AGENT SKILL

docs-claims-evidence-review

Use when reviewing README or docs truthfulness, recruiter-facing claims, security claims, production-readiness claims, evidence maps, or unsupported project claims.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-05-04
Stars
★ 1
Forks
0

01 前言 Front Matter

name
docs-claims-evidence-review
metadata
{ "internal": true }
description
Use when reviewing README or docs truthfulness, recruiter-facing claims, security claims, production-readiness claims, evidence maps, or unsupported project claims.

03 SKILL.md 正文

Docs Claims Evidence Review

Workflow

  1. Extract strong claims from README and docs.
  2. Classify claim strength: weak, moderate, or strong.
  3. Map each claim to file, test, or documentation evidence.
  4. Mark missing evidence explicitly.
  5. Recommend keep, weaken, remove, or add evidence.

Strong Claims

Never allow unsupported claims such as secure, production-ready, enterprise-grade, fully tested, scalable, robust, or battle-tested. Docs should stay positive but truthful.

Evidence Examples

  • Security: middleware, auth checks, rate limits, headers, validation, threat model, security tests.
  • Production-ready: deployment docs, env docs, smoke tests, error handling, observability.
  • Fully tested: test framework, meaningful test files, coverage or test command evidence.

04 同仓库更多 Skills