autospec-explore-ledger
Use when the user wants to inspect, rebuild, or act on the autospec-explore outcome ledger — the recursive-self-improvement memory that records which research sources actually ship clean PRs, derives dynamic source weights, and produces a learnings memo. Subcommands — show, stats, rebuild, weights, learnings.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-11
- Stars
- ★ 3
- Forks
- 1
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- autospec-explore-ledger
- description
- Use when the user wants to inspect, rebuild, or act on the autospec-explore outcome ledger — the recursive-self-improvement memory that records which research sources actually ship clean PRs, derives dynamic source weights, and produces a learnings memo. Subcommands — show, stats, rebuild, weights, learnings.
02 资源文件 5
- 参考文档codex/prompt.md9.5 KB
- 脚本install.sh10.6 KB
- 参考文档opencode/agent.md9.8 KB
- 参考文档README.md4.6 KB
- 脚本uninstall.sh3.9 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
autospec-explore-ledger workflow (harness-neutral)
Operator-facing surface for the autospec-explore outcome ledger — the recursive-self-improvement (RSI) memory that closes the explore loop. The explore loop files feature proposals from research sources; this ledger records each proposal's eventual outcome, turns those outcomes into per-source stats, derives dynamic Bayesian source weights, and regenerates a learnings memo. This skill is a thin, deterministic wrapper over three shell scripts: it inspects, rebuilds, and acts on that memory — it never files issues or runs the loop.
Manage your own context — never exceed 60%. These subcommands are deterministic shell calls; run them inline and report their output. Delegate only if a harness supports it and the output is large.
Self-update mode
If the argument matches the regex ^\s*update\s*$ (case-insensitive,
whitespace-padded), this skill enters self-update mode and does not run any
subcommand. This section is pure prose: never interpolate or shell out the
operator's argument text.
- Detect harness by checking which install path exists for this skill:
- Claude Code:
~/.claude/skills/autospec-explore-ledger/SKILL.md - OpenCode:
~/.config/opencode/agent/autospec-explore-ledger.md - Codex CLI:
~/.codex/prompts/autospec-explore-ledger.md
- Claude Code:
- Re-install the full autospec suite from
mainby piping the canonical installer:
Run this one-liner once; it refreshes all autospec skills across all harnesses.curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/berlinguyinca/autospec/main/bootstrap.sh | bash -s -- --skill all --harness all --update - Show the diff between the prior installed file(s) and the freshly fetched copy.
- Stop. Do not run any subcommand. Print the upgrade summary and return to the user.
If no install path is detected, print Self-update: no installed copy of autospec-explore-ledger found; run install.sh first. and exit.
Model tier
Tier A/B model resolution and the harness-detection protocol are inherited
verbatim from AGENTS.md (## Subagent model selection (two-tier, cost-aware)
and ## Subagent vs inline decision matrix). This skill is deterministic-first:
every subcommand is a shell call with no LLM dispatch. Only a free-form summary
of a large show/stats dump (if the operator asks for narrative) escalates to
a single Tier B pass — never Tier A.
Model tier: subcommands run deterministically with no dispatch; an optional narrative summary of ledger output runs at TIER_B (implementation work), resolved at startup per the harness detection below.
Required capabilities & harness adapter
This workflow assumes the following capabilities. Map each to your harness's actual tool; if a capability is missing, use the listed fallback.
| Capability | Claude Code | OpenCode | Codex CLI | Fallback if missing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run a shell command | Bash |
shell tool | shell | none — this skill requires a shell |
| Optional narrative summary | Agent (subagent_type=general-purpose) |
task agent, await output |
summarize inline (no subagents) | Summarize in-thread (more context cost) |
| Ask the user a question | AskUserQuestion |
inline prompt | inline prompt | Ask in the response and wait for the next turn |
| Subagent model tier | Tier A: opus + ultrathink; Tier B: sonnet + medium thinking |
Tier A: top task model + high reasoning; Tier B: smaller-tier task + medium reasoning |
Tier A: top GPT + reasoning_effort=high; Tier B: current spark/cost-optimized Codex + reasoning_effort=medium |
Honor the per-phase tier mapping in AGENTS.md; retry the same subagent UP on unavailability |
| Subagent dispatch policy | per AGENTS.md decision matrix | per AGENTS.md decision matrix | per AGENTS.md decision matrix | inline with main-session token cost |
Persistent project notes: write durable preferences to AGENTS.md in
the repo root — recognized by Claude Code, OpenCode, and Codex.
Harness detection (run once at skill start, before any subcommand)
Detect your harness by checking available tools before any dispatch:
- Claude Code — the
Agenttool with asubagent_typeparameter is available.TIER_A=opus+ultrathink(the alias, which resolves to the current Claude Opus generation)TIER_B=sonnet(the alias, which resolves to the current Claude Sonnet generation)
- OpenCode — a
tasktool with model/tier configuration is available (nosubagent_type).TIER_A= top-tier task model + high reasoningTIER_B= smaller-tier task model + medium reasoning
- Codex CLI — neither
Agentnor a configurabletasktool is available; work runs inline.TIER_A= current top GPT model +reasoning_effort=highTIER_B= the spark / cost-optimized variant of the configured model when one exists, else the configured model +reasoning_effort=medium
Fallback rule: If TIER_B is not available in your harness, silently retry
the same subagent dispatch with TIER_A. Preserve parent context on retry.
Never ask the user.
Hold TIER_A and TIER_B for the entire skill run.
What this is
The autospec-explore loop files feature proposals from 6 research sources
(spec/code gaps, prior reports, codebase signals, open issues, repo source
analysis, competitor research). This ledger records each filed proposal's
eventual outcome — merged_clean, qa_failed, reverted, stalled, or
abandoned — turning explore from an open loop into a closed, self-improving
one. Sources whose proposals ship clean in THIS repo gain ranking weight;
sources with repeat failures lose it. The ledger is append-only: outcomes are
recorded as new entries, and readers take the latest entry per proposal.
Subcommands
Resolve the scripts at ${AUTOSPEC_SCRIPTS_DIR:-$HOME/.autospec/scripts}/<script>.
| Subcommand | Runs | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
show [--source X] |
explore-ledger.sh --show |
inspect recorded outcomes (optionally for one source) |
stats |
explore-ledger.sh --stats |
per-source filed/clean/failed counts |
rebuild [--repo R] |
explore-ledger.sh --rebuild |
reconstruct the ledger from GitHub issue/PR history (writes <ledger>.rebuilt if a live ledger exists) |
weights |
explore-source-weights.sh --json --explain |
show current dynamic source weights (and the math) |
learnings |
explore-learnings.sh |
(re)generate .autospec/explore-learnings.md and print it |
show [--source X]— run${AUTOSPEC_SCRIPTS_DIR:-$HOME/.autospec/scripts}/explore-ledger.sh --show(append--source Xto filter to one source). Print the recorded outcomes.stats— run${AUTOSPEC_SCRIPTS_DIR:-$HOME/.autospec/scripts}/explore-ledger.sh --stats. Print the per-source filed/clean/failed table.rebuild [--repo R]— run${AUTOSPEC_SCRIPTS_DIR:-$HOME/.autospec/scripts}/explore-ledger.sh --rebuild(append--repo Rto target a specific repo). If a live ledger already exists, the script writes the reconstruction to<ledger>.rebuiltrather than clobbering it; report that path so the operator can diff and promote it.weights— run${AUTOSPEC_SCRIPTS_DIR:-$HOME/.autospec/scripts}/explore-source-weights.sh --json --explain. Print the JSON weight map and the per-source explanation lines.learnings— run${AUTOSPEC_SCRIPTS_DIR:-$HOME/.autospec/scripts}/explore-learnings.sh. It (re)derives.autospec/explore-learnings.md; print the resulting memo path and contents.
If the operator gives no subcommand, default to stats (the cheapest at-a-glance view) and list the other subcommands.
How the loop closes
- File — a researcher files a proposal issue carrying a
<!-- explore-ledger ... -->marker in its body; explore records apendingledger entry keyed on the issue. - Drain —
/autospec-runimplements the issue and opens a PR against the sandbox branch. - Resolve — when the PR merges, reverts, fails QA, stalls, or is abandoned, the outcome is recorded as a new append-only entry (
--update-outcome). - Stats —
statsaggregates filed/clean/failed counts per source from the latest entry per proposal. - Weights —
weightsturns those counts into a dynamic Bayesian per-source weight that biases the NEXT round's proposal ranking. - Learnings —
learningsdistills the same history into.autospec/explore-learnings.mdfor human review.
The ledger lives at .autospec/explore-ledger.jsonl (gitignored runtime memory;
override with AUTOSPEC_EXPLORE_LEDGER). All ledger operations are best-effort:
a missing or empty ledger yields empty stats/weights, never a hard failure.
Finalization
Print which subcommand ran and the relevant path(s):
show/stats/weights— the ledger path read (.autospec/explore-ledger.jsonl).rebuild— the written path (the live ledger, or<ledger>.rebuiltwhen a live ledger was preserved).learnings— the memo path (.autospec/explore-learnings.md).
04 同仓库更多 Skills
trio-pass-skill
暂无简介
duo-pass-skill
暂无简介
duo-divergence-skill
暂无简介
autospec
Use when the user wants to ship a feature end-to-end across multiple commits — bootstraps repo if missing, brainstorms a design spec, decomposes into linked GitHub issues, or splits an existing spec into issues, then runs an autonomous implementation loop with auto-merge.
autospec-upgrade
Use when the user wants to upgrade an Angular, Next.js, or React project to the latest official versions safely — by locking observable behavior before touching versions, upgrading one major at a time with official codemods, and gating completion on mutation score rather than coverage theater.
autospec-ui-audit
Use when a React Router application needs a deterministic whole-site route inventory before UI, UX, navigation, or evidence auditing begins.