[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M71TD0VYP2DFW3Y08PZR4952":3,"skill-same:01M71TD0VYP2DFW3Y08PZR4952":70},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":15,"categories":16,"keywords":17,"publishedAt":31,"linkOnly":32,"markdownContent":33,"markdownBody":34,"frontMatter":35,"refName":36,"commitSha":37,"skillDirectory":38,"forksCount":13,"repositoryHtmlUrl":39,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":40,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":41,"install":42,"resources":55},"01M71TD0VYP2DFW3Y08PZR4952","subagent-driven-development",null,"Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session","javiertarazon\u002Fide-agente-free-jt7-","javiertarazon","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F153141207?v=4","01M71R52TB3S9HXKH6WSNT8A7V","01M71R52VG5KS2DKDDH4GDQ30A",0,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjaviertarazon\u002Fide-agente-free-jt7-\u002Fblob\u002Frelease\u002Fv4.2.11-panel-pro\u002F.github\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development\u002FSKILL.md",[],[18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30],"development","subagent driven development","subagent","driven","with","community","session","plans","implementation","use","when","unknown","tasks","2026-11-10 13:02:02",false,"---\nname: subagent-driven-development\ndescription: \"Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session\"\nrisk: unknown\nsource: community\n---\n\n# Subagent-Driven Development\n\nExecute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review.\n\n**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration\n\n## When to Use\n\n```dot\ndigraph when_to_use {\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"subagent-driven-development\" [shape=box];\n    \"executing-plans\" [shape=box];\n    \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [shape=box];\n\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Stay in this session?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no - tightly coupled\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"subagent-driven-development\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"executing-plans\" [label=\"no - parallel session\"];\n}\n```\n\n**vs. Executing Plans (parallel session):**\n- Same session (no context switch)\n- Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)\n- Two-stage review after each task: spec compliance first, then code quality\n- Faster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)\n\n## The Process\n\n```dot\ndigraph process {\n    rankdir=TB;\n\n    subgraph cluster_per_task {\n        label=\"Per Task\";\n        \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Answer questions, provide context\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [shape=box];\n        \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    }\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [shape=box];\n    \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Answer questions, provide context\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Answer questions, provide context\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\";\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\";\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" -> \"More tasks remain?\";\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" -> \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\";\n}\n```\n\n## Prompt Templates\n\n- `.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md` - Dispatch implementer subagent\n- `.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch spec compliance reviewer subagent\n- `.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent\n\n## Example Workflow\n\n```\nYou: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.\n\n[Read plan file once: docs\u002Fplans\u002Ffeature-plan.md]\n[Extract all 5 tasks with full text and context]\n[Create TodoWrite with all tasks]\n\nTask 1: Hook installation script\n\n[Get Task 1 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: \"Before I begin - should the hook be installed at user or system level?\"\n\nYou: \"User level (~\u002F.config\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fhooks\u002F)\"\n\nImplementer: \"Got it. Implementing now...\"\n[Later] Implementer:\n  - Implemented install-hook command\n  - Added tests, 5\u002F5 passing\n  - Self-review: Found I missed --force flag, added it\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant - all requirements met, nothing extra\n\n[Get git SHAs, dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage, clean. Issues: None. Approved.\n\n[Mark Task 1 complete]\n\nTask 2: Recovery modes\n\n[Get Task 2 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: [No questions, proceeds]\nImplementer:\n  - Added verify\u002Frepair modes\n  - 8\u002F8 tests passing\n  - Self-review: All good\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ❌ Issues:\n  - Missing: Progress reporting (spec says \"report every 100 items\")\n  - Extra: Added --json flag (not requested)\n\n[Implementer fixes issues]\nImplementer: Removed --json flag, added progress reporting\n\n[Spec reviewer reviews again]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant now\n\n[Dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Magic number (100)\n\n[Implementer fixes]\nImplementer: Extracted PROGRESS_INTERVAL constant\n\n[Code reviewer reviews again]\nCode reviewer: ✅ Approved\n\n[Mark Task 2 complete]\n\n...\n\n[After all tasks]\n[Dispatch final code-reviewer]\nFinal reviewer: All requirements met, ready to merge\n\nDone!\n```\n\n## Advantages\n\n**vs. Manual execution:**\n- Subagents follow TDD naturally\n- Fresh context per task (no confusion)\n- Parallel-safe (subagents don't interfere)\n- Subagent can ask questions (before AND during work)\n\n**vs. Executing Plans:**\n- Same session (no handoff)\n- Continuous progress (no waiting)\n- Review checkpoints automatic\n\n**Efficiency gains:**\n- No file reading overhead (controller provides full text)\n- Controller curates exactly what context is needed\n- Subagent gets complete information upfront\n- Questions surfaced before work begins (not after)\n\n**Quality gates:**\n- Self-review catches issues before handoff\n- Two-stage review: spec compliance, then code quality\n- Review loops ensure fixes actually work\n- Spec compliance prevents over\u002Funder-building\n- Code quality ensures implementation is well-built\n\n**Cost:**\n- More subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)\n- Controller does more prep work (extracting all tasks upfront)\n- Review loops add iterations\n- But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging later)\n\n## Red Flags\n\n**Never:**\n- Skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)\n- Proceed with unfixed issues\n- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)\n- Make subagent read plan file (provide full text instead)\n- Skip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where task fits)\n- Ignore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)\n- Accept \"close enough\" on spec compliance (spec reviewer found issues = not done)\n- Skip review loops (reviewer found issues = implementer fixes = review again)\n- Let implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)\n- **Start code quality review before spec compliance is ✅** (wrong order)\n- Move to next task while either review has open issues\n\n**If subagent asks questions:**\n- Answer clearly and completely\n- Provide additional context if needed\n- Don't rush them into implementation\n\n**If reviewer finds issues:**\n- Implementer (same subagent) fixes them\n- Reviewer reviews again\n- Repeat until approved\n- Don't skip the re-review\n\n**If subagent fails task:**\n- Dispatch fix subagent with specific instructions\n- Don't try to fix manually (context pollution)\n\n## Integration\n\n**Required workflow skills:**\n- **superpowers:writing-plans** - Creates the plan this skill executes\n- **superpowers:requesting-code-review** - Code review template for reviewer subagents\n- **superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch** - Complete development after all tasks\n\n**Subagents should use:**\n- **superpowers:test-driven-development** - Subagents follow TDD for each task\n\n**Alternative workflow:**\n- **superpowers:executing-plans** - Use for parallel session instead of same-session execution\n","# Subagent-Driven Development\n\nExecute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review.\n\n**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration\n\n## When to Use\n\n```dot\ndigraph when_to_use {\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"subagent-driven-development\" [shape=box];\n    \"executing-plans\" [shape=box];\n    \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [shape=box];\n\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Stay in this session?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no - tightly coupled\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"subagent-driven-development\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"executing-plans\" [label=\"no - parallel session\"];\n}\n```\n\n**vs. Executing Plans (parallel session):**\n- Same session (no context switch)\n- Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)\n- Two-stage review after each task: spec compliance first, then code quality\n- Faster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)\n\n## The Process\n\n```dot\ndigraph process {\n    rankdir=TB;\n\n    subgraph cluster_per_task {\n        label=\"Per Task\";\n        \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Answer questions, provide context\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [shape=box];\n        \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    }\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [shape=box];\n    \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Answer questions, provide context\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Answer questions, provide context\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\";\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\";\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" -> \"More tasks remain?\";\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" -> \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\";\n}\n```\n\n## Prompt Templates\n\n- `.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md` - Dispatch implementer subagent\n- `.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch spec compliance reviewer subagent\n- `.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent\n\n## Example Workflow\n\n```\nYou: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.\n\n[Read plan file once: docs\u002Fplans\u002Ffeature-plan.md]\n[Extract all 5 tasks with full text and context]\n[Create TodoWrite with all tasks]\n\nTask 1: Hook installation script\n\n[Get Task 1 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: \"Before I begin - should the hook be installed at user or system level?\"\n\nYou: \"User level (~\u002F.config\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fhooks\u002F)\"\n\nImplementer: \"Got it. Implementing now...\"\n[Later] Implementer:\n  - Implemented install-hook command\n  - Added tests, 5\u002F5 passing\n  - Self-review: Found I missed --force flag, added it\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant - all requirements met, nothing extra\n\n[Get git SHAs, dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage, clean. Issues: None. Approved.\n\n[Mark Task 1 complete]\n\nTask 2: Recovery modes\n\n[Get Task 2 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: [No questions, proceeds]\nImplementer:\n  - Added verify\u002Frepair modes\n  - 8\u002F8 tests passing\n  - Self-review: All good\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ❌ Issues:\n  - Missing: Progress reporting (spec says \"report every 100 items\")\n  - Extra: Added --json flag (not requested)\n\n[Implementer fixes issues]\nImplementer: Removed --json flag, added progress reporting\n\n[Spec reviewer reviews again]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant now\n\n[Dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Magic number (100)\n\n[Implementer fixes]\nImplementer: Extracted PROGRESS_INTERVAL constant\n\n[Code reviewer reviews again]\nCode reviewer: ✅ Approved\n\n[Mark Task 2 complete]\n\n...\n\n[After all tasks]\n[Dispatch final code-reviewer]\nFinal reviewer: All requirements met, ready to merge\n\nDone!\n```\n\n## Advantages\n\n**vs. Manual execution:**\n- Subagents follow TDD naturally\n- Fresh context per task (no confusion)\n- Parallel-safe (subagents don't interfere)\n- Subagent can ask questions (before AND during work)\n\n**vs. Executing Plans:**\n- Same session (no handoff)\n- Continuous progress (no waiting)\n- Review checkpoints automatic\n\n**Efficiency gains:**\n- No file reading overhead (controller provides full text)\n- Controller curates exactly what context is needed\n- Subagent gets complete information upfront\n- Questions surfaced before work begins (not after)\n\n**Quality gates:**\n- Self-review catches issues before handoff\n- Two-stage review: spec compliance, then code quality\n- Review loops ensure fixes actually work\n- Spec compliance prevents over\u002Funder-building\n- Code quality ensures implementation is well-built\n\n**Cost:**\n- More subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)\n- Controller does more prep work (extracting all tasks upfront)\n- Review loops add iterations\n- But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging later)\n\n## Red Flags\n\n**Never:**\n- Skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)\n- Proceed with unfixed issues\n- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)\n- Make subagent read plan file (provide full text instead)\n- Skip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where task fits)\n- Ignore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)\n- Accept \"close enough\" on spec compliance (spec reviewer found issues = not done)\n- Skip review loops (reviewer found issues = implementer fixes = review again)\n- Let implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)\n- **Start code quality review before spec compliance is ✅** (wrong order)\n- Move to next task while either review has open issues\n\n**If subagent asks questions:**\n- Answer clearly and completely\n- Provide additional context if needed\n- Don't rush them into implementation\n\n**If reviewer finds issues:**\n- Implementer (same subagent) fixes them\n- Reviewer reviews again\n- Repeat until approved\n- Don't skip the re-review\n\n**If subagent fails task:**\n- Dispatch fix subagent with specific instructions\n- Don't try to fix manually (context pollution)\n\n## Integration\n\n**Required workflow skills:**\n- **superpowers:writing-plans** - Creates the plan this skill executes\n- **superpowers:requesting-code-review** - Code review template for reviewer subagents\n- **superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch** - Complete development after all tasks\n\n**Subagents should use:**\n- **superpowers:test-driven-development** - Subagents follow TDD for each task\n\n**Alternative workflow:**\n- **superpowers:executing-plans** - Use for parallel session instead of same-session execution\n",{"name":5,"risk":29,"source":23,"description":7},"release\u002Fv4.2.11-panel-pro","a92ea02bcf7e2b3dbaf46d49696c29a3cb490d4f",".github\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjaviertarazon\u002Fide-agente-free-jt7-","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjaviertarazon","2026-07-12 07:10:45",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":43,"prompt":53,"zipAvailable":54},[44,47,50],{"tool":45,"command":46},"npx","npx skills add javiertarazon\u002Fide-agente-free-jt7- --skill subagent-driven-development",{"tool":48,"command":49},"bunx","bunx skills add javiertarazon\u002Fide-agente-free-jt7- --skill subagent-driven-development",{"tool":51,"command":52},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add javiertarazon\u002Fide-agente-free-jt7- --skill subagent-driven-development","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjaviertarazon\u002Fide-agente-free-jt7-\u002Fblob\u002Frelease\u002Fv4.2.11-panel-pro\u002F.github\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development\u002FSKILL.md",true,[56,62,66],{"path":57,"resourceType":58,"resourceTypeDesc":59,"sizeBytes":60,"sourceHtmlUrl":61},"code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",630,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjaviertarazon\u002Fide-agente-free-jt7-\u002Fblob\u002Frelease\u002Fv4.2.11-panel-pro\u002F.github\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md",{"path":63,"resourceType":58,"resourceTypeDesc":59,"sizeBytes":64,"sourceHtmlUrl":65},"implementer-prompt.md",2195,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjaviertarazon\u002Fide-agente-free-jt7-\u002Fblob\u002Frelease\u002Fv4.2.11-panel-pro\u002F.github\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md",{"path":67,"resourceType":58,"resourceTypeDesc":59,"sizeBytes":68,"sourceHtmlUrl":69},"spec-reviewer-prompt.md",1999,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjaviertarazon\u002Fide-agente-free-jt7-\u002Fblob\u002Frelease\u002Fv4.2.11-panel-pro\u002F.github\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md",[71,98,125,144,159,181],{"skillNo":72,"name":73,"nameZh":6,"description":74,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":75,"categories":76,"keywords":82,"publishedAt":31},"01M71TQ7Q6Z10VWF3C2H5X1KW9","zustand-store-ts","Create Zustand stores with TypeScript, subscribeWithSelector middleware, and proper state\u002Faction separation. Use when building React state management, creating global stores, or implementing reacti...","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjaviertarazon\u002Fide-agente-free-jt7-\u002Fblob\u002Frelease\u002Fv4.2.11-panel-pro\u002F.github\u002Fskills\u002Fzustand-store-ts\u002FSKILL.md",[77],{"categoryNo":78,"categoryName":79,"taxonomyType":80,"taxonomyTypeDesc":81},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000009","前端开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",[83,84,85,23,86,87,27,88,28,29,89,22,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97],"zustand","store","zustand store ts","middleware","implementing","react state management","react","state","create","state management","typescript","action","management","separation","global",{"skillNo":99,"name":100,"nameZh":6,"description":101,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":102,"categories":103,"keywords":107,"publishedAt":31},"01M71TQ5EAR40G6W0MV5ZDVEZT","zoom-automation","Automate Zoom meeting creation, management, recordings, webinars, and participant tracking via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjaviertarazon\u002Fide-agente-free-jt7-\u002Fblob\u002Frelease\u002Fv4.2.11-panel-pro\u002F.github\u002Fskills\u002Fzoom-automation\u002FSKILL.md",[104],{"categoryNo":105,"categoryName":106,"taxonomyType":80,"taxonomyTypeDesc":81},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",[108,109,110,23,111,112,113,114,115,29,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,95,124],"zoom automation","zoom","automation","creation","for","search","schemas","MCP","first","via","meeting","search tools","tracking","webinars","composio","recordings","Tools",{"skillNo":126,"name":127,"nameZh":6,"description":128,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":129,"categories":130,"keywords":132,"publishedAt":31},"01M71TQ29B1EYBCEAP1ZBGXQ1A","zoho-crm-automation","Automate Zoho CRM tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): create\u002Fupdate records, search contacts, manage leads, and convert leads. Always search tools first for current schemas.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjaviertarazon\u002Fide-agente-free-jt7-\u002Fblob\u002Frelease\u002Fv4.2.11-panel-pro\u002F.github\u002Fskills\u002Fzoho-crm-automation\u002FSKILL.md",[131],{"categoryNo":105,"categoryName":106,"taxonomyType":80,"taxonomyTypeDesc":81},[133,134,110,135,136,137,23,138,139,112,140,113,114,141,115,29,142,30,143,91],"crm automation","zoho crm automation","crm","zoho crm","zoho","leads","manage leads","manage","records","convert","contacts",{"skillNo":145,"name":146,"nameZh":6,"description":147,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":148,"categories":149,"keywords":151,"publishedAt":31},"01M71TPZPMN60DH0XV58KVHY23","zendesk-automation","Automate Zendesk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): tickets, users, organizations, replies. Always search tools first for current schemas.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjaviertarazon\u002Fide-agente-free-jt7-\u002Fblob\u002Frelease\u002Fv4.2.11-panel-pro\u002F.github\u002Fskills\u002Fzendesk-automation\u002FSKILL.md",[150],{"categoryNo":105,"categoryName":106,"taxonomyType":80,"taxonomyTypeDesc":81},[152,110,153,23,112,113,114,115,154,29,30,155,156,116,117,157,119,122,124,158],"zendesk automation","zendesk","organizations","replies","users","tickets","automate",{"skillNo":160,"name":161,"nameZh":6,"description":162,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":163,"categories":164,"keywords":165,"publishedAt":31},"01M71TPXDWKHKG4N6TVEPXWD0N","zapier-make-patterns","No-code automation democratizes workflow building. Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) let non-developers automate business processes without writing code. But no-code doesn't mean no-complexity ...","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjaviertarazon\u002Fide-agente-free-jt7-\u002Fblob\u002Frelease\u002Fv4.2.11-panel-pro\u002F.github\u002Fskills\u002Fzapier-make-patterns\u002FSKILL.md",[],[166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,110,175,29,176,177,178,179,180,158],"zapier make patterns","zapier","patterns","make","No-Code","complexity","writing","spawner","business","workflow","code","integromat","apache","processes","but",{"skillNo":182,"name":183,"nameZh":6,"description":184,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":185,"categories":186,"keywords":190,"publishedAt":31},"01M71TPT5T10WXNKW9G7ZXZ27W","youtube-summarizer","Extract transcripts from YouTube videos and generate comprehensive, detailed summaries using intelligent analysis frameworks","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjaviertarazon\u002Fide-agente-free-jt7-\u002Fblob\u002Frelease\u002Fv4.2.11-panel-pro\u002F.github\u002Fskills\u002Fyoutube-summarizer\u002FSKILL.md",[187],{"categoryNo":188,"categoryName":189,"taxonomyType":80,"taxonomyTypeDesc":81},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000016","图像与多媒体",[191,192,193,194,23,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,176,202,203,204,205,206,207,208],"summarizer","youtube","youtube summarizer","Video","content-analysis","frameworks","copilot","2025","github-copilot","extract transcripts","analysis","codex","cli","summaries","github","generate","summarization","2026"]