[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M751GSTDQBA73VGKQW8GXW22":3,"skill-same:01M751GSTDQBA73VGKQW8GXW22":49},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":19,"linkOnly":20,"markdownContent":21,"markdownBody":22,"frontMatter":23,"refName":26,"commitSha":27,"skillDirectory":28,"forksCount":29,"repositoryHtmlUrl":30,"repositoryHomepageUrl":31,"ownerHtmlUrl":32,"ownerBlogUrl":31,"ownerDescription":33,"updatedAt":34,"install":35,"resources":48},"01M751GSTDQBA73VGKQW8GXW22","rate-limit-handler",null,"Adds retry-with-backoff, Retry-After handling, and client-side throttling so a caller stays under an upstream API's rate limits instead of hammering it. Use when you call a rate-limited or quota-enforced third-party API, see 429 or 503 responses or Retry-After headers, or have a worker fleet that needs to share one upstream's quota. Do NOT use to fail fast when a dependency is down - use circuit-breaker-builder instead; do NOT use to scaffold the HTTP client itself - use api-client-generator instead.","SkillMedev\u002Fskills","SkillMedev","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F298078254?v=4","01M74ZSGTQ918CB0VXW4EG3RMX","SkillMe","01M74ZSGVBT497NA95CBT8JTY4",25,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSkillMedev\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Frate-limit-handler\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],"2026-11-11 18:15:31",false,"---\nname: rate-limit-handler\ndescription: Adds retry-with-backoff, Retry-After handling, and client-side throttling so a caller stays under an upstream API's rate limits instead of hammering it. Use when you call a rate-limited or quota-enforced third-party API, see 429 or 503 responses or Retry-After headers, or have a worker fleet that needs to share one upstream's quota. Do NOT use to fail fast when a dependency is down - use circuit-breaker-builder instead; do NOT use to scaffold the HTTP client itself - use api-client-generator instead.\nmetadata:\n  title: \"Rate Limit Handler\"\n---\n# Rate Limit Handler\n\nStay under an upstream's quota by backing off cooperatively, obeying what the server tells you, and de-synchronizing your fleet - retrying harder is how a transient limit becomes an outage.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. **Classify the response before reacting.** Retry only on 429, 502, 503, 504, and connection\u002Ftimeout errors. Never retry 400, 401, 403, 404, or 422 - they will fail identically. Retry only idempotent or idempotency-keyed operations; a bare non-idempotent POST can duplicate effects.\n2. **Honor the server first.** If the response carries `Retry-After`, obey it exactly and skip local backoff math - parse both the delta-seconds and the HTTP-date form. Read `X-RateLimit-Remaining` and `X-RateLimit-Reset` proactively and slow down as remaining approaches zero rather than waiting to be rejected - throttling when remaining drops below ~10% of the window's quota is a reasonable trigger.\n3. **Back off with full jitter when there is no `Retry-After`.** Compute `delay = base * 2^attempt` with a base of 100-500ms, clamp it to a max (e.g. 30-60s), then sleep a uniform random value between 0 and that clamped cap - not the cap itself. Full jitter is what de-synchronizes many clients retrying the same downed service.\n4. **Bound the retries.** Cap both the attempt count (e.g. 5) and the total elapsed budget (e.g. 30-60s, and always below the caller's own timeout) so a request fails fast instead of hanging a caller for minutes. Surface the final failure to the caller; do not swallow it.\n5. **Throttle proactively with a token bucket.** Put a client-side limiter in front of the API sized to roughly 80% of the published quota - the headroom absorbs retries, clock skew, and other callers you forgot about - so bursts are smoothed and you stay under the limit by design rather than reacting to 429s. When many workers hit one upstream, back the bucket with a shared store (e.g. Redis) so the aggregate rate - not the per-process rate - stays bounded.\n6. **Make it observable.** Emit metrics for retry count, backoff duration, and 429 rate. A rising 429 rate is the early signal to lower concurrency or request a quota increase before users see errors; sustained 429s above ~1% of requests means the token bucket is mis-sized or missing.\n\n## Deliverable\n\nProduce the retry\u002Fthrottle layer (a wrapper, interceptor, or middleware around the upstream client) plus a short configuration summary stating: the retryable status set, base delay, cap, and jitter mode, the attempt and total-time budgets, the token-bucket rate and burst size relative to the published quota, whether the bucket is per-process or shared across the fleet, and the metrics emitted. The summary is what the next engineer tunes when the upstream changes its limits.\n\n## Quality bar\n\n- No fixed-delay or no-jitter retry loop survives - every backoff path applies jitter.\n- `Retry-After` always wins over computed backoff.\n- Every retry path is bounded by both attempt count and total time budget.\n- Non-idempotent operations are never retried without an idempotency key.\n- The 4xx set above is never retried.\n\n## Do NOT\n\n- Do NOT retry on 4xx client errors (except 429) - the request is malformed or unauthorized and will fail again.\n- Do NOT use fixed or cap-only backoff - synchronized clients recreate the thundering herd you are trying to avoid.\n- Do NOT retry forever or without a total-time budget.\n- Do NOT enforce per-process limits when a fleet shares one quota - the aggregate will still blow the limit.\n- Do NOT add the full backoff-plus-bucket stack to a single best-effort background call; let it fail and move on, and reserve the machinery for hot paths and high-volume integrations.\n","# Rate Limit Handler\n\nStay under an upstream's quota by backing off cooperatively, obeying what the server tells you, and de-synchronizing your fleet - retrying harder is how a transient limit becomes an outage.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. **Classify the response before reacting.** Retry only on 429, 502, 503, 504, and connection\u002Ftimeout errors. Never retry 400, 401, 403, 404, or 422 - they will fail identically. Retry only idempotent or idempotency-keyed operations; a bare non-idempotent POST can duplicate effects.\n2. **Honor the server first.** If the response carries `Retry-After`, obey it exactly and skip local backoff math - parse both the delta-seconds and the HTTP-date form. Read `X-RateLimit-Remaining` and `X-RateLimit-Reset` proactively and slow down as remaining approaches zero rather than waiting to be rejected - throttling when remaining drops below ~10% of the window's quota is a reasonable trigger.\n3. **Back off with full jitter when there is no `Retry-After`.** Compute `delay = base * 2^attempt` with a base of 100-500ms, clamp it to a max (e.g. 30-60s), then sleep a uniform random value between 0 and that clamped cap - not the cap itself. Full jitter is what de-synchronizes many clients retrying the same downed service.\n4. **Bound the retries.** Cap both the attempt count (e.g. 5) and the total elapsed budget (e.g. 30-60s, and always below the caller's own timeout) so a request fails fast instead of hanging a caller for minutes. Surface the final failure to the caller; do not swallow it.\n5. **Throttle proactively with a token bucket.** Put a client-side limiter in front of the API sized to roughly 80% of the published quota - the headroom absorbs retries, clock skew, and other callers you forgot about - so bursts are smoothed and you stay under the limit by design rather than reacting to 429s. When many workers hit one upstream, back the bucket with a shared store (e.g. Redis) so the aggregate rate - not the per-process rate - stays bounded.\n6. **Make it observable.** Emit metrics for retry count, backoff duration, and 429 rate. A rising 429 rate is the early signal to lower concurrency or request a quota increase before users see errors; sustained 429s above ~1% of requests means the token bucket is mis-sized or missing.\n\n## Deliverable\n\nProduce the retry\u002Fthrottle layer (a wrapper, interceptor, or middleware around the upstream client) plus a short configuration summary stating: the retryable status set, base delay, cap, and jitter mode, the attempt and total-time budgets, the token-bucket rate and burst size relative to the published quota, whether the bucket is per-process or shared across the fleet, and the metrics emitted. The summary is what the next engineer tunes when the upstream changes its limits.\n\n## Quality bar\n\n- No fixed-delay or no-jitter retry loop survives - every backoff path applies jitter.\n- `Retry-After` always wins over computed backoff.\n- Every retry path is bounded by both attempt count and total time budget.\n- Non-idempotent operations are never retried without an idempotency key.\n- The 4xx set above is never retried.\n\n## Do NOT\n\n- Do NOT retry on 4xx client errors (except 429) - the request is malformed or unauthorized and will fail again.\n- Do NOT use fixed or cap-only backoff - synchronized clients recreate the thundering herd you are trying to avoid.\n- Do NOT retry forever or without a total-time budget.\n- Do NOT enforce per-process limits when a fleet shares one quota - the aggregate will still blow the limit.\n- Do NOT add the full backoff-plus-bucket stack to a single best-effort background call; let it fail and move on, and reserve the machinery for hot paths and high-volume integrations.\n",{"name":5,"metadata":24,"description":7},{"title":25},"Rate Limit Handler","main","97a13607d669157a4a16d5ba79b77f208319f7b9","skills\u002Frate-limit-handler",3,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSkillMedev\u002Fskills","https:\u002F\u002Fskillme.dev","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSkillMedev","MCP-native catalog of Claude Agent Skills. Browse, recommend, install, and auto-apply skills in chat. Open source, every skill free and clonable on GitHub.","2026-10-14 03:19:31",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":36,"prompt":46,"zipAvailable":47},[37,40,43],{"tool":38,"command":39},"npx","npx skills add SkillMedev\u002Fskills --skill rate-limit-handler",{"tool":41,"command":42},"bunx","bunx skills add SkillMedev\u002Fskills --skill rate-limit-handler",{"tool":44,"command":45},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add SkillMedev\u002Fskills --skill rate-limit-handler","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSkillMedev\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Frate-limit-handler\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[50,60,67,74,81,88],{"skillNo":51,"name":52,"nameZh":53,"description":54,"descriptionZh":55,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":56,"categories":57,"keywords":58,"publishedAt":59},"01M75271B256DF3FX2VG5VRYEE","zone-2-cardio-plan","有氧运动计划","Use when someone asks to build a steady-state cardio plan, train an aerobic base or Zone 2, structure easy or endurance weekly cardio, train by heart-rate zones, or improve resting heart rate, VO2, or endurance. Builds a heart-rate-zone aerobic training block with session structure, modality choice, and progression. General fitness guidance, not medical advice. Do NOT use to design a strength or lifting program (use Strength Training Plan), high-intensity interval conditioning, HIIT, or circuits (use Conditioning & HIIT Program), or a mobility\u002Fflexibility routine (use Mobility Routine).","当有人要求制定稳态有氧训练计划、进行有氧基础训练或达到第二区间、安排轻松或耐力型的每周有氧训练、按心率区间训练，或提高静息心率、最大摄氧量或耐力时，可以使用此方案。该方案构建了一个包含训练计划结构、训练方式选择和进度安排的心率区间有氧训练模块。本方案仅提供一般健身指导，不构成医疗建议。请勿用于设计力量或举重训练计划（请使用力量训练计划）、高强度间歇训练 (HIIT) 或循环训练（请使用体能训练和 HIIT 计划），或灵活性\u002F柔韧性训练（请使用灵活性训练计划）。","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSkillMedev\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fzone-2-cardio-plan\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],"2026-11-11 18:27:18",{"skillNo":61,"name":62,"nameZh":6,"description":63,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":64,"categories":65,"keywords":66,"publishedAt":59},"01M7526VP1QBBKYBE17S1WR86Y","youtube-script-writer","Writes retention-engineered long-form YouTube scripts on a hook\u002Fbody\u002Fpayoff architecture - a first-30-seconds hook that survives the retention cliff, a beat-sheet body with mini-hooks and bridges, timed pattern interrupts, and a payoff that over-delivers - with B-roll and editing cues marked inline. Use when someone says \"script my next video\", \"my retention graph dies at the start\", \"tighten this draft\", or \"outline a video on X\". Do NOT use for the 3-second opener of TikTok, Reels, or Shorts - use video-hook-writer instead; do NOT use for spoken voiceover synced to on-screen tutorial actions - use narration-script instead; do NOT use for a sales demo built on a buyer's discovery notes - use demo-script instead; do NOT use to design the thumbnail and title - use thumbnail-concept instead.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSkillMedev\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fyoutube-script-writer\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":68,"name":69,"nameZh":6,"description":70,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":71,"categories":72,"keywords":73,"publishedAt":59},"01M7526P2T0WKMHDXS4Q58237T","win-back-campaign","Designs segmented win-back email sequences for dormant users - dormancy tiers, a three-beat sequence with a single proportional incentive, and a suppression rule - and measures success by re-activation, not opens. Use when someone says \"our users went quiet\", \"design a win-back campaign\", \"how do I re-engage lapsed customers\", \"should we email people who haven't logged in for months\", or lifecycle messaging has stopped landing with a lapsed segment. Do NOT use for recovering an unfinished checkout - use abandoned-cart-sequence instead. Do NOT use for diagnosing and fixing why active customers cancel - use churn-reduction instead. Do NOT use for building always-on onboarding or nurture flows - use email-drip-builder instead.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSkillMedev\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fwin-back-campaign\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":75,"name":76,"nameZh":6,"description":77,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":78,"categories":79,"keywords":80,"publishedAt":59},"01M7526HF2RCDJ50P93WRZRHVV","wikipedia-style","Writes neutral, verifiable, encyclopedic prose following Wikipedia's core content policies and manual of style - NPOV, inline citations, notability-backed claims, and a strict ban on promotional language. Use when someone asks \"write this like a Wikipedia article\", \"draft a Wikipedia page for this company or person\", \"make this neutral and encyclopedic\", or \"why does my article draft keep getting rejected\". Do NOT use for persuasive or opinion writing - use op-ed-writer instead; for thesis-driven academic papers, use academic-essay; for verifying claims in existing text, use fact-checker.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSkillMedev\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fwikipedia-style\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":82,"name":83,"nameZh":6,"description":84,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":85,"categories":86,"keywords":87,"publishedAt":59},"01M7526D43CTGRKGKNQ2GB0KVX","whitepapers","Structures and writes authoritative B2B whitepapers - a standalone executive summary, a data-sized problem statement, methodology, evidence-driven findings, recommendations, and a soft call to action - flagging every claim that needs a real citation. Use when a marketer asks \"write a whitepaper on this topic\", \"turn our research into a lead-gen asset\", \"make this credible enough for executives\", or a draft reads like a product pitch instead of analysis. Do NOT use for customer-story-driven proof - use case-study-builder instead; for policy audiences, use policy-brief.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSkillMedev\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fwhitepapers\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":89,"name":90,"nameZh":6,"description":91,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":92,"categories":93,"keywords":94,"publishedAt":59},"01M75268423Y3K50SY5WC2NX2G","white-space-analysis","Finds unmet market gaps by ranking jobs-to-be-done on importance versus satisfaction, overlaying them against current solutions and workarounds, and validating that each gap is real, winnable, and worth winning. Use when someone asks \"where are the gaps in this market\", \"what's underserved here\", \"where should we play next\", or is hunting for product, feature, or market-entry opportunities. Do NOT use for profiling competitors and building battle cards - use competitive-intelligence instead; for putting a dollar figure on an identified opportunity - use market-sizing instead; for extracting jobs-to-be-done from raw customer interviews - use jtbd-extractor instead.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSkillMedev\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fwhite-space-analysis\u002FSKILL.md",[],[]]