[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M71CQWT99CFEQXPQQ2X1W5GF":3,"skill-same:01M71CQWT99CFEQXPQQ2X1W5GF":92},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":23,"publishedAt":44,"linkOnly":45,"markdownContent":46,"markdownBody":47,"frontMatter":48,"refName":56,"commitSha":57,"skillDirectory":58,"forksCount":14,"repositoryHtmlUrl":59,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":60,"ownerBlogUrl":61,"ownerDescription":62,"updatedAt":63,"install":64,"resources":77},"01M71CQWT99CFEQXPQQ2X1W5GF","board-meeting",null,"Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollination), critic analysis, synthesis, founder review, and decision extraction. Use when the user invokes \u002Fcs:board, calls a board meeting, or wants structured multi-perspective executive deliberation on a strategic question.","agency-black\u002FSkills","agency-black","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F234862658?v=4","01M6HWVFPNGNR5N2CX9ECSAD57","agencia.black","01M719WF77BF3HN0N9FK1APEFY",0,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fagency-black\u002FSkills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fskills\u002Fboard-meeting\u002FSKILL.md",[18],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000034","行政与办公人员","PROFESSION","适用职业",[24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43],"board","meeting","board meeting","2026","multi","two","review","phase","analysis","decisions","when","use","strategic","question","calls","critic","decision","loading","for","memory","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: \"board-meeting\"\ndescription: \"Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollination), critic analysis, synthesis, founder review, and decision extraction. Use when the user invokes \u002Fcs:board, calls a board meeting, or wants structured multi-perspective executive deliberation on a strategic question.\"\nlicense: MIT\nmetadata:\n  version: 1.0.0\n  author: Alireza Rezvani\n  category: c-level\n  domain: board-protocol\n  updated: 2026-03-05\n  frameworks: 6-phase-board, two-layer-memory, independent-contributions\n---\n\n# Board Meeting Protocol\n\nStructured multi-agent deliberation that prevents groupthink, captures minority views, and produces clean, actionable decisions.\n\n## Keywords\nboard meeting, executive deliberation, strategic decision, C-suite, multi-agent, \u002Fcs:board, founder review, decision extraction, independent perspectives\n\n## Invoke\n`\u002Fcs:board [topic]` — e.g. `\u002Fcs:board Should we expand to Spain in Q3?`\n\n---\n\n## The 6-Phase Protocol\n\n### PHASE 1: Context Gathering\n1. Load `memory\u002Fcompany-context.md`\n2. Load `memory\u002Fboard-meetings\u002Fdecisions.md` **(Layer 2 ONLY — never raw transcripts)**\n3. Reset session state — no bleed from previous conversations\n4. Present agenda + activated roles → wait for founder confirmation\n\n**Chief of Staff selects relevant roles** based on topic (not all 9 every time):\n| Topic | Activate |\n|-------|----------|\n| Market expansion | CEO, CMO, CFO, CRO, COO |\n| Product direction | CEO, CPO, CTO, CMO |\n| Hiring\u002Forg | CEO, CHRO, CFO, COO |\n| Pricing | CMO, CFO, CRO, CPO |\n| Technology | CTO, CPO, CFO, CISO |\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 2: Independent Contributions (ISOLATED)\n\n**No cross-pollination. Each agent runs before seeing others' outputs.**\n\nOrder: Research (if needed) → CMO → CFO → CEO → CTO → COO → CHRO → CRO → CISO → CPO\n\n**Reasoning techniques:** CEO: Tree of Thought (3 futures) | CFO: Chain of Thought (show the math) | CMO: Recursion of Thought (draft→critique→refine) | CPO: First Principles | CRO: Chain of Thought (pipeline math) | COO: Step by Step (process map) | CTO: ReAct (research→analyze→act) | CISO: Risk-Based (P×I) | CHRO: Empathy + Data\n\n**Contribution format (max 5 key points, self-verified):**\n```\n## [ROLE] — [DATE]\n\nKey points (max 5):\n• [Finding] — [VERIFIED\u002FASSUMED] — 🟢\u002F🟡\u002F🔴\n• [Finding] — [VERIFIED\u002FASSUMED] — 🟢\u002F🟡\u002F🔴\n\nRecommendation: [clear position]\nConfidence: High \u002F Medium \u002F Low\nSource: [where the data came from]\nWhat would change my mind: [specific condition]\n```\n\nEach agent self-verifies before contributing: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring. No untagged claims.\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 3: Critic Analysis\nExecutive Mentor receives ALL Phase 2 outputs simultaneously. Role: adversarial reviewer, not synthesizer.\n\nChecklist:\n- Where did agents agree too easily? (suspicious consensus = red flag)\n- What assumptions are shared but unvalidated?\n- Who is missing from the room? (customer voice? front-line ops?)\n- What risk has nobody mentioned?\n- Which agent operated outside their domain?\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 4: Synthesis\nChief of Staff delivers using the **Board Meeting Output** format (defined in `agent-protocol\u002FSKILL.md`):\n- Decision Required (one sentence)\n- Perspectives (one line per contributing role)\n- Where They Agree \u002F Where They Disagree\n- Critic's View (the uncomfortable truth)\n- Recommended Decision + Action Items (owners, deadlines)\n- Your Call (options if founder disagrees)\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 5: Human in the Loop ⏸️\n\n**Full stop. Wait for the founder.**\n\n```\n⏸️ FOUNDER REVIEW — [Paste synthesis]\n\nOptions: ✅ Approve | ✏️ Modify | ❌ Reject | ❓ Ask follow-up\n```\n\n**Rules:**\n- User corrections OVERRIDE agent proposals. No pushback. No \"but the CFO said...\"\n- 30-min inactivity → auto-close as \"pending review\"\n- Reopen any time with `\u002Fcs:board resume`\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 6: Decision Extraction\nAfter founder approval:\n- **Layer 1:** Write full transcript → `memory\u002Fboard-meetings\u002FYYYY-MM-DD-raw.md`\n- **Layer 2:** Append approved decisions → `memory\u002Fboard-meetings\u002Fdecisions.md`\n- Mark rejected proposals `[DO_NOT_RESURFACE]`\n- Confirm to founder with count of decisions logged, actions tracked, flags added\n\n---\n\n## Memory Structure\n```\nmemory\u002Fboard-meetings\u002F\n├── decisions.md          # Layer 2 — founder-approved only (Phase 1 loads this)\n├── YYYY-MM-DD-raw.md     # Layer 1 — full transcripts (never auto-loaded)\n└── archive\u002FYYYY\u002F         # Raw transcripts after 90 days\n```\n\n**Future meetings load Layer 2 only.** Never Layer 1. This prevents hallucinated consensus.\n\n---\n\n## Failure Mode Quick Reference\n| Failure | Fix |\n|---------|-----|\n| Groupthink (all agree) | Re-run Phase 2 isolated; force \"strongest argument against\" |\n| Analysis paralysis | Cap at 5 points; force recommendation even with Low confidence |\n| Bikeshedding | Log as async action item; return to main agenda |\n| Role bleed (CFO making product calls) | Critic flags; exclude from synthesis |\n| Layer contamination | Phase 1 loads decisions.md only — hard rule |\n\n---\n\n## References\n- `templates\u002Fmeeting-agenda.md` — agenda format\n- `templates\u002Fmeeting-minutes.md` — final output format\n- `references\u002Fmeeting-facilitation.md` — conflict handling, timing, failure modes\n","# Board Meeting Protocol\n\nStructured multi-agent deliberation that prevents groupthink, captures minority views, and produces clean, actionable decisions.\n\n## Keywords\nboard meeting, executive deliberation, strategic decision, C-suite, multi-agent, \u002Fcs:board, founder review, decision extraction, independent perspectives\n\n## Invoke\n`\u002Fcs:board [topic]` — e.g. `\u002Fcs:board Should we expand to Spain in Q3?`\n\n---\n\n## The 6-Phase Protocol\n\n### PHASE 1: Context Gathering\n1. Load `memory\u002Fcompany-context.md`\n2. Load `memory\u002Fboard-meetings\u002Fdecisions.md` **(Layer 2 ONLY — never raw transcripts)**\n3. Reset session state — no bleed from previous conversations\n4. Present agenda + activated roles → wait for founder confirmation\n\n**Chief of Staff selects relevant roles** based on topic (not all 9 every time):\n| Topic | Activate |\n|-------|----------|\n| Market expansion | CEO, CMO, CFO, CRO, COO |\n| Product direction | CEO, CPO, CTO, CMO |\n| Hiring\u002Forg | CEO, CHRO, CFO, COO |\n| Pricing | CMO, CFO, CRO, CPO |\n| Technology | CTO, CPO, CFO, CISO |\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 2: Independent Contributions (ISOLATED)\n\n**No cross-pollination. Each agent runs before seeing others' outputs.