[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6R9FWEMM8HFDHAXR02CQVES":3,"skill-same:01M6R9FWEMM8HFDHAXR02CQVES":70},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":32,"linkOnly":33,"markdownContent":34,"markdownBody":35,"frontMatter":36,"refName":38,"commitSha":39,"skillDirectory":40,"forksCount":41,"repositoryHtmlUrl":42,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":43,"ownerBlogUrl":44,"ownerDescription":45,"updatedAt":46,"install":47,"resources":59},"01M6R9FWEMM8HFDHAXR02CQVES","triage",null,"Move issues and external PRs through a state machine of triage roles — categorise, verify, grill if needed, and write agent-ready briefs.","Nairon-AI\u002Fagentic-starter-pack","Nairon-AI","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F260662138?v=4","01M6R8PZ1Y8CSQGFN61VACZGTH","Nairon AI","01M6R8PZ6184VR3BA88YZFBC3N",4,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FNairon-AI\u002Fagentic-starter-pack\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fengineering\u002Ftriage\u002FSKILL.md",[],[5,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31],"state","issues","verify","write","ready","grill","roles","machine","move","briefs","true","state machine","prs","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: triage\ndescription: Move issues and external PRs through a state machine of triage roles — categorise, verify, grill if needed, and write agent-ready briefs.\ndisable-model-invocation: true\n---\n\n# Triage\n\nMove issues on the project issue tracker through a small state machine of triage roles.\n\nIf this repo treats external pull requests as a request surface (see the issue-tracker config), triage covers them too: **a PR is an issue with attached code** — same roles, same states, same machine, with a few deltas marked \"for a PR\" below. Resolve a bare `#42` to an issue or PR per the tracker config.\n\nEvery comment or issue posted to the issue tracker during triage **must** start with this disclaimer:\n\n```\n> *This was generated by AI during triage.*\n```\n\n## Reference docs\n\n- [AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md) — how to write durable agent briefs\n- [OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md) — how the `.out-of-scope\u002F` knowledge base works\n\n## