AGENT SKILL

testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures

Test and validate ransomware recovery procedures including backup restore operations, RTO/RPO target verification, recovery sequencing, and clean restore validation to ensure organizational resilience against destructive ransomware attacks.

License 许可
Apache-2.0
最近更新
2026-11-11
Stars
★ 13
Forks
1

01 前言 Front Matter

name
testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures
tags
[ "incident-response", "ransomware", "disaster-recovery", "backup", "rto", "rpo", "resilience" ]
author
mahipal
domain
cybersecurity
source
https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
license
Apache-2.0
version
1.0
nist_csf
[ "RS.MA-01", "RS.MA-02", "RS.AN-03", "RC.RP-01" ]
subdomain
incident-response
description
Test and validate ransomware recovery procedures including backup restore operations, RTO/RPO target verification, recovery sequencing, and clean restore validation to ensure organizational resilience against destructive ransomware attacks.
mitre_attack
[ "T1486", "T1490", "T1070", "T1078", "T1489" ]
source_commit
04450304b12645cb2b974ab96d28c0664758a88d

02 资源文件 3

03 SKILL.md 正文

Testing Ransomware Recovery Procedures

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Validating that ransomware recovery plans actually work under realistic conditions
  • Measuring RTO (Recovery Time Objective) and RPO (Recovery Point Objective) against business requirements
  • Testing backup restore operations to confirm data integrity and completeness after simulated encryption
  • Conducting tabletop exercises or live recovery drills for ransomware scenarios
  • Auditing disaster recovery readiness as part of compliance or cyber insurance requirements

Do not use for active incident response during a live ransomware attack. Use dedicated IR playbooks instead.

Prerequisites

  • Isolated recovery test environment (air-gapped or network-segmented lab)
  • Access to backup infrastructure (Veeam, Commvault, Rubrik, AWS Backup, Azure Backup)
  • Documented RTO/RPO targets per application tier from business impact analysis
  • Backup copies available for restore testing (production replicas or test snapshots)
  • Recovery runbooks with step-by-step procedures for each critical system

Workflow

Step 1: Define Recovery Test Scope

Identify critical systems and their tiered recovery targets:

Tier System Type RTO Target RPO Target Example
Tier 1 Mission-critical < 1 hour < 15 min Active Directory, core database
Tier 2 Business-critical < 4 hours < 1 hour ERP, email, CRM
Tier 3 Business-operational < 24 hours < 4 hours File shares, internal apps
Tier 4 Non-critical < 72 hours < 24 hours Dev/test, analytics

Step 2: Prepare Test Environment

# Verify isolated recovery network is segmented
# No routes to production should exist
ip route show | grep -v "192.168.100.0/24"  # recovery VLAN only

# Verify backup catalog is accessible
restic snapshots --repo s3:s3.amazonaws.com/backup-bucket --password-file /etc/restic/pw
# Or for Veeam:
# Get-VBRBackup | Where-Object {$_.JobType -eq "Backup"} | Select Name, LastPointCreationTime

Step 3: Execute Restore and Measure RTO

For each tiered system, measure the full recovery timeline:

  1. Detection to Decision - Time from simulated alert to restore decision
  2. Backup Locate - Time to identify and select the correct clean restore point
  3. Restore Execution - Time to restore data/VM/application from backup
  4. Validation - Time to verify data integrity and application functionality
  5. Service Restoration - Time until the system is fully operational
Recovery Timeline Measurement:
  T0: Incident declared (simulated ransomware detection)
  T1: Recovery team assembled and backup identified
  T2: Restore initiated from clean backup
  T3: Restore completed, integrity checks passed
  T4: Application validated and service restored

  Actual RTO = T4 - T0
  Actual RPO = T0 - backup_timestamp

Step 4: Validate Data Integrity Post-Restore

# Compare file counts between backup manifest and restored data
find /restored/data -type f | wc -l
# Compare against pre-backup manifest

# Verify database consistency after restore
pg_isready -h localhost -p 5432
psql -c "SELECT count(*) FROM critical_table;" -d restored_db

# Hash verification of critical files
sha256sum /restored/data/critical_config.xml
# Compare against known-good hash from backup manifest

