[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M7383Q7ZKZBAPGAZFMGCFECT":3,"skill-same:01M7383Q7ZKZBAPGAZFMGCFECT":49},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":15,"categories":16,"keywords":17,"publishedAt":18,"linkOnly":19,"markdownContent":20,"markdownBody":21,"frontMatter":22,"refName":27,"commitSha":28,"skillDirectory":29,"forksCount":30,"repositoryHtmlUrl":31,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":32,"ownerBlogUrl":33,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":34,"install":35,"resources":48},"01M7383Q7ZKZBAPGAZFMGCFECT","deal-risk-scoring",null,"Assess deal health and identify at-risk opportunities using engagement signals, stakeholder mapping, and velocity analysis","roohe\u002Fagentic-super-skills","roohe","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F99054084?v=4","01M734WCDFP6RZVT5CNM00QR26","01M734WCE4BD0T4NZS5PCV9V5F",10,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Froohe\u002Fagentic-super-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills_library\u002Fdeal-risk-scoring\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],"2026-11-11 15:11:14",false,"---\nname: deal-risk-scoring\ndescription: Assess deal health and identify at-risk opportunities using engagement signals, stakeholder mapping, and velocity analysis\nlicense: MIT\nmetadata:\n  author: ClawFu\n  version: 1.0.0\n  mcp-server: \"@clawfu\u002Fmcp-skills\"\n---\n\n# Deal Risk Scoring\n\n> Evaluate individual deal health through multi-signal analysis to prioritize coaching, intervention, and resource allocation.\n\n## When to Use This Skill\n\n- Weekly deal reviews and pipeline scrubs\n- Before QBRs to identify problem deals\n- When deals stall or push close dates\n- Prioritizing manager coaching time\n- Allocating SE\u002Fexecutive resources\n\n## Methodology Foundation\n\nBased on **Gong's Deal Intelligence research** and **Winning by Design's Revenue Architecture**, analyzing:\n- Engagement velocity (email, meeting frequency)\n- Stakeholder breadth (multi-threading)\n- Competitive signals\n- Timeline alignment\n- Champion strength\n\n## What Claude Does vs What You Decide\n\n| Claude Does | You Decide |\n|-------------|------------|\n| Scores deals on risk factors | Which deals to save vs. let go |\n| Identifies missing elements | Resource allocation priorities |\n| Suggests intervention actions | Executive sponsor assignments |\n| Tracks velocity trends | Final stage\u002Fprobability updates |\n| Flags competitive threats | Win strategy adjustments |\n\n## What This Skill Does\n\n1. **Multi-signal analysis** - Engagement, stakeholders, timeline, competition\n2. **Risk scoring** - Green\u002FYellow\u002FRed health status with reasons\n3. **Gap identification** - Missing stakeholders, stalled stages, unclear next steps\n4. **Action recommendations** - Specific interventions to reduce risk\n5. **Trend tracking** - Velocity changes over time\n\n## How to Use\n\n```\nAssess the risk for this deal:\n\nDeal: [Company Name]\nValue: $X\nStage: [Current Stage]\nClose Date: [Target Date]\nDays in Stage: X\n\nRecent Activity:\n- [List emails, meetings, calls with dates]\n\nStakeholders:\n- [Name, Title, Role in deal, Engagement level]\n\nCompetition: [Known competitors]\nChampion: [Name and strength assessment]\n```\n\n## Instructions\n\n### Step 1: Engagement Velocity Score (0-25 points)\n\n| Criteria | Points |\n|----------|--------|\n| Meeting in last 7 days | +10 |\n| Email response in last 3 days | +5 |\n| Multiple contacts engaged | +5 |\n| Prospect initiating contact | +5 |\n| No activity 14+ days | -15 |\n\n### Step 2: Stakeholder Coverage Score (0-25 