[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M71KDM3ZNZWDSVC2WGCD5RF5":3,"skill-same:01M71KDM3ZNZWDSVC2WGCD5RF5":66},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":15,"categories":16,"keywords":22,"publishedAt":40,"linkOnly":41,"markdownContent":42,"markdownBody":43,"frontMatter":44,"refName":45,"commitSha":46,"skillDirectory":47,"forksCount":48,"repositoryHtmlUrl":49,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":50,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":51,"install":52,"resources":65},"01M71KDM3ZNZWDSVC2WGCD5RF5","consult-codex",null,"Compare OpenAI Codex GPT-5.5 and code-searcher responses for comprehensive dual-AI code analysis. Use when you need multiple AI perspectives on code questions.","developAgent\u002Fbmad-start","developAgent","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F264530239?v=4","01M71J8X6CY24V5ZZHFGETRMSW","01M71J8X739FS28DGQAAY7V4QR",1,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FdevelopAgent\u002Fbmad-start\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fconsult-codex\u002FSKILL.md",[17],{"categoryNo":18,"categoryName":19,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",[23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39],"consult","codex","consult codex","gpt","openai","questions","perspectives","code analysis","compare","searcher","code","analysis","you","when","use","for","openai codex","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: consult-codex\ndescription: Compare OpenAI Codex GPT-5.5 and code-searcher responses for comprehensive dual-AI code analysis. Use when you need multiple AI perspectives on code questions.\n---\n\n# Dual-AI Consultation: Codex GPT-5.5 vs Code-Searcher\n\nYou orchestrate consultation between OpenAI's Codex GPT-5.5 and Claude's code-searcher to provide comprehensive analysis with comparison.\n\n## When to Use This Skill\n\n**High value queries:**\n- Complex code analysis requiring multiple perspectives\n- Debugging difficult issues\n- Architecture\u002Fdesign questions\n- Code review requests\n- Finding specific implementations across a codebase\n\n**Lower value (single AI may suffice):**\n- Simple syntax questions\n- Basic file lookups\n- Straightforward documentation queries\n\n## Workflow\n\nWhen the user asks a code question:\n\n### 1. Build Enhanced Prompt\n\nWrap the user's question with structured output requirements:\n\n```\n[USER_QUESTION]\n\n=== Analysis Guidelines ===\n\n**Structure your response with:**\n1. **Summary:** 2-3 sentence overview\n2. **Key Findings:** bullet points of discoveries\n3. **Evidence:** file paths with line numbers (format: `file:line` or `file:start-end`)\n4. **Confidence:** High\u002FMedium\u002FLow with reasoning\n5. **Limitations:** what couldn't be determined\n\n**Line Number Requirements:**\n- ALWAYS include specific line numbers when referencing code\n- Use format: `path\u002Fto\u002Ffile.ext:42` or `path\u002Fto\u002Ffile.ext:42-58`\n- For multiple references: list each with its line number\n- Include brief code snippets for key findings\n\n**Examples of good citations:**\n- \"The authentication check at `src\u002Fauth\u002Fvalidate.ts:127-134`\"\n- \"Configuration loaded from `config\u002Fsettings.json:15`\"\n- \"Error handling in `lib\u002Ferrors.ts:45, 67-72, 98`\"\n```\n\n### 2. Invoke Both Analyses in Parallel\n\n**Setup (run first).** `$CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR` is not always exported into the Bash\ntool shell, so resolve it with a `$PWD` fallback and ensure the tmp dir exists.\nSubstitute the resolved literal path for `$PROJECT_DIR` in every command below.\n```bash\nPROJECT_DIR=\"${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR:-$PWD}\"; mkdir -p \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\"\n[ -d \"$PROJECT_DIR\" ] || echo \"ERROR: PROJECT_DIR '$PROJECT_DIR' is not a directory\"\n```\n\n**Codex binary resilience (run once, before dispatch).