[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M754DRCSW058QVYQX7KCFF8F":3,"skill-same:01M754DRCSW058QVYQX7KCFF8F":55},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":19,"linkOnly":20,"markdownContent":21,"markdownBody":22,"frontMatter":23,"refName":33,"commitSha":34,"skillDirectory":35,"forksCount":36,"repositoryHtmlUrl":37,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":38,"ownerBlogUrl":39,"ownerDescription":40,"updatedAt":41,"install":42,"resources":54},"01M754DRCSW058QVYQX7KCFF8F","x-review-qa",null,"QA specialist review: validates test coverage, TDD compliance, test naming, fixtures, parametrized tests, and acceptance criteria coverage.","review-bench\u002Federcnj_ia-dev-environment","review-bench","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F286778065?v=4","01M7517F9NTEPDZDAXJBR30FWT","ReviewBench","01M7517FAC9F4P7TGWCNJ8VYVW",0,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freview-bench\u002Federcnj_ia-dev-environment\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fsrc\u002Ftest\u002Fresources\u002Fgolden\u002Fjava-spring-event-driven\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fx-review-qa\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],"2026-11-12 13:55:43",false,"---\nname: x-review-qa\ndescription: \"QA specialist review: validates test coverage, TDD compliance, test naming, fixtures, parametrized tests, and acceptance criteria coverage.\"\nuser-invocable: true\nallowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash\nargument-hint: \"[PR number or file paths]\"\ncontext-budget: light\nrequires-capabilities: []\nfragment-slot: { slot: review-specialist, fragment-id: qa, fragment-order: 100 }\n---\n\n## Global Output Policy\n\n- **Language**: English ONLY.\n- **Tone**: Technical, Direct, and Concise.\n- **Efficiency**: Remove all conversational fillers and greetings to save tokens.\n\n# Skill: QA Specialist Review\n\n## Purpose\n\nReview code changes for QA compliance: test coverage thresholds, TDD process adherence, test naming conventions, fixture centralization, parametrized tests for data-driven scenarios, and acceptance criteria coverage. Validates that tests follow the Transformation Priority Premise (TPP) and Double-Loop TDD.\n\n## When to Use\n\n- Pre-PR quality validation for test quality\n- Verifying TDD compliance in commit history\n- Ensuring coverage thresholds are met\n- Checking test naming and organization\n\n## Triggers\n\n- `\u002Fx-review-qa 42` -- review PR #42 for QA compliance\n- `\u002Fx-review-qa src\u002Ftest\u002F` -- review test files at specific paths\n- `\u002Fx-review-qa` -- review all current test changes\n\n## Parameters\n\n| Parameter | Type | Required | Default | Description |\n|-----------|------|----------|---------|-------------|\n| `target` | String | No | (current changes) | PR number or file paths to review |\n\n## Knowledge Pack References\n\n| Pack | Files | Purpose |\n|------|-------|---------|\n| testing | `knowledge\u002Ftesting.md` | Test categories, coverage thresholds, fixture patterns, TDD workflow |\n\n## Checklist (20 Items, Max Score: \u002F40 full scale; adjusted max excludes N\u002FA items)\n\nEach applicable item scores 0 (missing), 1 (partial), or 2 (fully compliant). Items\nmarked N\u002FA are excluded from BOTH the earned score and the maximum possible score.\nWhen `testing.smoke_tests == false`, QA-19 and QA-20 are automatically marked N\u002FA,\nso the adjusted maximum is \u002F36 instead of \u002F40. Report the adjusted max in the final\nscore line (see Output Template below).\n\n### Coverage & Criteria (QA-01 to QA-03)\n\n| # | Item | Score |\n|---|------|-------|\n| QA-01 | Test exists for each acceptance criterion | \u002F2 |\n| QA-02 | Line coverage >= 95% (absolute gate — Rule 05 RULE-005-01) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-03 | Branch coverage >= 90% (absolute gate — Rule 05 RULE-005-01) | \u002F2 |\n\n> **Absolute-gate note (Rule 05 RULE-005-01):** QA-02 and QA-03 evaluate the\n> repository's current coverage, not just the PR diff. The specialist MUST\n> fail these items regardless of whether the deficit was introduced by this\n> PR or was pre-existing on the base branch. Pre-existing deficits must be\n> closed in the current PR or in a predecessor PR; no \"pre-existing\" exemption\n> is permitted. The only escape path is an approved ADR that temporarily\n> lowers the gate for a specific package (with sunset date).\n\n### Test Quality (QA-04 to QA-10)\n\n| # | Item | Score |\n|---|------|-------|\n| QA-04 | Test naming convention followed: `[method]_[scenario]_[expected]` | \u002F2 |\n| QA-05 | AAA pattern (Arrange-Act-Assert) in every test | \u002F2 |\n| QA-06 | Parametrized tests for data-driven scenarios | \u002F2 |\n| QA-07 | Exception paths tested with specific assertions | \u002F2 |\n| QA-08 | No test interdependency (tests run in any order) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-09 | Fixtures centralized (no duplicate records\u002Fclasses across test files) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-10 | Unique test data per test (no shared mutable state) | \u002F2 |\n\n### Test Completeness (QA-11 to QA-12)\n\n| # | Item | Score |\n|---|------|-------|\n| QA-11 | Edge cases covered (null, empty, boundary values) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-12 | Integration tests for DB\u002FAPI interactions | \u002F2 |\n\n### TDD Compliance (QA-13 to QA-18)\n\n| # | Item | Score |\n|---|------|-------|\n| QA-13 | Commits show test-first pattern (test precedes implementation in git log) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-14 | Explicit refactoring after green (separate refactor commits) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-15 | Tests follow TPP progression (simple to complex) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-16 | No test written after implementation (test-after is a violation) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-17 | Acceptance tests validate end-to-end behavior | \u002F2 |\n| QA-18 | TDD coverage thresholds maintained across all modules | \u002F2 |\n\n### Smoke Test Verification (QA-19 to QA-20) — EPIC-0042\n\n| # | Item | Score |\n|---|------|-------|\n| QA-19 | Smoke tests exist and cover critical path (when `testing.smoke_tests == true`; N\u002FA when false) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-20 | ALL smoke tests pass — `{{SMOKE_COMMAND}}` executed with zero failures (when `testing.smoke_tests == true`; N\u002FA when false) | \u002F2 |\n\n## Workflow\n\n### Step 1 -- Gather Context\n\nRead the testing knowledge pack for project test conventions:\n- `knowledge\u002Ftesting.md`\n\n### Step 2 -- Identify Changed Files\n\nDetermine scope: PR diff or specified paths. Separate production code from test code.\n\n### Step 3 -- Coverage Analysis\n\nCheck coverage reports or run coverage tool. Verify line >= 95% and branch >= 90%.\n\n**Absolute gate (Rule 05 RULE-005-01):** the gate fires when the repository's\nmeasured coverage falls below either threshold, regardless of whether the\ndeficit was caused by the PR or was pre-existing on the base branch. The\nspecialist MUST record the finding and fail QA-02\u002FQA-03 in both cases; it\nis not the specialist's place to grant a pre-existing exemption.\n\n### Step 4 -- Test Naming Audit\n\nScan test files for naming convention compliance: `[methodUnderTest]_[scenario]_[expectedBehavior]`.\n\n### Step 5 -- TDD Commit Audit\n\nAnalyze git log for test-first pattern: test commits should precede or accompany implementation commits.\n\n### Step 6 -- Test Quality Review\n\nFor each test file:\n- Check AAA pattern\n- Check parametrized tests for multi-scenario validations\n- Check exception path coverage\n- Check fixture centralization\n- Check unique test data\n\n### Step 6.5 -- Smoke Test Verification (EPIC-0042)\n\nExecute smoke test verification when `testing.smoke_tests == true`:\n\n1. Check if smoke test infrastructure exists:\n   - If `testing.smoke_tests == false`: mark QA-19 and QA-20 as **N\u002FA** (not scored, excluded from max score)\n   - If `testing.smoke_tests == true`: proceed with smoke verification\n2. **QA-19 — Smoke test existence:** Verify smoke tests exist and cover at least the critical path (health check + primary flow)\n3. **QA-20 — Smoke test execution:** Run `{{SMOKE_COMMAND}}` and verify ALL smoke tests pass:\n   ```bash\n   {{SMOKE_COMMAND}}\n   ```\n   - If ALL smoke tests **PASS**: QA-20 scores 2\u002F2\n   - If ANY smoke test **FAILS**: QA-20 scores 0\u002F2 AND STATUS becomes **Rejected**\n   - Log each failing smoke test name and failure reason\n4. **Hard rule:** ALL unit + integration + smoke tests MUST pass for STATUS: Approved\n\n### Step 7 -- Generate Report\n\nProduce the scored report.\n\n## Output Format\n\n```\nENGINEER: QA\nSTORY: [story-id or change description]\nSCORE: XX\u002F40 (or XX\u002F36 when QA-19 and QA-20 are N\u002FA — use the adjusted max that\n       excludes N\u002FA items; see Checklist header for the N\u002FA rules)\n\nSTATUS: PASS | FAIL | PARTIAL\n\n### PASSED\n- [QA-XX] [Item description]\n\n### FAILED\n- [QA-XX] [Item description]\n  - Finding: [file:line] [issue description]\n  - Fix: [remediation guidance]\n\n### PARTIAL\n- [QA-XX] [Item description]\n  - Finding: [partial compliance details]\n```\n\n## Error Handling\n\n| Scenario | Action |\n|----------|--------|\n| No test files found | Report INFO: no test code discovered |\n| Coverage tool not configured | Warn and skip QA-02, QA-03 |\n| Git log not available | Warn and skip QA-13, QA-14, QA-16 |\n| Smoke test failure (QA-20) | STATUS becomes Rejected regardless of other scores |\n| `testing.smoke_tests == false` | Mark QA-19, QA-20 as N\u002FA (excluded from max score) |\n","## Global Output Policy\n\n- **Language**: English ONLY.\n- **Tone**: Technical, Direct, and Concise.\n- **Efficiency**: Remove all conversational fillers and greetings to save tokens.\n\n# Skill: QA Specialist Review\n\n## Purpose\n\nReview code changes for QA compliance: test coverage thresholds, TDD process adherence, test naming conventions, fixture centralization, parametrized tests for data-driven scenarios, and acceptance criteria coverage. Validates that tests follow the Transformation Priority Premise (TPP) and Double-Loop TDD.\n\n## When to Use\n\n- Pre-PR quality validation for test quality\n- Verifying TDD compliance in commit history\n- Ensuring coverage thresholds are met\n- Checking test naming and organization\n\n## Triggers\n\n- `\u002Fx-review-qa 42` -- review PR #42 for QA compliance\n- `\u002Fx-review-qa src\u002Ftest\u002F` -- review test files at specific paths\n- `\u002Fx-review-qa` -- review all current test changes\n\n## Parameters\n\n| Parameter | Type | Required | Default | Description |\n|-----------|------|----------|---------|-------------|\n| `target` | String | No | (current changes) | PR number or file paths to review |\n\n## Knowledge Pack References\n\n| Pack | Files | Purpose |\n|------|-------|---------|\n| testing | `knowledge\u002Ftesting.md` | Test categories, coverage thresholds, fixture patterns, TDD workflow |\n\n## Checklist (20 Items, Max Score: \u002F40 full scale; adjusted max excludes N\u002FA items)\n\nEach applicable item scores 0 (missing), 1 (partial), or 2 (fully compliant). Items\nmarked N\u002FA are excluded from BOTH the earned score and the maximum possible score.\nWhen `testing.smoke_tests == false`, QA-19 and QA-20 are automatically marked N\u002FA,\nso the adjusted maximum is \u002F36 instead of \u002F40. Report the adjusted max in the final\nscore line (see Output Template below).\n\n### Coverage & Criteria (QA-01 to QA-03)\n\n| # | Item | Score |\n|---|------|-------|\n| QA-01 | Test exists for each acceptance criterion | \u002F2 |\n| QA-02 | Line coverage >= 95% (absolute gate — Rule 05 RULE-005-01) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-03 | Branch coverage >= 90% (absolute gate — Rule 05 RULE-005-01) | \u002F2 |\n\n> **Absolute-gate note (Rule 05 RULE-005-01):** QA-02 and QA-03 evaluate the\n> repository's current coverage, not just the PR diff. The specialist MUST\n> fail these items regardless of whether the deficit was introduced by this\n> PR or was pre-existing on the base branch. Pre-existing deficits must be\n> closed in the current PR or in a predecessor PR; no \"pre-existing\" exemption\n> is permitted. The only escape path is an approved ADR that temporarily\n> lowers the gate for a specific package (with sunset date).\n\n### Test Quality (QA-04 to QA-10)\n\n| # | Item | Score |\n|---|------|-------|\n| QA-04 | Test naming convention followed: `[method]_[scenario]_[expected]` | \u002F2 |\n| QA-05 | AAA pattern (Arrange-Act-Assert) in every test | \u002F2 |\n| QA-06 | Parametrized tests for data-driven scenarios | \u002F2 |\n| QA-07 | Exception paths tested with specific assertions | \u002F2 |\n| QA-08 | No test interdependency (tests run in any order) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-09 | Fixtures centralized (no duplicate records\u002Fclasses across test files) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-10 | Unique test data per test (no shared mutable state) | \u002F2 |\n\n### Test Completeness (QA-11 to QA-12)\n\n| # | Item | Score |\n|---|------|-------|\n| QA-11 | Edge cases covered (null, empty, boundary values) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-12 | Integration tests for DB\u002FAPI interactions | \u002F2 |\n\n### TDD Compliance (QA-13 to QA-18)\n\n| # | Item | Score |\n|---|------|-------|\n| QA-13 | Commits show test-first pattern (test precedes implementation in git log) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-14 | Explicit refactoring after green (separate refactor commits) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-15 | Tests follow TPP progression (simple to complex) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-16 | No test written after implementation (test-after is a violation) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-17 | Acceptance tests validate end-to-end behavior | \u002F2 |\n| QA-18 | TDD coverage thresholds maintained across all modules | \u002F2 |\n\n### Smoke Test Verification (QA-19 to QA-20) — EPIC-0042\n\n| # | Item | Score |\n|---|------|-------|\n| QA-19 | Smoke tests exist and cover critical path (when `testing.smoke_tests == true`; N\u002FA when false) | \u002F2 |\n| QA-20 | ALL smoke tests pass — `{{SMOKE_COMMAND}}` executed with zero failures (when `testing.smoke_tests == true`; N\u002FA when false) | \u002F2 |\n\n## Workflow\n\n### Step 1 -- Gather Context\n\nRead the testing knowledge pack for project test conventions:\n- `knowledge\u002Ftesting.md`\n\n### Step 2 -- Identify Changed Files\n\nDetermine scope: PR diff or specified paths. Separate production code from test code.\n\n### Step 3 -- Coverage Analysis\n\nCheck coverage reports or run coverage tool. Verify line >= 95% and branch >= 90%.\n\n**Absolute gate (Rule 05 RULE-005-01):** the gate fires when the repository's\nmeasured coverage falls below either threshold, regardless of whether the\ndeficit was caused by the PR or was pre-existing on the base branch. The\nspecialist MUST record the finding and fail QA-02\u002FQA-03 in both cases; it\nis not the specialist's place to grant a pre-existing exemption.\n\n### Step 4 -- Test Naming Audit\n\nScan test files for naming convention compliance: `[methodUnderTest]_[scenario]_[expectedBehavior]`.\n\n### Step 5 -- TDD Commit Audit\n\nAnalyze git log for test-first pattern: test commits should precede or accompany implementation commits.\n\n### Step 6 -- Test Quality Review\n\nFor each test file:\n- Check AAA pattern\n- Check parametrized tests for multi-scenario validations\n- Check exception path coverage\n- Check fixture centralization\n- Check unique test data\n\n### Step 6.5 -- Smoke Test Verification (EPIC-0042)\n\nExecute smoke test verification when `testing.smoke_tests == true`:\n\n1. Check if smoke test infrastructure exists:\n   - If `testing.smoke_tests == false`: mark QA-19 and QA-20 as **N\u002FA** (not scored, excluded from max score)\n   - If `testing.smoke_tests == true`: proceed with smoke verification\n2. **QA-19 — Smoke test existence:** Verify smoke tests exist and cover at least the critical path (health check + primary flow)\n3. **QA-20 — Smoke test execution:** Run `{{SMOKE_COMMAND}}` and verify ALL smoke tests pass:\n   ```bash\n   {{SMOKE_COMMAND}}\n   ```\n   - If ALL smoke tests **PASS**: QA-20 scores 2\u002F2\n   - If ANY smoke test **FAILS**: QA-20 scores 0\u002F2 AND STATUS becomes **Rejected**\n   - Log each failing smoke test name and failure reason\n4. **Hard rule:** ALL unit + integration + smoke tests MUST pass for STATUS: Approved\n\n### Step 7 -- Generate Report\n\nProduce the scored report.\n\n## Output Format\n\n```\nENGINEER: QA\nSTORY: [story-id or change description]\nSCORE: XX\u002F40 (or XX\u002F36 when QA-19 and QA-20 are N\u002FA — use the adjusted max that\n       excludes N\u002FA items; see Checklist header for the N\u002FA rules)\n\nSTATUS: PASS | FAIL | PARTIAL\n\n### PASSED\n- [QA-XX] [Item description]\n\n### FAILED\n- [QA-XX] [Item description]\n  - Finding: [file:line] [issue description]\n  - Fix: [remediation guidance]\n\n### PARTIAL\n- [QA-XX] [Item description]\n  - Finding: [partial compliance details]\n```\n\n## Error Handling\n\n| Scenario | Action |\n|----------|--------|\n| No test files found | Report INFO: no test code discovered |\n| Coverage tool not configured | Warn and skip QA-02, QA-03 |\n| Git log not available | Warn and skip QA-13, QA-14, QA-16 |\n| Smoke test failure (QA-20) | STATUS becomes Rejected regardless of other scores |\n| `testing.smoke_tests == false` | Mark QA-19, QA-20 as N\u002FA (excluded from max score) |\n",{"name":5,"description":7,"allowed-tools":24,"argument-hint":25,"fragment-slot":26,"context-budget":30,"user-invocable":31,"requires-capabilities":32},"Read, Grep, Glob, Bash","[PR number or file paths]",{"slot":27,"fragment-id":28,"fragment-order":29},"review-specialist","qa",100,"light",true,[],"main","952a630c6f38d193a349d86fa18db1de8843e837","src\u002Ftest\u002Fresources\u002Fgolden\u002Fjava-spring-event-driven\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fx-review-qa",1,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freview-bench\u002Federcnj_ia-dev-environment","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freview-bench","https:\u002F\u002Freview-bench.ai","An open benchmark for AI code review.","2026-10-27 06:56:37",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":43,"prompt":53,"zipAvailable":31},[44,47,50],{"tool":45,"command":46},"npx","npx skills add review-bench\u002Federcnj_ia-dev-environment --skill x-review-qa",{"tool":48,"command":49},"bunx","bunx skills add review-bench\u002Federcnj_ia-dev-environment --skill x-review-qa",{"tool":51,"command":52},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add review-bench\u002Federcnj_ia-dev-environment --skill x-review-qa","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freview-bench\u002Federcnj_ia-dev-environment\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fsrc\u002Ftest\u002Fresources\u002Fgolden\u002Fjava-spring-event-driven\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fx-review-qa\u002FSKILL.md",[],[56,63,70,77,84,91],{"skillNo":57,"name":58,"nameZh":6,"description":59,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":60,"categories":61,"keywords":62,"publishedAt":19},"01M757M8J48TQ1Y3X25GSJBXAS","x-parallel-eval","Detects and classifies file-collision risks between work units (tasks, stories, or epic phases) before parallel execution. Reads ## File Footprint blocks produced by x-task-plan \u002F x-story-plan, applies the parallelism-heuristics knowledge pack (hard \u002F regen \u002F soft categories + hotspot overrides), and emits a collision matrix + serialization recommendation in Markdown (default) or JSON.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freview-bench\u002Federcnj_ia-dev-environment\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fsrc\u002Ftest\u002Fresources\u002Fgolden\u002Fx-parallel-eval\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":64,"name":65,"nameZh":6,"description":66,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":67,"categories":68,"keywords":69,"publishedAt":19},"01M757M57XMR9546S69466HDWT","parallelism-heuristics","Canonical catalog of file-collision heuristics for parallel task, story, and epic execution. Defines the File Footprint block format, the three Conflict Categories (hard \u002F regen \u002F soft), a hotspot list of high-contention paths, and the degrade-with-warning policy. Consumed by x-task-plan, x-story-plan, x-epic-map, x-parallel-eval, and x-dev-*-implement.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freview-bench\u002Federcnj_ia-dev-environment\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fsrc\u002Ftest\u002Fresources\u002Fgolden\u002Fparallelism-heuristics\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":71,"name":72,"nameZh":6,"description":73,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":74,"categories":75,"keywords":76,"publishedAt":19},"01M757M11SZ8P1VCQABT08QVYA","x-watch-pr-ci","Polls a PR's CI checks and Copilot review status, blocking until checks complete or timeout. Returns one of 8 stable exit codes (SUCCESS=0, CI_PENDING_PROCEED=10, CI_FAILED=20, TIMEOUT=30, PR_ALREADY_MERGED=40, NO_CI_CONFIGURED=50, PR_CLOSED=60, PR_NOT_FOUND=70). Writes a versioned state-file for session resume.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freview-bench\u002Federcnj_ia-dev-environment\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fsrc\u002Ftest\u002Fresources\u002Fgolden\u002Fjava-spring\u002Fplatform-claude-code\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fx-watch-pr-ci\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":78,"name":79,"nameZh":6,"description":80,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":81,"categories":82,"keywords":83,"publishedAt":19},"01M757KW53K8KFPGADFB4PH949","x-validate-docs","Documentation freshness gate: validates 6 dimensions (readme, api-specs, grpc-proto, adr, skill-docs, system-architecture) against code changes in a PR. Stack-aware — only validates targets declared\u002Fauto-detected from ProjectConfig.documentation.targets. Returns exit non-zero on staleness; produces structured report.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freview-bench\u002Federcnj_ia-dev-environment\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fsrc\u002Ftest\u002Fresources\u002Fgolden\u002Fjava-spring\u002Fplatform-claude-code\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fx-validate-docs\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":85,"name":86,"nameZh":6,"description":87,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":88,"categories":89,"keywords":90,"publishedAt":19},"01M757KQZHSA10MKC0CR571D60","x-update-system-architecture","Incrementally updates docs\u002Farchitecture\u002Fsystem.md after an epic completes. Appends new entries to the Decision Log (§11) using x-internal-write-report --append (dedup by ## ID: marker) and surgically inserts component\u002Fintegration changes into sections 1-10 via Edit. Idempotent: re-running with the same epic produces a byte-identical system.md.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freview-bench\u002Federcnj_ia-dev-environment\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fsrc\u002Ftest\u002Fresources\u002Fgolden\u002Fjava-spring\u002Fplatform-claude-code\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fx-update-system-architecture\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":92,"name":93,"nameZh":6,"description":94,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":95,"categories":96,"keywords":97,"publishedAt":19},"01M757KKBT5Q1SVF8DMJBVF46M","x-update-architecture","Incrementally updates the service architecture document with changes from architecture plans. Adds new components, integrations, flows, and ADR references without rewriting existing content. Use after implementation to keep architecture documentation current.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freview-bench\u002Federcnj_ia-dev-environment\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fsrc\u002Ftest\u002Fresources\u002Fgolden\u002Fjava-spring\u002Fplatform-claude-code\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fx-update-architecture\u002FSKILL.md",[],[]]