[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M71RSR7567Z4ZCYJS4V11RSG":3,"skill-same:01M71RSR7567Z4ZCYJS4V11RSG":92},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":15,"categories":16,"keywords":27,"publishedAt":48,"linkOnly":49,"markdownContent":50,"markdownBody":51,"frontMatter":52,"refName":54,"commitSha":55,"skillDirectory":56,"forksCount":57,"repositoryHtmlUrl":58,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":59,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":60,"install":61,"resources":73},"01M71RSR7567Z4ZCYJS4V11RSG","pstack-interrogate",null,"Use for \"interrogate\", \"adversarial review\", \"multi-model review\", \"challenge this\", \"stress test this code\", \"find blind spots\", or \"tear this apart\". Multiple LLM reviewers challenge changes from independent angles.","dmae97\u002Fomk","dmae97","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F146327957?v=4","01M71RJRBWDNKEJ1A2DZVES8X1","01M71RJRCYHNT7E83M0Q42V6SJ",152,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdmae97\u002Fomk\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002Fcoding-agent\u002Fresources\u002Fpstack\u002Fskills\u002Finterrogate\u002FSKILL.md",[17,22],{"categoryNo":18,"categoryName":19,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":23,"categoryName":24,"taxonomyType":25,"taxonomyTypeDesc":26},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000030","开发工程师","PROFESSION","适用职业",[28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47],"pstack interrogate","interrogate","pstack","multi-model","adversarial","changes","for","true","multi","stress","spots","review","use","stress test","challenge","find","model","code","adversarial review","test","2026-11-10 13:02:02",false,"---\nname: pstack-interrogate\ndescription: \"Use for \\\"interrogate\\\", \\\"adversarial review\\\", \\\"multi-model review\\\", \\\"challenge this\\\", \\\"stress test this code\\\", \\\"find blind spots\\\", or \\\"tear this apart\\\". Multiple LLM reviewers challenge changes from independent angles.\"\ndisable-model-invocation: true\n---\n\n# Interrogate\n\nSpawn one reviewer per configured role entry to adversarially review code changes. OMK delegates inherit the session model, so independent briefs provide review separation, not model diversity. The deliverable is a synthesized verdict. Do NOT auto-apply changes.\n\n## Step 1, Scope\n\nIdentify what to review from context:\n\n- If the user points at specific files or a diff, use that.\n- If on a feature branch, run `git diff main...HEAD` (or the appropriate base branch) for the full changeset.\n- If the user's message references recent work, gather the relevant files.\n\nPackage the diff or file contents with any surrounding context files the reviewers need to understand the code.\n\n## Step 2, Intent\n\nBefore spawning reviewers, state the intent in one clear paragraph from the user's message, commit messages, the PR description if one exists, and the code. If you're unsure about the intent, ask the user before proceeding.\n\n## Step 3, Spawn Reviewers\n\nLaunch all reviewers in a single message with the `subagent` extension, one per entry on the `interrogate reviewers` line in the pstack settings file (`~\u002F.omk\u002Fagent\u002Fpstack-models.md`, written by `\u002Fskill:pstack-setup-pstack`), labeled Reviewer A, B, and so on to match the entry count. If the file or that line is missing, use the table defaults.\n\n**Subagent tool.** Spawns in this skill use OMK's `subagent` extension. Call it with `agent`, `task`, and `agentScope`, and use `tasks: [{agent, task}, ...]` for a parallel fan-out. Keep the prompt and inherit the session model. Pass no model, effort, or speed fields. If the `subagent` extension is not loaded or the project is not trusted, run each reviewer yourself, one after another.\n\n| Subagent | Default model |\n|----------|---------------|\n| Reviewer A | `inherit-parent` |\n| Reviewer B | `inherit-parent` |\n\nEach reviewer is a read-only `subagent` call. OMK subagents inherit the session model, so `auto` and `inherit-parent` entries need no model field; a configured entry that is not in the OMK catalog also falls back to the session model.\n\nIf a configured entry is not in the OMK catalog, run that reviewer on the session model and say so. If a table default is not in the OMK catalog, run that reviewer on the session model, and open a separate PR to update the default table. Do not block the review on the slug issue. Never treat an alias entry as a rejected slug or apply either fallback to it.\n\nRead `references\u002Freviewer-prompt.md` and fill in the same template for every reviewer with the stated intent, the diff or file contents, the rubric from `references\u002Frubric.md`, and the code-quality lens from `references\u002Fcode-quality-review.md`. OMK subagents inherit the session model and effort; pass no model, effort, or speed fields.\n\n## Step 4, Synthesize\n\nAs results come back, build a unified picture. Parse every reviewer's findings. Merge findings that describe the same issue differently, and note which reviewer labels raised each one. Findings two or more reviewers raised independently are the highest signal. Read a lone reviewer's finding, but weight it accordingly. Note disagreements. If one reviewer flags something and another explicitly says the opposite, that is context for the verdict.\n\n## Step 5, Lead Judgment\n\nYou are the lead reviewer, a pragmatic senior engineer, not a neutral aggregator. Read `references\u002Flead-judgment.md` for the full framework. Put every finding in one of four buckets, with the reviewer label(s) that raised it and a one-line rationale.\n\n- **Act on**. Real issues affecting correctness, security, or maintainability given the actual goals. They would block a real PR.\n- **Consider**. Legitimate, but you're not sure they outweigh the cost of addressing them now. Worth the user's attention.\n- **Noted**. Technically valid but not actionable. Context-dependent, premature optimization, or low-impact at this stage.\n- **Dismissed**. Wrong, nitpicky, or missing context, with a brief reason.\n\n## Output Format\n\n### Intent\n> [The stated intent paragraph from Step 2]\n\n### Reviewers\n- Reviewer [label]: [model name], [N findings] (one bullet per reviewer)\n\n### Act On\n[Each: description, which reviewers raised it, why it matters.]\n\n### Consider\n[Each: description, which models raised it, the tradeoff.]\n\n### Noted\n[Brief list.]\n\n### Dismissed\n[Each with a brief rationale.]\n\n### Agreement Map\n[Where reviewers agreed and diverged. State that shared-model agreement is not cross-model evidence.]\n","# Interrogate\n\nSpawn one reviewer per configured role entry to adversarially review code changes. OMK delegates inherit the session model, so independent briefs provide review separation, not model diversity. The deliverable is a synthesized verdict. Do NOT auto-apply changes.\n\n## Step 1, Scope\n\nIdentify what to review from context:\n\n- If the user points at specific files or a diff, use that.\n- If on a feature branch, run `git diff main...HEAD` (or the appropriate base branch) for the full changeset.\n- If the user's message references recent work, gather the relevant files.\n\nPackage the diff or file contents with any surrounding context files the reviewers need to understand the code.\n\n## Step 2, Intent\n\nBefore spawning reviewers, state the intent in one clear paragraph from the user's message, commit messages, the PR description if one exists, and the code. If you're unsure about the intent, ask the user before proceeding.\n\n## Step 3, Spawn Reviewers\n\nLaunch all reviewers in a single message with the `subagent` extension, one per entry on the `interrogate reviewers` line in the pstack settings file (`~\u002F.omk\u002Fagent\u002Fpstack-models.md`, written by `\u002Fskill:pstack-setup-pstack`), labeled Reviewer A, B, and so on to match the entry count. If the file or that line is missing, use the table defaults.\n\n**Subagent tool.** Spawns in this skill use OMK's `subagent` extension. Call it with `agent`, `task`, and `agentScope`, and use `tasks: [{agent, task}, ...]` for a parallel fan-out. Keep the prompt and inherit the session model. Pass no model, effort, or speed fields. If the `subagent` extension is not loaded or the project is not trusted, run each reviewer yourself, one after another.\n\n| Subagent | Default model |\n|----------|---------------|\n| Reviewer A | `inherit-parent` |\n| Reviewer B | `inherit-parent` |\n\nEach reviewer is a read-only `subagent` call. OMK subagents inherit the session model, so `auto` and `inherit-parent` entries need no model field; a configured entry that is not in the OMK catalog also falls back to the session model.\n\nIf a configured entry is not in the OMK catalog, run that reviewer on the session model and say so. If a table default is not in the OMK catalog, run that reviewer on the session model, and open a separate PR to update the default table. Do not block the review on the slug issue. Never treat an alias entry as a rejected slug or apply either fallback to it.\n\nRead `references\u002Freviewer-prompt.md` and fill in the same template for every reviewer with the stated intent, the diff or file contents, the rubric from `references\u002Frubric.md`, and the code-quality lens from `references\u002Fcode-quality-review.md`. OMK subagents inherit the session model and effort; pass no model, effort, or speed fields.\n\n## Step 4, Synthesize\n\nAs results come back, build a unified picture. Parse every reviewer's findings. Merge findings that describe the same issue differently, and note which reviewer labels raised each one. Findings two or more reviewers raised independently are the highest signal. Read a lone reviewer's finding, but weight it accordingly. Note disagreements. If one reviewer flags something and another explicitly says the opposite, that is context for the verdict.\n\n## Step 5, Lead Judgment\n\nYou are the lead reviewer, a pragmatic senior engineer, not a neutral aggregator. Read `references\u002Flead-judgment.md` for the full framework. Put every finding in one of four buckets, with the reviewer label(s) that raised it and a one-line rationale.\n\n- **Act on**. Real issues affecting correctness, security, or maintainability given the actual goals. They would block a real PR.\n- **Consider**. Legitimate, but you're not sure they outweigh the cost of addressing them now. Worth the user's attention.\n- **Noted**. Technically valid but not actionable. Context-dependent, premature optimization, or low-impact at this stage.\n- **Dismissed**. Wrong, nitpicky, or missing context, with a brief reason.\n\n## Output Format\n\n### Intent\n> [The stated intent paragraph from Step 2]\n\n### Reviewers\n- Reviewer [label]: [model name], [N findings] (one bullet per reviewer)\n\n### Act On\n[Each: description, which reviewers raised it, why it matters.]\n\n### Consider\n[Each: description, which models raised it, the tradeoff.]\n\n### Noted\n[Brief list.]\n\n### Dismissed\n[Each with a brief rationale.]\n\n### Agreement Map\n[Where reviewers agreed and diverged. State that shared-model agreement is not cross-model evidence.]\n",{"name":5,"description":7,"disable-model-invocation":53},true,"main","ea03fcf76b438f12f0cebcd6b255d24d4cb52741","packages\u002Fcoding-agent\u002Fresources\u002Fpstack\u002Fskills\u002Finterrogate",29,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdmae97\u002Fomk","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdmae97","2026-11-13 14:34:42",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":62,"prompt":72,"zipAvailable":53},[63,66,69],{"tool":64,"command":65},"npx","npx skills add dmae97\u002Fomk --skill pstack-interrogate",{"tool":67,"command":68},"bunx","bunx skills add dmae97\u002Fomk --skill pstack-interrogate",{"tool":70,"command":71},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add dmae97\u002Fomk --skill pstack-interrogate","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdmae97\u002Fomk\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002Fcoding-agent\u002Fresources\u002Fpstack\u002Fskills\u002Finterrogate\u002FSKILL.md",[74,80,84,88],{"path":75,"resourceType":76,"resourceTypeDesc":77,"sizeBytes":78,"sourceHtmlUrl":79},"references\u002Fcode-quality-review.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",5217,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdmae97\u002Fomk\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002Fcoding-agent\u002Fresources\u002Fpstack\u002Fskills\u002Finterrogate\u002Freferences\u002Fcode-quality-review.md",{"path":81,"resourceType":76,"resourceTypeDesc":77,"sizeBytes":82,"sourceHtmlUrl":83},"references\u002Flead-judgment.md",2283,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdmae97\u002Fomk\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002Fcoding-agent\u002Fresources\u002Fpstack\u002Fskills\u002Finterrogate\u002Freferences\u002Flead-judgment.md",{"path":85,"resourceType":76,"resourceTypeDesc":77,"sizeBytes":86,"sourceHtmlUrl":87},"references\u002Freviewer-prompt.md",2275,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdmae97\u002Fomk\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002Fcoding-agent\u002Fresources\u002Fpstack\u002Fskills\u002Finterrogate\u002Freferences\u002Freviewer-prompt.md",{"path":89,"resourceType":76,"resourceTypeDesc":77,"sizeBytes":90,"sourceHtmlUrl":91},"references\u002Frubric.md",4772,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdmae97\u002Fomk\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002Fcoding-agent\u002Fresources\u002Fpstack\u002Fskills\u002Finterrogate\u002Freferences\u002Frubric.md",[93,104,118,131,142,150],{"skillNo":94,"name":95,"nameZh":6,"description":96,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":97,"categories":98,"keywords":100,"publishedAt":48},"01M71RZKQCQ4G7MP08TE3QQ0PD","valid-skill","A valid skill for testing purposes.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdmae97\u002Fomk\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002Fcoding-agent\u002Ftest\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskills\u002Fvalid-skill\u002FSKILL.md",[99],{"categoryNo":18,"categoryName":19,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},[101,102,103,34],"valid skill","valid","testing",{"skillNo":105,"name":106,"nameZh":6,"description":107,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":108,"categories":109,"keywords":111,"publishedAt":48},"01M71RZJ8YHH8GKADPTSZBCJ1T","unknown-field","A skill with an unknown frontmatter field.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdmae97\u002Fomk\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002Fcoding-agent\u002Ftest\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskills\u002Funknown-field\u002FSKILL.md",[110],{"categoryNo":18,"categoryName":19,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},[112,113,114,115,116,117],"unknown","unknown field","a skill","frontmatter","with","unknown frontmatter field",{"skillNo":119,"name":120,"nameZh":6,"description":121,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":122,"categories":123,"keywords":125,"publishedAt":48},"01M71RZH4FVEENABTV8WTQ5HTS","nested-child","Nested skill should be ignored.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdmae97\u002Fomk\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002Fcoding-agent\u002Ftest\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskills\u002Froot-skill-preferred\u002Fnested-child\u002FSKILL.md",[124],{"categoryNo":18,"categoryName":19,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},[126,127,128,129,130],"nested child","child","nested","ignored","nested skill",{"skillNo":132,"name":133,"nameZh":6,"description":134,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":135,"categories":136,"keywords":138,"publishedAt":48},"01M71RZFZYSXRRVY5M8HP05NJV","root-skill-preferred","Root skill should win.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdmae97\u002Fomk\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002Fcoding-agent\u002Ftest\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskills\u002Froot-skill-preferred\u002FSKILL.md",[137],{"categoryNo":18,"categoryName":19,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},[139,140,141],"root","root skill preferred","root skill",{"skillNo":143,"name":144,"nameZh":6,"description":6,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":145,"categories":146,"keywords":148,"publishedAt":48},"01M71RZEQDH7RZ1PH36G7GPN9N","no-frontmatter","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdmae97\u002Fomk\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002Fcoding-agent\u002Ftest\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskills\u002Fno-frontmatter\u002FSKILL.md",[147],{"categoryNo":18,"categoryName":19,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},[115,149],"no frontmatter",{"skillNo":151,"name":152,"nameZh":6,"description":153,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":154,"categories":155,"keywords":157,"publishedAt":48},"01M71RZDC0QR3ZJQ549N3H94Y4","child-skill","A nested skill in a subdirectory.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdmae97\u002Fomk\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002Fcoding-agent\u002Ftest\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskills\u002Fnested\u002Fchild-skill\u002FSKILL.md",[156],{"categoryNo":18,"categoryName":19,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},[158,127,130,128],"child skill"]