adversarial-verification
Use when verifying completed work, reviewing Claude or Codex output, wiring routes or adapters, relaunching lanes, committing, pushing, or avoiding first-run confidence.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 2
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- adversarial-verification
- scope
- harness
- triggers
- [ "adversarial verification", "attack your own output", "verify completed work" ]
- invocation
- workflow
- description
- Use when verifying completed work, reviewing Claude or Codex output, wiring routes or adapters, relaunching lanes, committing, pushing, or avoiding first-run confidence.
03 SKILL.md 正文
Adversarial Verification
First-run success is a hypothesis, not proof. The job is not done until the work survives a skeptical pass.
Use When
- about to claim work is complete, fixed, wired, safe, or ready
- reviewing Claude, Codex, DeepSeek, or other agent output
- changing skills, routing, registries, permissions, launch packets, adapters, or parsers
- preparing a commit, push, relaunch, demo, or handoff
- the user asks to attack, stress test, double-check, verify, or stop trusting first output
Attack Loop
- State the claim being tested and the blast radius.
- List likely failure modes: cosmetic-only change, wrong path, stale lane, missing registry entry, bad permissions, protected-path leak, live-service risk, unrelated staged changes, false-positive test.
- Run positive checks that prove the intended path works.
- Run negative or mismatch checks when the change has routing, parsing, permission, adapter, or policy behavior.
- Independently verify collaborator output from local evidence; agent success reports are proposals.
- Inspect changed/staged scope and protected surfaces before commit, push, or relaunch.
- Report what failed first, what was fixed, the exact checks run, and residual risk.
Minimum Evidence
- code/config change: syntax or targeted test plus diff scope
- route/skill/registry change: validation plus recommender/activation check
- permission/output-lane change: one accepted packet and one rejected mismatch
- moved/imported tree: source absence, destination presence, file count, protected-surface scan
- Claude output: local file/diff/test evidence, not Claude's wording
- commit/push: staged scope, protected-path scan, GitNexus change detection when applicable
Stop Conditions
Stop and say so when no deterministic check exists, when the negative case unexpectedly passes, when staged scope includes unrelated work, or when a required check needs credentials/live services that are out of scope.
No "looks good" shortcut. Evidence first, then the claim.
Session Notes
2026-07-05
- session: 117m | peak ctx: 0% | compacts: 0
- tools: TaskCreate×505, Bash×119, Read×109, TaskUpdate×8, WebSearch×8, TaskOutput×6, StructuredOutput×4, Write×4, Agent×3, Workflow×2, AskUserQuestion×1
- corrections: none
- errors: none
2026-06-02
- session: 196m | peak ctx: 0% | compacts: 0
- tools: Bash×101, WebSearch×68, WebFetch×67, Read×45, StructuredOutput×18, ToolSearch×13, Write×11, Edit×7, TodoWrite×5, mcp×4, Workflow×3
- corrections: none
- errors: none
2026-05-29
- session: 349m | peak ctx: 71% | compacts: 4
- tools: Bash×268, Read×133, Edit×104, TodoWrite×12, Write×8, StructuredOutput×8, Workflow×2, ToolSearch×1, AskUserQuestion×1
- corrections: none
- errors: none
04 同仓库更多 Skills
zoom-out
Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.
yuri-shura
6-perspective adversarial review for high-stakes turns (architecture decisions, refactor planning, deployment review) — fans out architect, adversary (7-vector attack), maintainer, ops, product, and security perspectives in parallel, then consolidates. Use when user says 'review this decision', '/shura', 'adversarial review', 'what could go wrong', 'architecture review', or 'deployment review'.
yuri-sales-intelligence
Unified sales and outreach skill generating cold outreach openers, social selling sequences, objection rebuttals, and ad creative for any paid platform — multi-persona aware, adapting tone and offer frame to buyer type. Use when user says 'write a cold email', 'outreach sequence', 'objection handling', 'ad copy', or 'sales pitch'.
yuri-code-intelligence
Unified code quality intelligence layer that diagnoses code smells (Long Method, Feature Envy, design pattern issues), prescribes targeted Fowler refactoring techniques, and reviews code for security, performance, and clarity. Use when user says 'review this code', 'refactor this', 'what's wrong with this method', 'code smells', or 'clean this up'.
yuri-adw
Invoke when user asks to run the ADW loop / agentic engineering loop / software factory workflow.
writing-skills
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment