ln-642-layer-ownership-boundary-auditor
Checks layer, resource ownership, and orchestration boundaries. Use when auditing architecture boundary enforcement.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-06-15
- Stars
- ★ 2
- Forks
- 1
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- ln-642-layer-ownership-boundary-auditor
- license
- MIT
- description
- Checks layer, resource ownership, and orchestration boundaries. Use when auditing architecture boundary enforcement.
- allowed-tools
- Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, mcp__hex-graph__find_references, mcp__hex-graph__trace_paths, mcp__hex-graph__inspect_symbol, mcp__hex-graph__analyze_architecture, mcp__hex-line__read_file, mcp__hex-line__grep_search, mcp__hex-line__outline
02 资源文件 9
- 参考文档references/ai_ready_architecture.md7.0 KB
- 参考文档references/audit_scoring.md1.1 KB
- 参考文档references/audit_summary_contract.md2.2 KB
- 参考文档references/audit_worker_core_contract.md1.8 KB
- 参考文档references/layer_rules.md3.9 KB
- 参考文档references/mcp_integration_patterns.md1.5 KB
- 参考文档references/mcp_tool_preferences.md2.3 KB
- 参考文档references/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md1.6 KB
- 参考文档references/two_layer_detection.md1.5 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Paths: File paths (
references/,../ln-*) are relative to this skill directory.
Layer & Ownership Boundary Auditor
Type: L3 Worker
L3 Worker that audits architectural layer boundaries and detects violations.
Purpose & Scope
- Read architecture.md to discover project's layer structure
- Detect layer violations (I/O code outside infrastructure layer)
- Detect cross-layer consistency issues:
- Transaction boundaries (commit/rollback ownership)
- Session ownership (DI vs local)
- Check pattern coverage (all HTTP calls use client abstraction)
- Detect error handling duplication
- Return violations list
Out of Scope:
- Blocking I/O in async functions (sync open/read in async def)
- Fire-and-forget tasks (create_task without error handler)
Input
- architecture_path: string # Path to docs/architecture.md
- codebase_root: string # Root directory to scan
- skip_violations: string[] # Files to skip (legacy)
- output_dir: string # e.g., ".hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/audit-report"
# Domain-aware (optional)
- domain_mode: "global" | "domain-aware" # Default: "global"
- current_domain: string # e.g., "users", "billing" (only if domain-aware)
- scan_path: string # e.g., "src/users/" (only if domain-aware)
When domain_mode="domain-aware": Use scan_path instead of codebase_root for all Grep/Glob operations. Tag all findings with domain field.
Workflow
Detection policy: use two-layer detection (candidate scan, then context verification); load references/two_layer_detection.md only when the verification method is ambiguous.
Tool policy: follow host AGENTS.md MCP preferences; load references/mcp_tool_preferences.md and references/mcp_integration_patterns.md only when host policy is absent or MCP behavior is unclear.
Use hex-graph first when references, call paths, or architecture coupling materially improve the audit. Use hex-line first for local code and config reads when available. If MCP is unavailable, unsupported, or not indexed, continue with built-in Read/Grep/Glob/Bash and state the fallback in the report.
Phase 1: Discover Architecture
MANDATORY READ: Load references/layer_rules.md -- use Architecture Presets (fallback), I/O Pattern Boundary Rules (Phase 2), Coverage Checks (Phase 4), Cross-Layer Consistency rules (Phase 3).
Read docs/architecture.md
Extract from Section 4.2 (Top-Level Decomposition):
- architecture_type: "Layered" | "Hexagonal" | "Clean" | "MVC" | etc.
- layers: [{name, directories[], purpose}]
Extract from Section 5.3 (Infrastructure Layer Components):
- infrastructure_components: [{name, responsibility}]
IF architecture.md not found:
Use fallback presets from layer_rules.md
Build ruleset:
FOR EACH layer:
allowed_deps = layers that can be imported
forbidden_deps = layers that cannot be imported
Graph acceleration (if available): IF contextStore.graph_indexed OR .hex-skills/codegraph/index.db exists:
- Module coupling:
analyze_architecture(path=scan_root, verbosity="full")-- use returned coupling metrics to identify tightly-coupled layers. - Cross-layer calls:
find_references(symbol)for transaction/session functions -- trace commit/rollback ownership across layers. - Orchestration depth:
trace_paths(name="ServiceFn", file="...", path_kind="calls", direction="forward", depth=3, path=scan_root)-- measure chain depth for flat orchestration check from a concrete service symbol. - Empty
trace_pathsfrom a coarse or module-level selector is not enough to clear a layer; fall back toinspect_symbolor grep/manual review when the selector is broad. - Fall back to grep-based detection below if graph unavailable.
Phase 2: Detect Layer Violations
scan_root = scan_path IF domain_mode == "domain-aware" ELSE codebase_root
FOR EACH violation_type IN layer_rules.md I/O Pattern Boundary Rules:
grep_pattern = violation_type.detection_grep
forbidden_dirs = violation_type.forbidden_in
matches = Grep(grep_pattern, scan_root, include="*.py,*.ts,*.js")
FOR EACH match IN matches:
IF match.path NOT IN skip_violations:
IF any(forbidden IN match.path FOR forbidden IN forbidden_dirs):
violations.append({
type: "layer_violation",
severity: "HIGH",
pattern: violation_type.name,
file: match.path,
line: match.line,
code: match.context,
allowed_in: violation_type.allowed_in,
suggestion: f"Move to {violation_type.allowed_in}"
})
Phase 3: Cross-Layer Consistency Checks
3.1 Transaction Boundary Violations
What: commit()/rollback() called at inconsistent layers (repo + service + API)
Detection:
repo_commits = Grep("\.commit\(\)|\.rollback\(\)", "**/repositories/**/*.py")
service_commits = Grep("\.commit\(\)|\.rollback\(\)", "**/services/**/*.py")
api_commits = Grep("\.commit\(\)|\.rollback\(\)", "**/api/**/*.py")
layers_with_commits = count([repo_commits, service_commits, api_commits].filter(len > 0))
Safe Patterns (ignore):
- Comment "# best-effort telemetry" in same context
- File ends with
_callbacks.py(progress notifiers) - Explicit
# UoW boundarycomment
Violation Rules:
| Condition | Severity | Issue |
|---|---|---|
| layers_with_commits >= 3 | CRITICAL | Mixed UoW ownership across all layers |
| repo + api commits | HIGH | Transaction control bypasses service layer |
| repo + service commits | HIGH | Ambiguous UoW owner (repo vs service) |
| service + api commits | MEDIUM | Transaction control spans service + API |
Exception: Saga pattern / distributed transactions with explicit compensating actions -> downgrade CRITICAL to MEDIUM. UoW boundary documented with // architecture decision or ADR -> skip.
Recommendation: Choose single UoW owner (service layer recommended), remove commit() from other layers
Effort: L (requires architectural decision + refactoring)
3.2 Session Ownership Violations
What: Mixed DI-injected and locally-created sessions in same call chain
Detection:
di_session = Grep("Depends\(get_session\)|Depends\(get_db\)", "**/api/**/*.py")
local_session = Grep("AsyncSessionLocal\(\)|async_sessionmaker", "**/services/**/*.py")
local_in_repo = Grep("AsyncSessionLocal\(\)", "**/repositories/**/*.py")
Violation Rules:
| Condition | Severity | Issue |
|---|---|---|
| di_session AND local_in_repo in same module | HIGH | Repo creates own session while API injects different |
| local_session in service calling DI-based repo | MEDIUM | Session mismatch in call chain |
Recommendation: Use DI consistently OR use local sessions consistently. Document exceptions (e.g., telemetry)
Effort: M
3.3 Flat Orchestration Violations
What: Service-layer functions calling other services that call yet other services -- deep orchestration chains.
Detection: MANDATORY READ: Load references/ai_ready_architecture.md -- map service imports, find chain depth.
Violation Rules:
| Condition | Severity | Issue |
|---|---|---|
| Service chain >= 3 (A->B->C->D) | HIGH | Deep orchestration |
| Service chain = 2 (A->B->C) | MEDIUM | Consider flattening |
Recommendation: Extract orchestrator calling all services at same level. Each service becomes a sink.
Effort: L
Phase 4: Check Pattern Coverage
# HTTP Client Coverage
all_http_calls = Grep("httpx\\.|aiohttp\\.|requests\\.", codebase_root)
abstracted_calls = Grep("client\\.(get|post|put|delete)", infrastructure_dirs)
IF len(all_http_calls) > 0:
coverage = len(abstracted_calls) / len(all_http_calls) * 100
IF coverage < 90%:
violations.append({
type: "low_coverage",
severity: "MEDIUM",
pattern: "HTTP Client Abstraction",
coverage: coverage,
uncovered_files: files with direct calls outside infrastructure
})
# Error Handling Duplication
http_error_handlers = Grep("except\\s+(httpx\\.|aiohttp\\.|requests\\.)", codebase_root)
unique_files = set(f.path for f in http_error_handlers)
IF len(unique_files) > 2:
violations.append({
type: "duplication",
severity: "MEDIUM",
pattern: "HTTP Error Handling",
files: list(unique_files),
suggestion: "Centralize in infrastructure layer"
})
Phase 5: Calculate Score
MANDATORY READ: Load references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and references/audit_scoring.md.
