AGENT SKILL

sev-triage

Classifies incident severity (SEV1-4) using impact, scope, and urgency signals and decides who to page. Use when an alert fires or a report comes in and a severity call must be made quickly.

License 许可
MIT
所属仓库
SkillMedev/skills
最近更新
2026-10-14
Stars
★ 25
Forks
3

01 前言 Front Matter

name
sev-triage
metadata
{ "title": "SEV Triage" }
description
Classifies incident severity (SEV1-4) using impact, scope, and urgency signals and decides who to page. Use when an alert fires or a report comes in and a severity call must be made quickly.

03 SKILL.md 正文

SEV Triage

Severity is a paging decision, not a feelings meter. Assign the highest SEV that any single signal justifies, then downgrade only with evidence.

Severity Definitions

  • SEV1 - Revenue-impacting or total service loss. More than 5% of users cannot complete a critical flow. Data loss or breach possible. Page IC + engineering lead + exec on-call immediately.
  • SEV2 - Significant degradation. Core feature broken for a subset, elevated error rate above SLO breach threshold, or a workaround exists but is unacceptable long-term. Page IC + team on-call within 5 minutes.
  • SEV3 - Partial or minor degradation. Non-critical feature affected, SLO still within budget, no customer escalations yet. Ticket created, team notified async, fix before next business day.
  • SEV4 - Cosmetic or edge case. No user impact, caught proactively. Ticket only.

Signal Checklist

Answer these to land on a SEV. First 'yes' that matches wins.

  1. Is a payment, auth, or data-integrity flow broken for any user? -> SEV1 candidate.
  2. Is error rate above your SLO threshold for the last 10 minutes? -> SEV2 at minimum.
  3. Are multiple regions or availability zones affected? -> Escalate one level.
  4. Is there active data exfiltration or corruption risk? -> SEV1 regardless of user count.
  5. Is a single non-critical endpoint slow but the rest healthy? -> SEV3.

Scope Multipliers

  • Blast radius: estimate percentage of users affected. Below 1% rarely justifies SEV1 unless the 1% are paying customers or the data risk is severe.
  • Growth rate: is impact spreading? A SEV3 that doubles every 10 minutes is a SEV2.
  • Detection lag: if the issue started more than 30 minutes ago undetected, assume blast radius is larger than current signals show.

Who to Page

  • SEV1: IC (incident commander), service owner, on-call SRE, and engineering lead. Open a war room immediately.
  • SEV2: IC and service owner on-call. Invite others as needed.
  • SEV3: Service team on-call async. No war room.
  • SEV4: Ticket, no page.

Worked example: making the call

Bad: "Checkout seems broken for some users. Feels like a SEV3 - I'll dig into the cause first and page someone if it turns out to be serious."

Good: "Checkout error rate at 12% for the last 15 minutes (SLO threshold: 1%). Payment flow broken -> signal 1 -> SEV1. Paged IC, service owner, and on-call SRE at 14:32; war room open. Blast radius estimate: ~12% of checkout attempts, growth unclear. Cause unknown - irrelevant to the SEV. Re-triage at 15:00."

The bad version inverts the order (cause before severity), hedges on a broken payment flow, and delays paging. The good version cites the signal that set the level, pages immediately, records blast radius, and schedules the re-triage - all before anyone knows why it broke.

Deliverable

Produce a triage record - posted to the incident channel or ticket - containing: the assigned SEV, a one-line justification naming the checklist signal that set it, the blast radius estimate (percentage of users or requests), who was paged and when, and the scheduled re-triage time. The record is what lets the next responder trust the level instead of re-deriving it.

Quality bar

  • The SEV was assigned from impact signals before any root-cause investigation began.
  • The justification names a specific checklist signal, not a gut feel.
  • Paging happened on assignment, not after confirmation - a potential SEV1 pages on one data point.
  • A re-triage time is set (every 30 minutes) and the level moves with the evidence, both up and down.

Do / Don't

  • Do: assign SEV before investigating root cause. Severity is about impact now, not cause.
  • Do: re-triage every 30 minutes. A SEV2 resolved is a SEV4; a SEV3 spreading is a SEV1.
  • Don't: under-SEV to avoid waking people. False SEV1s are cheaper than missed ones.
  • Don't: wait for a second data point before paging on a potential SEV1.

04 同仓库更多 Skills

SkillMedev
SkillMedev/skills

有氧运动计划

zone-2-cardio-plan

当有人要求制定稳态有氧训练计划、进行有氧基础训练或达到第二区间、安排轻松或耐力型的每周有氧训练、按心率区间训练,或提高静息心率、最大摄氧量或耐力时,可以使用此方案。该方案构建了一个包含训练计划结构、训练方式选择和进度安排的心率区间有氧训练模块。本方案仅提供一般健身指导,不构成医疗建议。请勿用于设计力量或举重训练计划(请使用力量训练计划)、高强度间歇训练 (HIIT) 或循环训练(请使用体能训练和 HIIT 计划),或灵活性/柔韧性训练(请使用灵活性训练计划)。

★ 25
SkillMedev
SkillMedev/skills

youtube-script-writer

Writes retention-engineered long-form YouTube scripts on a hook/body/payoff architecture - a first-30-seconds hook that survives the retention cliff, a beat-sheet body with mini-hooks and bridges, timed pattern interrupts, and a payoff that over-delivers - with B-roll and editing cues marked inline. Use when someone says "script my next video", "my retention graph dies at the start", "tighten this draft", or "outline a video on X". Do NOT use for the 3-second opener of TikTok, Reels, or Shorts - use video-hook-writer instead; do NOT use for spoken voiceover synced to on-screen tutorial actions - use narration-script instead; do NOT use for a sales demo built on a buyer's discovery notes - use demo-script instead; do NOT use to design the thumbnail and title - use thumbnail-concept instead.

★ 25
SkillMedev
SkillMedev/skills

win-back-campaign

Designs segmented win-back email sequences for dormant users - dormancy tiers, a three-beat sequence with a single proportional incentive, and a suppression rule - and measures success by re-activation, not opens. Use when someone says "our users went quiet", "design a win-back campaign", "how do I re-engage lapsed customers", "should we email people who haven't logged in for months", or lifecycle messaging has stopped landing with a lapsed segment. Do NOT use for recovering an unfinished checkout - use abandoned-cart-sequence instead. Do NOT use for diagnosing and fixing why active customers cancel - use churn-reduction instead. Do NOT use for building always-on onboarding or nurture flows - use email-drip-builder instead.

★ 25
SkillMedev
SkillMedev/skills

wikipedia-style

Writes neutral, verifiable, encyclopedic prose following Wikipedia's core content policies and manual of style - NPOV, inline citations, notability-backed claims, and a strict ban on promotional language. Use when someone asks "write this like a Wikipedia article", "draft a Wikipedia page for this company or person", "make this neutral and encyclopedic", or "why does my article draft keep getting rejected". Do NOT use for persuasive or opinion writing - use op-ed-writer instead; for thesis-driven academic papers, use academic-essay; for verifying claims in existing text, use fact-checker.

★ 25
SkillMedev
SkillMedev/skills

whitepapers

Structures and writes authoritative B2B whitepapers - a standalone executive summary, a data-sized problem statement, methodology, evidence-driven findings, recommendations, and a soft call to action - flagging every claim that needs a real citation. Use when a marketer asks "write a whitepaper on this topic", "turn our research into a lead-gen asset", "make this credible enough for executives", or a draft reads like a product pitch instead of analysis. Do NOT use for customer-story-driven proof - use case-study-builder instead; for policy audiences, use policy-brief.

★ 25
SkillMedev
SkillMedev/skills

white-space-analysis

Finds unmet market gaps by ranking jobs-to-be-done on importance versus satisfaction, overlaying them against current solutions and workarounds, and validating that each gap is real, winnable, and worth winning. Use when someone asks "where are the gaps in this market", "what's underserved here", "where should we play next", or is hunting for product, feature, or market-entry opportunities. Do NOT use for profiling competitors and building battle cards - use competitive-intelligence instead; for putting a dollar figure on an identified opportunity - use market-sizing instead; for extracting jobs-to-be-done from raw customer interviews - use jtbd-extractor instead.

★ 25