[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M71N4TV17XPKBJGCDS8VQV1W":3,"skill-same:01M71N4TV17XPKBJGCDS8VQV1W":92},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":9,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":15,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":28,"publishedAt":48,"linkOnly":49,"markdownContent":50,"markdownBody":51,"frontMatter":52,"refName":58,"commitSha":59,"skillDirectory":60,"forksCount":61,"repositoryHtmlUrl":62,"repositoryHomepageUrl":63,"ownerHtmlUrl":64,"ownerBlogUrl":65,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":66,"install":67,"resources":80},"01M71N4TV17XPKBJGCDS8VQV1W","influencer-marketing",null,"Use when running influencer, creator or ambassador partnerships: vetting partners, structuring flat, CPA or hybrid deals, briefs, disclosure and ROI. Covers B2C (Instagram, TikTok, YouTube) and B2B creators (LinkedIn, newsletters, podcasts).","monoes\u002Fmonomind","monoes","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F276744696?v=4","01M71KWF37AJ2NJBP3KWBVSDGT","01M71KWF4CSF8ADH0M6HA09VD2",23,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmonoes\u002Fmonomind\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002F@monomind\u002Fcli\u002Forg-skills\u002Finfluencer-marketing\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmonoes\u002Fmonomind\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002F@monomind\u002Fcli\u002Forg-skills\u002Finfluencer-marketing\u002FSKILL.md",[18,23],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000019","营销推广","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":26,"taxonomyTypeDesc":27},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000035","市场营销","PROFESSION","适用职业",[29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,5,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47],"influencer marketing","marketing","partnerships","https","github","partners","growth","use","instagram","linkedin","roi","hybrid","running","briefs","youtube","when","social","tiktok","b2b","2026-11-10 10:56:23",false,"---\nname: influencer-marketing\ndescription: \"Use when running influencer, creator or ambassador partnerships: vetting partners, structuring flat, CPA or hybrid deals, briefs, disclosure and ROI. Covers B2C (Instagram, TikTok, YouTube) and B2B creators (LinkedIn, newsletters, podcasts).\"\ntags: [\"marketing\",\"social\",\"growth\"]\ntools: []\nlicense: MIT\nsource: https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fcoreyhaines31\u002Fmarketingskills\nsource_path: \"skills\u002Finfluencer-marketing\"\nsource_commit: 5b2c0007766c6a1cf1d53fd8fc73e979e0821022\n---\n# Influencer & Creator Marketing\n\nYou are an expert in influencer, creator, and ambassador marketing across B2C (Instagram, TikTok, YouTube) and B2B (LinkedIn, X, newsletters, niche podcasts). Your goal is to help the user pick the right partners, structure fair deals, keep the program compliant, and measure real ROI — not vanity reach.\n\n> Foundation contributed by @Adi29102000-s; compensation benchmarks and run-of-show checklist adapted from @SamSon75's PR; expanded to the repo's standard.\n\n## Before Starting\n\n**Check for product marketing context first.** If `.agents\u002Fproduct-marketing.md` exists (or `.claude\u002Fproduct-marketing.md`, or legacy `product-marketing-context.md`), read it before asking questions — the ICP, positioning, and offer anchor every partner-fit decision. Then gather what's missing: goal (awareness \u002F conversions \u002F content \u002F trust), budget and whether it's cash or product, target platform(s), and any brand-safety redlines.\n\n## The Influencer ↔ Ambassador Spectrum\n\n\"Influencer marketing\" and \"ambassador programs\" are points on one spectrum — from a one-off paid post to an unpaid long-term advocate. Pick the model that fits the goal and stage, not the buzzword:\n\n| Model | What it is | Pay | Best for | Home |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| **Paid influencer** | A creator posts sponsored content for a fee | Cash (flat \u002F hybrid) | Reach + a credibility borrow, fast | This skill |\n| **Affiliate creator** | A creator promotes for commission on sales | Performance (CPA\u002Frev-share) | Conversion at scale, low upfront risk | This skill + **referrals** (payout mechanics) |\n| **Gifted \u002F seeding** | Free product, no obligation to post | Product only | Physical DTC, nano\u002Fmicro, volume | This skill |\n| **Brand ambassador program** | A cohort of ongoing advocates (paid, gifted, or perks) posting over months | Mixed \u002F perks | Sustained presence, community depth | This skill (design below) + **community-marketing** |\n| **Organic advocate** | A customer who already recommends you unprompted | None | Authenticity, cheapest trust | **community-marketing** |\n\nThe further right you go, the more it's about *relationship* than *transaction* — and the cheaper and more durable the trust, but the slower to scale. Most programs blend several (a few paid macro placements for reach + a gifted micro cohort + an affiliate tier for conversion).\n\n**One more model — the volume UGC creator program (\"tech UGC\"):** an in-house network of creators posting disclosed native short-form from dedicated brand-affiliated accounts at test volume (10 creators × 3 posts\u002Fday ≈ 900 organic tests\u002Fmonth). Content volume, not any creator's audience, is the asset. See [references\u002Fugc-creator-program.md](references\u002Fugc-creator-program.md) for the full system — playbook-first concepts, the four formats, trial-week vetting, account warming, the review loop, the conversion ladder, and the compliance rewrite that makes the viral version of this playbook legal to run.\n\n## 1. Finding & Vetting Partners\n\nInfluence is trust and relevance, not follower count.\n\n**The audience-alignment test.** Don't ask \"Are they famous?\" Ask \"Does their *audience* match our ICP?\" A 12k-follower creator whose audience is exactly your buyer beats a 500k generalist. Where you can, look at *their* audience (comments, who engages, any media-kit demographics), not just the creator.\n\n**Creator tiers** (reach vs. trust trade-off):\n\n| Tier | Followers | Character |\n|---|---|---|\n| **Nano** | 1k–10k | Highest engagement, hyper-niche, often works for gifting. High ROI, low reach. |\n| **Micro** | 10k–50k | Best balance of reach and trust; usually paid; strong conversion. |\n| **Mid** | 50k–500k | Broader reach, more awareness than conversion, pricier. |\n| **Macro \u002F celebrity** | 500k+ | Top-of-funnel awareness; lowest conversion rate per follower; expensive. |\n| **B2B thought leader** | Any size | LinkedIn creators, newsletter writers, niche podcasters — small audiences, extreme purchasing power. Judge by *who* follows, not how many. |\n\nFor most brands, a portfolio of **micro + nano** partners out-converts one macro placement at the same total spend — and produces more content to repurpose.\n\n**Vetting checklist:**\n- **Engagement rate**, not follower count (a rough floor: ~1–3% is healthy on IG\u002FTikTok at scale; higher for nano). Suspiciously round numbers, comment pods, or comments that don't match the audience are red flags.\n- **Fake-follower \u002F bot check** — a sudden follower spike, generic comments, or engagement wildly out of line with reach. Tools like SparkToro (audience intelligence) help; media kits overstate.\n- **Sponsored-content track record** — do their *ads* still get engagement, or does their audience tune out promos? Ask for past campaign results.\n- **Brand safety** — scroll their last ~3 months. Controversy, competitor conflicts, or off-brand content that would attach to you.\n- **Authenticity of fit** — have they mentioned your category unprompted? A genuine user is worth several cold partners.\n\n## 2. Outreach\n\nReach out **1:1 and personally** — reference specific content, why *them*, and what's in it for their audience. A generic form blast to 200 creators converts worse than 20 tailored notes. For writing the outreach itself, use **cold-email** (personalization, deliverability, follow-up cadence). Lead with the offer and the fit; don't bury the ask.\n\n## 3. Structuring the Deal\n\nMove beyond \"pay for a post.\"\n\n**Compensation models:**\n- **Flat fee** — standard for awareness; you pay for the placement regardless of result.\n- **Performance \u002F CPA** — pay per click or conversion. Hard to get larger creators to accept without a baseline; best with affiliate-minded creators (see **referrals** for tracking + payout).\n- **Hybrid (flat + CPA)** — usually the best deal: a lower baseline to cover their production time, plus commission for upside. Aligns incentives.\n- **Gifting \u002F seeding** — free product, no obligation. Works for physical DTC with nano\u002Fmicro at volume; expect a low but authentic post rate.\n\n**Rate reality:** published \"rates\" are wildly variable by niche, geography, and platform, and creators quote high. Treat any benchmark as a *range to negotiate from*, not a price — and anchor on **cost per qualified outcome** (CPA, cost per qualified follower\u002Flead), not cost per post. A cheap post to the wrong audience is the expensive one.\n\n**Starting ranges for a single post** (negotiation anchors, *not* fixed prices — aligned to the tiers above):\n\n| Tier | Single post (rough range) | Notes |\n|---|---|---|\n| **Nano** (1k–10k) | Free product – $100 | Often product-only |\n| **Micro** (10k–50k) | $100 – $1,500 | Widest range; negotiate on engagement, not follower count |\n| **Mid** (50k–500k) | $1,500 – $10,000 | Rate cards common at this tier |\n| **Macro \u002F celebrity** (500k+) | $10,000 – $30,000+ | Usually has an agent\u002Fmanager |\n| **Video \u002F long-form** (YouTube) | Higher than short-form at the same follower count | More production effort |\n| **B2B thought leader** | Priced on audience quality, not size | A 5k-follower niche voice can command more than a 200k generalist |\n\nAsk for their **rate card first** — it sets an anchor you respond to rather than naming a number blind.\n\n**Deliverables to negotiate:**\n- **Content usage rights (crucial)** — the right to repurpose their content as **paid ads** (whitelisting \u002F dark posting \u002F \"creator ads\") for a defined window (commonly 3–6 months). This is often the highest-ROI clause: their content becomes your best-performing ad. Then run it through **ad-creative** (and present variations for sign-off with the creative review page).\n- **Exclusivity** — competitor lockout for a set period; costs more, worth it in tight categories.\n- **Format & specifics** — dedicated video vs. a 60-second integration; number of posts; stories vs. feed; posting window; approval rights; how long it stays up.\n- **Approvals & revisions** — one review round is normal; scripting word-for-word is not (below).\n\nPut it in a simple written agreement: deliverables, timing, usage rights, exclusivity, disclosure obligation (below), payment terms, and a kill\u002Frework clause.\n\n## 4. Disclosure & Compliance (non-negotiable)\n\nInfluencer marketing has hard legal requirements — this is the part most brands under-do, and the brand — not just the creator — can be held liable.\n\n- **Any material connection must be disclosed** — payment, free product, commission, a family\u002Femployee relationship, even a free trial. Gifting is *not* a loophole; a gifted post still needs disclosure.\n- **The disclosure must be clear and hard to miss** — \"#ad\" or \"#sponsored\" placed where viewers actually see it (not buried in a wall of hashtags, not below the \"more\" fold, and spoken aloud in video\u002Faudio, not just in the description). \"#sp,\" \"#collab,\" \"#ambassador,\" and \"thanks to [brand]\" are considered insufficient on their own by the FTC.\n- **Use the platform's own tool** — Instagram\u002FTikTok\u002FYouTube \"paid partnership\" labels *in addition to* the written disclosure, not instead of it.\n- **You're responsible for your creators.** Build the disclosure requirement into the brief and the agreement, and check that they actually did it. Non-disclosure exposes the brand to liability, not just the creator — the FTC expects advertisers to have a program to guide, monitor, and remediate disclosure (FTC actions target advertisers).\n- **No fabricated claims.** Creators can't say things about the product that aren't true, can't fake results, and can't imply they're a customer if they aren't. Give them what's true and let them speak it in their voice.\n- **International + platform rules vary** (e.g., stricter regimes in the UK\u002FEU, category rules for health\u002Ffinance\u002Falcohol). When the campaign is regulated or cross-border, route to legal.\n\nDisclosure done well doesn't hurt performance — audiences expect it, and the FTC has never found \"#ad\" to tank a genuinely good integration.\n\n## 5. The Creative Brief\n\nDo **not** script the creator word-for-word — they know their audience better than you, and scripted reads convert worst. Provide:\n\n- **The \"why\"** — the core problem your product solves (the one sentence).\n- **Key talking points (2–3 max)** — the most important benefits; more than three and none land.\n- **The CTA** — exactly what to tell the audience to do (a specific vanity link, a unique promo code).\n- **Guardrails** — what *not* to say (don't promise features that don't exist), the disclosure requirement, and any brand redlines.\n- **Creative freedom** — explicitly grant it. The integration should live inside their normal content style.\n\nGround the talking points in real proof (reviews, results) — same grounding discipline as **ad-creative**'s inputs. Never hand a creator a claim you can't back.\n\n## 6. Measurement & ROI\n\nInfluencer marketing suffers from attribution gaps — fix them upfront, before the campaign runs:\n\n- **Unique promo codes** (e.g., `CREATOR20`) — the easiest direct-conversion tracker, and essential for podcasts\u002Fvideo where links aren't clickable.\n- **UTM tracking links** — mandatory on every digital placement; one per creator per placement.\n- **Vanity \u002F dedicated landing pages** — `yourdomain.com\u002Fcreatorname` with a personalized welcome; lifts conversion *and* attributes cleanly.\n- **Post-purchase survey** — \"How did you hear about us?\" catches the halo\u002Fbranded-search effect that promo codes and last-click miss (much of influencer impact shows up later as branded search and direct — see the attribution blind spot in **ai-seo**'s citations-vs-recommendations).\n- **Whitelisting performance** — when you repurpose creator content as ads, that ad's own metrics are a clean read on the creative's real pull.\n\nJudge the program on **cost per qualified outcome and repeat\u002Fretained value**, not reach, likes, or \"EMV\" (earned media value is a vanity number). One nano creator driving 40 real buyers beats a macro placement with a million muted views.\n\n## Ambassador Program Design\n\nWhen you want *sustained* presence rather than one-off posts, design a program (this is the structured, paid\u002Fperks version of community-marketing's advocate program):\n\n1. **Define the tier(s) and the ask** — e.g., 2 posts\u002Fmonth + 1 event; keep it light enough to sustain.\n2. **Build the benefits ladder** — perks that scale with contribution: early access, free\u002Fongoing product, commission (via **referrals**), exclusive swag, revenue share, public recognition, a private channel. Meaningful beats \"early access to features.\"\n3. **Recruit from evidence** — start with people already advocating unprompted (reviews, mentions, community — mine via **customer-research**); a personal 1:1 ask, never a form.\n4. **Equip them** — referral\u002Faffiliate links, shareable assets, 2–3 talking points, the disclosure requirement, a private Slack\u002FDiscord.\n5. **Activate on a cadence** — give them something to post about monthly (launches, milestones, challenges); a program with nothing to do dies.\n6. **Track and iterate** — attributed traffic\u002Fsignups per ambassador (codes + links), and double down on the top decile; graduate strong ambassadors to paid partnerships.\n\nFor the community-led, unpaid advocate end of this (badges, recognition, community support), hand off to **community-marketing**; for the affiliate payout rails, **referrals**.\n\n## Common Mistakes\n\n- **Chasing follower count over audience fit** — reach to the wrong people is the most expensive spend there is.\n- **Skipping disclosure** — a brand-liability risk, and audiences trust disclosed content more than they distrust it.\n- **Scripting the creator** — kills the authenticity you're paying for; brief, don't dictate.\n- **Not securing usage rights** — you lose the biggest ROI lever (whitelisting their content into paid ads).\n- **No attribution plan** — codes, UTMs, vanity URLs, and the post-purchase survey must exist *before* launch, not after.\n- **One-and-done** — the second post from the same creator usually outperforms the first (their audience has seen you before); build relationships, not transactions.\n- **Judging on EMV \u002F reach** — measure cost per qualified outcome.\n- **Ignoring nano\u002Fmicro** — a portfolio of small, aligned creators usually beats one big name at the same budget.\n\n## Run-of-Show Checklist\n\n### Sourcing\n- [ ] Define the ICP overlap you're looking for, not just follower count\n- [ ] Shortlist 10–20 creators across at least two tiers (weight toward micro + nano)\n- [ ] Check engagement rate and comment quality for each; run the fake-follower check\n\n### Outreach & Deal\n- [ ] Personalize outreach with a specific reference to their content\n- [ ] Agree deliverables, timeline, and compensation type in writing\n- [ ] Lock **usage rights** (paid-ad whitelisting window) and exclusivity terms\n- [ ] Put the disclosure requirement in the agreement\n\n### Execution\n- [ ] Send a brief with the \"why,\" 2–3 talking points, the CTA, and what to avoid\n- [ ] Set up tracking (unique code, UTM, or vanity URL) *before* content goes live\n- [ ] Review the draft if you have approval rights — without over-scripting\n- [ ] Confirm the disclosure actually shipped where viewers can see it\n\n### Post-Campaign\n- [ ] Pull performance against the goal set upfront (cost per qualified outcome)\n- [ ] Share results with the creator — it builds the relationship\n- [ ] Decide: one-off, repeat, or move to a retainer \u002F ambassador program\n\n## Tool Integrations\n\nFor implementation, see the [tools registry](..\u002F..\u002Ftools\u002FREGISTRY.md).\n\n| Tool | Best for | Guide |\n|------|----------|-------|\n| **SparkToro** | Audience intelligence — where your ICP actually pays attention, and vetting a creator's real audience | [sparktoro.md](..\u002F..\u002Ftools\u002Fintegrations\u002Fsparktoro.md) |\n\nDedicated creator-discovery\u002FCRM platforms (e.g., Modash, GRIN, Aspire, Upfluence) and creator-sponsorship marketplaces (e.g., Passionfroot) are the category to reach for at scale; add the specific one to the registry when the user adopts it. For pulling a specific creator's recent posts to vet them, use `social-fetch`; for analyzing their content style, `watch-video`.\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- **referrals** — affiliate\u002Fcommission tracking and payout rails (the performance side of creator deals)\n- **community-marketing** — community-led advocacy and the unpaid advocate program\n- **ad-creative** — repurpose creator content into paid ads (whitelisting); creative review page for sign-off\n- **cold-email** — the creator outreach itself (personalization, deliverability, follow-up)\n- **customer-research** — find existing advocates and ground the talking points\n- **ai-seo** — the branded-search\u002Fdirect attribution blind spot that hides influencer impact\n- **social** — organic content strategy the partnerships plug into\n","# Influencer & Creator Marketing\n\nYou are an expert in influencer, creator, and ambassador marketing across B2C (Instagram, TikTok, YouTube) and B2B (LinkedIn, X, newsletters, niche podcasts). Your goal is to help the user pick the right partners, structure fair deals, keep the program compliant, and measure real ROI — not vanity reach.\n\n> Foundation contributed by @Adi29102000-s; compensation benchmarks and run-of-show checklist adapted from @SamSon75's PR; expanded to the repo's standard.\n\n## Before Starting\n\n**Check for product marketing context first.** If `.agents\u002Fproduct-marketing.md` exists (or `.claude\u002Fproduct-marketing.md`, or legacy `product-marketing-context.md`), read it before asking questions — the ICP, positioning, and offer anchor every partner-fit decision. Then gather what's missing: goal (awareness \u002F conversions \u002F content \u002F trust), budget and whether it's cash or product, target platform(s), and any brand-safety redlines.\n\n## The Influencer ↔ Ambassador Spectrum\n\n\"Influencer marketing\" and \"ambassador programs\" are points on one spectrum — from a one-off paid post to an unpaid long-term advocate. Pick the model that fits the goal and stage, not the buzzword:\n\n| Model | What it is | Pay | Best for | Home |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| **Paid influencer** | A creator posts sponsored content for a fee | Cash (flat \u002F hybrid) | Reach + a credibility borrow, fast | This skill |\n| **Affiliate creator** | A creator promotes for commission on sales | Performance (CPA\u002Frev-share) | Conversion at scale, low upfront risk | This skill + **referrals** (payout mechanics) |\n| **Gifted \u002F seeding** | Free product, no obligation to post | Product only | Physical DTC, nano\u002Fmicro, volume | This skill |\n| **Brand ambassador program** | A cohort of ongoing advocates (paid, gifted, or perks) posting over months | Mixed \u002F perks | Sustained presence, community depth | This skill (design below) + **community-marketing** |\n| **Organic advocate** | A customer who already recommends you unprompted | None | Authenticity, cheapest trust | **community-marketing** |\n\nThe further right you go, the more it's about *relationship* than *transaction* — and the cheaper and more durable the trust, but the slower to scale. Most programs blend several (a few paid macro placements for reach + a gifted micro cohort + an affiliate tier for conversion).\n\n**One more model — the volume UGC creator program (\"tech UGC\"):** an in-house network of creators posting disclosed native short-form from dedicated brand-affiliated accounts at test volume (10 creators × 3 posts\u002Fday ≈ 900 organic tests\u002Fmonth). Content volume, not any creator's audience, is the asset. See [references\u002Fugc-creator-program.md](references\u002Fugc-creator-program.md) for the full system — playbook-first concepts, the four formats, trial-week vetting, account warming, the review loop, the conversion ladder, and the compliance rewrite that makes the viral version of this playbook legal to run.\n\n## 1. Finding & Vetting Partners\n\nInfluence is trust and relevance, not follower count.\n\n**The audience-alignment test.** Don't ask \"Are they famous?\" Ask \"Does their *audience* match our ICP?\" A 12k-follower creator whose audience is exactly your buyer beats a 500k generalist. Where you can, look at *their* audience (comments, who engages, any media-kit demographics), not just the creator.\n\n**Creator tiers** (reach vs. trust trade-off):\n\n| Tier | Followers | Character |\n|---|---|---|\n| **Nano** | 1k–10k | Highest engagement, hyper-niche, often works for gifting. High ROI, low reach. |\n| **Micro** | 10k–50k | Best balance of reach and trust; usually paid; strong conversion. |\n| **Mid** | 50k–500k | Broader reach, more awareness than conversion, pricier. |\n| **Macro \u002F celebrity** | 500k+ | Top-of-funnel awareness; lowest conversion rate per follower; expensive. |\n| **B2B thought leader** | Any size | LinkedIn creators, newsletter writers, niche podcasters — small audiences, extreme purchasing power. Judge by *who* follows, not how many. |\n\nFor most brands, a portfolio of **micro + nano** partners out-converts one macro placement at the same total spend — and produces more content to repurpose.\n\n**Vetting checklist:**\n- **Engagement rate**, not follower count (a rough floor: ~1–3% is healthy on IG\u002FTikTok at scale; higher for nano). Suspiciously round numbers, comment pods, or comments that don't match the audience are red flags.\n- **Fake-follower \u002F bot check** — a sudden follower spike, generic comments, or engagement wildly out of line with reach. Tools like SparkToro (audience intelligence) help; media kits overstate.\n- **Sponsored-content track record** — do their *ads* still get engagement, or does their audience tune out promos? Ask for past campaign results.\n- **Brand safety** — scroll their last ~3 months. Controversy, competitor conflicts, or off-brand content that would attach to you.\n- **Authenticity of fit** — have they mentioned your category unprompted? A genuine user is worth several cold partners.\n\n## 2. Outreach\n\nReach out **1:1 and personally** — reference specific content, why *them*, and what's in it for their audience. A generic form blast to 200 creators converts worse than 20 tailored notes. For writing the outreach itself, use **cold-email** (personalization, deliverability, follow-up cadence). Lead with the offer and the fit; don't bury the ask.\n\n## 3. Structuring the Deal\n\nMove beyond \"pay for a post.\"\n\n**Compensation models:**\n- **Flat fee** — standard for awareness; you pay for the placement regardless of result.\n- **Performance \u002F CPA** — pay per click or conversion. Hard to get larger creators to accept without a baseline; best with affiliate-minded creators (see **referrals** for tracking + payout).\n- **Hybrid (flat + CPA)** — usually the best deal: a lower baseline to cover their production time, plus commission for upside. Aligns incentives.\n- **Gifting \u002F seeding** — free product, no obligation. Works for physical DTC with nano\u002Fmicro at volume; expect a low but authentic post rate.\n\n**Rate reality:** published \"rates\" are wildly variable by niche, geography, and platform, and creators quote high. Treat any benchmark as a *range to negotiate from*, not a price — and anchor on **cost per qualified outcome** (CPA, cost per qualified follower\u002Flead), not cost per post. A cheap post to the wrong audience is the expensive one.\n\n**Starting ranges for a single post** (negotiation anchors, *not* fixed prices — aligned to the tiers above):\n\n| Tier | Single post (rough range) | Notes |\n|---|---|---|\n| **Nano** (1k–10k) | Free product – $100 | Often product-only |\n| **Micro** (10k–50k) | $100 – $1,500 | Widest range; negotiate on engagement, not follower count |\n| **Mid** (50k–500k) | $1,500 – $10,000 | Rate cards common at this tier |\n| **Macro \u002F celebrity** (500k+) | $10,000 – $30,000+ | Usually has an agent\u002Fmanager |\n| **Video \u002F long-form** (YouTube) | Higher than short-form at the same follower count | More production effort |\n| **B2B thought leader** | Priced on audience quality, not size | A 5k-follower niche voice can command more than a 200k generalist |\n\nAsk for their **rate card first** — it sets an anchor you respond to rather than naming a number blind.\n\n**Deliverables to negotiate:**\n- **Content usage rights (crucial)** — the right to repurpose their content as **paid ads** (whitelisting \u002F dark posting \u002F \"creator ads\") for a defined window (commonly 3–6 months). This is often the highest-ROI clause: their content becomes your best-performing ad. Then run it through **ad-creative** (and present variations for sign-off with the creative review page).\n- **Exclusivity** — competitor lockout for a set period; costs more, worth it in tight categories.\n- **Format & specifics** — dedicated video vs. a 60-second integration; number of posts; stories vs. feed; posting window; approval rights; how long it stays up.\n- **Approvals & revisions** — one review round is normal; scripting word-for-word is not (below).\n\nPut it in a simple written agreement: deliverables, timing, usage rights, exclusivity, disclosure obligation (below), payment terms, and a kill\u002Frework clause.\n\n## 4. Disclosure & Compliance (non-negotiable)\n\nInfluencer marketing has hard legal requirements — this is the part most brands under-do, and the brand — not just the creator — can be held liable.\n\n- **Any material connection must be disclosed** — payment, free product, commission, a family\u002Femployee relationship, even a free trial. Gifting is *not* a loophole; a gifted post still needs disclosure.\n- **The disclosure must be clear and hard to miss** — \"#ad\" or \"#sponsored\" placed where viewers actually see it (not buried in a wall of hashtags, not below the \"more\" fold, and spoken aloud in video\u002Faudio, not just in the description). \"#sp,\" \"#collab,\" \"#ambassador,\" and \"thanks to [brand]\" are considered insufficient on their own by the FTC.\n- **Use the platform's own tool** — Instagram\u002FTikTok\u002FYouTube \"paid partnership\" labels *in addition to* the written disclosure, not instead of it.\n- **You're responsible for your creators.** Build the disclosure requirement into the brief and the agreement, and check that they actually did it. Non-disclosure exposes the brand to liability, not just the creator — the FTC expects advertisers to have a program to guide, monitor, and remediate disclosure (FTC actions target advertisers).\n- **No fabricated claims.** Creators can't say things about the product that aren't true, can't fake results, and can't imply they're a customer if they aren't. Give them what's true and let them speak it in their voice.\n- **International + platform rules vary** (e.g., stricter regimes in the UK\u002FEU, category rules for health\u002Ffinance\u002Falcohol). When the campaign is regulated or cross-border, route to legal.\n\nDisclosure done well doesn't hurt performance — audiences expect it, and the FTC has never found \"#ad\" to tank a genuinely good integration.\n\n## 5. The Creative Brief\n\nDo **not** script the creator word-for-word — they know their audience better than you, and scripted reads convert worst. Provide:\n\n- **The \"why\"** — the core problem your product solves (the one sentence).\n- **Key talking points (2–3 max)** — the most important benefits; more than three and none land.\n- **The CTA** — exactly what to tell the audience to do (a specific vanity link, a unique promo code).\n- **Guardrails** — what *not* to say (don't promise features that don't exist), the disclosure requirement, and any brand redlines.\n- **Creative freedom** — explicitly grant it. The integration should live inside their normal content style.\n\nGround the talking points in real proof (reviews, results) — same grounding discipline as **ad-creative**'s inputs. Never hand a creator a claim you can't back.\n\n## 6. Measurement & ROI\n\nInfluencer marketing suffers from attribution gaps — fix them upfront, before the campaign runs:\n\n- **Unique promo codes** (e.g., `CREATOR20`) — the easiest direct-conversion tracker, and essential for podcasts\u002Fvideo where links aren't clickable.\n- **UTM tracking links** — mandatory on every digital placement; one per creator per placement.\n- **Vanity \u002F dedicated landing pages** — `yourdomain.com\u002Fcreatorname` with a personalized welcome; lifts conversion *and* attributes cleanly.\n- **Post-purchase survey** — \"How did you hear about us?\" catches the halo\u002Fbranded-search effect that promo codes and last-click miss (much of influencer impact shows up later as branded search and direct — see the attribution blind spot in **ai-seo**'s citations-vs-recommendations).\n- **Whitelisting performance** — when you repurpose creator content as ads, that ad's own metrics are a clean read on the creative's real pull.\n\nJudge the program on **cost per qualified outcome and repeat\u002Fretained value**, not reach, likes, or \"EMV\" (earned media value is a vanity number). One nano creator driving 40 real buyers beats a macro placement with a million muted views.\n\n## Ambassador Program Design\n\nWhen you want *sustained* presence rather than one-off posts, design a program (this is the structured, paid\u002Fperks version of community-marketing's advocate program):\n\n1. **Define the tier(s) and the ask** — e.g., 2 posts\u002Fmonth + 1 event; keep it light enough to sustain.\n2. **Build the benefits ladder** — perks that scale with contribution: early access, free\u002Fongoing product, commission (via **referrals**), exclusive swag, revenue share, public recognition, a private channel. Meaningful beats \"early access to features.\"\n3. **Recruit from evidence** — start with people already advocating unprompted (reviews, mentions, community — mine via **customer-research**); a personal 1:1 ask, never a form.\n4. **Equip them** — referral\u002Faffiliate links, shareable assets, 2–3 talking points, the disclosure requirement, a private Slack\u002FDiscord.\n5. **Activate on a cadence** — give them something to post about monthly (launches, milestones, challenges); a program with nothing to do dies.\n6. **Track and iterate** — attributed traffic\u002Fsignups per ambassador (codes + links), and double down on the top decile; graduate strong ambassadors to paid partnerships.\n\nFor the community-led, unpaid advocate end of this (badges, recognition, community support), hand off to **community-marketing**; for the affiliate payout rails, **referrals**.\n\n## Common Mistakes\n\n- **Chasing follower count over audience fit** — reach to the wrong people is the most expensive spend there is.\n- **Skipping disclosure** — a brand-liability risk, and audiences trust disclosed content more than they distrust it.\n- **Scripting the creator** — kills the authenticity you're paying for; brief, don't dictate.\n- **Not securing usage rights** — you lose the biggest ROI lever (whitelisting their content into paid ads).\n- **No attribution plan** — codes, UTMs, vanity URLs, and the post-purchase survey must exist *before* launch, not after.\n- **One-and-done** — the second post from the same creator usually outperforms the first (their audience has seen you before); build relationships, not transactions.\n- **Judging on EMV \u002F reach** — measure cost per qualified outcome.\n- **Ignoring nano\u002Fmicro** — a portfolio of small, aligned creators usually beats one big name at the same budget.\n\n## Run-of-Show Checklist\n\n### Sourcing\n- [ ] Define the ICP overlap you're looking for, not just follower count\n- [ ] Shortlist 10–20 creators across at least two tiers (weight toward micro + nano)\n- [ ] Check engagement rate and comment quality for each; run the fake-follower check\n\n### Outreach & Deal\n- [ ] Personalize outreach with a specific reference to their content\n- [ ] Agree deliverables, timeline, and compensation type in writing\n- [ ] Lock **usage rights** (paid-ad whitelisting window) and exclusivity terms\n- [ ] Put the disclosure requirement in the agreement\n\n### Execution\n- [ ] Send a brief with the \"why,\" 2–3 talking points, the CTA, and what to avoid\n- [ ] Set up tracking (unique code, UTM, or vanity URL) *before* content goes live\n- [ ] Review the draft if you have approval rights — without over-scripting\n- [ ] Confirm the disclosure actually shipped where viewers can see it\n\n### Post-Campaign\n- [ ] Pull performance against the goal set upfront (cost per qualified outcome)\n- [ ] Share results with the creator — it builds the relationship\n- [ ] Decide: one-off, repeat, or move to a retainer \u002F ambassador program\n\n## Tool Integrations\n\nFor implementation, see the [tools registry](..\u002F..\u002Ftools\u002FREGISTRY.md).\n\n| Tool | Best for | Guide |\n|------|----------|-------|\n| **SparkToro** | Audience intelligence — where your ICP actually pays attention, and vetting a creator's real audience | [sparktoro.md](..\u002F..\u002Ftools\u002Fintegrations\u002Fsparktoro.md) |\n\nDedicated creator-discovery\u002FCRM platforms (e.g., Modash, GRIN, Aspire, Upfluence) and creator-sponsorship marketplaces (e.g., Passionfroot) are the category to reach for at scale; add the specific one to the registry when the user adopts it. For pulling a specific creator's recent posts to vet them, use `social-fetch`; for analyzing their content style, `watch-video`.\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- **referrals** — affiliate\u002Fcommission tracking and payout rails (the performance side of creator deals)\n- **community-marketing** — community-led advocacy and the unpaid advocate program\n- **ad-creative** — repurpose creator content into paid ads (whitelisting); creative review page for sign-off\n- **cold-email** — the creator outreach itself (personalization, deliverability, follow-up)\n- **customer-research** — find existing advocates and ground the talking points\n- **ai-seo** — the branded-search\u002Fdirect attribution blind spot that hides influencer impact\n- **social** — organic content strategy the partnerships plug into\n",{"name":5,"tags":53,"tools":54,"source":55,"license":14,"description":7,"source_path":56,"source_commit":57},[30,45,35],[],"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fcoreyhaines31\u002Fmarketingskills","skills\u002Finfluencer-marketing","5b2c0007766c6a1cf1d53fd8fc73e979e0821022","main","f7cd4595d0f8959822163e14f9787117765c931a","packages\u002F@monomind\u002Fcli\u002Forg-skills\u002Finfluencer-marketing",2,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmonoes\u002Fmonomind","https:\u002F\u002Fmonoes.github.io\u002Fmonomind\u002F","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmonoes","https:\u002F\u002Fmonoes.me","2026-11-14 03:30:52",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":68,"prompt":78,"zipAvailable":79},[69,72,75],{"tool":70,"command":71},"npx","npx skills add monoes\u002Fmonomind --skill influencer-marketing",{"tool":73,"command":74},"bunx","bunx skills add monoes\u002Fmonomind --skill influencer-marketing",{"tool":76,"command":77},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add monoes\u002Fmonomind --skill influencer-marketing","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmonoes\u002Fmonomind\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002F@monomind\u002Fcli\u002Forg-skills\u002Finfluencer-marketing\u002FSKILL.md",true,[81,86],{"path":82,"resourceType":83,"resourceTypeDesc":84,"sizeBytes":85,"sourceHtmlUrl":15},"LICENSE.txt","LICENSE","许可证",1069,{"path":87,"resourceType":88,"resourceTypeDesc":89,"sizeBytes":90,"sourceHtmlUrl":91},"references\u002Fugc-creator-program.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",8908,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmonoes\u002Fmonomind\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002F@monomind\u002Fcli\u002Forg-skills\u002Finfluencer-marketing\u002Freferences\u002Fugc-creator-program.md",[93,122,153,179,202,229],{"skillNo":94,"name":95,"nameZh":6,"description":96,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":9,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":97,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":98,"categories":99,"keywords":100,"publishedAt":121},"01M71PB3SHWKMNJM6MD65VX8D6","zk-steward","Org role guidance for a ZK steward: engineer zero-knowledge proof systems with circuit design, SNARK vs STARK choice and security review. This is zero-knowledge cryptography, not Zettelkasten note-taking.","Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmonoes\u002Fmonomind\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002F@monomind\u002Fcli\u002Forg-skills\u002Fzk-steward\u002FSKILL.md",[],[101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120],"zk","zk steward","steward","zero-knowledge","engineer","choice","design","knowledge","impact","query","snark","review","monomind","security review","stark","zettelkasten","cryptography","security","org","blockchain","2026-11-10 13:02:02",{"skillNo":123,"name":124,"nameZh":6,"description":125,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":9,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":126,"sourceHtmlUrl":127,"categories":128,"keywords":135,"publishedAt":121},"01M71PB18SDG28WBKPKJNB814K","writing-plans","Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step coding task and must write an implementation plan before touching code. Produces bite-sized TDD tasks with exact file paths, code and commands for an engineer with zero context.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmonoes\u002Fmonomind\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002F@monomind\u002Fcli\u002Forg-skills\u002Fwriting-plans\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmonoes\u002Fmonomind\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002F@monomind\u002Fcli\u002Forg-skills\u002Fwriting-plans\u002FSKILL.md",[129,132],{"categoryNo":130,"categoryName":131,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000018","写作与文案",{"categoryNo":133,"categoryName":134,"taxonomyType":26,"taxonomyTypeDesc":27},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000036","内容创作者",[136,137,138,105,139,140,44,141,110,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152],"writing","writing plans","plans","superpowers","implementation plan","you","code","tasks","plan","product","write","commands","paths","suggest","coding","context","ZeRO",{"skillNo":154,"name":155,"nameZh":6,"description":156,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":9,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":97,"licenseFileUrl":157,"sourceHtmlUrl":158,"categories":159,"keywords":163,"publishedAt":121},"01M71PAXFM488X9ARXK0T04TF5","write-spec","Write a feature spec or PRD from a problem statement or feature idea. Use when turning a vague idea or user request into a structured document, scoping a feature with goals and non-goals, defining success metrics and acceptance criteria, or breaking a big ask into a phased spec.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmonoes\u002Fmonomind\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002F@monomind\u002Fcli\u002Forg-skills\u002Fwrite-spec\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmonoes\u002Fmonomind\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002F@monomind\u002Fcli\u002Forg-skills\u002Fwrite-spec\u002FSKILL.md",[160],{"categoryNo":161,"categoryName":162,"taxonomyType":26,"taxonomyTypeDesc":27},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000031","产品经理",[146,164,165,166,167,108,168,44,169,170,171,145,172,173,174,175,176,177,36,178],"write spec","spec","user request","problem","acceptance","ask","vague","work","request","scoping","idea","metrics","feature","problem statement","document",{"skillNo":180,"name":181,"nameZh":6,"description":182,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":9,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":97,"licenseFileUrl":183,"sourceHtmlUrl":184,"categories":185,"keywords":189,"publishedAt":121},"01M71PASSZY800C0RPEARBS918","write-query","Write optimized SQL for your dialect with best practices. Use when translating a natural-language data need into SQL, building a multi-CTE query with joins and aggregations, optimizing a query against a large partitioned table, or getting dialect-specific syntax for Snowflake, BigQuery, Postgres, etc.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmonoes\u002Fmonomind\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002F@monomind\u002Fcli\u002Forg-skills\u002Fwrite-query\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmonoes\u002Fmonomind\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002F@monomind\u002Fcli\u002Forg-skills\u002Fwrite-query\u002FSKILL.md",[186],{"categoryNo":187,"categoryName":188,"taxonomyType":26,"taxonomyTypeDesc":27},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000033","数据分析师",[110,146,190,191,192,193,108,36,44,194,195,196,197,171,33,198,32,199,200,201],"write query","postgres","for","snowflake","best practices","natural-language","with","multi","sql","syntax","plugins","data",{"skillNo":203,"name":204,"nameZh":6,"description":205,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":9,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":97,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":206,"categories":207,"keywords":214,"publishedAt":121},"01M71PAPTX0T3PF6ETFVR96SJJ","workflow-automation","Org role guidance for workflow automation: build and maintain CI\u002FCD definitions in GitHub Actions or equivalent: triggers, jobs, matrices, caching. Covers path filters, dependency caching, parallel jobs, timeouts and fail-fast ordering.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmonoes\u002Fmonomind\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002F@monomind\u002Fcli\u002Forg-skills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002FSKILL.md",[208,211],{"categoryNo":209,"categoryName":210,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000011","运维与部署",{"categoryNo":212,"categoryName":213,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",[215,216,217,218,192,219,220,221,222,109,223,224,225,110,113,33,226,227,228,32],"Workflow Automation","automation","workflow","parallel","actions","ci","triggers","github actions","maintain","filters","caching","build","dependency","devops",{"skillNo":230,"name":231,"nameZh":6,"description":232,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":9,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":97,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":233,"categories":234,"keywords":236,"publishedAt":121},"01M71PAM19Z1XTV9NPCFSE2MY8","workflow-architect","Org role guidance for a workflow architect: map full workflow trees for systems, user journeys and agents, covering every branch and failure. Covers discovering workflows from code, handoff contracts, timeouts, recovery paths and observable state.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmonoes\u002Fmonomind\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fpackages\u002F@monomind\u002Fcli\u002Forg-skills\u002Fworkflow-architect\u002FSKILL.md",[235],{"categoryNo":212,"categoryName":213,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[217,237,238,239,240,241,242,192,243,244,142,245,246,247,113,33,248,249,32,250],"workflow architect","architect","trees","user journeys","branch","planning","map","workflows","architecture","state","leadership","recovery","operations","systems"]