**\n\nOrder: Research (if needed) → CMO → CFO → CEO → CTO → COO → CHRO → CRO → CISO → CPO\n\n**Reasoning techniques:** CEO: Tree of Thought (3 futures) | CFO: Chain of Thought (show the math) | CMO: Recursion of Thought (draft→critique→refine) | CPO: First Principles | CRO: Chain of Thought (pipeline math) | COO: Step by Step (process map) | CTO: ReAct (research→analyze→act) | CISO: Risk-Based (P×I) | CHRO: Empathy + Data\n\n**Contribution format (max 5 key points, self-verified):**\n```\n## [ROLE] — [DATE]\n\nKey points (max 5):\n• [Finding] — [VERIFIED\u002FASSUMED] — 🟢\u002F🟡\u002F🔴\n• [Finding] — [VERIFIED\u002FASSUMED] — 🟢\u002F🟡\u002F🔴\n\nRecommendation: [clear position]\nConfidence: High \u002F Medium \u002F Low\nSource: [where the data came from]\nWhat would change my mind: [specific condition]\n```\n\nEach agent self-verifies before contributing: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring. No untagged claims.\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 3: Critic Analysis\nExecutive Mentor receives ALL Phase 2 outputs simultaneously. Role: adversarial reviewer, not synthesizer.\n\nChecklist:\n- Where did agents agree too easily? (suspicious consensus = red flag)\n- What assumptions are shared but unvalidated?\n- Who is missing from the room? (customer voice? front-line ops?)\n- What risk has nobody mentioned?\n- Which agent operated outside their domain?\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 4: Synthesis\nChief of Staff delivers using the **Board Meeting Output** format (defined in `agent-protocol\u002FSKILL.md`):\n- Decision Required (one sentence)\n- Perspectives (one line per contributing role)\n- Where They Agree \u002F Where They Disagree\n- Critic's View (the uncomfortable truth)\n- Recommended Decision + Action Items (owners, deadlines)\n- Your Call (options if founder disagrees)\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 5: Human in the Loop ⏸️\n\n**Full stop. Wait for the founder.**\n\n```\n⏸️ FOUNDER REVIEW — [Paste synthesis]\n\nOptions: ✅ Approve | ✏️ Modify | ❌ Reject | ❓ Ask follow-up\n```\n\n**Rules:**\n- User corrections OVERRIDE agent proposals. No pushback. No \"but the CFO said...\"\n- 30-min inactivity → auto-close as \"pending review\"\n- Reopen any time with `\u002Fcs:board resume`\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 6: Decision Extraction\nAfter founder approval:\n- **Layer 1:** Write full transcript → `memory\u002Fboard-meetings\u002FYYYY-MM-DD-raw.md`\n- **Layer 2:** Append approved decisions → `memory\u002Fboard-meetings\u002Fdecisions.md`\n- Mark rejected proposals `[DO_NOT_RESURFACE]`\n- Confirm to founder with count of decisions logged, actions tracked, flags added\n\n---\n\n## Memory Structure\n```\nmemory\u002Fboard-meetings\u002F\n├── decisions.md          # Layer 2 — founder-approved only (Phase 1 loads this)\n├── YYYY-MM-DD-raw.md     # Layer 1 — full transcripts (never auto-loaded)\n└── archive\u002FYYYY\u002F         # Raw transcripts after 90 days\n```\n\n**Future meetings load Layer 2 only.** Never Layer 1. This prevents hallucinated consensus.\n\n---\n\n## Failure Mode Quick Reference\n| Failure | Fix |\n|---------|-----|\n| Groupthink (all agree) | Re-run Phase 2 isolated; force \"strongest argument against\" |\n| Analysis paralysis | Cap at 5 points; force recommendation even with Low confidence |\n| Bikeshedding | Log as async action item; return to main agenda |\n| Role bleed (CFO making product calls) | Critic flags; exclude from synthesis |\n| Layer contamination | Phase 1 loads decisions.md only — hard rule |\n\n---\n\n## References\n- `templates\u002Fmeeting-agenda.md` — agenda format\n- `templates\u002Fmeeting-minutes.md` — final output format\n- `references\u002Fmeeting-facilitation.md` — conflict handling, timing, failure modes\n",{"name":5,"license":15,"metadata":49,"description":7},{"author":50,"domain":51,"updated":52,"version":53,"category":54,"frameworks":55},"Alireza Rezvani","board-protocol",1772668800000,"1.0.0","c-level","6-phase-board, two-layer-memory, independent-contributions","main","681496e0662f4c45c4758fae9d4510ae87311bf2","c-level-advisor\u002Fskills\u002Fboard-meeting","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fagency-black\u002FSkills","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fagency-black","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.dogma.black","Las grandes ideas merecen una ejecución impecable. Construimos