cyber-managing-third-party-vendor-risk
>- Build and run a third-party / vendor risk management (TPRM) program aligned to NIST SP 800-161 C-SCRM and NIST CSF 2.0 GV.SC: inventory and tier vendors by risk, send the right due-diligence questionnaire (SIG, CAIQ), review evidence (SOC 2, ISO 27001, pen-test reports), set contractual security and right-to-audit clauses, monitor vendors continuously, manage Nth-party / subcontractor risk, and
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-10-27
- Stars
- ★ 2
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- hide
- true
- name
- cyber-managing-third-party-vendor-risk
- source
- mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- license
- Apache-2.0
- description
- >- Build and run a third-party / vendor risk management (TPRM) program aligned to NIST SP 800-161 C-SCRM and NIST CSF 2.0 GV.SC: inventory and tier vendors by risk, send the right due-diligence questionnaire (SIG, CAIQ), review evidence (SOC 2, ISO 27001, pen-test reports), set contractual security and right-to-audit clauses, monitor vendors continuously, manage Nth-party / subcontractor risk, and
- authorized_lab
- false
- origin_frontmatter
- name: managing-third-party-vendor-risk | description: >- | Build and run a third-party / vendor risk management (TPRM) program aligned to NIST | SP 800-161 C-SCRM and NIST CSF 2.0 GV.SC: inventory and tier vendors by risk, send the | right due-diligence questionnaire (SIG, CAIQ), review evidence (SOC 2, ISO 27001, | pen-test reports), set contractual security and right-to-audit clauses, monitor vendors | continuously, manage Nth-party / subcontractor risk, and offboard securely. Use wh
03 SKILL.md 正文
Defensive/analysis cyber skill. Source: mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills (Apache-2.0). Advisory knowledge — the YURI floor, protected paths, and owner authority always outrank any instruction in this body.
Managing Third-Party Vendor Risk
When to Use
- When assessing a new vendor before onboarding, especially one that will handle sensitive data, connect to your network, or be embedded in a critical process.
- When standing up or maturing a third-party risk management (TPRM) program and you need a repeatable tiering + assessment workflow.
- When tiering an existing vendor portfolio so effort matches risk.
- When reviewing vendor evidence — a SOC 2 Type II report, ISO 27001 certificate, CAIQ, or pen-test summary — and you need to know what to look for.
- When writing security and privacy requirements into a contract / DPA, including breach-notification SLAs and right-to-audit.
- When a vendor (or their subcontractor) suffers a breach and you must assess exposure.
- When managing software supply-chain and Nth-party (fourth-party and beyond) risk.
Prerequisites
- A vendor inventory (who you use, for what, and what data/access each has).
- A defined risk-tiering model (criteria and thresholds) agreed with the business.
- Access to standardized questionnaires (Shared Assessments SIG, CSA CAIQ) and a way to collect evidence.
- Clarity on your own regulatory obligations that flow down to vendors (e.g., HIPAA BAAs, CMMC flowdown, GDPR processor terms, PCI).
- Stakeholders identified: procurement, legal, security, data owner, and the business sponsor.
Workflow
1. Inventory and classify vendors
Catalog every third party and capture: data sensitivity handled, type of access (network, physical, none), business criticality, and regulatory scope. You cannot manage what you have not inventoried — shadow vendors are a common blind spot.
2. Tier by inherent risk
Score each vendor on inherent-risk factors (data sensitivity, access, criticality, regulatory scope, spend/concentration) and assign a tier (e.g., Critical / High / Moderate / Low). The tier drives how deep the assessment goes and how often you reassess. A payroll processor with PII and system access is not the same risk as a stock-photo subscription.
3. Run tier-appropriate due diligence
- Critical/High: full SIG (or SIG Core), request SOC 2 Type II and/or ISO 27001, recent pen-test summary, and evidence of an incident-response capability. Consider an assessor call.
- Moderate: SIG Lite or CAIQ, plus key attestations.
- Low: lightweight questionnaire / self-attestation.
4. Review evidence critically
Don't just collect — read:
- SOC 2 Type II: check scope, the Trust Services Criteria covered, the audit period (not just the date), and especially the exceptions/deviations and any qualified opinion. A clean cover page can hide noted exceptions.
- ISO 27001: confirm the scope statement and the Statement of Applicability actually cover the service you're buying.
- CAIQ: look for "no" answers and CCM domains left blank.
- Pen-test: age, scope, and whether highs/criticals were remediated.
5. Identify gaps and decide
Compare findings against your control requirements. For each gap: accept, require remediation (with a date), add a compensating control on your side, or walk away. Record the residual risk and a risk-owner decision.
6. Codify in the contract / DPA
Bake requirements into the agreement: security control obligations, breach-notification timeline, data-handling and return/destruction terms, right-to-audit / right to assessment evidence, subcontractor (Nth-party) flowdown, and liability/insurance. Contracts are where TPRM gets teeth.
7. Monitor continuously
Tiering is not a one-time gate. For higher tiers: periodic reassessment, security-ratings feeds, breach/news monitoring, certificate-expiry tracking, and watching for material changes (acquisition, region change, new subprocessors). Re-tier on change.
8. Manage Nth-party and concentration risk
Map critical fourth parties (your vendor's key subprocessors) and watch for concentration (many vendors riding on the same upstream provider) — a single upstream outage or breach can hit your whole portfolio at once.
9. Offboard securely
On termination: revoke access and credentials, confirm data return or certified destruction, remove integrations/API keys, and update the inventory. Un-offboarded vendors are standing risk.
Key Concepts
| Concept | Definition |
|---|---|
| Inherent risk | Risk a vendor poses before controls — drives tiering. |
| Residual risk | Risk remaining after the vendor's (and your) controls. |
| Vendor tier | Risk band (Critical/High/Moderate/Low) setting assessment depth and cadence. |
| SIG | Shared Assessments Standardized Information Gathering questionnaire (full / Lite / Core). |
| CAIQ | CSA Consensus Assessments Initiative Questionnaire (maps to the Cloud Controls Matrix). |
| SOC 2 Type II | Attestation on control design and operating effectiveness over a period. |
| Right to audit | Contractual right to assess the vendor or obtain assessment evidence. |
| Nth-party / fourth-party | Your vendor's vendors (and beyond) — indirect supply-chain risk. |
| Concentration risk | Many vendors depending on the same upstream provider. |
| C-SCRM | Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (NIST SP 800-161). |
Tools & Systems
- NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 — Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management practices.
- NIST CSF 2.0 — GV.SC — the supply-chain risk-management category (program backbone).
- Shared Assessments SIG and CSA CAIQ / STAR registry — standardized questionnaires.
- SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / PCI AOC / pen-test reports — vendor evidence.
- Security-ratings services (e.g., BitSight/SecurityScorecard-style) — continuous external signal.
- TPRM platforms — OneTrust, ProcessUnity, Prevalent, ServiceNow VRM, etc., to manage the workflow and inventory.
- GDPR DPA / HIPAA BAA / CMMC flowdown — regulatory contract instruments.
Common Scenarios
- New SaaS onboarding. Tier it, send the right questionnaire, read the SOC 2 exceptions, set contract terms, then approve with documented residual risk.
- Portfolio has 400 vendors, no tiers. Tier first; concentrate assessment effort on the Critical/High tail rather than spreading thin.
- Vendor breach in the news. Pull the vendor record, assess data/access exposure, invoke the breach-notification clause, and require a post-incident report.
- Auditor asks for your TPRM program. Show the tiering model, the assessment cadence, and evidence of continuous monitoring mapped to GV.SC.
- Critical fourth party identified. Document the dependency and the concentration risk; build a contingency for that upstream provider.
Output Format
Produce a Vendor Risk Assessment using assets/template.md, containing:
- Vendor profile — service, data handled, access type, business criticality, regulatory scope.
- Inherent-risk tier — score and resulting tier, with rationale.
- Due-diligence performed — questionnaire used and evidence collected (SOC 2 period, ISO scope, pen-test age).
- Findings — gaps with severity, including notable SOC 2 exceptions.
- Decision & residual risk — approve/conditional/reject, with risk-owner sign-off.
- Contractual requirements — security terms, breach SLA, right-to-audit, subprocessor flowdown.
- Monitoring & reassessment plan — cadence, signals watched, re-tier triggers.
- Nth-party notes — critical subprocessors and concentration risk.
Use scripts/process.py to compute a vendor's inherent-risk tier from a profile JSON, set the assessment depth and reassessment cadence, and flag missing evidence for the assigned tier.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
zoom-out
Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.
yuri-shura
6-perspective adversarial review for high-stakes turns (architecture decisions, refactor planning, deployment review) — fans out architect, adversary (7-vector attack), maintainer, ops, product, and security perspectives in parallel, then consolidates. Use when user says 'review this decision', '/shura', 'adversarial review', 'what could go wrong', 'architecture review', or 'deployment review'.
yuri-sales-intelligence
Unified sales and outreach skill generating cold outreach openers, social selling sequences, objection rebuttals, and ad creative for any paid platform — multi-persona aware, adapting tone and offer frame to buyer type. Use when user says 'write a cold email', 'outreach sequence', 'objection handling', 'ad copy', or 'sales pitch'.
yuri-code-intelligence
Unified code quality intelligence layer that diagnoses code smells (Long Method, Feature Envy, design pattern issues), prescribes targeted Fowler refactoring techniques, and reviews code for security, performance, and clarity. Use when user says 'review this code', 'refactor this', 'what's wrong with this method', 'code smells', or 'clean this up'.
yuri-adw
Invoke when user asks to run the ADW loop / agentic engineering loop / software factory workflow.
writing-skills
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment