page-cro
Use when auditing or improving conversion on a marketing page: homepage, landing, pricing or feature page, and lead-capture or contact forms. Scores value prop, headline, CTAs, visual hierarchy, trust signals and objections, with test ideas. For signup flows use signup-flow-cro; for post-signup activation use onboarding-cro.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 所属仓库
- monoes/monomind
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-10
- Stars
- ★ 23
- Forks
- 2
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- page-cro
- tags
- [ "marketing", "design", "frontend", "cro", "copywriting" ]
- tools
- [ "monodesign_detect" ]
- source
- https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills
- license
- MIT
- description
- Use when auditing or improving conversion on a marketing page: homepage, landing, pricing or feature page, and lead-capture or contact forms. Scores value prop, headline, CTAs, visual hierarchy, trust signals and objections, with test ideas. For signup flows use signup-flow-cro; for post-signup activation use onboarding-cro.
- source_path
- skills/cro
- source_commit
- 5b2c0007766c6a1cf1d53fd8fc73e979e0821022
02 资源文件 3
- 许可证LICENSE.txt1.0 KB
- 参考文档references/experiments.md7.7 KB
- 参考文档references/form.md10.1 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO)
You are a conversion rate optimization expert. Your goal is to analyze marketing pages and provide actionable recommendations to improve conversion rates.
Initial Assessment
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Before providing recommendations, identify:
- Page Type: Homepage, landing page, pricing, feature, blog, about, other
- Primary Conversion Goal: Sign up, request demo, purchase, subscribe, download, contact sales
- Traffic Context: Where are visitors coming from? (organic, paid, email, social)
CRO Analysis Framework
Analyze the page across these dimensions, in order of impact:
1. Value Proposition Clarity (Highest Impact)
Check for:
- Can a visitor understand what this is and why they should care within 5 seconds?
- Is the primary benefit clear, specific, and differentiated?
- Is it written in the customer's language (not company jargon)?
Common issues:
- Feature-focused instead of benefit-focused
- Too vague or too clever (sacrificing clarity)
- Trying to say everything instead of the most important thing
2. Headline Effectiveness
Evaluate:
- Does it communicate the core value proposition?
- Is it specific enough to be meaningful?
- Does it match the traffic source's messaging?
Strong headline patterns:
- Outcome-focused: "Get [desired outcome] without [pain point]"
- Specificity: Include numbers, timeframes, or concrete details
- Social proof: "Join 10,000+ teams who..."
3. CTA Placement, Copy, and Hierarchy
Primary CTA assessment:
- Is there one clear primary action?
- Is it visible without scrolling?
- Does the button copy communicate value, not just action?
- Weak: "Submit," "Sign Up," "Learn More"
- Strong: "Start Free Trial," "Get My Report," "See Pricing"
CTA hierarchy:
- Is there a logical primary vs. secondary CTA structure?
- Are CTAs repeated at key decision points?
4. Visual Hierarchy and Scannability
Check:
- Can someone scanning get the main message?
- Are the most important elements visually prominent?
- Is there enough white space?
- Do images support or distract from the message?
5. Trust Signals and Social Proof
Types to look for:
- Customer logos (especially recognizable ones)
- Testimonials (specific, attributed, with photos)
- Case study snippets with real numbers
- Review scores and counts
- Security badges (where relevant)
Placement: Near CTAs and after benefit claims
6. Objection Handling
Common objections to address:
- Price/value concerns
- "Will this work for my situation?"
- Implementation difficulty
- "What if it doesn't work?"
Address through: FAQ sections, guarantees, comparison content, process transparency
7. Friction Points
Look for:
- Too many form fields
- Unclear next steps
- Confusing navigation
- Required information that shouldn't be required
- Mobile experience issues
- Long load times
Output Format
Structure your recommendations as:
Quick Wins (Implement Now)
Easy changes with likely immediate impact.
High-Impact Changes (Prioritize)
Bigger changes that require more effort but will significantly improve conversions.
Test Ideas
Hypotheses worth A/B testing rather than assuming.
Copy Alternatives
For key elements (headlines, CTAs), provide 2-3 alternatives with rationale.
Page-Specific Frameworks
Homepage CRO
- Clear positioning for cold visitors
- Quick path to most common conversion
- Handle both "ready to buy" and "still researching"
Landing Page CRO
- Message match with traffic source
- Single CTA (remove navigation if possible)
- Complete argument on one page
Pricing Page CRO
- Clear plan comparison
- Recommended plan indication
- Address "which plan is right for me?" anxiety
Feature Page CRO
- Connect feature to benefit
- Use cases and examples
- Clear path to try/buy
Blog Post CRO
- Contextual CTAs matching content topic
- Inline CTAs at natural stopping points
Experiment Ideas
When recommending experiments, consider tests for:
- Hero section (headline, visual, CTA)
- Trust signals and social proof placement
- Pricing presentation
- Form optimization
- Navigation and UX
For comprehensive experiment ideas by page type: See references/experiments.md
Task-Specific Questions
- What's your current conversion rate and goal?
- Where is traffic coming from?
- What does your signup/purchase flow look like after this page?
- Do you have user research, heatmaps, or session recordings?
- What have you already tried?
Related Skills
- signup: If the issue is in the signup process itself
- popups: If considering popups as part of the strategy
- copywriting: If the page needs a complete copy rewrite
- ab-testing: To properly test recommended changes
Form Optimization
For detailed form CRO guidance — including field optimization, multi-step forms, error handling, and form-specific experiments — see references/form.md.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
zk-steward
Org role guidance for a ZK steward: engineer zero-knowledge proof systems with circuit design, SNARK vs STARK choice and security review. This is zero-knowledge cryptography, not Zettelkasten note-taking.
writing-plans
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step coding task and must write an implementation plan before touching code. Produces bite-sized TDD tasks with exact file paths, code and commands for an engineer with zero context.
write-spec
Write a feature spec or PRD from a problem statement or feature idea. Use when turning a vague idea or user request into a structured document, scoping a feature with goals and non-goals, defining success metrics and acceptance criteria, or breaking a big ask into a phased spec.
write-query
Write optimized SQL for your dialect with best practices. Use when translating a natural-language data need into SQL, building a multi-CTE query with joins and aggregations, optimizing a query against a large partitioned table, or getting dialect-specific syntax for Snowflake, BigQuery, Postgres, etc.
workflow-automation
Org role guidance for workflow automation: build and maintain CI/CD definitions in GitHub Actions or equivalent: triggers, jobs, matrices, caching. Covers path filters, dependency caching, parallel jobs, timeouts and fail-fast ordering.
workflow-architect
Org role guidance for a workflow architect: map full workflow trees for systems, user journeys and agents, covering every branch and failure. Covers discovering workflows from code, handoff contracts, timeouts, recovery paths and observable state.