what-did-i-get-done
Summarize authored commits over a user-specified time period into a concise update
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-12
- Stars
- ★ 1
- Forks
- 1
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- what-did-i-get-done
- description
- Summarize authored commits over a user-specified time period into a concise update
03 SKILL.md 正文
What did I get done
Trigger
Need a short, high-signal summary of work completed in a specific time range (for example: yesterday, last 3 days, or last week).
Workflow
- Resolve the requested time window into concrete dates.
- Read commits authored by the current git user email within that range.
- Exclude merge commits and uncommitted changes.
- Synthesize the most important shipped changes into a concise status update.
- Include the actual date range used in the final summary.
Guardrails
- Be extremely concise and information-dense.
- Prioritize substantial behavior or architecture changes.
- Omit cosmetic-only changes (formatting, imports, minor renames).
- Do not infer intent or motivation. Describe changes functionally.
Output
- One short summary suitable for a status update
- Real date range
- Optional 2-5 bullets for major changes only
04 同仓库更多 Skills
workflow-from-chats
Extract durable working preferences from recent Cursor chats and convert them into skills, rules, or workflow docs. Use when asked to learn preferences, mine feedback, personalize workflows, or generate team/person-specific agent guidance.
why
Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, product analytics warehouse) in parallel, then returns a cited read on decisions and tradeoffs. Use how for runtime behavior.
weekly-review
Produce a weekly synthesis of authored commits with highlights by bugfix, tech debt, and net-new work
verify-this
Verify a claim with fresh local evidence: restate it falsifiably, capture baseline and treatment, compare artifacts, and return VERIFIED, NOT VERIFIED, or INCONCLUSIVE.
typescript-best-practices
TypeScript best practices. Use when reading or editing any .ts or .tsx file.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review
Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.