forensic-science-stakeholder-presentation

Stakeholder Presentation — Forensic Science

Present forensic scientist findings and proposals to decision-makers and stakeholders. The deliverable is a presentation structure with evidence summary and decision asks. This skill is written for a forensic scientist working with police, courts and legal teams in laboratories and crime scenes.

When to use

• You are a forensic scientist preparing, delivering or reviewing this part of your work in laboratories and crime scenes.
• You need a defensible, repeatable approach that produces a presentation structure with evidence summary and decision asks.
• A colleague, auditor or client asks how this was done and what evidence supports it.

Key Concepts

Term	Meaning
Chain of custody	the documented movement of evidence
Exhibit	an item of evidence in an investigation
Proficiency testing	external checks of a scientist's accuracy

Workflow

1. Step 1 - Open with the decision or conclusion, then the evidence — busy stakeholders should not wait for the point
2. Step 2 - Support claims with data from examination records and movement in report turnaround, with sources and limits stated
3. Step 3 - Address the hard parts directly, including evidence contamination and what it would take to reduce it
4. Step 4 - Make the ask specific: what decision, by when, with what resources for work in laboratories and crime scenes
5. Step 5 - Follow up in writing the same day: decisions made, actions agreed, owners and dates

Profession-Specific Components

Component	Details for Forensic Science
Core documentation	examination records; evidence logs; expert reports; court statements
Core tools & equipment	laboratory instruments; comparison microscopes; DNA analysis systems; scene equipment
People involved	police, courts and legal teams; the forensic scientist; colleagues and other services in laboratories and crime scenes
Primary record	examination records — keep it current, dated and attributable

Output Format

Context: [Situation in laboratories and crime scenes] | Objective: [What this must achieve] | Audience: [police, courts and legal teams and other stakeholders]

The finished output is a presentation structure with evidence summary and decision asks, structured as:

1. Summary of position and evidence
2. Detail, following the workflow above
3. Decisions, actions, owners and dates
4. Review point and escalation route

Action Plan

1. Immediate: Confirm scope, consent and the evidence available in examination records.
2. Short-term: Complete the workflow steps and record outcomes against report turnaround.
3. Medium-term: Review results, close actions, and update local procedures in laboratories and crime scenes.

Success Metrics

Metric	Target	Method
report turnaround	Agree a local target and track the trend	Measured from examination records and reviewed on a set cycle
evidence integrity audits	Agree a local target and track the trend	Measured from examination records and reviewed on a set cycle
court acceptance	Agree a local target and track the trend	Measured from examination records and reviewed on a set cycle
proficiency test results	Agree a local target and track the trend	Measured from examination records and reviewed on a set cycle

Guardrails & Quality Checks

• Never let this happen: evidence contamination.
• Never let this happen: interpretation overstated.
• Never let this happen: chain of custody gaps.
• Work only within the competence and authority of a forensic scientist; escalate or refer anything beyond it.
• Record facts and observations, not speculation, and keep records confidential to laboratories and crime scenes's rules.
• Verify names, dates, figures and measurements twice before anything is issued or signed off.
• Use only real, verified information from the case in hand — never invent results, credentials or evidence.

Example (illustrative)

A forensic scientist in laboratories and crime scenes applies this workflow for police, courts and legal teams: they open examination records, work through the five steps using laboratory instruments, and close by recording the outcome against report turnaround and agreeing the next review date. (Illustrative example only — replace with the real details of the case in hand.)