ln-311-review-research-worker
Use when an evaluation run needs mandatory official-doc, MCP Ref, Context7, and current best-practice research with a structured research summary.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-06-15
- Stars
- ★ 2
- Forks
- 1
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- ln-311-review-research-worker
- license
- MIT
- description
- Use when an evaluation run needs mandatory official-doc, MCP Ref, Context7, and current best-practice research with a structured research summary.
02 资源文件 5
- 参考文档references/epistemic_protocol.md3.4 KB
- 参考文档references/evaluation_research_contract.md2.0 KB
- 参考文档references/evaluation_summary_contract.md1.8 KB
- 参考文档references/evaluation_worker_runtime_contract.md2.0 KB
- 参考文档references/researchgraph_mcp_usage.md2.9 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Paths: File paths (
references/,../ln-*) are relative to this skill directory.
Type: L3 Worker Category: 3XX Planning
Review Research Worker
Structured research worker for validation, audit, and review flows.
Mandatory Read
MANDATORY READ: Load references/evaluation_worker_runtime_contract.md, references/evaluation_summary_contract.md, references/evaluation_research_contract.md, references/epistemic_protocol.md
MANDATORY READ: Load references/researchgraph_mcp_usage.md only when the review target explicitly cites H##, G##, benchmark run IDs, or researchgraph files.
Purpose
- gather official documentation or standards
- gather MCP Ref evidence
- gather Context7 evidence when a library or framework is involved
- gather current web best-practice evidence
- emit a compact machine-readable research summary instead of prose-only notes
Runtime
Runtime family:
evaluation-worker-runtime
Required manifest fields:
identifierphase_ordersummary_kind=review-researchoperation=research
Recommended phase_order:
PHASE_0_CONFIGPHASE_1_RESOLVE_STACKPHASE_2_OFFICIAL_DOCSPHASE_3_MCP_REFPHASE_4_CONTEXT7PHASE_5_WEB_BEST_PRACTICESPHASE_6_ANTI_HALLUCINATIONPHASE_7_WRITE_SUMMARYPHASE_8_SELF_CHECK
Workflow
Phase 0: Config
- Load runtime manifest.
- Resolve review target, stack hints, and output location.
- Fail if target context is missing.
Phase 1: Resolve Stack
- Detect language, framework, libraries, and domain.
- Build a bounded research topic list.
- Keep topic count small and evidence-oriented.
- If the target explicitly cites local H/G/run IDs, do a read-only researchgraph preflight to capture local context before external research. Do not replace official-doc, MCP Ref, Context7, or current-web lanes with local graph evidence.
Phase 2: Official Docs
- Read official docs or standards first.
- Record source URLs and the exact topic each source supports.
Phase 3: MCP Ref
- Query MCP Ref for the same bounded topics.
- Prefer primary documentation over tertiary commentary.
Phase 4: Context7
- If a library or framework is involved, resolve the Context7 library id.
- Query only the libraries actually used by the target.
- If no relevant library exists, record that explicitly.
Phase 5: Web Best Practices
- Perform current web research for best practices and recent changes.
- Use current sources, not frozen heuristics.
- Record only evidence that changes a conclusion or adds decision value.
Phase 6: Anti-Hallucination Verification
- Scan target artifact for factual claims across all trigger categories per
epistemic_protocol.mdSection B. - For each claim, check against research evidence gathered in Phases 2-5:
- Has MCP Ref/Context7/Web evidence → mark
VERIFIED - No tool evidence but claim is plausible → mark
FROM_TRAINING - Contradicts tool evidence → mark
FLAGGED(CRITICAL)
- Has MCP Ref/Context7/Web evidence → mark
- This step verifies against existing research. It does NOT run new searches.
- Include verification status in summary metadata.
Phase 7: Write Summary
Emit summary_kind=review-research.
Payload must include:
worker=ln-311statusoperation=researchwarnings
Prefer these fields when available:
findingsmetrics.research_sourcesmetrics.anti_hallucination_status(VERIFIED | FLAGGED)metrics.flagged_claims_countartifact_pathreport_pathmetadata
Phase 8: Self-Check
- Verify all four research lanes were attempted.
- Verify anti-hallucination verification was executed.
- Verify skipped lanes are justified in machine-readable form.
- Record
pass=trueonly after the summary is written.
Definition of Done
- [ ] Official-doc evidence recorded
- [ ] MCP Ref evidence recorded
- [ ] Context7 evidence recorded or justified as not applicable
- [ ] Current web best-practice evidence recorded
- [ ] Anti-hallucination verification executed (claims marked VERIFIED/FROM_TRAINING/FLAGGED)
- [ ]
review-researchsummary written - [ ] Self-check passed
Version: 1.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-04-10
04 同仓库更多 Skills
solana-dev
Use when user asks to "build a Solana dapp", "write an Anchor program", "create a token", "debug Solana errors", "set up wallet connection", "test my Solana program", "deploy to devnet", or "explain Solana concepts" (rent, accounts, PDAs, CPIs, etc.). End-to-end Solana development playbook covering wallet connection, Anchor/Pinocchio programs, Codama client generation, LiteSVM/Mollusk/Surfpool testing, and security checklists. Integrates with the Solana MCP server for live documentation search. Prefers framework-kit (@solana/client + @solana/react-hooks) for UI, wallet-standard-first connection (incl. ConnectorKit), @solana/kit for client/RPC code, and @solana/web3-compat for legacy boundaries.
generating-trading-signals
Generate trading signals using technical indicators (RSI, MACD, Bollinger Bands, etc.). Combines multiple indicators into composite signals with confidence scores. Use when analyzing assets for trading opportunities or checking technical indicators. Trigger with phrases like "get trading signals", "check indicators", "analyze for entry", "scan for opportunities", "generate buy/sell signals", or "technical analysis".
prediction-monitor
Prediction Monitor - Auto-activating skill for ML Deployment. Triggers on: prediction monitor, prediction monitor Part of the ML Deployment skill category.
strategy-advisor
High-level strategic thinking and business decision guidance for planning and direction-setting. Use when: making strategic decisions, evaluating business options, setting direction, analyzing trade-offs, or when user mentions strategy, business planning, competitive analysis, or long-term planning.
app-paywall-pilot
Design, audit, debug, and implement App Store-compliant mobile paywalls, subscription flows, pricing screens, trials, offers, feature gates, and subscription lifecycle UX. Use when the user asks to audit my paywall, fix App Store 3.1.2 rejection, improve trial-to-paid, choose plans/prices/trials, review RevenueCat/Adapty/Apphud/Superwall setup, calculate LTV/ROAS, or build paywall implementation.
figma
Use the Figma MCP server to fetch design context, screenshots, variables, and assets from Figma, and to translate Figma nodes into production code. Trigger when a task involves Figma URLs, node IDs, design-to-code implementation, or Figma MCP setup and troubleshooting.