[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M71BS166AF3H2ZWXYJR5J0DP":3,"skill-same:01M71BS166AF3H2ZWXYJR5J0DP":76},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":39,"linkOnly":40,"markdownContent":41,"markdownBody":42,"frontMatter":43,"refName":44,"commitSha":45,"skillDirectory":46,"forksCount":47,"repositoryHtmlUrl":48,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":49,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":50,"updatedAt":51,"install":52,"resources":65},"01M71BS166AF3H2ZWXYJR5J0DP","grill-with-docs",null,"Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.","nexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os","nexuslinkproductions","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F273246263?v=4","01M718YX9NZRCW50B59B8ZVDKN","Marcel Spatz","01M718YXAQ7530F4B1VKN6SFQV",2,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fgrill-with-docs\u002FSKILL.md",[],[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38],"grill with docs","docs","with","grill","when","Existing","updates","as","project","stress-test","domain","use","session","decisions","model","plan","harness","documentation","test","workflow","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: grill-with-docs\ndescription: Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.\nscope: harness\ninvocation: workflow\n---\n\n\u003Cwhat-to-do>\n\nInterview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.\n\nAsk the questions one at a time, waiting for feedback on each question before continuing.\n\nIf a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead.\n\n\u003C\u002Fwhat-to-do>\n\n\u003Csupporting-info>\n\n## Domain awareness\n\nDuring codebase exploration, also look for existing documentation:\n\n### File structure\n\nMost repos have a single context:\n\n```\n\u002F\n├── CONTEXT.md\n├── docs\u002F\n│   └── adr\u002F\n│       ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md\n│       └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md\n└── src\u002F\n```\n\nIf a `CONTEXT-MAP.md` exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:\n\n```\n\u002F\n├── CONTEXT-MAP.md\n├── docs\u002F\n│   └── adr\u002F                          ← system-wide decisions\n├── src\u002F\n│   ├── ordering\u002F\n│   │   ├── CONTEXT.md\n│   │   └── docs\u002Fadr\u002F                 ← context-specific decisions\n│   └── billing\u002F\n│       ├── CONTEXT.md\n│       └── docs\u002Fadr\u002F\n```\n\nCreate files lazily — only when you have something to write. If no `CONTEXT.md` exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no `docs\u002Fadr\u002F` exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.\n\n## During the session\n\n### Challenge against the glossary\n\nWhen the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in `CONTEXT.md`, call it out immediately. \"Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y — which is it?\"\n\n### Sharpen fuzzy language\n\nWhen the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. \"You're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things.\"\n\n### Discuss concrete scenarios\n\nWhen domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.\n\n### Cross-reference with code\n\nWhen the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: \"Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible — which is right?\"\n\n### Update CONTEXT.md inline\n\nWhen a term is resolved, update `CONTEXT.md` right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in [CONTEXT-FORMAT.md](.\u002FCONTEXT-FORMAT.md).\n\nDon't couple `CONTEXT.md` to implementation details. Only include terms that are meaningful to domain experts.\n\n### Offer ADRs sparingly\n\nOnly offer to create an ADR when all three are true:\n\n1. **Hard to reverse** — the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful\n2. **Surprising without context** — a future reader will wonder \"why did they do it this way?\"\n3. **The result of a real trade-off** — there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons\n\nIf any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in [ADR-FORMAT.md](.\u002FADR-FORMAT.md).\n\n\u003C\u002Fsupporting-info>\n\n## Session Notes\n\n- 2026-06-16 — Grilling session that challenges plans against the existing domain model and updates documentation inline; use when stress-testing a plan against project language and ADRs.\n","\u003Cwhat-to-do>\n\nInterview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.\n\nAsk the questions one at a time, waiting for feedback on each question before continuing.\n\nIf a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead.\n\n\u003C\u002Fwhat-to-do>\n\n\u003Csupporting-info>\n\n## Domain awareness\n\nDuring codebase exploration, also look for existing documentation:\n\n### File structure\n\nMost repos have a single context:\n\n```\n\u002F\n├── CONTEXT.md\n├── docs\u002F\n│   └── adr\u002F\n│       ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md\n│       └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md\n└── src\u002F\n```\n\nIf a `CONTEXT-MAP.md` exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:\n\n```\n\u002F\n├── CONTEXT-MAP.md\n├── docs\u002F\n│   └── adr\u002F                          ← system-wide decisions\n├── src\u002F\n│   ├── ordering\u002F\n│   │   ├── CONTEXT.md\n│   │   └── docs\u002Fadr\u002F                 ← context-specific decisions\n│   └── billing\u002F\n│       ├── CONTEXT.md\n│       └── docs\u002Fadr\u002F\n```\n\nCreate files lazily — only when you have something to write. If no `CONTEXT.md` exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no `docs\u002Fadr\u002F` exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.\n\n## During the session\n\n### Challenge against the glossary\n\nWhen the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in `CONTEXT.md`, call it out immediately. \"Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y — which is it?\"\n\n### Sharpen fuzzy language\n\nWhen the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. \"You're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things.\"\n\n### Discuss concrete scenarios\n\nWhen domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.\n\n### Cross-reference with code\n\nWhen the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: \"Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible — which is right?\"\n\n### Update CONTEXT.md inline\n\nWhen a term is resolved, update `CONTEXT.md` right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in [CONTEXT-FORMAT.md](.\u002FCONTEXT-FORMAT.md).\n\nDon't couple `CONTEXT.md` to implementation details. Only include terms that are meaningful to domain experts.\n\n### Offer ADRs sparingly\n\nOnly offer to create an ADR when all three are true:\n\n1. **Hard to reverse** — the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful\n2. **Surprising without context** — a future reader will wonder \"why did they do it this way?\"\n3. **The result of a real trade-off** — there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons\n\nIf any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in [ADR-FORMAT.md](.\u002FADR-FORMAT.md).\n\n\u003C\u002Fsupporting-info>\n\n## Session Notes\n\n- 2026-06-16 — Grilling session that challenges plans against the existing domain model and updates documentation inline; use when stress-testing a plan against project language and ADRs.\n",{"name":5,"scope":35,"invocation":38,"description":7},"main","4c6d8d65f3d6096e2fc25b0845e481dda73c2794",".claude\u002Fskills\u002Fgrill-with-docs",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions","Building deterministic AI governance and continuity systems. Workflow architect + visual storyteller","2026-11-11 16:42:59",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":53,"prompt":63,"zipAvailable":64},[54,57,60],{"tool":55,"command":56},"npx","npx skills add nexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os --skill grill-with-docs",{"tool":58,"command":59},"bunx","bunx skills add nexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os --skill grill-with-docs",{"tool":61,"command":62},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add nexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os --skill grill-with-docs","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fgrill-with-docs\u002FSKILL.md",true,[66,72],{"path":67,"resourceType":68,"resourceTypeDesc":69,"sizeBytes":70,"sourceHtmlUrl":71},"ADR-FORMAT.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",2766,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fgrill-with-docs\u002FADR-FORMAT.md",{"path":73,"resourceType":68,"resourceTypeDesc":69,"sizeBytes":74,"sourceHtmlUrl":75},"CONTEXT-FORMAT.md",3145,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fgrill-with-docs\u002FCONTEXT-FORMAT.md",[77,96,118,148,177,196],{"skillNo":78,"name":79,"nameZh":6,"description":80,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":81,"categories":82,"keywords":83,"publishedAt":39},"01M71CG1AME5WC0A79AE65WT0X","zoom-out","Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fzoom-out\u002FSKILL.md",[],[84,85,21,35,86,87,88,89,90,30,91,23,92,93,94,95],"zoom out","zoom","how","section","re","true","understand","perspective","you","code","it","context",{"skillNo":97,"name":98,"nameZh":6,"description":99,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":100,"categories":101,"keywords":102,"publishedAt":39},"01M71CFY9ATD0BAXV6B14HFG7C","yuri-shura","6-perspective adversarial review for high-stakes turns (architecture decisions, refactor planning, deployment review) — fans out architect, adversary (7-vector attack), maintainer, ops, product, and security perspectives in parallel, then consolidates. Use when user says 'review this decision', '\u002Fshura', 'adversarial review', 'what could go wrong', 'architecture review', or 'deployment review'.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fyuri-shura\u002FSKILL.md",[],[103,104,35,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,30,113,23,38,32,114,115,116,117],"yuri shura","parallel","architecture review","planning","for","deployment","vector","strategic review","decision","strategic","ops","architecture","review","perspectives","adversarial",{"skillNo":119,"name":120,"nameZh":6,"description":121,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":122,"categories":123,"keywords":129,"publishedAt":39},"01M71CFTTYW1HA2MNX38EV1GJ5","yuri-sales-intelligence","Unified sales and outreach skill generating cold outreach openers, social selling sequences, objection rebuttals, and ad creative for any paid platform — multi-persona aware, adapting tone and offer frame to buyer type. Use when user says 'write a cold email', 'outreach sequence', 'objection handling', 'ad copy', or 'sales pitch'.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fyuri-sales-intelligence\u002FSKILL.md",[124],{"categoryNo":125,"categoryName":126,"taxonomyType":127,"taxonomyTypeDesc":128},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000005","邮件与沟通","SCENARIO","使用场景",[130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,23,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,107,146,147],"intelligence","sales intelligence","yuri sales intelligence","sales","cold","paid","social","persona","pitch","cold email","ad creative","write","sequences","sequence","platform","email","cold outreach","frame",{"skillNo":149,"name":150,"nameZh":6,"description":151,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":152,"categories":153,"keywords":162,"publishedAt":39},"01M71CFQMBFTFADJNGP0Z2WCYK","yuri-code-intelligence","Unified code quality intelligence layer that diagnoses code smells (Long Method, Feature Envy, design pattern issues), prescribes targeted Fowler refactoring techniques, and reviews code for security, performance, and clarity. Use when user says 'review this code', 'refactor this', 'what's wrong with this method', 'code smells', or 'clean this up'.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fyuri-code-intelligence\u002FSKILL.md",[154,157],{"categoryNo":155,"categoryName":156,"taxonomyType":127,"taxonomyTypeDesc":128},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000007","代码审查",{"categoryNo":158,"categoryName":159,"taxonomyType":160,"taxonomyTypeDesc":161},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000030","开发工程师","PROFESSION","适用职业",[163,93,164,130,35,165,166,167,107,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,30,23],"yuri code intelligence","code intelligence","reviews","code quality","feature","performance","code review","long","up","issues","clean","techniques","improve","design",{"skillNo":178,"name":179,"nameZh":6,"description":180,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":181,"categories":182,"keywords":183,"publishedAt":39},"01M71CFP32RT6GD3GKNHCJP8VP","yuri-adw","Invoke when user asks to run the ADW loop \u002F agentic engineering loop \u002F software factory workflow.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fyuri-adw\u002FSKILL.md",[],[184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,23,193,38,194,195],"yuri adw","run","engineering loop","software factory","software","agentic engineering","factory","loop","invoke","engineering","agentic","user",{"skillNo":197,"name":198,"nameZh":6,"description":199,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":200,"categories":201,"keywords":214,"publishedAt":39},"01M71CFK4VPEKY6A73237P7RSN","writing-skills","Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fnexuslinkproductions\u002Fyuri-os\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fwriting-skills\u002FSKILL.md",[202,205,208,211],{"categoryNo":203,"categoryName":204,"taxonomyType":127,"taxonomyTypeDesc":128},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量",{"categoryNo":206,"categoryName":207,"taxonomyType":127,"taxonomyTypeDesc":128},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000018","写作与文案",{"categoryNo":209,"categoryName":210,"taxonomyType":127,"taxonomyTypeDesc":128},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",{"categoryNo":212,"categoryName":213,"taxonomyType":160,"taxonomyTypeDesc":161},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000036","内容创作者",[215,216,217,23,38,218,35,219,108,30,24],"writing","writing skills","new","work","editing"]