[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M70H9KP1MZ0HAFNXGSZVM8XW":3,"skill-same:01M70H9KP1MZ0HAFNXGSZVM8XW":78},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":23,"publishedAt":35,"linkOnly":36,"markdownContent":37,"markdownBody":38,"frontMatter":39,"refName":40,"commitSha":41,"skillDirectory":42,"forksCount":43,"repositoryHtmlUrl":44,"repositoryHomepageUrl":45,"ownerHtmlUrl":46,"ownerBlogUrl":47,"ownerDescription":48,"updatedAt":49,"install":50,"resources":63},"01M70H9KP1MZ0HAFNXGSZVM8XW","subagent-driven-development",null,"Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session","shengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills","shengdabai","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F116417419?v=4","01M70F6D2WY5PQV5A92BKYJQEW","Tony Sheng","01M70F6D3GAAAYZ5H4CC1G8VXM",3,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002F_collections\u002Frghamilton3-dotfiles\u002Fdot_config\u002Fopencode\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development\u002FSKILL.md",[18],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",[24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34],"development","subagent driven development","subagent","driven","session","plans","use","when","tasks","with","implementation","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: subagent-driven-development\ndescription: Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session\n---\n\n# Subagent-Driven Development\n\nExecute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review.\n\n**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration\n\n## When to Use\n\n```dot\ndigraph when_to_use {\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"subagent-driven-development\" [shape=box];\n    \"executing-plans\" [shape=box];\n    \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [shape=box];\n\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Stay in this session?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no - tightly coupled\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"subagent-driven-development\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"executing-plans\" [label=\"no - parallel session\"];\n}\n```\n\n**vs. Executing Plans (parallel session):**\n- Same session (no context switch)\n- Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)\n- Two-stage review after each task: spec compliance first, then code quality\n- Faster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)\n\n## The Process\n\n```dot\ndigraph process {\n    rankdir=TB;\n\n    subgraph cluster_per_task {\n        label=\"Per Task\";\n        \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Answer questions, provide context\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [shape=box];\n        \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    }\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [shape=box];\n    \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Answer questions, provide context\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Answer questions, provide context\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\";\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\";\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" -> \"More tasks remain?\";\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" -> \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\";\n}\n```\n\n## Prompt Templates\n\n- `.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md` - Dispatch implementer subagent\n- `.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch spec compliance reviewer subagent\n- `.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent\n\n## Example Workflow\n\n```\nYou: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.\n\n[Read plan file once: docs\u002Fplans\u002Ffeature-plan.md]\n[Extract all 5 tasks with full text and context]\n[Create TodoWrite with all tasks]\n\nTask 1: Hook installation script\n\n[Get Task 1 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: \"Before I begin - should the hook be installed at user or system level?\"\n\nYou: \"User level (~\u002F.config\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fhooks\u002F)\"\n\nImplementer: \"Got it. Implementing now...\"\n[Later] Implementer:\n  - Implemented install-hook command\n  - Added tests, 5\u002F5 passing\n  - Self-review: Found I missed --force flag, added it\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant - all requirements met, nothing extra\n\n[Get git SHAs, dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage, clean. Issues: None. Approved.\n\n[Mark Task 1 complete]\n\nTask 2: Recovery modes\n\n[Get Task 2 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: [No questions, proceeds]\nImplementer:\n  - Added verify\u002Frepair modes\n  - 8\u002F8 tests passing\n  - Self-review: All good\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ❌ Issues:\n  - Missing: Progress reporting (spec says \"report every 100 items\")\n  - Extra: Added --json flag (not requested)\n\n[Implementer fixes issues]\nImplementer: Removed --json flag, added progress reporting\n\n[Spec reviewer reviews again]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant now\n\n[Dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Magic number (100)\n\n[Implementer fixes]\nImplementer: Extracted PROGRESS_INTERVAL constant\n\n[Code reviewer reviews again]\nCode reviewer: ✅ Approved\n\n[Mark Task 2 complete]\n\n...\n\n[After all tasks]\n[Dispatch final code-reviewer]\nFinal reviewer: All requirements met, ready to merge\n\nDone!\n```\n\n## Advantages\n\n**vs. Manual execution:**\n- Subagents follow TDD naturally\n- Fresh context per task (no confusion)\n- Parallel-safe (subagents don't interfere)\n- Subagent can ask questions (before AND during work)\n\n**vs. Executing Plans:**\n- Same session (no handoff)\n- Continuous progress (no waiting)\n- Review checkpoints automatic\n\n**Efficiency gains:**\n- No file reading overhead (controller provides full text)\n- Controller curates exactly what context is needed\n- Subagent gets complete information upfront\n- Questions surfaced before work begins (not after)\n\n**Quality gates:**\n- Self-review catches issues before handoff\n- Two-stage review: spec compliance, then code quality\n- Review loops ensure fixes actually work\n- Spec compliance prevents over\u002Funder-building\n- Code quality ensures implementation is well-built\n\n**Cost:**\n- More subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)\n- Controller does more prep work (extracting all tasks upfront)\n- Review loops add iterations\n- But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging later)\n\n## Red Flags\n\n**Never:**\n- Skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)\n- Proceed with unfixed issues\n- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)\n- Make subagent read plan file (provide full text instead)\n- Skip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where task fits)\n- Ignore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)\n- Accept \"close enough\" on spec compliance (spec reviewer found issues = not done)\n- Skip review loops (reviewer found issues = implementer fixes = review again)\n- Let implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)\n- **Start code quality review before spec compliance is ✅** (wrong order)\n- Move to next task while either review has open issues\n\n**If subagent asks questions:**\n- Answer clearly and completely\n- Provide additional context if needed\n- Don't rush them into implementation\n\n**If reviewer finds issues:**\n- Implementer (same subagent) fixes them\n- Reviewer reviews again\n- Repeat until approved\n- Don't skip the re-review\n\n**If subagent fails task:**\n- Dispatch fix subagent with specific instructions\n- Don't try to fix manually (context pollution)\n\n## Integration\n\n**Required workflow skills:**\n- **superpowers:writing-plans** - Creates the plan this skill executes\n- **superpowers:requesting-code-review** - Code review template for reviewer subagents\n- **superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch** - Complete development after all tasks\n\n**Subagents should use:**\n- **superpowers:test-driven-development** - Subagents follow TDD for each task\n\n**Alternative workflow:**\n- **superpowers:executing-plans** - Use for parallel session instead of same-session execution\n","# Subagent-Driven Development\n\nExecute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review.\n\n**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration\n\n## When to Use\n\n```dot\ndigraph when_to_use {\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"subagent-driven-development\" [shape=box];\n    \"executing-plans\" [shape=box];\n    \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [shape=box];\n\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Stay in this session?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no - tightly coupled\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"subagent-driven-development\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"executing-plans\" [label=\"no - parallel session\"];\n}\n```\n\n**vs. Executing Plans (parallel session):**\n- Same session (no context switch)\n- Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)\n- Two-stage review after each task: spec compliance first, then code quality\n- Faster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)\n\n## The Process\n\n```dot\ndigraph process {\n    rankdir=TB;\n\n    subgraph cluster_per_task {\n        label=\"Per Task\";\n        \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Answer questions, provide context\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [shape=box];\n        \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    }\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [shape=box];\n    \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Answer questions, provide context\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Answer questions, provide context\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\";\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\";\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" -> \"More tasks remain?\";\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" -> \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\";\n}\n```\n\n## Prompt Templates\n\n- `.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md` - Dispatch implementer subagent\n- `.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch spec compliance reviewer subagent\n- `.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent\n\n## Example Workflow\n\n```\nYou: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.\n\n[Read plan file once: docs\u002Fplans\u002Ffeature-plan.md]\n[Extract all 5 tasks with full text and context]\n[Create TodoWrite with all tasks]\n\nTask 1: Hook installation script\n\n[Get Task 1 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: \"Before I begin - should the hook be installed at user or system level?\"\n\nYou: \"User level (~\u002F.config\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fhooks\u002F)\"\n\nImplementer: \"Got it. Implementing now...\"\n[Later] Implementer:\n  - Implemented install-hook command\n  - Added tests, 5\u002F5 passing\n  - Self-review: Found I missed --force flag, added it\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant - all requirements met, nothing extra\n\n[Get git SHAs, dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage, clean. Issues: None. Approved.\n\n[Mark Task 1 complete]\n\nTask 2: Recovery modes\n\n[Get Task 2 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: [No questions, proceeds]\nImplementer:\n  - Added verify\u002Frepair modes\n  - 8\u002F8 tests passing\n  - Self-review: All good\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ❌ Issues:\n  - Missing: Progress reporting (spec says \"report every 100 items\")\n  - Extra: Added --json flag (not requested)\n\n[Implementer fixes issues]\nImplementer: Removed --json flag, added progress reporting\n\n[Spec reviewer reviews again]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant now\n\n[Dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Magic number (100)\n\n[Implementer fixes]\nImplementer: Extracted PROGRESS_INTERVAL constant\n\n[Code reviewer reviews again]\nCode reviewer: ✅ Approved\n\n[Mark Task 2 complete]\n\n...\n\n[After all tasks]\n[Dispatch final code-reviewer]\nFinal reviewer: All requirements met, ready to merge\n\nDone!\n```\n\n## Advantages\n\n**vs. Manual execution:**\n- Subagents follow TDD naturally\n- Fresh context per task (no confusion)\n- Parallel-safe (subagents don't interfere)\n- Subagent can ask questions (before AND during work)\n\n**vs. Executing Plans:**\n- Same session (no handoff)\n- Continuous progress (no waiting)\n- Review checkpoints automatic\n\n**Efficiency gains:**\n- No file reading overhead (controller provides full text)\n- Controller curates exactly what context is needed\n- Subagent gets complete information upfront\n- Questions surfaced before work begins (not after)\n\n**Quality gates:**\n- Self-review catches issues before handoff\n- Two-stage review: spec compliance, then code quality\n- Review loops ensure fixes actually work\n- Spec compliance prevents over\u002Funder-building\n- Code quality ensures implementation is well-built\n\n**Cost:**\n- More subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)\n- Controller does more prep work (extracting all tasks upfront)\n- Review loops add iterations\n- But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging later)\n\n## Red Flags\n\n**Never:**\n- Skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)\n- Proceed with unfixed issues\n- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)\n- Make subagent read plan file (provide full text instead)\n- Skip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where task fits)\n- Ignore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)\n- Accept \"close enough\" on spec compliance (spec reviewer found issues = not done)\n- Skip review loops (reviewer found issues = implementer fixes = review again)\n- Let implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)\n- **Start code quality review before spec compliance is ✅** (wrong order)\n- Move to next task while either review has open issues\n\n**If subagent asks questions:**\n- Answer clearly and completely\n- Provide additional context if needed\n- Don't rush them into implementation\n\n**If reviewer finds issues:**\n- Implementer (same subagent) fixes them\n- Reviewer reviews again\n- Repeat until approved\n- Don't skip the re-review\n\n**If subagent fails task:**\n- Dispatch fix subagent with specific instructions\n- Don't try to fix manually (context pollution)\n\n## Integration\n\n**Required workflow skills:**\n- **superpowers:writing-plans** - Creates the plan this skill executes\n- **superpowers:requesting-code-review** - Code review template for reviewer subagents\n- **superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch** - Complete development after all tasks\n\n**Subagents should use:**\n- **superpowers:test-driven-development** - Subagents follow TDD for each task\n\n**Alternative workflow:**\n- **superpowers:executing-plans** - Use for parallel session instead of same-session execution\n",{"name":5,"description":7},"main","7850740bd837adb32f0a109ab2af82482196c6f2","skills\u002F_collections\u002Frghamilton3-dotfiles\u002Fdot_config\u002Fopencode\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development",1,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills","https:\u002F\u002Fzturnsgo.com","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai","https:\u002F\u002Fzturnsgo.com\u002F","AI × education creator — producer, not consumer. Taught 6,000+ learners; shipping learning tools & daily essays with Claude Code, practicing @xiaolai's way 🥋","2026-11-01 21:28:23",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":51,"prompt":61,"zipAvailable":62},[52,55,58],{"tool":53,"command":54},"npx","npx skills add shengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills --skill subagent-driven-development",{"tool":56,"command":57},"bunx","bunx skills add shengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills --skill subagent-driven-development",{"tool":59,"command":60},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add shengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills --skill subagent-driven-development","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002F_collections\u002Frghamilton3-dotfiles\u002Fdot_config\u002Fopencode\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development\u002FSKILL.md",true,[64,70,74],{"path":65,"resourceType":66,"resourceTypeDesc":67,"sizeBytes":68,"sourceHtmlUrl":69},"code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",630,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002F_collections\u002Frghamilton3-dotfiles\u002Fdot_config\u002Fopencode\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md",{"path":71,"resourceType":66,"resourceTypeDesc":67,"sizeBytes":72,"sourceHtmlUrl":73},"implementer-prompt.md",2195,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002F_collections\u002Frghamilton3-dotfiles\u002Fdot_config\u002Fopencode\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md",{"path":75,"resourceType":66,"resourceTypeDesc":67,"sizeBytes":76,"sourceHtmlUrl":77},"spec-reviewer-prompt.md",1999,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002F_collections\u002Frghamilton3-dotfiles\u002Fdot_config\u002Fopencode\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fskills\u002Fsubagent-driven-development\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md",[79,96,128,153,175,195],{"skillNo":80,"name":81,"nameZh":6,"description":82,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":83,"categories":84,"keywords":88,"publishedAt":35},"01M70P17DAD4C1C47NPH6A96EM","xiaolai-methodology","以李笑来(Li Xiaolai)的思考方式、方法论与表达风格,为用户做全方位 1-on-1 教练指导,覆盖创业、赚钱、投资、学习、自学、读书写作、用 AI、以及人生心态与自我管理。当用户提到 \"李笑来\"、\"笑来\"、\"笑来老师\"、\"扮演李笑来\"、\"找笑来聊聊\"、\"笑来怎么看\"、\"xiaolai\"、\"把时间当作朋友\"、\"通往财富自由之路\"、\"定投改变命运\"、\"韭菜的自我修养\"、\"自学是门手艺\"、\"让时间陪你慢慢变富\"、\"七年就是一辈子\"、\"元认知\"、\"活在未来\"、\"复利\u002F长期主义\"、\"践行\"、\"痴迷改进\"、\"个人商业模式\u002F出售时间\"、\"睡后收入\"、\"定投\"、\"财富自由\"、\"操作系统升级\"、\"最少必要知识\"、\"北极星提示词\"、\"用 AI 该怎么学\u002F思考\" 等任一触发词,或当用户带着关于创业\u002F赚钱\u002F投资\u002F学习\u002F职业\u002F重大人生决策的困惑、希望被人用笑来式的「逻辑 + 大白话 + 类比 + 重新定义 + 践行导向」来点醒和指导时,自动进入李笑来教练模式。","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fxiaolai-methodology\u002FSKILL.md",[85],{"categoryNo":86,"categoryName":87,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000018","写作与文案",[89,90,91,92,93,94,95],"methodology","xiaolai","xiaolai methodology","朋友","投资","writing","收入",{"skillNo":97,"name":98,"nameZh":6,"description":99,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":100,"categories":101,"keywords":108,"publishedAt":35},"01M70P13NB9YP7ACJR1S861CDS","zread","Produce and consume a wiki-style knowledge base for a code repository via the `zread` CLI and its on-disk output under `.