[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M71CDKWMFP2HMWBSC5VBMQ8B":3,"skill-same:01M71CDKWMFP2HMWBSC5VBMQ8B":93},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":23,"publishedAt":43,"linkOnly":44,"markdownContent":45,"markdownBody":46,"frontMatter":47,"refName":49,"commitSha":50,"skillDirectory":51,"forksCount":52,"repositoryHtmlUrl":53,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":54,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":55,"updatedAt":56,"install":57,"resources":70},"01M71CDKWMFP2HMWBSC5VBMQ8B","tdd",null,"Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions \"red-green-refactor\", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.","nexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os","nexuslinkproductions","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F273246263?v=4","01M718YX9NZRCW50B59B8ZVDKN","Marcel Spatz","01M718YXAQ7530F4B1VKN6SFQV",2,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Ftdd\u002FSKILL.md",[18],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000007","代码审查","SCENARIO","使用场景",[5,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42],"build","when","test-first","test-driven","bugs","for","with","fix bugs","tests","green","red-green-refactor","use","fix","loop","first","harness","development","integration tests","test","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: tdd\ndescription: Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions \"red-green-refactor\", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.\nscope: harness\ninvocation: ability\n---\n\n# Test-Driven Development\n\n## Philosophy\n\n**Core principle**: Tests should verify behavior through public interfaces, not implementation details. Code can change entirely; tests shouldn't.\n\n**Good tests** are integration-style: they exercise real code paths through public APIs. They describe _what_ the system does, not _how_ it does it. A good test reads like a specification - \"user can checkout with valid cart\" tells you exactly what capability exists. These tests survive refactors because they don't care about internal structure.\n\n**Bad tests** are coupled to implementation. They mock internal collaborators, test private methods, or verify through external means (like querying a database directly instead of using the interface). The warning sign: your test breaks when you refactor, but behavior hasn't changed. If you rename an internal function and tests fail, those tests were testing implementation, not behavior.\n\nSee [tests.md](tests.md) for examples and [mocking.md](mocking.md) for mocking guidelines.\n\n## Anti-Pattern: Horizontal Slices\n\n**DO NOT write all tests first, then all implementation.** This is \"horizontal slicing\" - treating RED as \"write all tests\" and GREEN as \"write all code.\"\n\nThis produces **crap tests**:\n\n- Tests written in bulk test _imagined_ behavior, not _actual_ behavior\n- You end up testing the _shape_ of things (data structures, function signatures) rather than user-facing behavior\n- Tests become insensitive to real changes - they pass when behavior breaks, fail when behavior is fine\n- You outrun your headlights, committing to test structure before understanding the implementation\n\n**Correct approach**: Vertical slices via tracer bullets. One test → one implementation → repeat. Each test responds to what you learned from the previous cycle. Because you just wrote the code, you know exactly what behavior matters and how to verify it.\n\n```\nWRONG (horizontal):\n  RED:   test1, test2, test3, test4, test5\n  GREEN: impl1, impl2, impl3, impl4, impl5\n\nRIGHT (vertical):\n  RED→GREEN: test1→impl1\n  RED→GREEN: test2→impl2\n  RED→GREEN: test3→impl3\n  ...\n```\n\n## Workflow\n\n### 1. Planning\n\nWhen exploring the codebase, use the project's domain glossary so that test names and interface vocabulary match the project's language, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.\n\nBefore writing any code:\n\n- [ ] Confirm with user what interface changes are needed\n- [ ] Confirm with user which behaviors to test (prioritize)\n- [ ] Identify opportunities for [deep modules](deep-modules.md) (small interface, deep implementation)\n- [ ] Design interfaces for [testability](interface-design.md)\n- [ ] List the behaviors to test (not implementation steps)\n- [ ] Get user approval on the plan\n\nAsk: \"What should the public interface look like? Which behaviors are most important to test?\"\n\n**You can't test everything.** Confirm with the user exactly which behaviors matter most. Focus testing effort on critical paths and complex logic, not every possible edge case.\n\n### 2. Tracer Bullet\n\nWrite ONE test that confirms ONE thing about the system:\n\n```\nRED:   Write test for first behavior → test fails\nGREEN: Write minimal code to pass → test passes\n```\n\nThis is your tracer bullet - proves the path works end-to-end.\n\n### 3. Incremental Loop\n\nFor each remaining behavior:\n\n```\nRED:   Write next test → fails\nGREEN: Minimal code to pass → passes\n```\n\nRules:\n\n- One test at a time\n- Only enough code to pass current test\n- Don't anticipate future tests\n- Keep tests focused on observable behavior\n\n### 4. Refactor\n\nAfter all tests pass, look for [refactor candidates](refactoring.md):\n\n- [ ] Extract duplication\n- [ ] Deepen modules (move complexity behind simple interfaces)\n- [ ] Apply SOLID principles where natural\n- [ ] Consider what new code reveals about existing code\n- [ ] Run tests after each refactor step\n\n**Never refactor while RED.** Get to GREEN first.\n\n## Checklist Per Cycle\n\n```\n[ ] Test describes behavior, not implementation\n[ ] Test uses public interface only\n[ ] Test would survive internal refactor\n[ ] Code is minimal for this test\n[ ] No speculative features added\n```\n\n## Session Notes\n\n- 2026-06-16 — Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Reach for it when building features or fixing bugs test-first, or when the user mentions TDD, red-green-refactor, or integration tests.\n","# Test-Driven Development\n\n## Philosophy\n\n**Core principle**: Tests should verify behavior through public interfaces, not implementation details. Code can change entirely; tests shouldn't.\n\n**Good tests** are integration-style: they exercise real code paths through public APIs. They describe _what_ the system does, not _how_ it does it. A good test reads like a specification - \"user can checkout with valid cart\" tells you exactly what capability exists. These tests survive refactors because they don't care about internal structure.\n\n**Bad tests** are coupled to implementation. They mock internal collaborators, test private methods, or verify through external means (like querying a database directly instead of using the interface). The warning sign: your test breaks when you refactor, but behavior hasn't changed. If you rename an internal function and tests fail, those tests were testing implementation, not behavior.\n\nSee [tests.md](tests.md) for examples and [mocking.md](mocking.md) for mocking guidelines.\n\n## Anti-Pattern: Horizontal Slices\n\n**DO NOT write all tests first, then all implementation.** This is \"horizontal slicing\" - treating RED as \"write all tests\" and GREEN as \"write all code.\"\n\nThis produces **crap tests**:\n\n- Tests written in bulk test _imagined_ behavior, not _actual_ behavior\n- You end up testing the _shape_ of things (data structures, function signatures) rather than user-facing behavior\n- Tests become insensitive to real changes - they pass when behavior breaks, fail when behavior is fine\n- You outrun your headlights, committing to test structure before understanding the implementation\n\n**Correct approach**: Vertical slices via tracer bullets. One test → one implementation → repeat. Each test responds to what you learned from the previous cycle. Because you just wrote the code, you know exactly what behavior matters and how to verify it.\n\n```\nWRONG (horizontal):\n  RED:   test1, test2, test3, test4, test5\n  GREEN: impl1, impl2, impl3, impl4, impl5\n\nRIGHT (vertical):\n  RED→GREEN: test1→impl1\n  RED→GREEN: test2→impl2\n  RED→GREEN: test3→impl3\n  ...\n```\n\n## Workflow\n\n### 1. Planning\n\nWhen exploring the codebase, use the project's domain glossary so that test names and interface vocabulary match the project's language, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.\n\nBefore writing any code:\n\n- [ ] Confirm with user what interface changes are needed\n- [ ] Confirm with user which behaviors to test (prioritize)\n- [ ] Identify opportunities for [deep modules](deep-modules.md) (small interface, deep implementation)\n- [ ] Design interfaces for [testability](interface-design.md)\n- [ ] List the behaviors to test (not implementation steps)\n- [ ] Get user approval on the plan\n\nAsk: \"What should the public interface look like? Which behaviors are most important to test?\"\n\n**You can't test everything.** Confirm with the user exactly which behaviors matter most. Focus testing effort on critical paths and complex logic, not every possible edge case.\n\n### 2. Tracer Bullet\n\nWrite ONE test that confirms ONE thing about the system:\n\n```\nRED:   Write test for first behavior → test fails\nGREEN: Write minimal code to pass → test passes\n```\n\nThis is your tracer bullet - proves the path works end-to-end.\n\n### 3. Incremental Loop\n\nFor each remaining behavior:\n\n```\nRED:   Write next test → fails\nGREEN: Minimal code to pass → passes\n```\n\nRules:\n\n- One test at a time\n- Only enough code to pass current test\n- Don't anticipate future tests\n- Keep tests focused on observable behavior\n\n### 4. Refactor\n\nAfter all tests pass, look for [refactor candidates](refactoring.md):\n\n- [ ] Extract duplication\n- [ ] Deepen modules (move complexity behind simple interfaces)\n- [ ] Apply SOLID principles where natural\n- [ ] Consider what new code reveals about existing code\n- [ ] Run tests after each refactor step\n\n**Never refactor while RED.** Get to GREEN first.\n\n## Checklist Per Cycle\n\n```\n[ ] Test describes behavior, not implementation\n[ ] Test uses public interface only\n[ ] Test would survive internal refactor\n[ ] Code is minimal for this test\n[ ] No speculative features added\n```\n\n## Session Notes\n\n- 2026-06-16 — Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Reach for it when building features or fixing bugs test-first, or when the user mentions TDD, red-green-refactor, or integration tests.\n",{"name":5,"scope":39,"invocation":48,"description":7},"ability","main","4c6d8d65f3d6096e2fc25b0845e481dda73c2794","skills\u002Ftdd",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions","Building deterministic AI governance and continuity systems. Workflow architect + visual storyteller","2026-11-11 16:42:59",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":58,"prompt":68,"zipAvailable":69},[59,62,65],{"tool":60,"command":61},"npx","npx skills add nexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os --skill tdd",{"tool":63,"command":64},"bunx","bunx skills add nexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os --skill tdd",{"tool":66,"command":67},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add nexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os --skill tdd","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Ftdd\u002FSKILL.md",true,[71,77,81,85,89],{"path":72,"resourceType":73,"resourceTypeDesc":74,"sizeBytes":75,"sourceHtmlUrl":76},"deep-modules.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",1239,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Ftdd\u002Fdeep-modules.md",{"path":78,"resourceType":73,"resourceTypeDesc":74,"sizeBytes":79,"sourceHtmlUrl":80},"interface-design.md",653,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Ftdd\u002Finterface-design.md",{"path":82,"resourceType":73,"resourceTypeDesc":74,"sizeBytes":83,"sourceHtmlUrl":84},"mocking.md",1481,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Ftdd\u002Fmocking.md",{"path":86,"resourceType":73,"resourceTypeDesc":74,"sizeBytes":87,"sourceHtmlUrl":88},"refactoring.md",387,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Ftdd\u002Frefactoring.md",{"path":90,"resourceType":73,"resourceTypeDesc":74,"sizeBytes":91,"sourceHtmlUrl":92},"tests.md",1640,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Ftdd\u002Ftests.md",[94,113,136,164,191,209],{"skillNo":95,"name":96,"nameZh":6,"description":97,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":98,"categories":99,"keywords":100,"publishedAt":43},"01M71CG1AME5WC0A79AE65WT0X","zoom-out","Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fzoom-out\u002FSKILL.md",[],[101,102,30,39,103,104,105,106,107,35,108,25,109,110,111,112],"zoom out","zoom","how","section","re","true","understand","perspective","you","code","it","context",{"skillNo":114,"name":115,"nameZh":6,"description":116,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":117,"categories":118,"keywords":119,"publishedAt":43},"01M71CFY9ATD0BAXV6B14HFG7C","yuri-shura","6-perspective adversarial review for high-stakes turns (architecture decisions, refactor planning, deployment review) — fans out architect, adversary (7-vector attack), maintainer, ops, product, and security perspectives in parallel, then consolidates. Use when user says 'review this decision', '\u002Fshura', 'adversarial review', 'what could go wrong', 'architecture review', or 'deployment review'.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fyuri-shura\u002FSKILL.md",[],[120,121,39,122,123,29,124,125,126,127,128,35,129,25,130,131,132,133,134,135],"yuri shura","parallel","architecture review","planning","deployment","vector","strategic review","decision","strategic","ops","workflow","decisions","architecture","review","perspectives","adversarial",{"skillNo":137,"name":138,"nameZh":6,"description":139,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":140,"categories":141,"keywords":145,"publishedAt":43},"01M71CFTTYW1HA2MNX38EV1GJ5","yuri-sales-intelligence","Unified sales and outreach skill generating cold outreach openers, social selling sequences, objection rebuttals, and ad creative for any paid platform — multi-persona aware, adapting tone and offer frame to buyer type. Use when user says 'write a cold email', 'outreach sequence', 'objection handling', 'ad copy', or 'sales pitch'.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fyuri-sales-intelligence\u002FSKILL.md",[142],{"categoryNo":143,"categoryName":144,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000005","邮件与沟通",[146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,25,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,29,162,163],"intelligence","sales intelligence","yuri sales intelligence","sales","cold","paid","social","persona","pitch","cold email","ad creative","write","sequences","sequence","platform","email","cold outreach","frame",{"skillNo":165,"name":166,"nameZh":6,"description":167,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":168,"categories":169,"keywords":176,"publishedAt":43},"01M71CFQMBFTFADJNGP0Z2WCYK","yuri-code-intelligence","Unified code quality intelligence layer that diagnoses code smells (Long Method, Feature Envy, design pattern issues), prescribes targeted Fowler refactoring techniques, and reviews code for security, performance, and clarity. Use when user says 'review this code', 'refactor this', 'what's wrong with this method', 'code smells', or 'clean this up'.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fyuri-code-intelligence\u002FSKILL.md",[170,171],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":172,"categoryName":173,"taxonomyType":174,"taxonomyTypeDesc":175},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000030","开发工程师","PROFESSION","适用职业",[177,110,178,146,39,179,180,181,29,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,35,25],"yuri code intelligence","code intelligence","reviews","code quality","feature","performance","code review","long","up","issues","clean","techniques","improve","design",{"skillNo":192,"name":193,"nameZh":6,"description":194,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":195,"categories":196,"keywords":197,"publishedAt":43},"01M71CFP32RT6GD3GKNHCJP8VP","yuri-adw","Invoke when user asks to run the ADW loop \u002F agentic engineering loop \u002F software factory workflow.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fyuri-adw\u002FSKILL.md",[],[198,199,200,201,202,203,204,37,205,25,206,130,207,208],"yuri adw","run","engineering loop","software factory","software","agentic engineering","factory","invoke","engineering","agentic","user",{"skillNo":210,"name":211,"nameZh":6,"description":212,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":213,"categories":214,"keywords":227,"publishedAt":43},"01M71CFK4VPEKY6A73237P7RSN","writing-skills","Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fwriting-skills\u002FSKILL.md",[215,218,221,224],{"categoryNo":216,"categoryName":217,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量",{"categoryNo":219,"categoryName":220,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000018","写作与文案",{"categoryNo":222,"categoryName":223,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",{"categoryNo":225,"categoryName":226,"taxonomyType":174,"taxonomyTypeDesc":175},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000036","内容创作者",[228,229,230,25,130,231,39,232,124,35,233],"writing","writing skills","new","work","editing","Existing"]