points)\n\n| Criteria | Points |\n|----------|--------|\n| Economic Buyer identified | +10 |\n| Champion confirmed | +10 |\n| Technical evaluator engaged | +5 |\n| Only 1 contact | -10 |\n| No C-level access | -5 |\n\n### Step 3: Process Alignment Score (0-25 points)\n\n| Criteria | Points |\n|----------|--------|\n| Clear next step scheduled | +10 |\n| Mutual action plan agreed | +10 |\n| Decision timeline confirmed | +5 |\n| Close date pushed 2+ times | -15 |\n| No defined process | -10 |\n\n### Step 4: Competitive Position Score (0-25 points)\n\n| Criteria | Points |\n|----------|--------|\n| No competition | +15 |\n| Differentiation clear | +10 |\n| Incumbent advantage | -10 |\n| Price pressure | -5 |\n| Unknown competitive status | -5 |\n\n### Step 5: Calculate Total Risk Score\n\n| Score | Health | Action |\n|-------|--------|--------|\n| 75-100 | 🟢 Green | Monitor, standard process |\n| 50-74 | 🟡 Yellow | Intervention needed |\n| 25-49 | 🟠 Orange | Escalate, major action |\n| 0-24 | 🔴 Red | Rescue or disqualify |\n\n## Examples\n\n### Example 1: At-Risk Enterprise Deal\n\n**Input:**\n```\nDeal: TechCorp Global\nValue: $250K ARR\nStage: 3 - Proposal\nClose Date: Feb 28 (pushed from Jan 31)\nDays in Stage: 28\n\nRecent Activity:\n- Jan 15: Proposal sent to John (Dir of Ops)\n- Jan 22: Follow-up email (no response)\n- Jan 29: Called, voicemail\n- Feb 5: Email asking for update (no response)\n\nStakeholders:\n- John Smith, Director of Ops, Champion (was engaged)\n- No other contacts\n\nCompetition: Competitor X mentioned in discovery\nChampion: John - went silent\n```\n\n**Output:**\n```\n## Deal Risk Assessment: TechCorp Global\n\n### Overall Score: 28\u002F100 🔴 RED - HIGH RISK\n\n### Score Breakdown\n\n| Factor | Score | Issues |\n|--------|-------|--------|\n| Engagement | 0\u002F25 | No response in 14+ days |\n| Stakeholders | 5\u002F25 | Single-threaded, no EB |\n| Process | 5\u002F25 | Pushed once, no clear next step |\n| Competition | 18\u002F25 | Competitor known but not blocking |\n| **Total** | **28\u002F100** | |\n\n### Critical Risks\n\n1. **🔴 Champion Gone Dark** - John hasn't responded in 14 days\n   - Possible: Left company, lost internal support, chose competitor\n\n2. **🔴 Single-Threaded** - No other relationships\n   - If John is out, deal is dead\n\n3. **🟠 No Economic Buyer** - Never met decision maker\n   - John may not have authority to close\n\n### Recommended Actions\n\n**This Week:**\n1. Research John on LinkedIn - still at company?\n2. Find another contact via LinkedIn\u002Freferral\n3. Send \"breakup email\" to force response\n4. Check if Competitor X is in active eval\n\n**If No Response by Friday:**\n- Move to Stage 2 or Closed-Lost\n- Free up forecast slot\n\n### Red Flags to Watch\n- If proposal was forwarded to competitor\n- If budget was reallocated\n- If project was deprioritized\n\n### Save Probability: 25%\nWithout new contact access, this deal is likely lost.\n```\n\n### Example 2: Healthy Deal Review\n\n**Input:**\n```\nDeal: GrowthCo Inc\nValue: $85K ARR\nStage: 4 - Negotiation\nClose Date: Feb 15\nDays in Stage: 7\n\nRecent Activity:\n- Feb 1: Demo to full team (8 attendees)\n- Feb 3: Pricing discussion with CFO\n- Feb 5: Legal reviewing MSA\n- Feb 7: Call scheduled for Feb 10\n\nStakeholders:\n- Maria Lopez, VP Sales (Champion, highly engaged)\n- Tom Chen, CFO (Economic Buyer, positive)\n- Legal team (reviewing contract)\n- 8 end users attended demo\n\nCompetition: None identified\nChampion: Maria - actively selling internally\n```\n\n**Output:**\n```\n## Deal Risk Assessment: GrowthCo Inc\n\n### Overall Score: 88\u002F100 🟢 GREEN - HEALTHY\n\n### Score Breakdown\n\n| Factor | Score | Status |\n|--------|-------|--------|\n| Engagement | 25\u002F25 | Daily activity, prospect-driven |\n| Stakeholders | 23\u002F25 | EB + Champion + Users confirmed |\n| Process | 22\u002F25 | Clear timeline, legal in motion |\n| Competition | 18\u002F25 | No competition identified |\n| **Total** | **88\u002F100** | |\n\n### Strengths\n\n1. **✅ Multi-threaded** - Champion, EB, and end users engaged\n2. **✅ Process momentum** - Legal reviewing = serious intent\n3. **✅ Executive access** - CFO in pricing discussions\n4. **✅ Champion active** - Maria driving internally\n\n### Minor Risks\n\n1. **🟡 Legal review** - Could surface unexpected blockers\n   - Mitigation: Pre-review common redlines\n\n2. **🟡 No competition confirmed** - May be unknown\n   - Mitigation: Ask directly in next call\n\n### Recommended Actions\n\n**Feb 10 Call Prep:**\n1. Prepare redline responses for common legal issues\n2. Confirm decision process post-legal\n3. Ask: \"Is anyone else in consideration?\"\n4. Get verbal commit from Maria\n\n### Close Probability: 85%\nDeal is on track. Focus on removing legal friction.\n```\n\n## Skill Boundaries\n\n### What This Skill Does Well\n- Objective risk scoring from available data\n- Identifying gaps in deal coverage\n- Prioritizing which deals need attention\n- Suggesting specific interventions\n\n### What This Skill Cannot Do\n- Know information not provided (internal politics)\n- Predict competitor moves\n- Replace relationship judgment\n- Guarantee score accuracy with incomplete data\n\n### When to Escalate to Human\n- Strategic accounts requiring executive judgment\n- Deals involving partnerships or M&A\n- Unusual contract structures\n- Competitive intelligence gathering\n\n## Iteration Guide\n\n### Follow-up Prompts\n- \"What's the single most important action for this deal?\"\n- \"Compare risk scores for my top 5 deals.\"\n- \"What questions should I ask in the next meeting?\"\n- \"Draft a re-engagement email for the silent champion.\"\n\n### Refinement Cycle\n1. Initial assessment → Identify top risks\n2. Take action → Update activity log\n3. Re-score → Track improvement\n4. Weekly review → Trend analysis\n\n## Checklists & Templates\n\n### Deal Health Checklist\n- [ ] Champion identified and engaged this week\n- [ ] Economic Buyer met at least once\n- [ ] Next step scheduled within 7 days\n- [ ] Competition status known\n- [ ] Close date validated by prospect\n\n### Risk Score Template\n```markdown\n## Deal: [Name] | Score: X\u002F100 [Status Emoji]\n\n### Quick Stats\n- Value: $X | Stage: X | Days: X | Close: [Date]\n\n### Scores\n| Factor | Score | Key Issue |\n|--------|-------|-----------|\n| Engagement | \u002F25 | |\n| Stakeholders | \u002F25 | |\n| Process | \u002F25 | |\n| Competition | \u002F25 | |\n\n### Top 3 Actions\n1.\n2.\n3.\n```\n\n## References\n\n- Gong Deal Intelligence Research\n- Winning by Design Revenue Architecture\n- MEDDPICC Qualification Framework\n- Force Management Command of the Message\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- `pipeline-forecasting` - Aggregate deal health into forecast\n- `lead-qualification-meddic` - Deep qualification framework\n- `account-health` - Post-sale relationship scoring\n\n## Skill Metadata\n\n- **Domain**: RevOps\n- **Complexity**: Intermediate\n- **Mode**: centaur\n- **Time to Value**: 10 minutes per deal\n- **Prerequisites**: Deal details, activity history, stakeholder map\n","# Deal Risk Scoring\n\n> Evaluate individual deal health through multi-signal analysis to prioritize coaching, intervention, and resource allocation.