AGENT SKILL

principle-foundational-thinking

Apply before writing logic: choosing core types and data structures, sequencing scaffold-vs-feature work, asking what concurrent actors share. Get the data structures right so downstream code becomes obvious.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-11
Stars
★ 0
Forks
0

01 前言 Front Matter

name
principle-foundational-thinking
description
Apply before writing logic: choosing core types and data structures, sequencing scaffold-vs-feature work, asking what concurrent actors share. Get the data structures right so downstream code becomes obvious.
disable-model-invocation
true

03 SKILL.md 正文

Foundational Thinking

Structural decisions protect option value. Code-level decisions protect simplicity.

Data structures first. Get the data shape right before writing logic. Define core types early, trace every access pattern, and choose structures that match the dominant paths.

At code level, DRY the structure, not every line. Types and data models should converge. Three similar statements still beat a premature abstraction. Prefer explicit over clever. Test behavior and edge cases, not line counts.

Concurrency corollary. Before sharing state between actors, ask "what happens if another actor modifies this concurrently?" If not "nothing", isolate.

Scaffold first. If something helps every later phase, do it first. Ask "does every subsequent phase benefit from this existing?" CI, linting, test infrastructure, and shared types are scaffold. Sequence for option value: setup before features, tests before fixes. Keep commits small and single-purpose.

Each increment should land a coherent abstraction or deepen one that exists. Do not spread a new capability across callers as special-case coordination.

Subtraction comes before scaffolding. Remove dead code first, then lay foundations.

04 同仓库更多 Skills

bbishdotdev
bbishdotdev/ai-tools

why

Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, product analytics warehouse) in parallel, then returns a cited read on decisions and tradeoffs. Use how for runtime behavior.

数据分析师
★ 0
bbishdotdev
bbishdotdev/ai-tools

unslop

Cut AI tells from any writing. Must always apply.

★ 0
bbishdotdev
bbishdotdev/ai-tools

typescript-best-practices

TypeScript best practices. Use when reading or editing any .ts or .tsx file.

★ 0
bbishdotdev
bbishdotdev/ai-tools

technical-writing

Layered technical-writing standard: Diátaxis structure, Google developer style sentences, STE instruction rules, Global English syntax. Use for /technical-writing or when writing or reviewing docs, RFCs, readmes, PR descriptions, or commit messages.

开发工程师内容创作者写作与文案
★ 0
bbishdotdev
bbishdotdev/ai-tools

teach

Explain a body of work plainly so a person actually understands it. Runs the `how` and `why` skills and weaves what they find into one clear explanation. Use for 'teach me this', 'help me really understand X', 'explain this change or subsystem to me'.

教师与教育
★ 0
bbishdotdev
bbishdotdev/ai-tools

tdd

Use only when the user explicitly asks for TDD, a failing test, or a regression test, OR when the bug has an obvious cheap local test target. Skip when the test path is unclear, expensive, integration-heavy, or not requested.

★ 0