gather-evidence
Gather direct evidence from the current target before responding to a human change request or QA finding. Use when human feedback needs confirmation or proof of resolution.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-12
- Stars
- ★ 1
- Forks
- 1
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- gather-evidence
- description
- Gather direct evidence from the current target before responding to a human change request or QA finding. Use when human feedback needs confirmation or proof of resolution.
02 资源文件 1
- 参考文档references/evidence.md1.1 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Gather evidence
Treat human feedback as a claim or requested outcome to investigate. Do not edit code, reply to the person, resolve their thread, or change their review state.
Define the evidence cases
Read the complete feedback and its nearby context. Split independent claims into separate evidence cases. Record each case using the evidence fields:
- the exact feedback source
- the requested behavior or result
- the expected and reported behavior
- the exact check and required environment
- the current target, pull request, commit, build, or deployment
Do not translate a concrete observation into a proxy. Ask for missing context only when no direct check can resolve it.
Inspect the current target
Resolve the current target before gathering evidence. For pull request feedback, record the current head SHA and confirm that the local checkout or deployed build matches it. A later push invalidates the evidence.
Gather direct evidence from the interface named by the feedback. Inspect the code
and diff for source claims. Run the exact interaction for behavioral claims.
Use the applicable driver for a UI, CLI, or runtime. Before changing a mobile
simulator or running mobile automation, invoke running-mobile-simulators.
Follow the direct-evidence rules. Record the command or interaction, target identity, environment, observation, and artifact location. Do not use a passing check, internal call, element presence, or agent report as proof of a different property.
Return a verdict
Return one verdict for each evidence case:
confirmed. Direct evidence reproduces the reported failure or shows that the requested outcome is absent from the current target.resolved. Direct evidence shows the requested outcome on the current target and does not reproduce the reported failure.blocked. The required target, environment, capability, or observation is unavailable.decision-needed. The feedback requires a product or preference decision that evidence cannot answer.
For confirmed, pass the evidence case to patina-mode's matching playbook. Use
Bug fix for a defect and Feature or Refactoring for a requested change. After
the target changes, run gather-evidence again before preparing a response.
Report
Return the feedback source, verdict, target identity, direct observation, and
artifact or command for each case. State exactly what blocks a blocked case.
Leave every human-authored conversation open for the operator.
When a case has local video evidence, add a compact Linear handoff directly
after that case:
- Write a short Markdown note the operator can paste without rewriting. Name the verdict, tested target, observation, and video filename. Include build, deployment, and device identity when available. Write one note per evidence case and name every video that proves it.
- Before cleanup, copy any video from a simulator, lease, or temporary directory that cleanup will remove to a path the current run will preserve. Leave the copy on disk at the reported path.
- Put one clickable file link per video immediately after its note. Render it as
[filename.mp4](/absolute/path/filename.mp4). Wrap a target containing spaces in angle brackets. Keep the local link outside the paste-ready note because a Linear reader cannot open the operator's local path. - If the host cannot render a clickable local file, return the exact absolute path and state that the operator must locate it manually. Report only actions that occurred; a link or path is not a copy, attachment, or upload.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
code-review
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along five axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?), Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?), Evidence (does each claim in the pull request have evidence that shows it?), Bugs (does the changed code have logic errors, unhandled states, races, or regressions?), and Security (does the change open injection, auth, secret, input, or CI workflow holes?). Runs the reviews in parallel sub-agents, tags every finding Important, Nit, or Pre-existing, and reports them side by side with what blocks merge. Given an earlier reviewed head and its findings, it reviews only the newer commits, rechecks the earlier findings, and never repeats one. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
writing-for-pstack
Write or tighten an operator prompt for a patina-mode run. Use when the operator asks to write, revise, or review a prompt that will be passed to patina-mode.
writing-for-agents
Writing documents for agents. Use when creating or editing skills, or modifying AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md.
wizard
Generate an interactive bash wizard that walks a human through steps only they can perform. Use when provisioning infrastructure, setting up credentials or CI secrets, walking an unfamiliar third-party dashboard, or running a one-off migration or cutover. Don't invoke this for steps the agent can perform itself.
wayfinder
Plan a huge chunk of work (more than one agent session can hold) as a shared map of decision tickets on your issue tracker, and resolve them one at a time until the way to the destination is clear.
wait-what
Stop. That last message did not land: re-pitch it.