plataformas web, aplicaciones y ecosistemas digitales completos. Esta Trinidad es nuestro dogma.","2026-05-29 16:13:55",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":65,"prompt":75,"zipAvailable":76},[66,69,72],{"tool":67,"command":68},"npx","npx skills add agency-black\u002FSkills --skill board-meeting",{"tool":70,"command":71},"bunx","bunx skills add agency-black\u002FSkills --skill board-meeting",{"tool":73,"command":74},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add agency-black\u002FSkills --skill board-meeting","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fagency-black\u002FSkills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fskills\u002Fboard-meeting\u002FSKILL.md",true,[78,84,88],{"path":79,"resourceType":80,"resourceTypeDesc":81,"sizeBytes":82,"sourceHtmlUrl":83},"references\u002Fmeeting-facilitation.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",8212,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fagency-black\u002FSkills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fskills\u002Fboard-meeting\u002Freferences\u002Fmeeting-facilitation.md",{"path":85,"resourceType":80,"resourceTypeDesc":81,"sizeBytes":86,"sourceHtmlUrl":87},"templates\u002Fmeeting-agenda.md",1976,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fagency-black\u002FSkills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fskills\u002Fboard-meeting\u002Ftemplates\u002Fmeeting-agenda.md",{"path":89,"resourceType":80,"resourceTypeDesc":81,"sizeBytes":90,"sourceHtmlUrl":91},"templates\u002Fmeeting-minutes.md",2465,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fagency-black\u002FSkills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fskills\u002Fboard-meeting\u002Ftemplates\u002Fmeeting-minutes.md",[93,118,147,177,201,225],{"skillNo":94,"name":95,"nameZh":6,"description":96,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":97,"categories":98,"keywords":99,"publishedAt":44},"01M71JZVZ0TVW7Z5DQBRWSBG8A","zarr-python","Chunked N-D arrays for cloud storage (Zarr-Python 3). Compressed arrays, parallel I\u002FO, S3\u002FGCS via fsspec, NumPy\u002FDask\u002FXarray compatible, for large-scale scientific computing pipelines.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fagency-black\u002FSkills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fzarr-python\u002FSKILL.md",[],[100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,42,113,35,114,115,116,117],"zarr python","python","zarr","arrays","Cloud Storage","remote","workflows","scientific","read","write","edit","parallel","dask","s3fs","numpy","s3","scientific computing","scale",{"skillNo":119,"name":120,"nameZh":6,"description":121,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":122,"sourceHtmlUrl":123,"categories":124,"keywords":130,"publishedAt":44},"01M71JYXC5VAEJT8KXN5GRK32S","xvary-stock-research","Thesis-driven equity analysis from public SEC EDGAR and market data; \u002Fanalyze, \u002Fscore, \u002Fcompare workflows with bundled Python tools (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex).","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fagency-black\u002FSkills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fxvary-stock-research\u002FLICENSE","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fagency-black\u002FSkills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fxvary-stock-research\u002FSKILL.md",[125],{"categoryNo":126,"categoryName":127,"taxonomyType":128,"taxonomyTypeDesc":129},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000021","资料检索与研究","SCENARIO","使用场景",[131,132,133,134,135,136,137,101,138,106,32,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,27],"xvary","stock","research","xvary stock research","sec edgar","community","equity","thesis","code","Market","compare","market data","analyze","with","codex","cursor",{"skillNo":148,"name":149,"nameZh":6,"description":150,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":151,"licenseFileUrl":152,"sourceHtmlUrl":153,"categories":154,"keywords":161,"publishedAt":44},"01M71JVSDPDQ5040YBN6J1ASKY","webapp-testing","Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.","Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fagency-black\u002FSkills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fwebapp-testing\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fagency-black\u002FSkills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fwebapp-testing\u002FSKILL.md",[155,158],{"categoryNo":156,"categoryName":157,"taxonomyType":128,"taxonomyTypeDesc":129},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量",{"categoryNo":159,"categoryName":160,"taxonomyType":128,"taxonomyTypeDesc":129},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000009","前端开发",[162,163,164,42,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,144,172,173,174,175,176],"webapp","testing","webapp testing","applications","local","frontend","debugging","toolkit","logs","browser","playwright","web","behavior","ui","screenshots",{"skillNo":178,"name":179,"nameZh":6,"description":180,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":151,"licenseFileUrl":181,"sourceHtmlUrl":182,"categories":183,"keywords":185,"publishedAt":44},"01M71JV64CW7R6FYYK9JWWGW0X","web-artifacts-builder","Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn\u002Fui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn\u002Fui components - not for simple single-file HTML\u002FJSX artifacts.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fagency-black\u002FSkills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fweb-artifacts-builder\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fagency-black\u002FSkills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fweb-artifacts-builder\u002FSKILL.md",[184],{"categoryNo":159,"categoryName":160,"taxonomyType":128,"taxonomyTypeDesc":129},[186,187,188,173,189,190,191,42,192,193,167,194,35,195,196,197,28,198,199,200],"builder","artifacts builder","artifacts","web artifacts builder","single-file","css","Tailwind","ui components","single","file","components","react","state","routing","state management",{"skillNo":202,"name":203,"nameZh":6,"description":204,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":205,"categories":206,"keywords":208,"publishedAt":44},"01M71JS4X2FRY41DE84DEP06MN","vercel-react-view-transitions","Guide for implementing smooth, native-feeling animations using React's View Transition API (`\u003CViewTransition>` component, `addTransitionType`, and CSS view transition pseudo-elements). Use this skill whenever the user wants to add page transitions, animate route changes, create shared element animations, animate enter\u002Fexit of components, animate list reorder, implement directional (forward\u002Fback) navigation animations, or integrate view transitions in Next.js. Also use when the user mentions view transitions, `startViewTransition`, `ViewTransition`, transition types, or asks about animating between UI states in React without third-party animation libraries.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fagency-black\u002FSkills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fvercel-react-view-transitions\u002FSKILL.md",[207],{"categoryNo":159,"categoryName":160,"taxonomyType":128,"taxonomyTypeDesc":129},[197,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,191,217,218,219,220,34,196,221,222,223,224],"vercel react view transitions","view","react view transitions","vercel","transitions","shared","back","Animation","types","states","element","implementing","api","route","create","libraries",{"skillNo":226,"name":227,"nameZh":6,"description":228,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":229,"categories":230,"keywords":232,"publishedAt":44},"01M71JS1WZ1J4F9YVC2203JBJW","vercel-react-native-skills","React Native and Expo best practices for building performant mobile apps. Use when building React Native components, optimizing list performance, implementing animations, or working with native modules. Triggers on tasks involving React Native, Expo, mobile performance, or native platform APIs.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fagency-black\u002FSkills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fvercel-react-native-skills\u002FSKILL.md",[231],{"categoryNo":159,"categoryName":160,"taxonomyType":128,"taxonomyTypeDesc":129},[212,233,197,234,235,236,237,238,239,42,240,220,241,35,242,243,34,244,245,196],"vercel react native skills","react native","native","react native skills","modules","platform","animations","performance","triggers","react native components","apps","best practices","tasks"]