model-domain
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates specs/tech-architecture/tech-stack.md and specs/adr/ inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's domain language and documented decisions.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-10
- Stars
- ★ 290
- Forks
- 24
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- model-domain
- model
- sonnet
- effort
- standard
- description
- Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates specs/tech-architecture/tech-stack.md and specs/adr/ inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's domain language and documented decisions.
02 资源文件 2
- 参考文档ADR-FORMAT.md2.7 KB
- 参考文档CONTEXT-FORMAT.md3.1 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Model Domain
Distinct from define-language and deepen-architecture: Use this skill to stress-test a plan through a grilling interview that resolves domain model decisions and captures invariants. Use define-language to produce a canonical glossary of terms. Use deepen-architecture to find module-level refactoring opportunities in code.
Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.
HARD GATE — Capture invariants (what MUST always be true) and state machines (what transitions are legal) for core entities. If these are fuzzy, design will fail.
Ask the questions one at a time, waiting for feedback on each question before continuing.
If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead.
Domain awareness
During codebase exploration, also look for existing documentation:
File structure
Most repos have a single context:
/
├── specs/
│ ├── CONTEXT.md
│ └── adr/
│ ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│ └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/
If a specs/tech-architecture/tech-stack.md exists, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:
/
├── specs/
│ ├── CONTEXT-MAP.md
│ └── adr/ ← system-wide decisions
└── src/
├── ordering/
│ └── specs/
│ ├── CONTEXT.md
│ └── adr/ ← context-specific decisions
└── billing/
└── specs/
├── CONTEXT.md
└── adr/
Create files lazily — only when you have something to write. If no specs/tech-architecture/tech-stack.md exists, create it when the first term is resolved. If no specs/adr/ exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.
During the session
Challenge against the glossary
When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in specs/tech-architecture/tech-stack.md, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y — which is it?"
Sharpen fuzzy language
When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."
Discuss concrete scenarios
When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.
Cross-reference with code
When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible — which is right?"
Update specs/tech-architecture/tech-stack.md inline
When a term is resolved, update specs/tech-architecture/tech-stack.md right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in CONTEXT-FORMAT.md.
Don't couple specs/tech-architecture/tech-stack.md to implementation details. Only include terms that are meaningful to domain experts.
Offer ADRs sparingly
Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:
- Hard to reverse — the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful
- Surprising without context — a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
- The result of a real trade-off — there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons
If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in ADR-FORMAT.md.
Concurrency safety audit
When the plan touches shared state, async, or multi-threaded code:
- [ ] List every shared mutable location (globals, singletons, module-level caches).
- [ ] For each: who reads, who writes, synchronization mechanism (lock, actor, immutable copy).
- [ ] Flag race risks (check-then-act, non-atomic read-modify-write) with severity.
- [ ] Record findings in
specs/tech-architecture/tech-stack.mdunder## Concurrencyor in an ADR if architectural.
<!-- story: e07s03 -->
04 同仓库更多 Skills
skill-verify-fail-open-fixture
Negative-path fixture for run-skill-verify.sh — must never PASS.
negative-path
暂无简介
write-document
Write, organize, and sync high-integrity technical documents using the BMAD methodology. Ensures every document is Bold, Minimal, Actionable, and Durable. Use when creating architectural docs, technical guides, or organizing the specs/ directory.
wire-observability
Add structured JSON logging, observability commands, and idempotent setup scripts to a project. Use when a project needs production-readiness instrumentation, when user wants structured logging, or as a production-readiness gate at any phase of development.
wire-ci
CI pipeline setup with bundled, forge-neutral templates and local validation. Detects the forge from the git remote, generates workflows for supported forges, and skips honestly for the rest. The CI equivalent of wire-observability.
visual-dashboard
Start a browser-based dashboard that visualizes architecture, implementation plans, and project status. Persists artifacts in .bigpowers/dashboard/. Reads specs/state.yaml, release-plan.yaml, epics, and planning-status via HTTP API or opencode panel.