AGENT SKILL

donor-communications

Builds a small nonprofit's individual-donor communication system - segmenting donors into major, recurring, first-time, and lapsed with different treatment for each, thanking within 48 hours of every gift, structuring impact stories around one beneficiary with the donor as hero, writing appeal letters, and holding a 3:1 impact-to-ask calendar ratio. Use when a nonprofit leader says "our donors are lapsing", "write our year-end appeal", "how often should we email donors", "write a thank-you letter for a major gift", or "we only contact donors when we ask for money". Do NOT use for winning back lapsed donors with a full re-engagement sequence - use win-back-campaign for the sequencing mechanics - and do NOT use for foundation funder communications - use grant-loi-writer instead.

License 许可
MIT
所属仓库
SkillMedev/skills
最近更新
2026-10-14
Stars
★ 25
Forks
3

01 前言 Front Matter

name
donor-communications
description
Builds a small nonprofit's individual-donor communication system - segmenting donors into major, recurring, first-time, and lapsed with different treatment for each, thanking within 48 hours of every gift, structuring impact stories around one beneficiary with the donor as hero, writing appeal letters, and holding a 3:1 impact-to-ask calendar ratio. Use when a nonprofit leader says "our donors are lapsing", "write our year-end appeal", "how often should we email donors", "write a thank-you letter for a major gift", or "we only contact donors when we ask for money". Do NOT use for winning back lapsed donors with a full re-engagement sequence - use win-back-campaign for the sequencing mechanics - and do NOT use for foundation funder communications - use grant-loi-writer instead.

03 SKILL.md 正文

Donor Communications

Most small nonprofits contact individual donors only when they want money, and then wonder why second gifts never come - when the sector-wide reality is that fewer than half of first-time donors ever give again, and the cheapest revenue any nonprofit has is a retained donor. This skill builds the communication system that keeps donors giving: segmentation, fast gratitude, impact stories, disciplined appeals, and a calendar that earns the right to ask.

Work the example organization throughout: Bright Futures Tutoring, a youth-education nonprofit with a $420,000 annual budget, 3 staff, serving 250 students. Individual donors provide roughly $120,000 of the budget alongside the grant pipeline (see grant-prospect-researcher). Its outcome numbers are the canonical ones from the pack's logic model: 72 percent of students gained a grade level in reading last year - the same figure impact-report-builder publishes.

Operating procedure

Step 1: Segment the donor file

Four segments, four treatments. Sort every donor into exactly one:

  • Major: the top of the file - for an organization Bright Futures' size, gifts of $1,000+ or the top 10 percent of donors. Treatment: personal. Handwritten or personally signed thanks, a phone call from the ED for gifts at this level, one-to-one updates, invited to see the program in person.
  • Recurring: monthly or committed annual givers. Treatment: protect the relationship - never resolicit them in general appeals as if their gift were invisible; send an annual "your $25/month did this" cumulative-impact note.
  • First-time: gave once, within the last 12 months. The riskiest segment. Treatment: a distinct welcome path - thank-you, then a no-ask impact story within 30 days, before any second appeal.
  • Lapsed: no gift in 13+ months (13, not 12, so annual givers on a yearly rhythm are not prematurely flagged). Treatment: a "we miss you" message pairing their last gift's impact with one concrete update. For the full multi-touch re-engagement sequence - timing, channel order, escalating offers - route to win-back-campaign; this skill defines who is lapsed and what the message says, win-back-campaign runs the mechanics.

Step 2: Install the thank-before-you-bank rule

Gratitude within 48 hours of every gift, before the deposit is even processed if possible. The thank-you is the single highest-leverage communication in fundraising: prompt, specific thanks measurably outperforms slow, generic receipts for retention. Requirements: sent within 48 hours; names what the gift does in program terms ("$150 funds a semester of small-group tutoring for one student"); contains no ask and no "while we have your attention" postscript; signed by a person, not "The Team." The IRS receipt language can ride along, but the letter is a thank-you that contains a receipt, not a receipt pretending to be a thank-you.

Step 3: Build impact stories with the donor as hero

Structure, in order: one beneficiary (a single named-with-permission or anonymized student - one, because a reader can care about Maya but not about "250 students"); concrete change (Maya went from two grade levels behind to reading at grade level, one specific before/after, drawn from the same outcomes the logic model reports); donor-as-hero framing (the donor's gift made it possible - "you put a tutor across the table from Maya twice a week," not "our innovative program achieved"). The organization is the guide; the donor is the protagonist. Close with the aggregate line for scale: "Maya is one of 250 students - and 72 percent of them gained at least a grade level in reading this year."

Step 4: Write appeals with the standard anatomy

Appeal-letter anatomy, in order: (1) open with a story or a jolting local fact - never "Dear Friend, as the year draws to a close"; (2) the problem, local and concrete; (3) what the organization does about it, with the headline outcome; (4) the specific ask - a dollar amount tied to a unit of impact ("$150 = a semester of tutoring for one student; $600 = a full year"), because untied round numbers depress response; (5) urgency that is real (a match deadline, a program-year start), never manufactured; (6) a P.S. that restates ask and deadline - it is the second-most-read line of any letter. Segment the ask amounts: anchor each donor at or slightly above their last gift, never below it.

Step 5: Build the communication calendar on the 3:1 ratio

The ratio, defined here for the pack: at least three impact touches for every one ask. A touch is anything that gives (story, outcome update, event invite, thank-you); an ask is anything that requests money. Bright Futures' year at roughly monthly cadence: 2-3 appeals (year-end, spring, optionally a fall match) and 8-9 impact touches - program-launch update, mid-year story, the annual report from impact-report-builder, a back-to-school note, a "you did this" video, family-night photos, and the thank-yous riding on every gift. Year-end matters disproportionately: a large share of individual giving lands in November-December, so the calendar protects that window with impact touches in October and the appeal in late November.

Inputs to collect

Donor file with gift dates and amounts (a spreadsheet is fine at this scale), current retention rate if known (label a guess as a guess; if unknown, assume the sector-typical 40-45 percent overall and worse for first-timers), the canonical outcome numbers (from the logic model - do not restate them differently here), one strong beneficiary story with permission status, and staff hours available per month for donor work.

Worked artifact: segment treatment grid

DONOR SEGMENTS - Bright Futures Tutoring ($120k individual revenue)

Segment     Definition           Thank-you           Cadence & treatment
Major       $1,000+ or top 10%   ED phone call +     Personal updates; site visit
                                 personal letter,    invite; asked personally,
                                 48h                 not by mail appeal
Recurring   Monthly/committed    Auto-receipt +      Annual cumulative-impact
            annual               personal note, 48h  note; excluded from general
                                                     resolicitation
First-time  1 gift, <12 mo       Letter naming what  No-ask impact story within
                                 the gift buys, 48h  30 days, BEFORE any 2nd ask
Lapsed      No gift 13+ mo       n/a                 "We miss you" + last-gift
                                                     impact; then hand sequence
                                                     mechanics to win-back-campaign

Calendar rule: 3+ impact touches per 1 ask, per segment, per year.

Good/bad thank-you contrast - Bad: "Thank you for your generous donation. Your support helps us fulfill our mission." Good: "Your $150 gift puts a tutor across the table from one student, twice a week, for an entire semester. Last year 72 percent of those students gained at least a grade level in reading. That's what you just did." Specific unit of impact, real outcome number, donor as actor.

Deliverable

A segmented donor grid with treatment rules, a 48-hour thank-you template per segment, one donor-as-hero impact story, one appeal letter following the anatomy, and a 12-month communication calendar that visibly holds the 3:1 ratio.

Do NOT

  • Do not send the same message to all segments; a major donor treated like a mailing-list entry becomes a lapsed major donor.
  • Do not let a thank-you carry an ask; gratitude with a price tag reads as neither.
  • Do not tell aggregate stories ("we served 250 students") when one beneficiary is available; scale belongs in the closing line, not the lede.
  • Do not make the organization the hero of its own appeal; the donor funds the story, so the donor stars in it.
  • Do not invert the 3:1 ratio under revenue pressure - over-asking is how files burn out, and rebuilding a burned file costs more than the appeals raised.
  • Do not use outcome numbers that differ from impact-report-builder's; a donor who reads both notices.

Quality bar

  • Every donor sits in exactly one segment with a defined treatment.
  • Thank-you turnaround is 48 hours and the letter names a unit of impact.
  • Every story has one beneficiary, one concrete change, donor-as-hero verbs.
  • The calendar shows the 3:1 ratio holding for every segment.
  • Outcome figures match the logic model in grant-proposal-writer and the report in impact-report-builder exactly.

Escalation

Lapsed-donor sequence mechanics go to win-back-campaign. The annual report the calendar promises comes from impact-report-builder. Individual-giving totals and retention feed the fundraising dashboard in nonprofit-board-pack. For gift-acceptance questions with tax or legal weight (stock gifts, bequests, donor-advised-fund rules), consult a nonprofit attorney or CPA; this skill is not tax advice.

04 同仓库更多 Skills

SkillMedev
SkillMedev/skills

zone-2-cardio-plan

Use when someone asks to build a steady-state cardio plan, train an aerobic base or Zone 2, structure easy or endurance weekly cardio, train by heart-rate zones, or improve resting heart rate, VO2, or endurance. Builds a heart-rate-zone aerobic training block with session structure, modality choice, and progression. General fitness guidance, not medical advice. Do NOT use to design a strength or lifting program (use Strength Training Plan), high-intensity interval conditioning, HIIT, or circuits (use Conditioning & HIIT Program), or a mobility/flexibility routine (use Mobility Routine).

★ 25
SkillMedev
SkillMedev/skills

youtube-script-writer

Writes retention-engineered long-form YouTube scripts on a hook/body/payoff architecture - a first-30-seconds hook that survives the retention cliff, a beat-sheet body with mini-hooks and bridges, timed pattern interrupts, and a payoff that over-delivers - with B-roll and editing cues marked inline. Use when someone says "script my next video", "my retention graph dies at the start", "tighten this draft", or "outline a video on X". Do NOT use for the 3-second opener of TikTok, Reels, or Shorts - use video-hook-writer instead; do NOT use for spoken voiceover synced to on-screen tutorial actions - use narration-script instead; do NOT use for a sales demo built on a buyer's discovery notes - use demo-script instead; do NOT use to design the thumbnail and title - use thumbnail-concept instead.

★ 25
SkillMedev
SkillMedev/skills

win-back-campaign

Designs segmented win-back email sequences for dormant users - dormancy tiers, a three-beat sequence with a single proportional incentive, and a suppression rule - and measures success by re-activation, not opens. Use when someone says "our users went quiet", "design a win-back campaign", "how do I re-engage lapsed customers", "should we email people who haven't logged in for months", or lifecycle messaging has stopped landing with a lapsed segment. Do NOT use for recovering an unfinished checkout - use abandoned-cart-sequence instead. Do NOT use for diagnosing and fixing why active customers cancel - use churn-reduction instead. Do NOT use for building always-on onboarding or nurture flows - use email-drip-builder instead.

★ 25
SkillMedev
SkillMedev/skills

wikipedia-style

Writes neutral, verifiable, encyclopedic prose following Wikipedia's core content policies and manual of style - NPOV, inline citations, notability-backed claims, and a strict ban on promotional language. Use when someone asks "write this like a Wikipedia article", "draft a Wikipedia page for this company or person", "make this neutral and encyclopedic", or "why does my article draft keep getting rejected". Do NOT use for persuasive or opinion writing - use op-ed-writer instead; for thesis-driven academic papers, use academic-essay; for verifying claims in existing text, use fact-checker.

★ 25
SkillMedev
SkillMedev/skills

whitepapers

Structures and writes authoritative B2B whitepapers - a standalone executive summary, a data-sized problem statement, methodology, evidence-driven findings, recommendations, and a soft call to action - flagging every claim that needs a real citation. Use when a marketer asks "write a whitepaper on this topic", "turn our research into a lead-gen asset", "make this credible enough for executives", or a draft reads like a product pitch instead of analysis. Do NOT use for customer-story-driven proof - use case-study-builder instead; for policy audiences, use policy-brief.

★ 25
SkillMedev
SkillMedev/skills

white-space-analysis

Finds unmet market gaps by ranking jobs-to-be-done on importance versus satisfaction, overlaying them against current solutions and workarounds, and validating that each gap is real, winnable, and worth winning. Use when someone asks "where are the gaps in this market", "what's underserved here", "where should we play next", or is hunting for product, feature, or market-entry opportunities. Do NOT use for profiling competitors and building battle cards - use competitive-intelligence instead; for putting a dollar figure on an identified opportunity - use market-sizing instead; for extracting jobs-to-be-done from raw customer interviews - use jtbd-extractor instead.

★ 25