cost-aware-llm-pipeline
Use when building a Python LLM API pipeline that must stay on budget: model routing by task complexity, immutable cost tracking, retries and prompt caching. Code patterns, not a spend audit; for auditing existing LLM spend use llm-cost-optimizer.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 所属仓库
- monoes/monomind
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-10
- Stars
- ★ 23
- Forks
- 2
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- cost-aware-llm-pipeline
- tags
- [ "ai-ml", "engineering", "llm", "python" ]
- tools
- []
- source
- https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC
- license
- MIT
- description
- Use when building a Python LLM API pipeline that must stay on budget: model routing by task complexity, immutable cost tracking, retries and prompt caching. Code patterns, not a spend audit; for auditing existing LLM spend use llm-cost-optimizer.
- source_path
- skills/cost-aware-llm-pipeline
- source_commit
- bf70150eb2df8070024e5bdf08e4aa08959e2735
02 资源文件 1
- 许可证LICENSE.txt1.0 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Cost-Aware LLM Pipeline
Patterns for controlling LLM API costs while maintaining quality. Combines model routing, budget tracking, retry logic, and prompt caching into a composable pipeline.
When to Activate
- Building applications that call LLM APIs (Claude, GPT, etc.)
- Processing batches of items with varying complexity
- Need to stay within a budget for API spend
- Optimizing cost without sacrificing quality on complex tasks
Core Concepts
1. Model Routing by Task Complexity
Automatically select cheaper models for simple tasks, reserving expensive models for complex ones.
MODEL_SONNET = "claude-sonnet-5"
MODEL_HAIKU = "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001"
_SONNET_TEXT_THRESHOLD = 10_000 # chars
_SONNET_ITEM_THRESHOLD = 30 # items
def select_model(
text_length: int,
item_count: int,
force_model: str | None = None,
) -> str:
"""Select model based on task complexity."""
if force_model is not None:
return force_model
if text_length >= _SONNET_TEXT_THRESHOLD or item_count >= _SONNET_ITEM_THRESHOLD:
return MODEL_SONNET # Complex task
return MODEL_HAIKU # Simple task (3-4x cheaper)
2. Immutable Cost Tracking
Track cumulative spend with frozen dataclasses. Each API call returns a new tracker — never mutates state.
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class CostRecord:
model: str
input_tokens: int
output_tokens: int
cost_usd: float
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class CostTracker:
budget_limit: float = 1.00
records: tuple[CostRecord, ...] = ()
def add(self, record: CostRecord) -> "CostTracker":
"""Return new tracker with added record (never mutates self)."""
return CostTracker(
budget_limit=self.budget_limit,
records=(*self.records, record),
)
@property
def total_cost(self) -> float:
return sum(r.cost_usd for r in self.records)
@property
def over_budget(self) -> bool:
return self.total_cost > self.budget_limit
3. Narrow Retry Logic
Retry only on transient errors. Fail fast on authentication or bad request errors.
from anthropic import (
APIConnectionError,
InternalServerError,
RateLimitError,
)
_RETRYABLE_ERRORS = (APIConnectionError, RateLimitError, InternalServerError)
_MAX_RETRIES = 3
def call_with_retry(func, *, max_retries: int = _MAX_RETRIES):
"""Retry only on transient errors, fail fast on others."""
for attempt in range(max_retries):
try:
return func()
except _RETRYABLE_ERRORS:
if attempt == max_retries - 1:
raise
time.sleep(2 ** attempt) # Exponential backoff
# AuthenticationError, BadRequestError etc. → raise immediately
4. Prompt Caching
Cache long system prompts to avoid resending them on every request.
messages = [
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "text",
"text": system_prompt,
"cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral"}, # Cache this
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": user_input, # Variable part
},
],
}
]
Composition
Combine all four techniques in a single pipeline function:
def process(text: str, config: Config, tracker: CostTracker) -> tuple[Result, CostTracker]:
# 1. Route model
model = select_model(len(text), estimated_items, config.force_model)
# 2. Check budget
if tracker.over_budget:
raise BudgetExceededError(tracker.total_cost, tracker.budget_limit)
# 3. Call with retry + caching
response = call_with_retry(lambda: client.messages.create(
model=model,
messages=build_cached_messages(system_prompt, text),
))
# 4. Track cost (immutable)
record = CostRecord(model=model, input_tokens=..., output_tokens=..., cost_usd=...)
tracker = tracker.add(record)
return parse_result(response), tracker
Pricing Reference (2026)
| Model | Input ($/1M tokens) | Output ($/1M tokens) | Relative Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haiku 3.5 (legacy) | $0.80 | $4.00 | 0.8x |
| Haiku 4.5 | $1.00 | $5.00 | 1x |
| Sonnet 5 | $2.00 | $10.00 | 2x |
| Sonnet 4.6 | $3.00 | $15.00 | 3x |
| Opus 4.8 | $5.00 | $25.00 | 5x |
| Fable 5 / Mythos 5 | $10.00 | $50.00 | 10x |
| Opus 4.0 / 4.1 (legacy) | $15.00 | $75.00 | 15x |
Best Practices
- Start with the cheapest model and only route to expensive models when complexity thresholds are met
- Set explicit budget limits before processing batches — fail early rather than overspend
- Log model selection decisions so you can tune thresholds based on real data
- Use prompt caching for system prompts over 1024 tokens — saves both cost and latency
- Never retry on authentication or validation errors — only transient failures (network, rate limit, server error)
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
- Using the most expensive model for all requests regardless of complexity
- Retrying on all errors (wastes budget on permanent failures)
- Mutating cost tracking state (makes debugging and auditing difficult)
- Hardcoding model names throughout the codebase (use constants or config)
- Ignoring prompt caching for repetitive system prompts
When to Use
- Any application calling Claude, OpenAI, or similar LLM APIs
- Batch processing pipelines where cost adds up quickly
- Multi-model architectures that need intelligent routing
- Production systems that need budget guardrails
04 同仓库更多 Skills
zk-steward
Org role guidance for a ZK steward: engineer zero-knowledge proof systems with circuit design, SNARK vs STARK choice and security review. This is zero-knowledge cryptography, not Zettelkasten note-taking.
writing-plans
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step coding task and must write an implementation plan before touching code. Produces bite-sized TDD tasks with exact file paths, code and commands for an engineer with zero context.
write-spec
Write a feature spec or PRD from a problem statement or feature idea. Use when turning a vague idea or user request into a structured document, scoping a feature with goals and non-goals, defining success metrics and acceptance criteria, or breaking a big ask into a phased spec.
write-query
Write optimized SQL for your dialect with best practices. Use when translating a natural-language data need into SQL, building a multi-CTE query with joins and aggregations, optimizing a query against a large partitioned table, or getting dialect-specific syntax for Snowflake, BigQuery, Postgres, etc.
workflow-automation
Org role guidance for workflow automation: build and maintain CI/CD definitions in GitHub Actions or equivalent: triggers, jobs, matrices, caching. Covers path filters, dependency caching, parallel jobs, timeouts and fail-fast ordering.
workflow-architect
Org role guidance for a workflow architect: map full workflow trees for systems, user journeys and agents, covering every branch and failure. Covers discovering workflows from code, handoff contracts, timeouts, recovery paths and observable state.