Calculate total\n  let total = 0;\n  for (let item of order.items) {\n    total += item.price * item.quantity;\n  }\n  \n  \u002F\u002F Apply discount\n  if (order.coupon) {\n    total *= 0.9;\n  }\n  \n  \u002F\u002F Process payment\n  const payment = stripe.charge(total);\n  \n  \u002F\u002F Send email\n  sendEmail(order.email, 'Order confirmed');\n  \n  \u002F\u002F Update inventory\n  updateInventory(order.items);\n  \n  return { orderId: order.id, total };\n}\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**✅ Good - Separated concerns:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nfunction processOrder(order) {\n  validateOrder(order);\n  const total = calculateOrderTotal(order);\n  const payment = processPayment(total);\n  sendOrderConfirmation(order.email);\n  updateInventory(order.items);\n  \n  return { orderId: order.id, total };\n}\n\\`\\`\\`\n```\n\n## Best Practices\n\n### ✅ Do This\n\n- **Review Small Changes** - Smaller PRs are easier to review thoroughly\n- **Check Tests First** - Verify tests pass and cover new code\n- **Run the Code** - Test it locally when possible\n- **Ask Questions** - Don't assume, ask for clarification\n- **Be Constructive** - Suggest improvements, don't just criticize\n- **Focus on Important Issues** - Don't nitpick minor style issues\n- **Use Automated Tools** - Linters, formatters, security scanners\n- **Review Documentation** - Check if docs are updated\n- **Consider Performance** - Think about scale and efficiency\n- **Check for Regressions** - Ensure existing functionality still works\n\n### ❌ Don't Do This\n\n- **Don't Approve Without Reading** - Actually review the code\n- **Don't Be Vague** - Provide specific feedback with examples\n- **Don't Ignore Security** - Security issues are critical\n- **Don't Skip Tests** - Untested code will cause problems\n- **Don't Be Rude** - Be respectful and professional\n- **Don't Rubber Stamp** - Every review should add value\n- **Don't Review When Tired** - You'll miss important issues\n- **Don't Forget Context** - Understand the bigger picture\n\n## Complete Review Checklist\n\n### Pre-Review\n- [ ] Read the PR description and linked issues\n- [ ] Understand what problem is being solved\n- [ ] Check if tests pass in CI\u002FCD\n- [ ] Pull the branch and run it locally\n\n### Functionality\n- [ ] Code solves the stated problem\n- [ ] Edge cases are handled\n- [ ] Error handling is appropriate\n- [ ] User input is validated\n- [ ] No logical errors\n\n### Security\n- [ ] No SQL injection vulnerabilities\n- [ ] No XSS vulnerabilities\n- [ ] Authentication\u002Fauthorization is correct\n- [ ] Sensitive data is protected\n- [ ] No hardcoded secrets\n\n### Performance\n- [ ] No unnecessary database queries\n- [ ] No N+1 query problems\n- [ ] Efficient algorithms used\n- [ ] No memory leaks\n- [ ] Caching used appropriately\n\n### Code Quality\n- [ ] Code is readable and clear\n- [ ] Names are descriptive\n- [ ] Functions are focused and small\n- [ ] No code duplication\n- [ ] Follows project conventions\n\n### Tests\n- [ ] New code has tests\n- [ ] Tests cover edge cases\n- [ ] Tests are meaningful\n- [ ] All tests pass\n- [ ] Test coverage is adequate\n\n### Documentation\n- [ ] Code comments explain why, not what\n- [ ] API documentation is updated\n- [ ] README is updated if needed\n- [ ] Breaking changes are documented\n- [ ] Migration guide provided if needed\n\n### Git\n- [ ] Commit messages are clear\n- [ ] No merge conflicts\n- [ ] Branch is up to date with main\n- [ ] No unnecessary files committed\n- [ ] .gitignore is properly configured\n\n## Common Pitfalls\n\n### Problem: Missing Edge Cases\n**Symptoms:** Code works for happy path but fails on edge cases\n**Solution:** Ask \"What if...?\" questions\n- What if the input is null?\n- What if the array is empty?\n- What if the user is not authenticated?\n- What if the network request fails?\n\n### Problem: Security Vulnerabilities\n**Symptoms:** Code exposes security risks\n**Solution:** Use security checklist\n- Run security scanners (npm audit, Snyk)\n- Check OWASP Top 10\n- Validate all inputs\n- Use parameterized queries\n- Never trust user input\n\n### Problem: Poor Test Coverage\n**Symptoms:** New code has no tests or inadequate tests\n**Solution:** Require tests for all new code\n- Unit tests for functions\n- Integration tests for features\n- Edge case tests\n- Error case tests\n\n### Problem: Unclear Code\n**Symptoms:** Reviewer can't understand what code does\n**Solution:** Request improvements\n- Better variable names\n- Explanatory comments\n- Smaller functions\n- Clear structure\n\n## Review Comment Templates\n\n### Requesting Changes\n```markdown\n**Issue:** [Describe the problem]\n\n**Current code:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\n\u002F\u002F Show problematic code\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**Suggested fix:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\n\u002F\u002F Show improved code\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**Why:** [Explain why this is better]\n```\n\n### Asking Questions\n```markdown\n**Question:** [Your question]\n\n**Context:** [Why you're asking]\n\n**Suggestion:** [If you have one]\n```\n\n### Praising Good Code\n```markdown\n**Nice!** [What you liked]\n\nThis is great because [explain why]\n```\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- `@requesting-code-review` - Prepare code for review\n- `@receiving-code-review` - Handle review feedback\n- `@systematic-debugging` - Debug issues found in review\n- `@test-driven-development` - Ensure code has tests\n\n## Additional Resources\n\n- [Google Code Review Guidelines](https:\u002F\u002Fgoogle.github.io\u002Feng-practices\u002Freview\u002F)\n- [OWASP Top 10](https:\u002F\u002Fowasp.org\u002Fwww-project-top-ten\u002F)\n- [Code Review Best Practices](https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fthoughtbot\u002Fguides\u002Ftree\u002Fmain\u002Fcode-review)\n- [How to Review Code](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kevinlondon.com\u002F2015\u002F05\u002F05\u002Fcode-review-best-practices.html)\n\n---\n\n**Pro Tip:** Use a checklist template for every review to ensure consistency and thoroughness. Customize it for your team's specific needs!\n","# Code Review Checklist\n\n## Overview\n\nProvide a systematic checklist for conducting thorough code reviews. This skill helps reviewers ensure code quality, catch bugs, identify security issues, and maintain consistency across the codebase.\n\n## When to Use This Skill\n\n- Use when reviewing pull requests\n- Use when conducting code audits\n- Use when establishing code review standards for a team\n- Use when training new developers on code review practices\n- Use when you want to ensure nothing is missed in reviews\n- Use when creating code review documentation\n\n## How It Works\n\n### Step 1: Understand the Context\n\nBefore reviewing code, I'll help you understand:\n- What problem does this code solve?\n- What are the requirements?\n- What files were changed and why?\n- Are there related issues or tickets?\n- What's the testing strategy?\n\n### Step 2: Review Functionality\n\nCheck if the code works correctly:\n- Does it solve the stated problem?\n- Are edge cases handled?\n- Is error handling appropriate?\n- Are there any logical errors?\n- Does it match the requirements?\n\n### Step 3: Review Code Quality\n\nAssess code maintainability:\n- Is the code readable and clear?\n- Are names descriptive?\n- Is it properly structured?\n- Are functions\u002Fmethods focused?\n- Is there unnecessary complexity?\n\n### Step 4: Review Security\n\nCheck for security issues:\n- Are inputs validated?\n- Is sensitive data protected?\n- Are there SQL injection risks?\n- Is authentication\u002Fauthorization correct?\n- Are dependencies secure?\n\n### Step 5: Review Performance\n\nLook for performance issues:\n- Are there unnecessary loops?\n- Is database access optimized?\n- Are there memory leaks?\n- Is caching used appropriately?\n- Are there N+1 query problems?\n\n### Step 6: Review Tests\n\nVerify test coverage:\n- Are there tests for new code?\n- Do tests cover edge cases?\n- Are tests meaningful?\n- Do all tests pass?\n- Is test coverage adequate?\n\n## Examples\n\n### Example 1: Functionality Review Checklist\n\n```markdown\n## Functionality Review\n\n### Requirements\n- [ ] Code solves the stated problem\n- [ ] All acceptance criteria are met\n- [ ] Edge cases are handled\n- [ ] Error cases are handled\n- [ ] User input is validated\n\n### Logic\n- [ ] No logical errors or bugs\n- [ ] Conditions are correct (no off-by-one errors)\n- [ ] Loops terminate correctly\n- [ ] Recursion has proper base cases\n- [ ] State management is correct\n\n### Error Handling\n- [ ] Errors are caught appropriately\n- [ ] Error messages are clear and helpful\n- [ ] Errors don't expose sensitive information\n- [ ] Failed operations are rolled back\n- [ ] Logging is appropriate\n\n### Example Issues to Catch:\n\n**❌ Bad - Missing validation:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nfunction createUser(email, password) {\n  \u002F\u002F No validation!\n  return db.users.create({ email, password });\n}\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**✅ Good - Proper validation:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nfunction createUser(email, password) {\n  if (!email || !isValidEmail(email)) {\n    throw new Error('Invalid email address');\n  }\n  if (!password || password.length \u003C 8) {\n    throw new Error('Password must be at least 8 characters');\n  }\n  return db.users.create({ email, password });\n}\n\\`\\`\\`\n```\n\n### Example 2: Security Review Checklist\n\n```markdown\n## Security Review\n\n### Input Validation\n- [ ] All user inputs are validated\n- [ ] SQL injection is prevented (use parameterized queries)\n- [ ] XSS is prevented (escape output)\n- [ ] CSRF protection is in place\n- [ ] File uploads are validated (type, size, content)\n\n### Authentication & Authorization\n- [ ] Authentication is required where needed\n- [ ] Authorization checks are present\n- [ ] Passwords are hashed (never stored plain text)\n- [ ] Sessions are managed securely\n- [ ] Tokens expire appropriately\n\n### Data Protection\n- [ ] Sensitive data is encrypted\n- [ ] API keys are not hardcoded\n- [ ] Environment variables are used for secrets\n- [ ] Personal data follows privacy regulations\n- [ ] Database credentials are secure\n\n### Dependencies\n- [ ] No known vulnerable dependencies\n- [ ] Dependencies are up to date\n- [ ] Unnecessary dependencies are removed\n- [ ] Dependency versions are pinned\n\n### Example Issues to Catch:\n\n**❌ Bad - SQL injection risk:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nconst query = \\`SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '\\${email}'\\`;\ndb.query(query);\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**✅ Good - Parameterized query:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nconst query = 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = $1';\ndb.query(query, [email]);\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**❌ Bad - Hardcoded secret:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nconst API_KEY = 'sk_live_abc123xyz';\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**✅ Good - Environment variable:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nconst API_KEY = process.env.API_KEY;\nif (!API_KEY) {\n  throw new Error('API_KEY environment variable is required');\n}\n\\`\\`\\`\n```\n\n### Example 3: Code Quality Review Checklist\n\n```markdown\n## Code Quality Review\n\n### Readability\n- [ ] Code is easy to understand\n- [ ] Variable names are descriptive\n- [ ] Function names explain what they do\n- [ ] Complex logic has comments\n- [ ] Magic numbers are replaced with constants\n\n### Structure\n- [ ] Functions are small and focused\n- [ ] Code follows DRY principle (Don't Repeat Yourself)\n- [ ] Proper separation of concerns\n- [ ] Consistent code style\n- [ ] No dead code or commented-out code\n\n### Maintainability\n- [ ] Code is modular and reusable\n- [ ] Dependencies are minimal\n- [ ] Changes are backwards compatible\n- [ ] Breaking changes are documented\n- [ ] Technical debt is noted\n\n### Example Issues to Catch:\n\n**❌ Bad - Unclear naming:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nfunction calc(a, b, c) {\n  return a * b + c;\n}\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**✅ Good - Descriptive naming:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nfunction calculateTotalPrice(quantity, unitPrice, tax) {\n  return quantity * unitPrice + tax;\n}\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**❌ Bad - Function doing too much:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nfunction processOrder(order) {\n  \u002F\u002F Validate order\n  if (!order.items) throw new Error('No items');\n  \n  \u002F\u002F Calculate total\n  let total = 0;\n  for (let item of order.items) {\n    total += item.price * item.quantity;\n  }\n  \n  \u002F\u002F Apply discount\n  if (order.coupon) {\n    total *= 0.9;\n  }\n  \n  \u002F\u002F Process payment\n  const payment = stripe.charge(total);\n  \n  \u002F\u002F Send email\n  sendEmail(order.email, 'Order confirmed');\n  \n  \u002F\u002F Update inventory\n  updateInventory(order.items);\n  \n  return { orderId: order.id, total };\n}\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**✅ Good - Separated concerns:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\nfunction processOrder(order) {\n  validateOrder(order);\n  const total = calculateOrderTotal(order);\n  const payment = processPayment(total);\n  sendOrderConfirmation(order.email);\n  updateInventory(order.items);\n  \n  return { orderId: order.id, total };\n}\n\\`\\`\\`\n```\n\n## Best Practices\n\n### ✅ Do This\n\n- **Review Small Changes** - Smaller PRs are easier to review thoroughly\n- **Check Tests First** - Verify tests pass and cover new code\n- **Run the Code** - Test it locally when possible\n- **Ask Questions** - Don't assume, ask for clarification\n- **Be Constructive** - Suggest improvements, don't just criticize\n- **Focus on Important Issues** - Don't nitpick minor style issues\n- **Use Automated Tools** - Linters, formatters, security scanners\n- **Review Documentation** - Check if docs are updated\n- **Consider Performance** - Think about scale and efficiency\n- **Check for Regressions** - Ensure existing functionality still works\n\n### ❌ Don't Do This\n\n- **Don't Approve Without Reading** - Actually review the code\n- **Don't Be Vague** - Provide specific feedback with examples\n- **Don't Ignore Security** - Security issues are critical\n- **Don't Skip Tests** - Untested code will cause problems\n- **Don't Be Rude** - Be respectful and professional\n- **Don't Rubber Stamp** - Every review should add value\n- **Don't Review When Tired** - You'll miss important issues\n- **Don't Forget Context** - Understand the bigger picture\n\n## Complete Review Checklist\n\n### Pre-Review\n- [ ] Read the PR description and linked issues\n- [ ] Understand what problem is being solved\n- [ ] Check if tests pass in CI\u002FCD\n- [ ] Pull the branch and run it locally\n\n### Functionality\n- [ ] Code solves the stated problem\n- [ ] Edge cases are handled\n- [ ] Error handling is appropriate\n- [ ] User input is validated\n- [ ] No logical errors\n\n### Security\n- [ ] No SQL injection vulnerabilities\n- [ ] No XSS vulnerabilities\n- [ ] Authentication\u002Fauthorization is correct\n- [ ] Sensitive data is protected\n- [ ] No hardcoded secrets\n\n### Performance\n- [ ] No unnecessary database queries\n- [ ] No N+1 query problems\n- [ ] Efficient algorithms used\n- [ ] No memory leaks\n- [ ] Caching used appropriately\n\n### Code Quality\n- [ ] Code is readable and clear\n- [ ] Names are descriptive\n- [ ] Functions are focused and small\n- [ ] No code duplication\n- [ ] Follows project conventions\n\n### Tests\n- [ ] New code has tests\n- [ ] Tests cover edge cases\n- [ ] Tests are meaningful\n- [ ] All tests pass\n- [ ] Test coverage is adequate\n\n### Documentation\n- [ ] Code comments explain why, not what\n- [ ] API documentation is updated\n- [ ] README is updated if needed\n- [ ] Breaking changes are documented\n- [ ] Migration guide provided if needed\n\n### Git\n- [ ] Commit messages are clear\n- [ ] No merge conflicts\n- [ ] Branch is up to date with main\n- [ ] No unnecessary files committed\n- [ ] .gitignore is properly configured\n\n## Common Pitfalls\n\n### Problem: Missing Edge Cases\n**Symptoms:** Code works for happy path but fails on edge cases\n**Solution:** Ask \"What if...?