\n\n## When to Use This Skill\n\n- Weekly deal reviews and pipeline scrubs\n- Before QBRs to identify problem deals\n- When deals stall or push close dates\n- Prioritizing manager coaching time\n- Allocating SE\u002Fexecutive resources\n\n## Methodology Foundation\n\nBased on **Gong's Deal Intelligence research** and **Winning by Design's Revenue Architecture**, analyzing:\n- Engagement velocity (email, meeting frequency)\n- Stakeholder breadth (multi-threading)\n- Competitive signals\n- Timeline alignment\n- Champion strength\n\n## What Claude Does vs What You Decide\n\n| Claude Does | You Decide |\n|-------------|------------|\n| Scores deals on risk factors | Which deals to save vs. let go |\n| Identifies missing elements | Resource allocation priorities |\n| Suggests intervention actions | Executive sponsor assignments |\n| Tracks velocity trends | Final stage\u002Fprobability updates |\n| Flags competitive threats | Win strategy adjustments |\n\n## What This Skill Does\n\n1. **Multi-signal analysis** - Engagement, stakeholders, timeline, competition\n2. **Risk scoring** - Green\u002FYellow\u002FRed health status with reasons\n3. **Gap identification** - Missing stakeholders, stalled stages, unclear next steps\n4. **Action recommendations** - Specific interventions to reduce risk\n5. **Trend tracking** - Velocity changes over time\n\n## How to Use\n\n```\nAssess the risk for this deal:\n\nDeal: [Company Name]\nValue: $X\nStage: [Current Stage]\nClose Date: [Target Date]\nDays in Stage: X\n\nRecent Activity:\n- [List emails, meetings, calls with dates]\n\nStakeholders:\n- [Name, Title, Role in deal, Engagement level]\n\nCompetition: [Known competitors]\nChampion: [Name and strength assessment]\n```\n\n## Instructions\n\n### Step 1: Engagement Velocity Score (0-25 points)\n\n| Criteria | Points |\n|----------|--------|\n| Meeting in last 7 days | +10 |\n| Email response in last 3 days | +5 |\n| Multiple contacts engaged | +5 |\n| Prospect initiating contact | +5 |\n| No activity 14+ days | -15 |\n\n### Step 2: Stakeholder Coverage Score (0-25 points)\n\n| Criteria | Points |\n|----------|--------|\n| Economic Buyer identified | +10 |\n| Champion confirmed | +10 |\n| Technical evaluator engaged | +5 |\n| Only 1 contact | -10 |\n| No C-level access | -5 |\n\n### Step 3: Process Alignment Score (0-25 points)\n\n| Criteria | Points |\n|----------|--------|\n| Clear next step scheduled | +10 |\n| Mutual action plan agreed | +10 |\n| Decision timeline confirmed | +5 |\n| Close date pushed 2+ times | -15 |\n| No defined process | -10 |\n\n### Step 4: Competitive Position Score (0-25 points)\n\n| Criteria | Points |\n|----------|--------|\n| No competition | +15 |\n| Differentiation clear | +10 |\n| Incumbent advantage | -10 |\n| Price pressure | -5 |\n| Unknown competitive status | -5 |\n\n### Step 5: Calculate Total Risk Score\n\n| Score | Health | Action |\n|-------|--------|--------|\n| 75-100 | 🟢 Green | Monitor, standard process |\n| 50-74 | 🟡 Yellow | Intervention needed |\n| 25-49 | 🟠 Orange | Escalate, major action |\n| 0-24 | 🔴 Red | Rescue or disqualify |\n\n## Examples\n\n### Example 1: At-Risk Enterprise Deal\n\n**Input:**\n```\nDeal: TechCorp Global\nValue: $250K ARR\nStage: 3 - Proposal\nClose Date: Feb 28 (pushed from Jan 31)\nDays in Stage: 28\n\nRecent Activity:\n- Jan 15: Proposal sent to John (Dir of Ops)\n- Jan 22: Follow-up email (no response)\n- Jan 29: Called, voicemail\n- Feb 5: Email asking for update (no response)\n\nStakeholders:\n- John Smith, Director of Ops, Champion (was engaged)\n- No other contacts\n\nCompetition: Competitor X mentioned in discovery\nChampion: John - went silent\n```\n\n**Output:**\n```\n## Deal Risk Assessment: TechCorp