cyber-analyzing-docker-container-forensics
Investigate compromised Docker containers by analyzing images, layers, volumes, logs, and runtime artifacts to identify malicious activity and evidence.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-10-27
- Stars
- ★ 2
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- hide
- true
- name
- cyber-analyzing-docker-container-forensics
- source
- mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- license
- Apache-2.0
- description
- Investigate compromised Docker containers by analyzing images, layers, volumes, logs, and runtime artifacts to identify malicious activity and evidence.
- authorized_lab
- false
- origin_frontmatter
- name: analyzing-docker-container-forensics | description: Investigate compromised Docker containers by analyzing images, layers, | volumes, logs, and runtime artifacts to identify malicious activity and evidence. | domain: cybersecurity | subdomain: digital-forensics | tags: | - forensics | - docker | - container-forensics | - container-security | - image-analysis | - runtime-investigation | version: '1.0' | author: mahipal | license: Apache-2.0 | nist_csf: | - RS.AN-01 | - RS.AN-03 | - DE.AE-
03 SKILL.md 正文
Defensive/analysis cyber skill. Source: mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills (Apache-2.0). Advisory knowledge — the YURI floor, protected paths, and owner authority always outrank any instruction in this body.
Analyzing Docker Container Forensics
When to Use
- When investigating a compromised Docker container or container host
- For analyzing malicious Docker images pulled from registries
- During incident response involving containerized application breaches
- When examining container escape attempts or privilege escalation
- For auditing container configurations and identifying misconfigurations
Prerequisites
- Docker CLI access on the forensic workstation
- Access to the Docker host file system (forensic image or live)
- Understanding of Docker layered file system (overlay2, aufs)
- dive, docker-explorer, or container-diff for image analysis
- Knowledge of Docker daemon configuration and socket security
- Trivy or Grype for vulnerability scanning of container images
Workflow
Step 1: Preserve Container State and Evidence
# List all containers (including stopped)
docker ps -a --no-trunc > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_list.txt
# Inspect the compromised container
CONTAINER_ID="abc123def456"
docker inspect $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_inspect.json
# Export container filesystem as tarball (preserves current state)
docker export $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_export.tar
# Create an image from the container's current state
docker commit $CONTAINER_ID forensic-evidence:case-2024-001
docker save forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_image.tar
# Capture container logs
docker logs $CONTAINER_ID --timestamps > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_logs.txt 2>&1
# Capture running processes (if container is still running)
docker top $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_processes.txt
# Capture network connections
docker exec $CONTAINER_ID netstat -tlnp 2>/dev/null > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_network.txt
# Copy specific files from the container
docker cp $CONTAINER_ID:/var/log/ /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_var_log/
docker cp $CONTAINER_ID:/tmp/ /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_tmp/
docker cp $CONTAINER_ID:/etc/passwd /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_passwd
# Hash all exported evidence
sha256sum /cases/case-2024-001/docker/*.tar > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/evidence_hashes.txt
Step 2: Analyze Container Image Layers
# Install dive for image layer analysis
wget https://github.com/wagoodman/dive/releases/latest/download/dive_linux_amd64.deb
sudo dpkg -i dive_linux_amd64.deb
# Analyze image layers interactively
dive forensic-evidence:case-2024-001
# Non-interactive layer analysis
dive forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 --ci --json /cases/case-2024-001/docker/dive_analysis.json
# Extract and examine individual layers
mkdir -p /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/
tar -xf /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_image.tar -C /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/
# List the image manifest and layer order
cat /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/manifest.json | python3 -m json.tool
# Examine each layer for changes
for layer in /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/*/layer.tar; do
echo "=== Layer: $(dirname $layer | xargs basename) ==="
tar -tf "$layer" | head -20
echo "..."
