AGENT SKILL

intel-mitre-threatmodel

Intel Mitre Threatmodel.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-09-01
Stars
★ 0
Forks
0

01 前言 Front Matter

name
intel-mitre-threatmodel
domain
cybersecurity
description
Intel Mitre Threatmodel.

02 资源文件 1

03 SKILL.md 正文

--| | MITRE ATT&CK | Knowledge base of adversary tactics, techniques, and procedures based on real-world observations | | TTP | Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures — the behavioral patterns of adversary groups | | ATT&CK Navigator | Web tool for visualizing ATT&CK matrices as layered heatmaps showing coverage or threat profiles | | Gap Analysis | Process of comparing threat actor TTPs against detection coverage to identify blind spots | | Threat-Informed Defense | Security strategy prioritizing defenses based on actual adversary behaviors rather than theoretical risks | | Adversary Emulation | Controlled simulation of threat actor TTPs to validate detection and response capabilities |

Tools & Systems

  • MITRE ATT&CK Navigator: Web-based visualization tool for creating and overlaying ATT&CK technique layers
  • MITRE Caldera: Automated adversary emulation platform for testing detection coverage at scale
  • Atomic Red Team: Open-source library of ATT&CK technique tests for security control validation
  • CTID ATT&CK Workbench: MITRE tool for customizing ATT&CK knowledge base with organizational context
  • Tidal Cyber: Commercial platform for threat-informed defense planning using ATT&CK framework

Common Scenarios

  • Annual Threat Assessment: Map top 5 threat actors to ATT&CK, overlay against detection, produce gap analysis
  • Cloud Migration Planning: Model cloud-specific threats (T1078.004, T1537) and plan detection coverage
  • M&A Security Assessment: Threat model the acquired company's environment against relevant threat actors
  • Budget Justification: Use gap analysis to demonstrate detection blind spots requiring tool investment
  • Purple Team Planning: Select adversary emulation scenarios based on highest-priority gaps from threat model

Output Format

THREAT MODEL ASSESSMENT — Financial Services Division
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Date:             2024-03-15
Threat Actors:    FIN7, APT38, Lazarus Group
Techniques Total: 87 unique techniques across all actors

DETECTION COVERAGE:
  Covered:     56/87 (64%)
  Gaps:        31/87 (36%)

  Tactic Coverage Breakdown:
    Initial Access:      78%  ████████░░
    Execution:           82%  █████████░
    Persistence:         71%  ████████░░
    Priv Escalation:     65%  ███████░░░
    Defense Evasion:     52%  ██████░░░░  <-- Priority gap
    Credential Access:   58%  ██████░░░░  <-- Priority gap
    Discovery:           45%  █████░░░░░
    Lateral Movement:    61%  ███████░░░
    Collection:          50%  ██████░░░░
    Exfiltration:        55%  ██████░░░░
    C2:                  67%  ███████░░░

TOP PRIORITY GAPS (30-day remediation):
  1. T1055 Process Injection — used by all 3 actors, 0 detections
  2. T1003.006 DCSync — used by FIN7 and Lazarus, 0 detections
  3. T1070.004 File Deletion — evidence destruction, 0 detections

INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
  Closing top 10 gaps requires: 2 detection engineer FTEs, 60 days
  Expected coverage improvement: 64% -> 76%

04 同仓库更多 Skills