AGENT SKILL

ln-642-layer-ownership-boundary-auditor

Checks layer, resource ownership, and orchestration boundaries. Use when auditing architecture boundary enforcement.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-06-15
Stars
★ 2
Forks
1

01 前言 Front Matter

name
ln-642-layer-ownership-boundary-auditor
license
MIT
description
Checks layer, resource ownership, and orchestration boundaries. Use when auditing architecture boundary enforcement.
allowed-tools
Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, mcp__hex-graph__find_references, mcp__hex-graph__trace_paths, mcp__hex-graph__inspect_symbol, mcp__hex-graph__analyze_architecture, mcp__hex-line__read_file, mcp__hex-line__grep_search, mcp__hex-line__outline

02 资源文件 9

03 SKILL.md 正文

Paths: File paths (references/, ../ln-*) are relative to this skill directory.

Layer & Ownership Boundary Auditor

Type: L3 Worker

L3 Worker that audits architectural layer boundaries and detects violations.

Purpose & Scope

  • Read architecture.md to discover project's layer structure
  • Detect layer violations (I/O code outside infrastructure layer)
  • Detect cross-layer consistency issues:
    • Transaction boundaries (commit/rollback ownership)
    • Session ownership (DI vs local)
  • Check pattern coverage (all HTTP calls use client abstraction)
  • Detect error handling duplication
  • Return violations list

Out of Scope:

  • Blocking I/O in async functions (sync open/read in async def)
  • Fire-and-forget tasks (create_task without error handler)

Input

- architecture_path: string    # Path to docs/architecture.md
- codebase_root: string        # Root directory to scan
- skip_violations: string[]    # Files to skip (legacy)
- output_dir: string           # e.g., ".hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/audit-report"

# Domain-aware (optional)
- domain_mode: "global" | "domain-aware"   # Default: "global"
- current_domain: string                   # e.g., "users", "billing" (only if domain-aware)
- scan_path: string                        # e.g., "src/users/" (only if domain-aware)

When domain_mode="domain-aware": Use scan_path instead of codebase_root for all Grep/Glob operations. Tag all findings with domain field.

Workflow

Detection policy: use two-layer detection (candidate scan, then context verification); load references/two_layer_detection.md only when the verification method is ambiguous. Tool policy: follow host AGENTS.md MCP preferences; load references/mcp_tool_preferences.md and references/mcp_integration_patterns.md only when host policy is absent or MCP behavior is unclear.

Use hex-graph first when references, call paths, or architecture coupling materially improve the audit. Use hex-line first for local code and config reads when available. If MCP is unavailable, unsupported, or not indexed, continue with built-in Read/Grep/Glob/Bash and state the fallback in the report.

Phase 1: Discover Architecture

MANDATORY READ: Load references/layer_rules.md -- use Architecture Presets (fallback), I/O Pattern Boundary Rules (Phase 2), Coverage Checks (Phase 4), Cross-Layer Consistency rules (Phase 3).

Read docs/architecture.md

Extract from Section 4.2 (Top-Level Decomposition):
  - architecture_type: "Layered" | "Hexagonal" | "Clean" | "MVC" | etc.
  - layers: [{name, directories[], purpose}]

Extract from Section 5.3 (Infrastructure Layer Components):
  - infrastructure_components: [{name, responsibility}]

IF architecture.md not found:
  Use fallback presets from layer_rules.md

Build ruleset:
  FOR EACH layer:
    allowed_deps = layers that can be imported
    forbidden_deps = layers that cannot be imported

Graph acceleration (if available): IF contextStore.graph_indexed OR .hex-skills/codegraph/index.db exists:

  • Module coupling: analyze_architecture(path=scan_root, verbosity="full") -- use returned coupling metrics to identify tightly-coupled layers.
  • Cross-layer calls: find_references(symbol) for transaction/session functions -- trace commit/rollback ownership across layers.
  • Orchestration depth: trace_paths(name="ServiceFn", file="...", path_kind="calls", direction="forward", depth=3, path=scan_root) -- measure chain depth for flat orchestration check from a concrete service symbol.
  • Empty trace_paths from a coarse or module-level selector is not enough to clear a layer; fall back to inspect_symbol or grep/manual review when the selector is broad.
  • Fall back to grep-based detection below if graph unavailable.

Phase 2: Detect Layer Violations

scan_root = scan_path IF domain_mode == "domain-aware" ELSE codebase_root

FOR EACH violation_type IN layer_rules.md I/O Pattern Boundary Rules:
  grep_pattern = violation_type.detection_grep
  forbidden_dirs = violation_type.forbidden_in

  matches = Grep(grep_pattern, scan_root, include="*.py,*.ts,*.js")

  FOR EACH match IN matches:
    IF match.path NOT IN skip_violations:
      IF any(forbidden IN match.path FOR forbidden IN forbidden_dirs):
        violations.append({
          type: "layer_violation",
          severity: "HIGH",
          pattern: violation_type.name,
          file: match.path,
          line: match.line,
          code: match.context,
          allowed_in: violation_type.allowed_in,
          suggestion: f"Move to {violation_type.allowed_in}"
        })

Phase 3: Cross-Layer Consistency Checks

3.1 Transaction Boundary Violations

What: commit()/rollback() called at inconsistent layers (repo + service + API)

Detection:

repo_commits = Grep("\.commit\(\)|\.rollback\(\)", "**/repositories/**/*.py")
service_commits = Grep("\.commit\(\)|\.rollback\(\)", "**/services/**/*.py")
api_commits = Grep("\.commit\(\)|\.rollback\(\)", "**/api/**/*.py")

layers_with_commits = count([repo_commits, service_commits, api_commits].filter(len > 0))

Safe Patterns (ignore):

  • Comment "# best-effort telemetry" in same context
  • File ends with _callbacks.py (progress notifiers)
  • Explicit # UoW boundary comment

Violation Rules:

Condition Severity Issue
layers_with_commits >= 3 CRITICAL Mixed UoW ownership across all layers
repo + api commits HIGH Transaction control bypasses service layer
repo + service commits HIGH Ambiguous UoW owner (repo vs service)
service + api commits MEDIUM Transaction control spans service + API

Exception: Saga pattern / distributed transactions with explicit compensating actions -> downgrade CRITICAL to MEDIUM. UoW boundary documented with // architecture decision or ADR -> skip.

Recommendation: Choose single UoW owner (service layer recommended), remove commit() from other layers

Effort: L (requires architectural decision + refactoring)

3.2 Session Ownership Violations

What: Mixed DI-injected and locally-created sessions in same call chain

Detection:

di_session = Grep("Depends\(get_session\)|Depends\(get_db\)", "**/api/**/*.py")
local_session = Grep("AsyncSessionLocal\(\)|async_sessionmaker", "**/services/**/*.py")
local_in_repo = Grep("AsyncSessionLocal\(\)", "**/repositories/**/*.py")

Violation Rules:

Condition Severity Issue
di_session AND local_in_repo in same module HIGH Repo creates own session while API injects different
local_session in service calling DI-based repo MEDIUM Session mismatch in call chain

Recommendation: Use DI consistently OR use local sessions consistently. Document exceptions (e.g., telemetry)

Effort: M

3.3 Flat Orchestration Violations

What: Service-layer functions calling other services that call yet other services -- deep orchestration chains.

Detection: MANDATORY READ: Load references/ai_ready_architecture.md -- map service imports, find chain depth.

Violation Rules:

Condition Severity Issue
Service chain >= 3 (A->B->C->D) HIGH Deep orchestration
Service chain = 2 (A->B->C) MEDIUM Consider flattening

Recommendation: Extract orchestrator calling all services at same level. Each service becomes a sink.

Effort: L


Phase 4: Check Pattern Coverage

# HTTP Client Coverage
all_http_calls = Grep("httpx\\.|aiohttp\\.|requests\\.", codebase_root)
abstracted_calls = Grep("client\\.(get|post|put|delete)", infrastructure_dirs)

IF len(all_http_calls) > 0:
  coverage = len(abstracted_calls) / len(all_http_calls) * 100
  IF coverage < 90%:
    violations.append({
      type: "low_coverage",
      severity: "MEDIUM",
      pattern: "HTTP Client Abstraction",
      coverage: coverage,
      uncovered_files: files with direct calls outside infrastructure
    })

# Error Handling Duplication
http_error_handlers = Grep("except\\s+(httpx\\.|aiohttp\\.|requests\\.)", codebase_root)
unique_files = set(f.path for f in http_error_handlers)

IF len(unique_files) > 2:
  violations.append({
    type: "duplication",
    severity: "MEDIUM",
    pattern: "HTTP Error Handling",
    files: list(unique_files),
    suggestion: "Centralize in infrastructure layer"
  })

Phase 5: Calculate Score

MANDATORY READ: Load references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and references/audit_scoring.md.

Phase 6: Write Report

MANDATORY READ: Load references/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.

Write JSON summary per references/audit_summary_contract.md. In managed mode the caller passes both runId and summaryArtifactPath; in standalone mode the worker generates its own run-scoped artifact path per shared contract.

# Build markdown report in memory with:
# - AUDIT-META (standard penalty-based: score, counts)
# - Checks table (io_isolation, http_abstraction, error_centralization, transaction_boundary, session_ownership)
# - Findings table (violations sorted by severity)
# - DATA-EXTENDED: {architecture, coverage}

IF domain_mode == "domain-aware":
  Write to {output_dir}/642-layer-boundary-{current_domain}.md
ELSE:
  Write to {output_dir}/642-layer-boundary.md

Phase 7: Return Summary

Report written: .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/audit-report/642-layer-boundary-users.md
Score: 4.5/10 | Issues: 8 (C:1 H:3 M:4 L:0)

Critical Rules

Apply the already-loaded references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

  • Read architecture.md first - never assume architecture type
  • Skip violations list - respect legacy files marked for gradual fix
  • File + line + code - always provide exact location with context
  • Actionable suggestions - always tell WHERE to move the code
  • No false positives - verify path contains forbidden dir, not just substring
  • Unique angle: Audit layer, ownership, and orchestration boundaries only. Do not audit package health, generic code quality, dependency graph topology, or runtime concurrency hazards.
  • Action required: Every finding uses MOVE_BOUNDARY, CHOOSE_OWNER, or FLATTEN_ORCHESTRATION.

Definition of Done

Apply the already-loaded references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

  • [ ] Architecture discovered from docs/architecture.md (or fallback used)
  • [ ] All violation types from layer_rules.md checked
  • [ ] Cross-layer consistency checked:
    • Transaction boundaries analyzed (commit/rollback distribution)
    • Session ownership analyzed (DI vs local)
  • [ ] Coverage calculated for HTTP abstraction + 2 consistency metrics
  • [ ] Violations list with severity, location, suggestion
  • [ ] If domain-aware: all Grep scoped to scan_path, findings tagged with domain
  • [ ] Report written to {output_dir}/642-layer-boundary[-{domain}].md (atomic single Write call)
  • [ ] Summary written per contract

Reference Files

  • Layer rules: references/layer_rules.md
  • Scoring impact: use references/audit_scoring.md

Version: 2.1.0 Last Updated: 2026-02-08

04 同仓库更多 Skills

vitalikpestov
vitalikpestov/Skills-Catalog

solana-dev

Use when user asks to "build a Solana dapp", "write an Anchor program", "create a token", "debug Solana errors", "set up wallet connection", "test my Solana program", "deploy to devnet", or "explain Solana concepts" (rent, accounts, PDAs, CPIs, etc.). End-to-end Solana development playbook covering wallet connection, Anchor/Pinocchio programs, Codama client generation, LiteSVM/Mollusk/Surfpool testing, and security checklists. Integrates with the Solana MCP server for live documentation search. Prefers framework-kit (@solana/client + @solana/react-hooks) for UI, wallet-standard-first connection (incl. ConnectorKit), @solana/kit for client/RPC code, and @solana/web3-compat for legacy boundaries.

开发工程师测试与质量前端开发
★ 2
vitalikpestov
vitalikpestov/Skills-Catalog

generating-trading-signals

Generate trading signals using technical indicators (RSI, MACD, Bollinger Bands, etc.). Combines multiple indicators into composite signals with confidence scores. Use when analyzing assets for trading opportunities or checking technical indicators. Trigger with phrases like "get trading signals", "check indicators", "analyze for entry", "scan for opportunities", "generate buy/sell signals", or "technical analysis".

★ 2
vitalikpestov
vitalikpestov/Skills-Catalog

prediction-monitor

Prediction Monitor - Auto-activating skill for ML Deployment. Triggers on: prediction monitor, prediction monitor Part of the ML Deployment skill category.

★ 2
vitalikpestov
vitalikpestov/Skills-Catalog

strategy-advisor

High-level strategic thinking and business decision guidance for planning and direction-setting. Use when: making strategic decisions, evaluating business options, setting direction, analyzing trade-offs, or when user mentions strategy, business planning, competitive analysis, or long-term planning.

★ 2
vitalikpestov
vitalikpestov/Skills-Catalog

app-paywall-pilot

Design, audit, debug, and implement App Store-compliant mobile paywalls, subscription flows, pricing screens, trials, offers, feature gates, and subscription lifecycle UX. Use when the user asks to audit my paywall, fix App Store 3.1.2 rejection, improve trial-to-paid, choose plans/prices/trials, review RevenueCat/Adapty/Apphud/Superwall setup, calculate LTV/ROAS, or build paywall implementation.

设计师视觉设计
★ 2
vitalikpestov
vitalikpestov/Skills-Catalog

figma

Use the Figma MCP server to fetch design context, screenshots, variables, and assets from Figma, and to translate Figma nodes into production code. Trigger when a task involves Figma URLs, node IDs, design-to-code implementation, or Figma MCP setup and troubleshooting.

设计师Skill与智能体开发
★ 2