api-testing
Use when writing API endpoint tests — integration tests, contract validation, response assertions, mocked external services — even when the user says 'test this route' without naming API testing.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-11
- Stars
- ★ 19
- Forks
- 1
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- api-testing
- packs
- [ "engineering-base" ]
- domain
- quality
- model_tier
- medium
- workspaces
- [ "engineering" ]
- description
- Use when writing API endpoint tests — integration tests, contract validation, response assertions, mocked external services — even when the user says 'test this route' without naming API testing.
02 资源文件 1
- 参考文档evals/triggers.json2.8 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
api-testing
When to use
Use this skill when writing or reviewing API endpoint tests — integration tests, contract validation, response structure checks, or external service mocking.
Procedure: Write API tests
- Understand the endpoint — Read the controller, form request, and existing tests. Understand expected behavior, edge cases, and auth requirements before writing anything.
- Set up test data — Use seeders (preferred) or factories. Mock external services with
Http::fake(). - Enumerate test cases — Run the
test-case-discoveryfunnel first; cover success, validation errors, authorization failures, and edge cases — floor per behavior: 1 happy + 1 boundary + 1 error (+1 abuse case; on data-returning endpoints the threebroken-access-controlnegative tests are mandatory). - Assert response — Check status code, JSON structure, data values. Use
assertJsonStructure(). - Verify — Run the test. Must pass. Check no flaky assertions (no time-dependent, no random ordering).
Example
describe('GET /api/v1/projects', function () {
it('returns paginated projects for authenticated user', function () {
$user = loginAsTestUser();
$response = $this->getJson('/api/v1/projects');
$response->assertOk()
->assertJsonStructure([
'data' => [['id', 'title', 'status']],
'meta' => ['current_page', 'per_page', 'total'],
]);
});
it('returns 401 for unauthenticated request', function () {
$this->getJson('/api/v1/projects')
->assertUnauthorized();
});
it('returns 403 when user lacks permission', function () {
loginAsRestrictedUser();
$this->getJson('/api/v1/projects')
->assertForbidden();
});
});
Test categories
Happy path
Test the expected success scenario with valid input:
it('creates a project', function () {
loginAsTestUser();
$this->postJson('/api/v1/projects', [
'title' => 'New Project',
'customer_id' => $customerId,
])
->assertCreated()
->assertJsonPath('data.title', 'New Project');
$this->assertDatabaseHas('projects', ['title' => 'New Project']);
});
Validation
Test that invalid input is rejected with correct error messages:
it('rejects project without title', function () {
loginAsTestUser();
$this->postJson('/api/v1/projects', [
'customer_id' => $customerId,
])
->assertUnprocessable()
->assertJsonValidationErrors(['title']);
});
Authorization
Test that unauthorized access is blocked:
it('prevents non-owner from updating project', function () {
$otherUser = loginAsOtherUser();
$this->putJson("/api/v1/projects/{$project->id}", [
'title' => 'Hijacked',
])
->assertForbidden();
});
Edge cases
Test boundary conditions:
it('handles empty collection', function () {
loginAsTestUser();
$this->getJson('/api/v1/projects')
->assertOk()
->assertJsonCount(0, 'data');
});
it('paginates large result sets', function () {
loginAsTestUser();
$this->getJson('/api/v1/projects?per_page=5')
->assertOk()
->assertJsonPath('meta.per_page', 5);
});
Response contract validation
Assert JSON structure
// Verify response shape (keys exist)
$response->assertJsonStructure([
'data' => ['id', 'title', 'status', 'created_at'],
]);
// Verify exact values
$response->assertJsonPath('data.status', 'active');
// Verify collection count
$response->assertJsonCount(3, 'data');
Assert response types
// When strict typing matters
$data = $response->json('data');
expect($data['id'])->toBeInt();
expect($data['title'])->toBeString();
expect($data['total'])->toBeString(); // Money as string, not float
Filter noisy responses
When a failing test dumps the full JSON body, narrow the diagnosis with jq or grep
instead of scrolling the whole payload:
# Extract only the failing assertion path
echo "$RESPONSE_JSON" | jq '.data.status, .errors'
# Targeted log scan
rg --json 'API call failed' storage/logs/laravel.log | jq -r '.data.lines.text'
External service mocking
it('handles external API failure gracefully', function () {
Http::fake([
'external-api.com/*' => Http::response(null, 500),
]);
loginAsTestUser();
$this->postJson('/api/v1/sync')
->assertStatus(502)
->assertJsonPath('message', 'External service unavailable');
});
Test checklist per endpoint
| Category | Tests needed |
|---|---|
| Auth | Unauthenticated (401), unauthorized (403) |
| Validation | Missing fields, wrong types, boundary values |
| Happy path | Success with valid input, correct status code |
| Response | JSON structure, field types, pagination meta |
| Side effects | Database changes, events dispatched, jobs queued |
| Edge cases | Empty results, large payloads, concurrent access |
Bridge to UI verification
API tests cover the contract layer. When an endpoint feeds a UI surface (Livewire component, Blade-rendered page, SPA route), complement the API test with a thin UI probe: a livewire test for wired components, or a Playwright spec / browser screenshot for the rendered shell. Never assume the UI works just because the API test is green.
Output format
- Test file in the project’s test framework (Pest, Jest, pytest) covering happy path, validation, auth, and edge cases
- Test names as readable sentences describing expected behavior
- Mocked external services where applicable
Auto-trigger keywords
- API test
- endpoint test
- integration test
- response validation
- contract testing
Gotcha
- Don't test framework internals (e.g., "does Laravel return 422 on validation error") — test YOUR validation rules.
- Always seed test data explicitly — don't rely on data from other tests (parallel execution).
- Mock external APIs with
Http::fake()— never hit real services in tests. - The model forgets to assert response structure, only checking status codes — always check both.
Do NOT
- Do not hardcode IDs or timestamps — use factories or seeders.
- Do not skip auth tests — always test both authenticated and unauthenticated.
- Do not assert entire JSON responses — assert only meaningful fields.
- Do not use
Http::fake()without also testing the real integration path.
Anti-bruteforce — diagnose before retry
When a test fails, do not retry blindly with tweaked assertions until something passes. Diagnose the root cause first: print the actual response shape once, compare it to the contract, then write a targeted fix. Trial-and-error retries hide real regressions.
Clarification guard — ambiguous contract → ask
If the endpoint contract is ambiguous (unclear status code, optional fields, error envelope shape), do not assume. Ask the user or check the OpenAPI spec / route definition before writing assertions — never guess the response shape from the route name.
The HTTP-assertion idiom, per ecosystem
The examples above are Laravel's. The shape they teach — assert the status,
then the body contract, then the side effect, and keep one behavior per test —
transfers unchanged; the API does not. Resolve the runner with
resolve_toolchain and read its ecosystems:
ecosystems |
Request + assertion surface |
|---|---|
php |
$this->getJson(...) / assertStatus / assertJsonPath |
js |
supertest or the framework's own test client, with expect(res.status) |
python |
httpx.AsyncClient / framework TestClient; assert res.status_code |
go |
httptest.NewServer + net/http, or the router's own ServeHTTP |
Whatever the surface, the negative tests are not optional: unauthenticated,
not-owner and cross-tenant each get their own case, per broken-access-control.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
unknown-key-fixture
Declares a key the schema does not know.
portable-fixture
Declares only semantics the MCP-lite carrier transports whole.
non-portable-fixture
Declares a runtime semantic the carrier drops.
candidate-zero-width
A candidate whose prose carries an invisible joiner.
candidate-disclosure-suppression
A candidate whose prose tells the agent to withhold from the user.
candidate-dangerous-frontmatter
A candidate claiming an unscoped tool grant and a permission bypass.