issue-root-resolution
Trigger: root audit, atacar la raíz, issue roots, backlog roots, mechanism map, deletion-driven fix, resolver issues de raíz, close outdated issues. Audit and resolve issue clusters by verified root cause.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-10
- Stars
- ★ 0
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- issue-root-resolution
- license
- Apache-2.0
- metadata
- { "author": "gentleman-programming", "version": "1.0" }
- triggers
- root audit, issue roots, backlog roots, mechanism map, deletion-driven fix, close outdated issues, root cause
- description
- Trigger: root audit, atacar la raíz, issue roots, backlog roots, mechanism map, deletion-driven fix, resolver issues de raíz, close outdated issues. Audit and resolve issue clusters by verified root cause.
03 SKILL.md 正文
Activation Contract
Load when auditing a defect backlog for shared root causes, proposing a fix for an issue cluster, or closing issues as resolved/outdated. Complements rdd-defect-workflow (single-defect flow) — this skill governs the cluster-level method.
Hard Rules
- Read full bodies and comments, never titles. Classify against the actual code or PR diff, not descriptions of it.
- Verify every "fixed" or "broken" claim against current
origin/mainthe day you act. Compare report dates to fix merge dates: a repro filed before the fix landed is evidence about old builds, not current code. - Cluster defects by causal root, not surface. Each root gets a measured row in the meta-issue (#2471 style): issues attached, fix shape, state.
- Before proposing any fix, produce a read-only mechanism map: one file:line anchor per claim, mechanism explained as implemented today. Report claim-vs-code mismatches explicitly; never force evidence to fit the hypothesis. Let the map shrink the proposal.
- Rank solutions by what they DELETE: (1) removes a mechanism so the class becomes impossible, (2) static guard-ratchet making reintroduction a test failure, (3) localized predicate fix behind a failing repro test. New surface (verbs, flags, mechanisms) is last resort — defer until re-verified evidence demands it.
- Extract maintainer choices as named D-items with recommended defaults. A maintainer condition recorded in an issue thread outranks any plan table, including yours.
- Close only with evidence, one rule per closure: (A) fixed on main, cite commit AND proving test; (B) superseded by recorded maintainer decision; (C) surface no longer exists; (D) duplicate of a fixed issue. Comment before closing: what resolved it, verified today, reopen invitation. When in doubt, do not close — list as borderline.
- Clean break, never compatibility. When a format or identity changes, bump its versioned tag as a REPLACEMENT: old records become outdated and fail closed with an actionable refusal naming the rerun. Never write dual recognition, legacy fallbacks, or compat shims; that residue is what the deletion criterion exists to prevent. Stored bytes are never rewritten and stay readable for forensics, but carry no gate or lifecycle validity.
- Implementation follows the waves recipe: repro as failing test first, byte-stable goldens as defect signal, independently revertible slices, one writer per slice.
- A universal guard's verification matrix is
go test ./...at the repository root, never a curated package list. A guard that forbids a shape breaks every fixture that relied on it, including in packages the change never touched. - One worktree per writer, always, including the orchestrator. Before editing inline, check whether a delegated worker holds that path; if so, create a separate worktree rather than reusing it.
- Audit every worker report yourself: re-run its key verification, decoy-test any new guard, spot-check its diffs. A self-report is a claim, not evidence.
Decision Gates
| Condition | Action |
|---|---|
| Issue's failure mechanism absent from current main | Re-verify on latest build; close by rule A/C or mark stale — never fix ghost code. |
| Fix would add a mechanism, flag, or verb | Defer with written reason; re-rank for a deletion-shaped alternative first. |
| Map contradicts the issue or your hypothesis | The map wins. Revise the plan and correct the public record (meta-issue) before coding. |
| Blocker's fix lives in an unmerged PR | Leave open; it closes on merge or by its own thread condition. |
| Closure evidence incomplete | Borderline list, not closure. |
Execution Steps
- Measure: read the cluster fully; partition by root; record counts in the meta-issue.
- Classify each issue against the real diff/code; separate closes-via-X, improved-not-closed, unrelated, blocker.
- Map mechanisms read-only with anchors; flag mismatches.
- Rank fixes deletion-first; name D-items; get maintainer answers.
- Implement in slices (issue-first: every PR links a
status:approvedissue), audit each worker report. - Hygiene pass: evidence-gated closures, stale-repro re-verification requests, meta-issue update with what changed and why.
Edge Cases
- An issue filed before a fix merged is evidence about old builds, not a claim against current
main. - When the mechanism map contradicts the hypothesis, the map wins and the plan must be revised first.
- A fix that adds a new mechanism, flag, or verb is deferred until a deletion-shaped alternative is ruled out.
Output Contract
Per pass, report: roots table (issues, fix shape, state), closures with rule+evidence, borderline list with reasons, D-items and their answers, mechanism-map mismatches found, and the meta-issue comment link.
References
../rdd-advisory-transport/references/shared-advisory-transport-proposal.md— exemplar proposal shape produced by this method.../rdd-advisory-transport/references/issue-impact-matrix.md— exemplar per-issue disposition matrix.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
web-quality-audit
Comprehensive web audit: performance, a11y, SEO, responsive, animation, design tokens.
ui-engine
UI system — Grid/Flexbox/@layer/:has(), container queries, compositor-only animation, OKLCH tokens, component patterns
baseline-ui
Anti-slop UI — layout, typography, responsive, animation, tokens. Use for cleanup or polish.
skill-creator
Create new AI agent skills following Agent Skills spec -- auto-bootstrap unknown tasks, define structure, register in AGENTS.md
senior-engineer
Apply senior engineering competencies — system design, trade-off analysis, delegation, mentoring, and tech debt strategy
prompt-engineering
Design effective prompts using SPEARS framework — scope, principles, examples, assertions, refinements, with ReAct and multi-agent patterns