Global\n\n### Overall Score: 28\u002F100 🔴 RED - HIGH RISK\n\n### Score Breakdown\n\n| Factor | Score | Issues |\n|--------|-------|--------|\n| Engagement | 0\u002F25 | No response in 14+ days |\n| Stakeholders | 5\u002F25 | Single-threaded, no EB |\n| Process | 5\u002F25 | Pushed once, no clear next step |\n| Competition | 18\u002F25 | Competitor known but not blocking |\n| **Total** | **28\u002F100** | |\n\n### Critical Risks\n\n1. **🔴 Champion Gone Dark** - John hasn't responded in 14 days\n   - Possible: Left company, lost internal support, chose competitor\n\n2. **🔴 Single-Threaded** - No other relationships\n   - If John is out, deal is dead\n\n3. **🟠 No Economic Buyer** - Never met decision maker\n   - John may not have authority to close\n\n### Recommended Actions\n\n**This Week:**\n1. Research John on LinkedIn - still at company?\n2. Find another contact via LinkedIn\u002Freferral\n3. Send \"breakup email\" to force response\n4. Check if Competitor X is in active eval\n\n**If No Response by Friday:**\n- Move to Stage 2 or Closed-Lost\n- Free up forecast slot\n\n### Red Flags to Watch\n- If proposal was forwarded to competitor\n- If budget was reallocated\n- If project was deprioritized\n\n### Save Probability: 25%\nWithout new contact access, this deal is likely lost.\n```\n\n### Example 2: Healthy Deal Review\n\n**Input:**\n```\nDeal: GrowthCo Inc\nValue: $85K ARR\nStage: 4 - Negotiation\nClose Date: Feb 15\nDays in Stage: 7\n\nRecent Activity:\n- Feb 1: Demo to full team (8 attendees)\n- Feb 3: Pricing discussion with CFO\n- Feb 5: Legal reviewing MSA\n- Feb 7: Call scheduled for Feb 10\n\nStakeholders:\n- Maria Lopez, VP Sales (Champion, highly engaged)\n- Tom Chen, CFO (Economic Buyer, positive)\n- Legal team (reviewing contract)\n- 8 end users attended demo\n\nCompetition: None identified\nChampion: Maria - actively selling internally\n```\n\n**Output:**\n```\n## Deal Risk Assessment: GrowthCo Inc\n\n### Overall Score: 88\u002F100 🟢 GREEN - HEALTHY\n\n### Score Breakdown\n\n| Factor | Score | Status |\n|--------|-------|--------|\n| Engagement | 25\u002F25 | Daily activity, prospect-driven |\n| Stakeholders | 23\u002F25 | EB + Champion + Users confirmed |\n| Process | 22\u002F25 | Clear timeline, legal in motion |\n| Competition | 18\u002F25 | No competition identified |\n| **Total** | **88\u002F100** | |\n\n### Strengths\n\n1. **✅ Multi-threaded** - Champion, EB, and end users engaged\n2. **✅ Process momentum** - Legal reviewing = serious intent\n3. **✅ Executive access** - CFO in pricing discussions\n4. **✅ Champion active** - Maria driving internally\n\n### Minor Risks\n\n1. **🟡 Legal review** - Could surface unexpected blockers\n   - Mitigation: Pre-review common redlines\n\n2. **🟡 No competition confirmed** - May be unknown\n   - Mitigation: Ask directly in next call\n\n### Recommended Actions\n\n**Feb 10 Call Prep:**\n1. Prepare redline responses for common legal issues\n2. Confirm decision process post-legal\n3. Ask: \"Is anyone else in consideration?\"\n4. Get verbal commit from Maria\n\n### Close Probability: 85%\nDeal is on track. Focus on removing legal friction.\n```\n\n## Skill Boundaries\n\n### What This Skill Does Well\n- Objective risk scoring from available data\n- Identifying gaps in deal coverage\n- Prioritizing which deals need attention\n- Suggesting specific interventions\n\n### What This Skill Cannot Do\n- Know information not provided (internal politics)\n- Predict competitor moves\n- Replace relationship judgment\n- Guarantee score accuracy with incomplete data\n\n### When to Escalate to Human\n- Strategic accounts requiring executive judgment\n- Deals involving partnerships or M&A\n- Unusual contract structures\n- Competitive intelligence gathering\n\n## Iteration Guide\n\n### Follow-up Prompts\n- \"What's the single most important action for this deal?\"\n- \"Compare risk scores for my top 5 deals.\"\n- \"What questions should I ask in the next meeting?\"\n- \"Draft a re-engagement email for the silent champion.\"\n\n### Refinement Cycle\n1. Initial assessment → Identify top risks\n2. Take action → Update activity log\n3. Re-score → Track improvement\n4. Weekly review → Trend analysis\n\n## Checklists & Templates\n\n### Deal Health Checklist\n- [ ] Champion identified and engaged this week\n- [ ] Economic Buyer met at least once\n- [ ] Next step scheduled within 7 days\n- [ ] Competition status known\n- [ ] Close date validated by prospect\n\n### Risk Score Template\n```markdown\n## Deal: [Name] | Score: X\u002F100 [Status Emoji]\n\n### Quick Stats\n- Value: $X | Stage: X | Days: X | Close: [Date]\n\n### Scores\n| Factor | Score | Key Issue |\n|--------|-------|-----------|\n| Engagement | \u002F25 | |\n| Stakeholders | \u002F25 | |\n| Process | \u002F25 | |\n| Competition | \u002F25 | |\n\n### Top 3 Actions\n1.\n2.\n3.\n```\n\n## References\n\n- Gong Deal Intelligence Research\n- Winning by Design Revenue Architecture\n- MEDDPICC Qualification Framework\n- Force Management Command of the Message\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- `pipeline-forecasting` - Aggregate deal health into forecast\n- `lead-qualification-meddic` - Deep qualification framework\n- `account-health` - Post-sale relationship scoring\n\n## Skill Metadata\n\n- **Domain**: RevOps\n- **Complexity**: Intermediate\n- **Mode**: centaur\n- **Time to Value**: 10 minutes per deal\n- **Prerequisites**: Deal details, activity history, stakeholder map\n",{"name":5,"license":14,"metadata":23,"description":7},{"author":24,"version":25,"mcp-server":26},"ClawFu","1.0.0","@clawfu\u002Fmcp-skills","master","f483e54f3ad5f202a77d45f2e57f8d970b71195f","skills_library\u002Fdeal-risk-scoring",2,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Froohe\u002Fagentic-super-skills","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Froohe","yoou.link","2026-05-19 15:56:07",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":36,"prompt":46,"zipAvailable":47},[37,40,43],{"tool":38,"command":39},"npx","npx skills add roohe\u002Fagentic-super-skills --skill deal-risk-scoring",{"tool":41,"command":42},"bunx","bunx skills add roohe\u002Fagentic-super-skills --skill deal-risk-scoring",{"tool":44,"command":45},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add roohe\u002Fagentic-super-skills --skill deal-risk-scoring","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Froohe\u002Fagentic-super-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills_library\u002Fdeal-risk-scoring\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[50,57,64,71,78,85],{"skillNo":51,"name":52,"nameZh":6,"description":53,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":54,"categories":55,"keywords":56,"publishedAt":18},"01M73D865CZME2FCMKA4PQM348","zarr-python","Chunked N-D arrays for cloud storage. Compressed arrays, parallel I\u002FO, S3\u002FGCS integration, NumPy\u002FDask\u002FXarray compatible, for large-scale scientific computing pipelines.