** An nvm-managed `codex`\ncan be a symlink whose `@openai\u002Fcodex` install is broken (deleted vendor binary →\n`spawn ... ENOENT`), and a broken version can sit EARLIER on `PATH` than a working\none. `command -v` \u002F `zsh -i` return the broken path, so detect by RUNNING the\nbinary. If the PATH-resolved codex fails, hunt all nvm node installs for one whose\n`--version` succeeds and emit its absolute path. Emit `CODEX_BIN=SKIP` if none work.\n```bash\nCODEX_BIN=\"\"\nif zsh -i -c 'codex --version' >\u002Fdev\u002Fnull 2>&1; then\n  CODEX_BIN=\"codex\"   # PATH-resolved codex works; use the default dispatch\nelse\n  for p in $(find \"$HOME\u002F.nvm\u002Fversions\u002Fnode\" -maxdepth 5 -name codex \\( -type f -o -type l \\) 2>\u002Fdev\u002Fnull); do\n    if \"$p\" --version >\u002Fdev\u002Fnull 2>&1; then CODEX_BIN=\"$p\"; break; fi\n  done\n  [ -z \"$CODEX_BIN\" ] && CODEX_BIN=\"SKIP\"\nfi\necho \"CODEX_BIN=$CODEX_BIN\"   # MUST echo: shell vars don't persist across Bash tool calls\n```\n\nLaunch both simultaneously in a single message with multiple tool calls:\n\n- **For Codex GPT-5.5:**\n\n  **Step 1:** Write the enhanced prompt to a temp file using the Write tool:\n  ```\n  Write to $PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-prompt.txt with the ENHANCED_PROMPT content\n  ```\n\n  **Step 2:** Execute Codex (allow ~10 min; Codex can be slow). Pipe the prompt\n  via stdin and capture the JSONL event stream to a file.\n\n  **Pick the form based on `CODEX_BIN` from Setup:**\n  - `CODEX_BIN=codex` → use the **macOS** \u002F **Linux** interactive-shell form below.\n  - `CODEX_BIN` is an absolute path → use the **absolute-path** form (calls the\n    binary directly so PATH ordering can't shadow it again).\n  - `CODEX_BIN=SKIP` → no working codex; skip this dispatch, present only the\n    Code-Searcher response, and note the failure in §4\u002F§5.\n\n  **macOS (`CODEX_BIN=codex`):**\n  ```bash\n  cat \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-prompt.txt\" \\\n    | zsh -i -c \"codex exec -s read-only --json -C '$PROJECT_DIR' 2>&1\" \\\n    > \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-output.jsonl\"\n  ```\n\n  **Linux (`CODEX_BIN=codex`):**\n  ```bash\n  cat \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-prompt.txt\" \\\n    | bash -i -c \"codex exec -s read-only --json -C '$PROJECT_DIR' 2>&1\" \\\n    > \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-output.jsonl\"\n  ```\n\n  **Absolute-path (`CODEX_BIN` resolved to a path — macOS & Linux):** substitute\n  the literal absolute path for `CODEX_BIN_LITERAL`; no shell wrapper needed.\n  ```bash\n  cat \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-prompt.txt\" \\\n    | CODEX_BIN_LITERAL exec -s read-only --json -C \"$PROJECT_DIR\" 2>&1 \\\n    > \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-output.jsonl\"\n  ```\n\n  Why this exact form (each piece prevents a failure seen in practice):\n  - **`-s read-only`** is the portable Codex sandbox flag — it needs no\n    `~\u002F.codex\u002Fconfig.toml` `[profiles.readonly]` entry, unlike `-p readonly`\n    (which silently misbehaves when that profile is absent).\n  - **stdin pipe** (`cat … | …`) instead of `\"$(cat …)\"` avoids the\n    `Reading additional input from stdin...` hang (Codex waits on stdin when the\n    prompt is passed as a positional) and ARG_MAX limits on large prompts.\n  - **`-C '$PROJECT_DIR'`** — outer-shell single-quote expansion of an absolute\n    path — gives Codex project context. Do NOT pass the dir via an inner-shell\n    positional (`-C \"$0\"`\u002Fliteral placeholders): that produces a cryptic\n    `Error: No such file or directory (os error 2)` when it goes wrong.\n\n  Parse `$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-output.jsonl` with the §2a recipes.\n\n- **For Code-Searcher:** Use Task tool with `subagent_type: \"code-searcher\"` with the same enhanced prompt\n\nThis parallel execution significantly improves response time.\n\n### 2a. Parse Codex `--json` Output Files (jq Recipes)\n\nCodex CLI with `--json` typically emits **newline-delimited JSON events** (JSONL). Some environments may prefix lines with terminal escape sequences; these recipes strip everything before the first `{` and then `fromjson?` safely.\n\nSet a variable first:\n\n```bash\nFILE=\"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-output.jsonl\"   # the file the §2 dispatch redirected to\n```\n\n**List event types (top-level `.type`)**\n\n```bash\njq -Rr 'sub(\"^[^{]*\";\"\") | fromjson? | .type \u002F\u002F empty' \"$FILE\" | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr\n```\n\n**List item types (nested `.item.type` on `item.completed`)**\n\n```bash\njq -Rr 'sub(\"^[^{]*\";\"\") | fromjson? | select(.type==\"item.completed\") | .item.type? \u002F\u002F empty' \"$FILE\" | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr\n```\n\n**Extract only “reasoning” and “agent_message” text (human-readable)**\n\n```bash\njq -Rr '\n  sub(\"^[^{]*\";\"\")\n  | fromjson?\n  | select(.type==\"item.completed\" and (.item.type? | IN(\"reasoning\",\"agent_message\")))\n  | \"===== \\(.item.type) \\(.item.id) =====\\n\\(.item.text \u002F\u002F \"\")\\n\"\n' \"$FILE\"\n```\n\n**Extract ALL `agent_message` events** (Codex frequently emits multiple; extracting only the last would truncate the answer)\n\n```bash\nout=$(jq -Rr '\n  sub(\"^[^{]*\";\"\")\n  | fromjson?\n  | select(.type==\"item.completed\" and .item.type?==\"agent_message\")\n  | .item.text \u002F\u002F empty\n' \"$FILE\")\n[ -z \"$out\" ] && echo \"ERROR: Codex produced no agent_message events — check the raw output for errors\" >&2\nprintf '%s\\n' \"$out\"\n```\n\n**Build a clean JSON array for downstream tools**\n\n```bash\njq -Rn '\n  [inputs\n   | sub(\"^[^{]*\";\"\")\n   | fromjson?\n   | select(.type==\"item.completed\" and (.item.type? | IN(\"reasoning\",\"agent_message\")))\n   | {type:.item.type, id:.item.id, text:(.item.text \u002F\u002F \"\")}\n  ]\n' \"$FILE\"\n```\n\n**Extract command executions (command + exit code), avoiding huge stdout\u002Fstderr**\n\nCodex JSON schemas vary slightly; this tries multiple common field names.\n\n```bash\njq -Rr '\n  sub(\"^[^{]*\";\"\")\n  | fromjson?\n  | select(.type==\"item.completed\" and .item.type?==\"command_execution\")\n  | [\n      (.item.id \u002F\u002F \"\"),\n      (.item.command \u002F\u002F .item.cmd \u002F\u002F .item.command_line \u002F\u002F \"\u003Cno command field>\"),\n      (.item.exit_code \u002F\u002F .item.exitCode \u002F\u002F \"\u003Cno exit>\")\n    ]\n  | @tsv\n' \"$FILE\"\n```\n\n**Discover actual fields present in `command_execution` for your environment**\n\n```bash\njq -Rr '\n  sub(\"^[^{]*\";\"\")\n  | fromjson?\n  | select(.type==\"item.completed\" and .item.type?==\"command_execution\")\n  | (.item | keys | @json)\n' \"$FILE\" | head -n 5\n```\n\n### 3. Cleanup Temp Files\n\nAfter processing the Codex response (success or failure), clean up the temp files:\n\n```bash\nrm -f \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-prompt.txt\" \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-output.jsonl\"\n```\n\nThis prevents stale prompts from accumulating and avoids potential confusion in future runs.\n\n### 4. Handle Errors\n\n- If one agent fails or times out, still present the successful agent's response\n- Note the failure in the comparison: \"Agent X failed to respond: [error message]\"\n- Provide analysis based on the available response\n\n### 5. Create Comparison Analysis\n\nUse this exact format:\n\n---\n\n## Codex (GPT-5.5) Response\n\n[Raw output from codex-cli agent]\n\n---\n\n## Code-Searcher (Claude) Response\n\n[Raw output from code-searcher agent]\n\n---\n\n## Comparison Table\n\n| Aspect | Codex (GPT-5.5) | Code-Searcher (Claude) |\n|--------|-----------------|------------------------|\n| File paths | [Specific\u002FGeneric\u002FNone] | [Specific\u002FGeneric\u002FNone] |\n| Line numbers | [Provided\u002FMissing] | [Provided\u002FMissing] |\n| Code snippets | [Yes\u002FNo + details] | [Yes\u002FNo + details] |\n| Unique findings | [List any] | [List any] |\n| Accuracy | [Note discrepancies] | [Note discrepancies] |\n| Strengths | [Summary] | [Summary] |\n\n## Agreement Level\n\n- **High Agreement:** Both AIs reached similar conclusions - Higher confidence in findings\n- **Partial Agreement:** Some overlap with unique findings - Investigate differences\n- **Disagreement:** Contradicting findings - Manual verification recommended\n\n[State which level applies and explain]\n\n## Key Differences\n\n- **Codex GPT-5.5:** [unique findings, strengths, approach]\n- **Code-Searcher:** [unique findings, strengths, approach]\n\n## Synthesized Summary\n\n[Combine the best insights from both sources into unified analysis. Prioritize findings that are:\n1. Corroborated by both agents\n2. Supported by specific file:line citations\n3. Include verifiable code snippets]\n\n## Recommendation\n\n[Which source was more helpful for this specific query and why. Consider:\n- Accuracy of file paths and line numbers\n- Quality of code snippets provided\n- Completeness of analysis\n- Unique insights offered]\n","# Dual-AI Consultation: Codex GPT-5.5 vs Code-Searcher\n\nYou orchestrate consultation between OpenAI's Codex GPT-5.5 and Claude's code-searcher to provide comprehensive analysis with comparison.\n\n## When to Use This Skill\n\n**High value queries:**\n- Complex code analysis requiring multiple perspectives\n- Debugging difficult issues\n- Architecture\u002Fdesign questions\n- Code review requests\n- Finding specific implementations across a codebase\n\n**Lower value (single AI may suffice):**\n- Simple syntax questions\n- Basic file lookups\n- Straightforward documentation queries\n\n## Workflow\n\nWhen the user asks a code question:\n\n### 1. Build Enhanced Prompt\n\nWrap the user's question with structured output requirements:\n\n```\n[USER_QUESTION]\n\n=== Analysis Guidelines ===\n\n**Structure your response with:**\n1. **Summary:** 2-3 sentence overview\n2. **Key Findings:** bullet points of discoveries\n3. **Evidence:** file paths with line numbers (format: `file:line` or `file:start-end`)\n4. **Confidence:** High\u002FMedium\u002FLow with reasoning\n5. **Limitations:** what couldn't be determined\n\n**Line Number Requirements:**\n- ALWAYS include specific line numbers when referencing code\n- Use format: `path\u002Fto\u002Ffile.ext:42` or `path\u002Fto\u002Ffile.ext:42-58`\n- For multiple references: list each with its line number\n- Include brief code snippets for key findings\n\n**Examples of good citations:**\n- \"The authentication check at `src\u002Fauth\u002Fvalidate.ts:127-134`\"\n- \"Configuration loaded from `config\u002Fsettings.json:15`\"\n- \"Error handling in `lib\u002Ferrors.ts:45, 67-72, 98`\"\n```\n\n### 2. Invoke Both Analyses in Parallel\n\n**Setup (run first).** `$CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR` is not always exported into the Bash\ntool shell, so resolve it with a `$PWD` fallback and ensure the tmp dir exists.\nSubstitute the resolved literal path for `$PROJECT_DIR` in every command below.\n```bash\nPROJECT_DIR=\"${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR:-$PWD}\"; mkdir -p \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\"\n[ -d \"$PROJECT_DIR\" ] || echo \"ERROR: PROJECT_DIR '$PROJECT_DIR' is not a directory\"\n```\n\n**Codex binary resilience (run once, before dispatch).** An nvm-managed `codex`\ncan be a symlink whose `@openai\u002Fcodex` install is broken (deleted vendor binary →\n`spawn ... ENOENT`), and a broken version can sit EARLIER on `PATH` than a working\none. `command -v` \u002F `zsh -i` return the broken path, so detect by RUNNING the\nbinary. If the PATH-resolved codex fails, hunt all nvm node installs for one whose\n`--version` succeeds and emit its absolute path. Emit `CODEX_BIN=SKIP` if none work.\n```bash\nCODEX_BIN=\"\"\nif zsh -i -c 'codex --version' >\u002Fdev\u002Fnull 2>&1; then\n  CODEX_BIN=\"codex\"   # PATH-resolved codex works; use the default dispatch\nelse\n  for p in $(find \"$HOME\u002F.nvm\u002Fversions\u002Fnode\" -maxdepth 5 -name codex \\( -type f -o -type l \\) 2>\u002Fdev\u002Fnull); do\n    if \"$p\" --version >\u002Fdev\u002Fnull 2>&1; then CODEX_BIN=\"$p\"; break; fi\n  done\n  [ -z \"$CODEX_BIN\" ] && CODEX_BIN=\"SKIP\"\nfi\necho \"CODEX_BIN=$CODEX_BIN\"   # MUST echo: shell vars don't persist across Bash tool calls\n```\n\nLaunch both simultaneously in a single message with multiple tool calls:\n\n- **For Codex GPT-5.5:**\n\n  **Step 1:** Write the enhanced prompt to a temp file using the Write tool:\n  ```\n  Write to $PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-prompt.txt with the ENHANCED_PROMPT content\n  ```\n\n  **Step 2:** Execute Codex (allow ~10 min; Codex can be slow). Pipe the prompt\n  via stdin and capture the JSONL event stream to a file.\n\n  **Pick the form based on `CODEX_BIN` from Setup:**\n  - `CODEX_BIN=codex` → use the **macOS** \u002F **Linux** interactive-shell form below.\n  - `CODEX_BIN` is an absolute path → use the **absolute-path** form (calls the\n    binary directly so PATH ordering can't shadow it again).\n  - `CODEX_BIN=SKIP` → no working codex; skip this dispatch, present only the\n    Code-Searcher response, and note the failure in §4\u002F§5.\n\n  **macOS (`CODEX_BIN=codex`):**\n  ```bash\n  cat \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-prompt.txt\" \\\n    | zsh -i -c \"codex exec -s read-only --json -C '$PROJECT_DIR' 2>&1\" \\\n    > \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-output.jsonl\"\n  ```\n\n  **Linux (`CODEX_BIN=codex`):**\n  ```bash\n  cat \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-prompt.txt\" \\\n    | bash -i -c \"codex exec -s read-only --json -C '$PROJECT_DIR' 2>&1\" \\\n    > \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-output.jsonl\"\n  ```\n\n  **Absolute-path (`CODEX_BIN` resolved to a path — macOS & Linux):** substitute\n  the literal absolute path for `CODEX_BIN_LITERAL`; no shell wrapper needed.\n  ```bash\n  cat \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-prompt.txt\" \\\n    | CODEX_BIN_LITERAL exec -s read-only --json -C \"$PROJECT_DIR\" 2>&1 \\\n    > \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-output.jsonl\"\n  ```\n\n  Why this exact form (each piece prevents a failure seen in practice):\n  - **`-s read-only`** is the portable Codex sandbox flag — it needs no\n    `~\u002F.codex\u002Fconfig.toml` `[profiles.readonly]` entry, unlike `-p readonly`\n    (which silently misbehaves when that profile is absent).\n  - **stdin pipe** (`cat … | …`) instead of `\"$(cat …)\"` avoids the\n    `Reading additional input from stdin...` hang (Codex waits on stdin when the\n    prompt is passed as a positional) and ARG_MAX limits on large prompts.\n  - **`-C '$PROJECT_DIR'`** — outer-shell single-quote expansion of an absolute\n    path — gives Codex project context. Do NOT pass the dir via an inner-shell\n    positional (`-C \"$0\"`\u002Fliteral placeholders): that produces a cryptic\n    `Error: No such file or directory (os error 2)` when it goes wrong.\n\n  Parse `$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-output.jsonl` with the §2a recipes.\n\n- **For Code-Searcher:** Use Task tool with `subagent_type: \"code-searcher\"` with the same enhanced prompt\n\nThis parallel execution significantly improves response time.\n\n### 2a. Parse Codex `--json` Output Files (jq Recipes)\n\nCodex CLI with `--json` typically emits **newline-delimited JSON events** (JSONL). Some environments may prefix lines with terminal escape sequences; these recipes strip everything before the first `{` and then `fromjson?` safely.\n\nSet a variable first:\n\n```bash\nFILE=\"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-output.jsonl\"   # the file the §2 dispatch redirected to\n```\n\n**List event types (top-level `.type`)**\n\n```bash\njq -Rr 'sub(\"^[^{]*\";\"\") | fromjson? | .type \u002F\u002F empty' \"$FILE\" | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr\n```\n\n**List item types (nested `.item.type` on `item.completed`)**\n\n```bash\njq -Rr 'sub(\"^[^{]*\";\"\") | fromjson? | select(.type==\"item.completed\") | .item.type? \u002F\u002F empty' \"$FILE\" | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr\n```\n\n**Extract only “reasoning” and “agent_message” text (human-readable)**\n\n```bash\njq -Rr '\n  sub(\"^[^{]*\";\"\")\n  | fromjson?\n  | select(.type==\"item.completed\" and (.item.type? | IN(\"reasoning\",\"agent_message\")))\n  | \"===== \\(.item.type) \\(.item.id) =====\\n\\(.item.text \u002F\u002F \"\")\\n\"\n' \"$FILE\"\n```\n\n**Extract ALL `agent_message` events** (Codex frequently emits multiple; extracting only the last would truncate the answer)\n\n```bash\nout=$(jq -Rr '\n  sub(\"^[^{]*\";\"\")\n  | fromjson?\n  | select(.type==\"item.completed\" and .item.type?==\"agent_message\")\n  | .item.text \u002F\u002F empty\n' \"$FILE\")\n[ -z \"$out\" ] && echo \"ERROR: Codex produced no agent_message events — check the raw output for errors\" >&2\nprintf '%s\\n' \"$out\"\n```\n\n**Build a clean JSON array for downstream tools**\n\n```bash\njq -Rn '\n  [inputs\n   | sub(\"^[^{]*\";\"\")\n   | fromjson?\n   | select(.type==\"item.completed\" and (.item.type? | IN(\"reasoning\",\"agent_message\")))\n   | {type:.item.type, id:.item.id, text:(.item.text \u002F\u002F \"\")}\n  ]\n' \"$FILE\"\n```\n\n**Extract command executions (command + exit code), avoiding huge stdout\u002Fstderr**\n\nCodex JSON schemas vary slightly; this tries multiple common field names.\n\n```bash\njq -Rr '\n  sub(\"^[^{]*\";\"\")\n  | fromjson?\n  | select(.type==\"item.completed\" and .item.type?==\"command_execution\")\n  | [\n      (.item.id \u002F\u002F \"\"),\n      (.item.command \u002F\u002F .item.cmd \u002F\u002F .item.command_line \u002F\u002F \"\u003Cno command field>\"),\n      (.item.exit_code \u002F\u002F .item.exitCode \u002F\u002F \"\u003Cno exit>\")\n    ]\n  | @tsv\n' \"$FILE\"\n```\n\n**Discover actual fields present in `command_execution` for your environment**\n\n```bash\njq -Rr '\n  sub(\"^[^{]*\";\"\")\n  | fromjson?\n  | select(.type==\"item.completed\" and .item.type?==\"command_execution\")\n  | (.item | keys | @json)\n' \"$FILE\" | head -n 5\n```\n\n### 3. Cleanup Temp Files\n\nAfter processing the Codex response (success or failure), clean up the temp files:\n\n```bash\nrm -f \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-prompt.txt\" \"$PROJECT_DIR\u002Ftmp\u002Fcodex-output.jsonl\"\n```\n\nThis prevents stale prompts from accumulating and avoids potential confusion in future runs.\n\n### 4. Handle Errors\n\n- If one agent fails or times out, still present the successful agent's response\n- Note the failure in the comparison: \"Agent X failed to respond: [error message]\"\n- Provide analysis based on the available response\n\n### 5. Create Comparison Analysis\n\nUse this exact format:\n\n---\n\n## Codex (GPT-5.5) Response\n\n[Raw output from codex-cli agent]\n\n---\n\n## Code-Searcher (Claude) Response\n\n[Raw output from code-searcher agent]\n\n---\n\n## Comparison Table\n\n| Aspect | Codex (GPT-5.5) | Code-Searcher (Claude) |\n|--------|-----------------|------------------------|\n| File paths | [Specific\u002FGeneric\u002FNone] | [Specific\u002FGeneric\u002FNone] |\n| Line numbers | [Provided\u002FMissing] | [Provided\u002FMissing] |\n| Code snippets | [Yes\u002FNo + details] | [Yes\u002FNo + details] |\n| Unique findings | [List any] | [List any] |\n| Accuracy | [Note discrepancies] | [Note discrepancies] |\n| Strengths | [Summary] | [Summary] |\n\n## Agreement Level\n\n- **High Agreement:** Both AIs reached similar conclusions - Higher confidence in findings\n- **Partial Agreement:** Some overlap with unique findings - Investigate differences\n- **Disagreement:** Contradicting findings - Manual verification recommended\n\n[State which level applies and explain]\n\n## Key Differences\n\n- **Codex GPT-5.5:** [unique findings, strengths, approach]\n- **Code-Searcher:** [unique findings, strengths, approach]\n\n## Synthesized Summary\n\n[Combine the best insights from both sources into unified analysis. Prioritize findings that are:\n1. Corroborated by both agents\n2. Supported by specific file:line citations\n3. Include verifiable code snippets]\n\n## Recommendation\n\n[Which source was more helpful for this specific query and why. Consider:\n- Accuracy of file paths and line numbers\n- Quality of code snippets provided\n- Completeness of analysis\n- Unique insights offered]\n",{"name":5,"description":7},"main","1907bbe850fb749efa8b499b8da7ebb78a663519",".claude\u002Fskills\u002Fconsult-codex",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FdevelopAgent\u002Fbmad-start","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FdevelopAgent","2026-07-19 05:19:22",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":53,"prompt":63,"zipAvailable":64},[54,57,60],{"tool":55,"command":56},"npx","npx skills add developAgent\u002Fbmad-start --skill consult-codex",{"tool":58,"command":59},"bunx","bunx skills add developAgent\u002Fbmad-start --skill consult-codex",{"tool":61,"command":62},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add developAgent\u002Fbmad-start --skill consult-codex","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FdevelopAgent\u002Fbmad-start\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fconsult-codex\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[67,89,118,136,150,173],{"skillNo":68,"name":69,"nameZh":6,"description":70,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":71,"categories":72,"keywords":78,"publishedAt":88},"01M71R3M9DJTTY0ARFQ6K04NMP","gds-correct-course","Manage significant changes during sprint execution. Use when the user says \"correct course\" or \"propose sprint change\"","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FdevelopAgent\u002Fbmad-start\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.rovodev\u002Fskills\u002Fgds-correct-course\u002FSKILL.md",[73],{"categoryNo":74,"categoryName":75,"taxonomyType":76,"taxonomyTypeDesc":77},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000039","教师与教育","PROFESSION","适用职业",[79,80,81,82,83,84,36,37,85,86,87],"gds correct course","course","correct","user","changes","change","execution","manage","sprint","2026-11-10 13:02:02",{"skillNo":90,"name":91,"nameZh":6,"description":92,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":93,"categories":94,"keywords":101,"publishedAt":88},"01M71R3GENSFD1A1XVZTTQG1KF","gds-code-review","Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers (Blind Hunter, Edge Case Hunter, Acceptance Auditor) with structured triage into actionable categories. Use when the user says \"run code review\" or \"review this code\"","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FdevelopAgent\u002Fbmad-start\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.rovodev\u002Fskills\u002Fgds-code-review\u002FSKILL.md",[95,98],{"categoryNo":96,"categoryName":97,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000007","代码审查",{"categoryNo":99,"categoryName":100,"taxonomyType":76,"taxonomyTypeDesc":77},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000030","开发工程师",[102,33,103,104,105,83,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,36,113,37,114,115,116,117],"code review","review","gds code review","categories","triage","review code","run","parallel","case","with","run code","acceptance","edge","actionable","layers","hunter",{"skillNo":119,"name":120,"nameZh":6,"description":121,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":122,"categories":123,"keywords":124,"publishedAt":88},"01M71R3DD098MQRD6F8S4GG0AW","gds-check-implementation-readiness","Verify GDD, UX, Architecture, and Epics alignment before production. Use when the user says \"check readiness\" or \"implementation readiness\"","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FdevelopAgent\u002Fbmad-start\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.rovodev\u002Fskills\u002Fgds-check-implementation-readiness\u002FSKILL.md",[],[125,126,127,128,129,130,82,131,132,133,134,36,37,135],"check","readiness","Implementation Readiness","gds check implementation readiness","implementation","check readiness","Production","ux","verify","architecture","alignment",{"skillNo":137,"name":138,"nameZh":6,"description":139,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":140,"categories":141,"keywords":142,"publishedAt":88},"01M71R3ACAA1G0NVQ330JQNJPK","gds-brainstorm-game","Facilitate game brainstorming sessions with game-specific techniques. Use when the user says \"brainstorm game\" or \"game ideas\"","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FdevelopAgent\u002Fbmad-start\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.rovodev\u002Fskills\u002Fgds-brainstorm-game\u002FSKILL.md",[],[143,144,145,82,146,111,36,37,147,148,149],"gds brainstorm game","game","brainstorm","brainstorming","techniques","sessions","ideas",{"skillNo":151,"name":152,"nameZh":6,"description":153,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":154,"categories":155,"keywords":157,"publishedAt":88},"01M71R377MJ6WJTTFARGKH3HX7","gds-agent-tech-writer","Technical documentation specialist and knowledge curator for game projects. Use when the user asks to talk to Paige or requests the Technical Writer.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FdevelopAgent\u002Fbmad-start\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.rovodev\u002Fskills\u002Fgds-agent-tech-writer\u002FSKILL.md",[156],{"categoryNo":18,"categoryName":19,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},[158,159,160,161,37,162,163,38,164,36,82,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,144,172],"gds agent tech writer","tech","writer","technical writer","technical","knowledge","projects","technical documentation","talk","specialist","documentation specialist","knowledge curator","requests","documentation","curator",{"skillNo":174,"name":175,"nameZh":6,"description":176,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":177,"categories":178,"keywords":180,"publishedAt":88},"01M71R34RGT2ZX3TSFA2CRT0NC","gds-agent-game-solo-dev","Elite indie game developer for rapid prototyping and solo quick-flow development. Use when the user asks to talk to Indie or requests the Game Solo Dev.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FdevelopAgent\u002Fbmad-start\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.rovodev\u002Fskills\u002Fgds-agent-game-solo-dev\u002FSKILL.md",[179],{"categoryNo":18,"categoryName":19,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},[181,144,182,183,184,185,82,166,170,186,187,36,37,188,38,189,190],"solo","gds agent game solo dev","dev","flow","developer","RAPID","game developer","prototyping","development","quick"]