AGENT SKILL

deal-risk-scoring

Assess deal health and identify at-risk opportunities using engagement signals, stakeholder mapping, and velocity analysis

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-05-19
Stars
★ 10
Forks
2

01 前言 Front Matter

name
deal-risk-scoring
license
MIT
metadata
{ "author": "ClawFu", "version": "1.0.0", "mcp-server": "@clawfu/mcp-skills" }
description
Assess deal health and identify at-risk opportunities using engagement signals, stakeholder mapping, and velocity analysis

03 SKILL.md 正文

Deal Risk Scoring

Evaluate individual deal health through multi-signal analysis to prioritize coaching, intervention, and resource allocation.

When to Use This Skill

  • Weekly deal reviews and pipeline scrubs
  • Before QBRs to identify problem deals
  • When deals stall or push close dates
  • Prioritizing manager coaching time
  • Allocating SE/executive resources

Methodology Foundation

Based on Gong's Deal Intelligence research and Winning by Design's Revenue Architecture, analyzing:

  • Engagement velocity (email, meeting frequency)
  • Stakeholder breadth (multi-threading)
  • Competitive signals
  • Timeline alignment
  • Champion strength

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude Does You Decide
Scores deals on risk factors Which deals to save vs. let go
Identifies missing elements Resource allocation priorities
Suggests intervention actions Executive sponsor assignments
Tracks velocity trends Final stage/probability updates
Flags competitive threats Win strategy adjustments

What This Skill Does

  1. Multi-signal analysis - Engagement, stakeholders, timeline, competition
  2. Risk scoring - Green/Yellow/Red health status with reasons
  3. Gap identification - Missing stakeholders, stalled stages, unclear next steps
  4. Action recommendations - Specific interventions to reduce risk
  5. Trend tracking - Velocity changes over time

How to Use

Assess the risk for this deal:

Deal: [Company Name]
Value: $X
Stage: [Current Stage]
Close Date: [Target Date]
Days in Stage: X

Recent Activity:
- [List emails, meetings, calls with dates]

Stakeholders:
- [Name, Title, Role in deal, Engagement level]

Competition: [Known competitors]
Champion: [Name and strength assessment]

Instructions

Step 1: Engagement Velocity Score (0-25 points)

Criteria Points
Meeting in last 7 days +10
Email response in last 3 days +5
Multiple contacts engaged +5
Prospect initiating contact +5
No activity 14+ days -15

Step 2: Stakeholder Coverage Score (0-25 points)

Criteria Points
Economic Buyer identified +10
Champion confirmed +10
Technical evaluator engaged +5
Only 1 contact -10
No C-level access -5

Step 3: Process Alignment Score (0-25 points)

Criteria Points
Clear next step scheduled +10
Mutual action plan agreed +10
Decision timeline confirmed +5
Close date pushed 2+ times -15
No defined process -10

Step 4: Competitive Position Score (0-25 points)

Criteria Points
No competition +15
Differentiation clear +10
Incumbent advantage -10
Price pressure -5
Unknown competitive status -5

Step 5: Calculate Total Risk Score

Score Health Action
75-100 🟢 Green Monitor, standard process
50-74 🟡 Yellow Intervention needed
25-49 🟠 Orange Escalate, major action
0-24 🔴 Red Rescue or disqualify

Examples

Example 1: At-Risk Enterprise Deal

Input:

Deal: TechCorp Global
Value: $250K ARR
Stage: 3 - Proposal
Close Date: Feb 28 (pushed from Jan 31)
Days in Stage: 28

Recent Activity:
- Jan 15: Proposal sent to John (Dir of Ops)
- Jan 22: Follow-up email (no response)
- Jan 29: Called, voicemail
- Feb 5: Email asking for update (no response)

Stakeholders:
- John Smith, Director of Ops, Champion (was engaged)
- No other contacts

Competition: Competitor X mentioned in discovery
Champion: John - went silent

Output:

## Deal Risk Assessment: TechCorp Global

### Overall Score: 28/100 🔴 RED - HIGH RISK

### Score Breakdown

| Factor | Score | Issues |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Engagement | 0/25 | No response in 14+ days |
| Stakeholders | 5/25 | Single-threaded, no EB |
| Process | 5/25 | Pushed once, no clear next step |
| Competition | 18/25 | Competitor known but not blocking |
| **Total** | **28/100** | |

### Critical Risks

1. **🔴 Champion Gone Dark** - John hasn't responded in 14 days
   - Possible: Left company, lost internal support, chose competitor

2. **🔴 Single-Threaded** - No other relationships
   - If John is out, deal is dead

3. **🟠 No Economic Buyer** - Never met decision maker
   - John may not have authority to close

### Recommended Actions

**This Week:**
1. Research John on LinkedIn - still at company?
2. Find another contact via LinkedIn/referral
3. Send "breakup email" to force response
4. Check if Competitor X is in active eval

**If No Response by Friday:**
- Move to Stage 2 or Closed-Lost
- Free up forecast slot

### Red Flags to Watch
- If proposal was forwarded to competitor
- If budget was reallocated
- If project was deprioritized

### Save Probability: 25%
Without new contact access, this deal is likely lost.

Example 2: Healthy Deal Review

Input:

Deal: GrowthCo Inc
Value: $85K ARR
Stage: 4 - Negotiation
Close Date: Feb 15
Days in Stage: 7

Recent Activity:
- Feb 1: Demo to full team (8 attendees)
- Feb 3: Pricing discussion with CFO
- Feb 5: Legal reviewing MSA
- Feb 7: Call scheduled for Feb 10

Stakeholders:
- Maria Lopez, VP Sales (Champion, highly engaged)
- Tom Chen, CFO (Economic Buyer, positive)
- Legal team (reviewing contract)
- 8 end users attended demo

Competition: None identified
Champion: Maria - actively selling internally

Output:

## Deal Risk Assessment: GrowthCo Inc

### Overall Score: 88/100 🟢 GREEN - HEALTHY

### Score Breakdown

| Factor | Score | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Engagement | 25/25 | Daily activity, prospect-driven |
| Stakeholders | 23/25 | EB + Champion + Users confirmed |
| Process | 22/25 | Clear timeline, legal in motion |
| Competition | 18/25 | No competition identified |
| **Total** | **88/100** | |

### Strengths

1. **✅ Multi-threaded** - Champion, EB, and end users engaged
2. **✅ Process momentum** - Legal reviewing = serious intent
3. **✅ Executive access** - CFO in pricing discussions
4. **✅ Champion active** - Maria driving internally

### Minor Risks

1. **🟡 Legal review** - Could surface unexpected blockers
   - Mitigation: Pre-review common redlines

2. **🟡 No competition confirmed** - May be unknown
   - Mitigation: Ask directly in next call

### Recommended Actions

**Feb 10 Call Prep:**
1. Prepare redline responses for common legal issues
2. Confirm decision process post-legal
3. Ask: "Is anyone else in consideration?"
4. Get verbal commit from Maria

### Close Probability: 85%
Deal is on track. Focus on removing legal friction.

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Objective risk scoring from available data
  • Identifying gaps in deal coverage
  • Prioritizing which deals need attention
  • Suggesting specific interventions

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Know information not provided (internal politics)
  • Predict competitor moves
  • Replace relationship judgment
  • Guarantee score accuracy with incomplete data

When to Escalate to Human

  • Strategic accounts requiring executive judgment
  • Deals involving partnerships or M&A
  • Unusual contract structures
  • Competitive intelligence gathering

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts

  • "What's the single most important action for this deal?"
  • "Compare risk scores for my top 5 deals."
  • "What questions should I ask in the next meeting?"
  • "Draft a re-engagement email for the silent champion."

Refinement Cycle

  1. Initial assessment → Identify top risks
  2. Take action → Update activity log
  3. Re-score → Track improvement
  4. Weekly review → Trend analysis

Checklists & Templates

Deal Health Checklist

  • [ ] Champion identified and engaged this week
  • [ ] Economic Buyer met at least once
  • [ ] Next step scheduled within 7 days
  • [ ] Competition status known
  • [ ] Close date validated by prospect

Risk Score Template

## Deal: [Name] | Score: X/100 [Status Emoji]

### Quick Stats
- Value: $X | Stage: X | Days: X | Close: [Date]

### Scores
| Factor | Score | Key Issue |
|--------|-------|-----------|
| Engagement | /25 | |
| Stakeholders | /25 | |
| Process | /25 | |
| Competition | /25 | |

### Top 3 Actions
1.
2.
3.

References

  • Gong Deal Intelligence Research
  • Winning by Design Revenue Architecture
  • MEDDPICC Qualification Framework
  • Force Management Command of the Message

Related Skills

  • pipeline-forecasting - Aggregate deal health into forecast
  • lead-qualification-meddic - Deep qualification framework
  • account-health - Post-sale relationship scoring

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: RevOps
  • Complexity: Intermediate
  • Mode: centaur
  • Time to Value: 10 minutes per deal
  • Prerequisites: Deal details, activity history, stakeholder map

04 同仓库更多 Skills

roohe
roohe/agentic-super-skills

zarr-python

Chunked N-D arrays for cloud storage. Compressed arrays, parallel I/O, S3/GCS integration, NumPy/Dask/Xarray compatible, for large-scale scientific computing pipelines.

★ 10
roohe
roohe/agentic-super-skills

youtube-downloader

Download and process YouTube content for research. Use when: downloading competitor videos for analysis; extracting audio for podcasts; getting transcripts for content repurposing; archiving webinars; research content curation

★ 10
roohe
roohe/agentic-super-skills

yc-pitch-deck

Create a compelling startup pitch deck that follows the structure proven to raise billions from top investors. Master the YC and Sequoia formats that get founders funded. Use when: **Fundraising** to create investor pitch decks; **YC application** to structure your narrative; **Demo Day prep** to craft your 2-minute pitch; **Angel investors** to communicate your opportunity; **Partnership pitches** to structure compelling asks

★ 10
roohe
roohe/agentic-super-skills

x-twitter-scraper

Use when the user needs X (Twitter) data or confirmation-gated X actions through Xquik: tweet search, user lookup, follower extraction, media download, monitoring, webhooks, MCP, SDKs, posting, likes, DMs, and profile updates. Requires a Xquik API key. Never ask for X login material.

★ 10
roohe
roohe/agentic-super-skills

write-vignette

Create R package vignettes using R Markdown or Quarto. Covers vignette setup, YAML configuration, code chunk options, building and testing, and CRAN requirements for vignettes. Use when adding a Getting Started tutorial, documenting complex workflows spanning multiple functions, creating domain-specific guides, or when CRAN submission requires user-facing documentation beyond function help pages.

★ 10
roohe
roohe/agentic-super-skills

write-validation-documentation

Write IQ/OQ/PQ validation documentation for computerized systems in regulated environments. Covers protocols, reports, test scripts, deviation handling, and approval workflows. Use when validating R or other software for regulated use, preparing for a regulatory audit, documenting qualification of computing environments, or creating and updating validation protocols and reports for new or re-qualified systems.

★ 10