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Froohe\u002Fagentic-super-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills_library\u002Fzarr-python\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":58,"name":59,"nameZh":6,"description":60,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":61,"categories":62,"keywords":63,"publishedAt":18},"01M73D7Z64J4ABWZJD7P44XBBF","youtube-downloader","Download and process YouTube content for research. Use when: downloading competitor videos for analysis; extracting audio for podcasts; getting transcripts for content repurposing; archiving webinars; research content curation","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Froohe\u002Fagentic-super-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills_library\u002Fyoutube-downloader\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":65,"name":66,"nameZh":6,"description":67,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":68,"categories":69,"keywords":70,"publishedAt":18},"01M73D7K8778TGZV3GJFR3703D","yc-pitch-deck","Create a compelling startup pitch deck that follows the structure proven to raise billions from top investors. Master the YC and Sequoia formats that get founders funded. Use when: **Fundraising** to create investor pitch decks; **YC application** to structure your narrative; **Demo Day prep** to craft your 2-minute pitch; **Angel investors** to communicate your opportunity; **Partnership pitches** to structure compelling asks","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Froohe\u002Fagentic-super-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills_library\u002Fyc-pitch-deck\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":72,"name":73,"nameZh":6,"description":74,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":75,"categories":76,"keywords":77,"publishedAt":18},"01M73D70KJSE0E8Z28YMNNRT04","x-twitter-scraper","Use when the user needs X (Twitter) data or confirmation-gated X actions through Xquik: tweet search, user lookup, follower extraction, media download, monitoring, webhooks, MCP, SDKs, posting, likes, DMs, and profile updates. Requires a Xquik API key. Never ask for X login material.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Froohe\u002Fagentic-super-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills_library\u002Fx-twitter-scraper\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":79,"name":80,"nameZh":6,"description":81,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":82,"categories":83,"keywords":84,"publishedAt":18},"01M73D6ED01GV077R7K4NZNFZJ","write-vignette","Create R package vignettes using R Markdown or Quarto. Covers vignette setup, YAML configuration, code chunk options, building and testing, and CRAN requirements for vignettes. Use when adding a Getting Started tutorial, documenting complex workflows spanning multiple functions, creating domain-specific guides, or when CRAN submission requires user-facing documentation beyond function help pages.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Froohe\u002Fagentic-super-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills_library\u002Fwrite-vignette\u002FSKILL.md",[],[],{"skillNo":86,"name":87,"nameZh":6,"description":88,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":89,"categories":90,"keywords":91,"publishedAt":18},"01M73D69YJR0BK3NFHE0CYG3EF","write-validation-documentation","Write IQ\u002FOQ\u002FPQ validation documentation for computerized systems in regulated environments. Covers protocols, reports, test scripts, deviation handling, and approval workflows. Use when validating R or other software for regulated use, preparing for a regulatory audit, documenting qualification of computing environments, or creating and updating validation protocols and reports for new or re-qualified systems.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Froohe\u002Fagentic-super-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills_library\u002Fwrite-validation-documentation\u002FSKILL.md",[],[]]