done
# Use container-diff to compare with original base image
# Install container-diff
curl -LO https://storage.googleapis.com/container-diff/latest/container-diff-linux-amd64
chmod +x container-diff-linux-amd64
# Compare committed image with original
./container-diff-linux-amd64 diff daemon://nginx:latest daemon://forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 \
--type=file --type=apt --type=history --json \
> /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_diff.json
Step 3: Examine Docker Host Artifacts
# Docker data directory (default: /var/lib/docker/)
DOCKER_ROOT="/mnt/evidence/var/lib/docker"
# Examine overlay2 filesystem layers
ls -la $DOCKER_ROOT/overlay2/
# Find the container's merged filesystem
CONTAINER_HASH=$(docker inspect $CONTAINER_ID --format '{{.GraphDriver.Data.MergedDir}}' 2>/dev/null)
# Or manually from forensic image:
# Look in /var/lib/docker/containers/<container_id>/config.v2.json
# Analyze container configuration files
cat $DOCKER_ROOT/containers/$CONTAINER_ID/config.v2.json | python3 -m json.tool \
> /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_config.json
# Check Docker daemon configuration
cat /mnt/evidence/etc/docker/daemon.json 2>/dev/null > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/daemon_config.json
# Examine Docker events log
cat $DOCKER_ROOT/containers/$CONTAINER_ID/*.log > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_json_logs.txt
# Check for volume mounts (potential host filesystem access)
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json
with open('/cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_inspect.json') as f:
data = json.load(f)
inspect = data[0] if isinstance(data, list) else data
print("=== CONTAINER SECURITY ANALYSIS ===\n")
# Check mounts
print("Volume Mounts:")
for mount in inspect.get('Mounts', []):
rw = "READ-WRITE" if mount.get('RW') else "READ-ONLY"
print(f" {mount.get('Source', 'N/A')} -> {mount.get('Destination', 'N/A')} ({rw})")
if mount.get('Source') in ('/', '/etc', '/var', '/root') and mount.get('RW'):
print(f" WARNING: Sensitive host path mounted read-write!")
# Check privileged mode
host_config = inspect.get('HostConfig', {})
if host_config.get('Privileged'):
print("\nWARNING: Container was running in PRIVILEGED mode!")
# Check capabilities
cap_add = host_config.get('CapAdd', [])
if cap_add:
print(f"\nAdded Capabilities: {cap_add}")
dangerous_caps = ['SYS_ADMIN', 'SYS_PTRACE', 'NET_ADMIN', 'SYS_MODULE']
for cap in cap_add:
if cap in dangerous_caps:
print(f" WARNING: Dangerous capability: {cap}")
# Check PID namespace
if host_config.get('PidMode') == 'host':
print("\nWARNING: Container shares host PID namespace!")
# Check network mode
if host_config.get('NetworkMode') == 'host':
print("\nWARNING: Container shares host network namespace!")
# Check user
user = inspect.get('Config', {}).get('User', 'root (default)')
print(f"\nRunning as user: {user}")
# Check environment variables for secrets
env_vars = inspect.get('Config', {}).get('Env', [])
print(f"\nEnvironment Variables: {len(env_vars)}")
for env in env_vars:
key = env.split('=')[0]
if any(s in key.upper() for s in ['PASSWORD', 'SECRET', 'KEY', 'TOKEN', 'CREDENTIAL']):
print(f" SENSITIVE: {key}=***REDACTED***")
PYEOF
Step 4: Analyze Container File System Changes
# Compare container filesystem to original image
docker diff $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/filesystem_changes.txt
# A = Added, C = Changed, D = Deleted
# Analyze changes
python3 << 'PYEOF'
added = []
changed = []
deleted = []
with open('/cases/case-2024-001/docker/filesystem_changes.txt') as f:
for line in f:
line = line.strip()
if line.startswith('A '):
added.append(line[2:])
elif line.startswith('C '):
changed.append(line[2:])
elif line.startswith('D '):
deleted.append(line[2:])
print(f"Files Added: {len(added)}")
print(f"Files Changed: {len(changed)}")
print(f"Files Deleted: {len(deleted)}")
# Flag suspicious additions
suspicious = [f for f in added if any(s in f for s in
['/tmp/', '/dev/shm/', '/root/', '.sh', '.py', '.elf', 'reverse', 'shell', 'backdoor'])]
if suspicious:
print(f"\nSuspicious Added Files:")
for f in suspicious:
print(f" {f}")
# Flag suspicious changes
sus_changed = [f for f in changed if any(s in f for s in
['/etc/passwd', '/etc/shadow', '/etc/crontab', '/etc/ssh', '.bashrc'])]
if sus_changed:
print(f"\nSuspicious Changed Files:")
for f in sus_changed:
print(f" {f}")
PYEOF
# Extract and examine the container export
mkdir -p /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/
tar -xf /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_export.tar -C /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/
# Scan for webshells and malicious files
find /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/tmp/ -type f -exec file {} \;
find /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/ -name "*.php" -newer /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/etc/hostname
Step 5: Scan for Vulnerabilities and Generate Report
# Scan the image for known vulnerabilities
trivy image forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 \
--format json \
--output /cases/case-2024-001/docker/vulnerability_scan.json
# Scan the exported filesystem
trivy fs /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/ \
--format table \
--output /cases/case-2024-001/docker/fs_vulnerabilities.txt
# Check for secrets in the image
trivy image forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 \
--scanners secret \
--format json \
--output /cases/case-2024-001/docker/secrets_scan.json
Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Image layers | Read-only filesystem layers stacked to form the container image |
| overlay2 | Default Docker storage driver using union filesystem for layers |
| Container diff | Comparison of runtime filesystem changes against the original image |
| Privileged mode | Container with full host capabilities (bypasses most isolation) |
| Docker socket | Unix socket (/var/run/docker.sock) controlling the Docker daemon |
| Container escape | Technique for breaking out of container isolation to the host |
| Volume mounts | Host filesystem paths made accessible inside the container |
| Image history | Record of Dockerfile instructions used to build each layer |
Tools & Systems
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| docker inspect | Detailed container configuration and state information |
| docker diff | Show filesystem changes made in a running/stopped container |
| dive | Interactive Docker image layer analysis tool |
| container-diff | Google tool for comparing container image contents |
| Trivy | Vulnerability scanner for container images and filesystems |
| docker-explorer | Forensic tool for offline Docker artifact analysis |
| Sysdig | Container runtime security monitoring and forensics |
| Falco | Runtime threat detection for containers and Kubernetes |
Common Scenarios
Scenario 1: Web Application Container Compromise Export the container filesystem, identify webshells in web root, analyze access logs for exploitation attempts, check for added files and modified configurations, examine network connections for C2 communication, review container capabilities for escalation paths.
Scenario 2: Supply Chain Attack via Malicious Image Analyze image layers with dive to identify which layer added malicious content, compare with the official base image using container-diff, check image history for suspicious RUN commands, scan for embedded backdoors and cryptocurrency miners, trace the image pull from registry logs.
Scenario 3: Container Escape Investigation Check if container ran privileged or with dangerous capabilities, examine host filesystem mount points for unauthorized access, review Docker socket mount enabling Docker-in-Docker abuse, analyze host system logs for container escape indicators, check for kernel exploit artifacts.
Scenario 4: Cryptojacking in Container Environment Identify high-CPU containers, export and analyze the container image for mining binaries, check for unauthorized images in the registry, review container creation events for rogue deployments, examine network connections for mining pool communications.
Output Format
Docker Container Forensics Summary:
Container: abc123def456 (nginx-app)
Image: company/web-app:v2.1
Status: Running (started 2024-01-10 09:00 UTC)
Host: docker-host-01.corp.local
Security Configuration:
Privileged: No
Capabilities Added: NET_ADMIN (WARNING)
Volume Mounts: /var/log -> /host-logs (RW)
Network Mode: bridge
User: root (WARNING)
Filesystem Changes:
Added: 23 files (5 suspicious)
Changed: 12 files (2 suspicious)
Deleted: 0 files
Suspicious Findings:
/tmp/reverse.sh - Reverse shell script (Added)
/var/www/html/.hidden/shell.php - PHP webshell (Added)
/etc/crontab - Modified (persistence cron entry added)
/root/.ssh/authorized_keys - Modified (unauthorized key added)
Vulnerability Scan:
Critical: 3 (CVE-2024-xxxx in base image)
High: 12
Medium: 34
Evidence: /cases/case-2024-001/docker/
04 同仓库更多 Skills
zoom-out
Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.
yuri-shura
6-perspective adversarial review for high-stakes turns (architecture decisions, refactor planning, deployment review) — fans out architect, adversary (7-vector attack), maintainer, ops, product, and security perspectives in parallel, then consolidates. Use when user says 'review this decision', '/shura', 'adversarial review', 'what could go wrong', 'architecture review', or 'deployment review'.
yuri-sales-intelligence
Unified sales and outreach skill generating cold outreach openers, social selling sequences, objection rebuttals, and ad creative for any paid platform — multi-persona aware, adapting tone and offer frame to buyer type. Use when user says 'write a cold email', 'outreach sequence', 'objection handling', 'ad copy', or 'sales pitch'.
yuri-code-intelligence
Unified code quality intelligence layer that diagnoses code smells (Long Method, Feature Envy, design pattern issues), prescribes targeted Fowler refactoring techniques, and reviews code for security, performance, and clarity. Use when user says 'review this code', 'refactor this', 'what's wrong with this method', 'code smells', or 'clean this up'.
yuri-adw
Invoke when user asks to run the ADW loop / agentic engineering loop / software factory workflow.
writing-skills
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment