vuln-validate
Validate security findings by assessing reachability, exploitability, and existing mitigations. Use after a security scan when the user wants to separate real vulnerabilities from false positives.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-09-20
- Stars
- ★ 4
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- vuln-validate
- description
- Validate security findings by assessing reachability, exploitability, and existing mitigations. Use after a security scan when the user wants to separate real vulnerabilities from false positives.
- user-invocable
- false
03 SKILL.md 正文
Vulnerability Validation
Validate whether a reported security finding is actually exploitable in this codebase.
Prerequisites
Expected inputs:
.agent-security/findings.json.agent-security/threat-model.md
Workflow
1. Load the Findings
Read the current findings file and determine which issues need validation.
2. Check Reachability
For each finding, determine:
- Can an external user reach the code path?
- What entry point leads to it?
- Is authentication required?
3. Check Attacker Control
Trace the data flow from source to sink and decide how much of the input is attacker-controlled.
4. Check Existing Mitigations
Look for:
- validation and sanitization
- framework protections
- auth gates
- rate limits
- CSP, ORM parameterization, or other platform guards
5. Assign Exploitability
Classify each issue as:
- easy
- medium
- hard
- not exploitable
6. Produce a Validated Findings File
Write:
.agent-security/validated-findings.json
Include reasoning, exploitability, and remediation priority.
Gotchas
- A pattern match is not a vulnerability until reachability is proven.
- A real code smell may still be non-exploitable in context.
- Do not generate sensational findings without concrete attack paths.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
writing-shape
Take a markdown file of raw material and shape it into an article through a conversational session — drafting candidate openings, growing the piece paragraph by paragraph, arguing about format (lists, tables, callouts, quotes) at each step. Use when the user has a pile of notes, fragments, or a rough draft and wants help turning it into something publishable.
writing-fragments
Grilling session that mines the user for fragments — heterogeneous nuggets of writing (claims, vignettes, sharp sentences, half-thoughts) — and appends them to a single document as raw material for a future article. Use when the user wants to develop ideas before imposing structure, or mentions "fragments", "ideate", or "raw material" for writing.
writing-beats
Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.
stop-slop
Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells.
humanizer
Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, passive voice, negative parallelisms, and filler phrases.
feedback
Prepare, deliver, and debrief timely interpersonal feedback using a question-first coaching flow, observable behavior, owned experience, and concrete impact. Use when drafting feedback, coaching managers, rehearsing a feedback conversation, praising specific behavior, or reviewing whether feedback landed.