Phase 6: Write Report
MANDATORY READ: Load references/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.
Write JSON summary per references/audit_summary_contract.md. In managed mode the caller passes both runId and summaryArtifactPath; in standalone mode the worker generates its own run-scoped artifact path per shared contract.
# Build markdown report in memory with:
# - AUDIT-META (standard penalty-based: score, counts)
# - Checks table (io_isolation, http_abstraction, error_centralization, transaction_boundary, session_ownership)
# - Findings table (violations sorted by severity)
# - DATA-EXTENDED: {architecture, coverage}
IF domain_mode == "domain-aware":
Write to {output_dir}/642-layer-boundary-{current_domain}.md
ELSE:
Write to {output_dir}/642-layer-boundary.md
Phase 7: Return Summary
Report written: .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/audit-report/642-layer-boundary-users.md
Score: 4.5/10 | Issues: 8 (C:1 H:3 M:4 L:0)
Critical Rules
Apply the already-loaded references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.
- Read architecture.md first - never assume architecture type
- Skip violations list - respect legacy files marked for gradual fix
- File + line + code - always provide exact location with context
- Actionable suggestions - always tell WHERE to move the code
- No false positives - verify path contains forbidden dir, not just substring
- Unique angle: Audit layer, ownership, and orchestration boundaries only. Do not audit package health, generic code quality, dependency graph topology, or runtime concurrency hazards.
- Action required: Every finding uses
MOVE_BOUNDARY,CHOOSE_OWNER, orFLATTEN_ORCHESTRATION.
Definition of Done
Apply the already-loaded references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.
- [ ] Architecture discovered from docs/architecture.md (or fallback used)
- [ ] All violation types from layer_rules.md checked
- [ ] Cross-layer consistency checked:
- Transaction boundaries analyzed (commit/rollback distribution)
- Session ownership analyzed (DI vs local)
- [ ] Coverage calculated for HTTP abstraction + 2 consistency metrics
- [ ] Violations list with severity, location, suggestion
- [ ] If domain-aware: all Grep scoped to scan_path, findings tagged with domain
- [ ] Report written to
{output_dir}/642-layer-boundary[-{domain}].md(atomic single Write call) - [ ] Summary written per contract
Reference Files
- Layer rules:
references/layer_rules.md - Scoring impact: use
references/audit_scoring.md
Version: 2.1.0 Last Updated: 2026-02-08
04 同仓库更多 Skills
solana-dev
Use when user asks to "build a Solana dapp", "write an Anchor program", "create a token", "debug Solana errors", "set up wallet connection", "test my Solana program", "deploy to devnet", or "explain Solana concepts" (rent, accounts, PDAs, CPIs, etc.). End-to-end Solana development playbook covering wallet connection, Anchor/Pinocchio programs, Codama client generation, LiteSVM/Mollusk/Surfpool testing, and security checklists. Integrates with the Solana MCP server for live documentation search. Prefers framework-kit (@solana/client + @solana/react-hooks) for UI, wallet-standard-first connection (incl. ConnectorKit), @solana/kit for client/RPC code, and @solana/web3-compat for legacy boundaries.
generating-trading-signals
Generate trading signals using technical indicators (RSI, MACD, Bollinger Bands, etc.). Combines multiple indicators into composite signals with confidence scores. Use when analyzing assets for trading opportunities or checking technical indicators. Trigger with phrases like "get trading signals", "check indicators", "analyze for entry", "scan for opportunities", "generate buy/sell signals", or "technical analysis".
prediction-monitor
Prediction Monitor - Auto-activating skill for ML Deployment. Triggers on: prediction monitor, prediction monitor Part of the ML Deployment skill category.
strategy-advisor
High-level strategic thinking and business decision guidance for planning and direction-setting. Use when: making strategic decisions, evaluating business options, setting direction, analyzing trade-offs, or when user mentions strategy, business planning, competitive analysis, or long-term planning.
app-paywall-pilot
Design, audit, debug, and implement App Store-compliant mobile paywalls, subscription flows, pricing screens, trials, offers, feature gates, and subscription lifecycle UX. Use when the user asks to audit my paywall, fix App Store 3.1.2 rejection, improve trial-to-paid, choose plans/prices/trials, review RevenueCat/Adapty/Apphud/Superwall setup, calculate LTV/ROAS, or build paywall implementation.
figma
Use the Figma MCP server to fetch design context, screenshots, variables, and assets from Figma, and to translate Figma nodes into production code. Trigger when a task involves Figma URLs, node IDs, design-to-code implementation, or Figma MCP setup and troubleshooting.