\" questions\n- What if the input is null?\n- What if the array is empty?\n- What if the user is not authenticated?\n- What if the network request fails?\n\n### Problem: Security Vulnerabilities\n**Symptoms:** Code exposes security risks\n**Solution:** Use security checklist\n- Run security scanners (npm audit, Snyk)\n- Check OWASP Top 10\n- Validate all inputs\n- Use parameterized queries\n- Never trust user input\n\n### Problem: Poor Test Coverage\n**Symptoms:** New code has no tests or inadequate tests\n**Solution:** Require tests for all new code\n- Unit tests for functions\n- Integration tests for features\n- Edge case tests\n- Error case tests\n\n### Problem: Unclear Code\n**Symptoms:** Reviewer can't understand what code does\n**Solution:** Request improvements\n- Better variable names\n- Explanatory comments\n- Smaller functions\n- Clear structure\n\n## Review Comment Templates\n\n### Requesting Changes\n```markdown\n**Issue:** [Describe the problem]\n\n**Current code:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\n\u002F\u002F Show problematic code\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**Suggested fix:**\n\\`\\`\\`javascript\n\u002F\u002F Show improved code\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**Why:** [Explain why this is better]\n```\n\n### Asking Questions\n```markdown\n**Question:** [Your question]\n\n**Context:** [Why you're asking]\n\n**Suggestion:** [If you have one]\n```\n\n### Praising Good Code\n```markdown\n**Nice!** [What you liked]\n\nThis is great because [explain why]\n```\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- `@requesting-code-review` - Prepare code for review\n- `@receiving-code-review` - Handle review feedback\n- `@systematic-debugging` - Debug issues found in review\n- `@test-driven-development` - Ensure code has tests\n\n## Additional Resources\n\n- [Google Code Review Guidelines](https:\u002F\u002Fgoogle.github.io\u002Feng-practices\u002Freview\u002F)\n- [OWASP Top 10](https:\u002F\u002Fowasp.org\u002Fwww-project-top-ten\u002F)\n- [Code Review Best Practices](https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fthoughtbot\u002Fguides\u002Ftree\u002Fmain\u002Fcode-review)\n- [How to Review Code](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kevinlondon.com\u002F2015\u002F05\u002F05\u002Fcode-review-best-practices.html)\n\n---\n\n**Pro Tip:** Use a checklist template for every review to ensure consistency and thoroughness. Customize it for your team's specific needs!\n",{"name":5,"description":7},"main","51493f354fd03e3f941d4df7fd64c0b8c7a2632d","skills\u002Fdevelopment\u002Fcode-review-checklist","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGongYuanCaiJi\u002Fdsh-claude-code-templates","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGongYuanCaiJi","漏洞研究、根因分析、黑箱測試｜做 AI agent 工具｜Vulnerability research, root-cause analysis, AI agent tooling","2026-08-16 02:24:07",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":32,"prompt":42,"zipAvailable":43},[33,36,39],{"tool":34,"command":35},"npx","npx skills add GongYuanCaiJi\u002Fdsh-claude-code-templates --skill code-review-checklist",{"tool":37,"command":38},"bunx","bunx skills add GongYuanCaiJi\u002Fdsh-claude-code-templates --skill code-review-checklist",{"tool":40,"command":41},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add GongYuanCaiJi\u002Fdsh-claude-code-templates --skill code-review-checklist","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGongYuanCaiJi\u002Fdsh-claude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fdevelopment\u002Fcode-review-checklist\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[46,53,62,69,76,83],{"skillNo":47,"name":48,"nameZh":6,"description":49,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":50,"categories":51,"keywords":52,"publishedAt":19},"01M7ARMYTZ5D4B7N5SKFXV345V","zapier-make-patterns","No-code automation democratizes workflow building. Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) let non-developers automate business processes without writing code. But no-code doesn't mean no-complexity - these platforms have their own patterns, pitfalls, and breaking points.  This skill covers when to use which platform, how to build reliable automations, and when to graduate to code-based solutions. Key insight: Zapier optimizes for simplicity and integrations (7000+ apps), Make optimizes for power","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGongYuanCaiJi\u002Fdsh-claude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Fzapier-make-patterns\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":54,"name":55,"nameZh":6,"description":56,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":57,"licenseFileUrl":58,"sourceHtmlUrl":59,"categories":60,"keywords":61,"publishedAt":19},"01M7ARMX1BVNEAR98SBANMDF2V","yeet","Use only when the user explicitly asks to stage, commit, push, and open a GitHub pull request in one flow using the GitHub CLI (`gh`).","Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGongYuanCaiJi\u002Fdsh-claude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Fyeet\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGongYuanCaiJi\u002Fdsh-claude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Fyeet\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":63,"name":64,"nameZh":6,"description":65,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":66,"categories":67,"keywords":68,"publishedAt":19},"01M7ARMPR4RQ417MG1HMPGNQHH","workflow-automation","Workflow automation is the infrastructure that makes AI agents reliable. Without durable execution, a network hiccup during a 10-step payment flow means lost money and angry customers. With it, workflows resume exactly where they left off.  This skill covers the platforms (n8n, Temporal, Inngest) and patterns (sequential, parallel, orchestrator-worker) that turn brittle scripts into production-grade automation.  Key insight: The platforms make different tradeoffs. n8n optimizes for accessibility","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGongYuanCaiJi\u002Fdsh-claude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":70,"name":71,"nameZh":6,"description":72,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":73,"categories":74,"keywords":75,"publishedAt":19},"01M7ARMHBERDMKGDMV7K6MQ6YP","trigger-dev","Trigger.dev expert for background jobs, AI workflows, and reliable async execution with excellent developer experience and TypeScript-first design. Use when: trigger.dev, trigger dev, background task, ai background job, long running task.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGongYuanCaiJi\u002Fdsh-claude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Ftrigger-dev\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":77,"name":78,"nameZh":6,"description":79,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":80,"categories":81,"keywords":82,"publishedAt":19},"01M7ARME0A7KFT330Q2H25HE2B","slack-automation","Automate Slack workspace operations including messaging, search, channel management, and reaction workflows through Composio's Slack toolkit.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGongYuanCaiJi\u002Fdsh-claude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Fslack-automation\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":84,"name":85,"nameZh":6,"description":86,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":87,"categories":88,"keywords":89,"publishedAt":19},"01M7ARM8D87V18WDG0GEZS11ZT","planning-with-files","Transforms workflow to use Manus-style persistent markdown files for planning, progress tracking, and knowledge storage. Use when starting complex tasks, multi-step projects, research tasks, or when the user mentions planning, organizing work, tracking progress, or wants structured output.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGongYuanCaiJi\u002Fdsh-claude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Fplanning-with-files\u002FSKILL.md",[],[]]