\u002F.zread\u002Fwiki\u002F`. Use this skill whenever the user wants to understand, onboard onto, explore, summarize, map, or get an overview of an unfamiliar codebase; asks for architecture docs, a project wiki, a repo walkthrough, module\u002Fpackage explanations, or \"what does this repo do\"; wants to generate, regenerate, resume, browse, or serve code documentation locally; or mentions zread \u002F zread.ai directly. Also use it proactively before diving into a large unknown repo — if `.\u002F.zread\u002Fwiki\u002Fcurrent` exists, read the generated pages instead of crawling source file-by-file; if it doesn't, consider offering to run `zread generate`. The trigger is the intent (understand a codebase through generated docs), not the literal word \"zread\".","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fzread\u002FSKILL.md",[102,103],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":104,"categoryName":105,"taxonomyType":106,"taxonomyTypeDesc":107},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000030","开发工程师","PROFESSION","适用职业",[98,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127],"knowledge","wiki","explore","walkthrough","project","get","knowledge base","run","generate","intent","cli","map","documentation","project wiki","disk","architecture","code","unknown","generated",{"skillNo":129,"name":130,"nameZh":6,"description":131,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":132,"categories":133,"keywords":138,"publishedAt":35},"01M70P10S4SWMZQ8BJAFBFDRW3","youtube","Launch the YouTube Creator Agent to auto-generate videos.\nUse when: user types \u002Fyoutube, wants to create YouTube videos,\ngenerate video content, or upload to YouTube.\nKeywords: youtube, video, 视频, 创作视频, 发布视频","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fyoutube\u002FSKILL.md",[134,135],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":136,"categoryName":137,"taxonomyType":106,"taxonomyTypeDesc":107},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000036","内容创作者",[130,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,117,146,147,148,31,30,149,150,151,152],"user","content","视频","creator","generate video","videos","launch","video content","create","upload","auto","types","Video","创作",{"skillNo":154,"name":155,"nameZh":6,"description":156,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":157,"categories":158,"keywords":160,"publishedAt":35},"01M70P0YE95D8BACZCGV8BK90K","youtube-script-sync","Sync, update, or optimize Tony's GetNote knowledge base `Youtube视频逐字稿` by turning each parent recording or first-person idea note into an idempotent child note containing a directly recordable YouTube long-video or Shorts script. Use when the user says “更新\u002F同步\u002F优化 Youtube视频逐字稿知识库”, or says “更新\u002F同步\u002F优化该知识库” while this knowledge base is the active context.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fyoutube-script-sync\u002FSKILL.md",[159],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[161,162,130,163,164,151,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,115,173,31,30,109,174],"sync","script","youtube script sync","recording","shorts","first","base","person","update","active","child","optimize","idempotent","long",{"skillNo":176,"name":177,"nameZh":6,"description":178,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":179,"categories":180,"keywords":185,"publishedAt":35},"01M70P0WMV5XT0EEC0N445PW07","writing-skills","How to write SKILL.md files that trigger reliably and teach effectively. Use when creating, improving, or reviewing Claude Code skills.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fxiaolai\u002Fnlpm\u002Fskills\u002Fnlpm\u002Fwriting-skills\u002FSKILL.md",[181,182,183,184],{"categoryNo":86,"categoryName":87,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":104,"categoryName":105,"taxonomyType":106,"taxonomyTypeDesc":107},{"categoryNo":136,"categoryName":137,"taxonomyType":106,"taxonomyTypeDesc":107},[186,94,187,188,189,190,125,31,30,191,192,193,194],"writing skills","how","teach","write skill","write","claude code skills","files","how to","trigger",{"skillNo":196,"name":197,"nameZh":6,"description":198,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":199,"categories":200,"keywords":203,"publishedAt":35},"01M70P0SJFR4YVJQBGMHKGSKXT","writing-rules","How to write .claude\u002Frules\u002F files that Claude actually follows. Use when creating, improving, or reviewing project rules.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fxiaolai\u002Fnlpm\u002Fskills\u002Fnlpm\u002Fwriting-rules\u002FSKILL.md",[201,202],{"categoryNo":86,"categoryName":87,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":136,"categoryName":137,"taxonomyType":106,"taxonomyTypeDesc":107},[204,94,205,113,206,192,31,187,190,30,193],"Rules","writing rules","project rules"]