Step 5: Test Credential Rotation and Security Hardening

After restore, validate that security controls are re-established:

  1. Rotate all service account passwords and API keys
  2. Verify MFA is enabled on all administrative accounts
  3. Confirm EDR/AV agents are running and reporting to management console
  4. Validate firewall rules block known C2 indicators
  5. Check that restored systems have latest security patches

Step 6: Document Results and Calculate Gap

Recovery Test Report:
  System: [Name]
  Tier: [1-4]
  RTO Target: [target]    Actual RTO: [measured]    Gap: [delta]
  RPO Target: [target]    Actual RPO: [measured]    Gap: [delta]
  Data Integrity: [PASS/FAIL]
  Application Validation: [PASS/FAIL]
  Security Controls Restored: [PASS/FAIL]

  Status: [MEETS TARGET / EXCEEDS TARGET / FAILS TARGET]
  Remediation Required: [description if FAILS]

Key Concepts

Term Definition
RTO Recovery Time Objective: maximum acceptable downtime for a system after a disaster
RPO Recovery Point Objective: maximum acceptable data loss measured in time
WRT Work Recovery Time: time to verify system integrity after restore completes
MTD Maximum Tolerable Downtime: absolute limit before unacceptable business impact
Clean Restore Point A backup verified to be free of ransomware artifacts or encryption
Recovery Sequencing The order in which interdependent systems must be restored
Air-Gapped Backup Backup stored on media physically disconnected from the network

Tools & Systems

Tool Purpose
Veeam Backup & Replication VM and physical server backup and restore
Commvault Enterprise data protection and recovery orchestration
Rubrik Cloud-native backup with ransomware recovery SLA
AWS Backup Centralized backup for AWS services
Azure Backup Microsoft cloud backup with immutable vault
Restic Open-source encrypted backup tool
Velero Kubernetes cluster backup and restore

Common Pitfalls

  • Not testing restores regularly: Backups that are never tested often fail when needed. Test quarterly at minimum.
  • Ignoring recovery sequencing: Restoring an application before its database dependency causes cascading failures.
  • Skipping credential rotation: Restored systems may contain compromised credentials that allow re-infection.
  • Using production network for testing: Recovery tests on production networks risk spreading simulated or real infections.
  • Measuring RTO without WRT: Restore completion is not recovery completion. Include validation and hardening time.
  • No immutable backups: If ransomware can encrypt or delete backups, recovery is impossible. Use air-gapped or immutable storage.

References

04 同仓库更多 Skills

Horonomos-laps
Horonomos-laps/Yana-AI

openai--sentry--sentry

Use when the user asks to inspect Sentry issues or events, summarize recent production errors, or pull basic Sentry health data via the Sentry API; perform read-only queries with the bundled script and require `SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN`.

★ 13
Horonomos-laps
Horonomos-laps/Yana-AI

ito-basket-compare

Compare Itô prediction-market baskets against a user's knowledge base, portfolio notes, financial context, watchlist, or research thesis. Use for read-only basket comparison and gap analysis without investment advice or live trading.

★ 13
Horonomos-laps
Horonomos-laps/Yana-AI

implementing-network-traffic-baselining

Build network traffic baselines from NetFlow/IPFIX data using Python pandas for statistical analysis, z-score anomaly detection, and hourly/daily traffic pattern profiling

★ 13
Horonomos-laps
Horonomos-laps/Yana-AI

detecting-evasion-techniques-in-endpoint-logs

Detects defense evasion techniques used by adversaries in endpoint logs including log tampering, timestomping, process injection, and security tool disabling. Use when investigating suspicious endpoint behavior, building detection rules for evasion tactics, or conducting threat hunting for stealthy adversary activity. Activates for requests involving evasion detection, defense evasion analysis, log tampering detection, or MITRE ATT&CK TA0005.

★ 13
Horonomos-laps
Horonomos-laps/Yana-AI

implementing-microsegmentation-with-guardicore

Implementing microsegmentation using Akamai Guardicore Segmentation to map application dependencies, create granular network policies, visualize east-west traffic flows, and enforce least-privilege communication between workloads across data centers and cloud.

★ 13
Horonomos-laps
Horonomos-laps/Yana-AI

ramdisk-tmpfs-patterns

暂无简介

★ 13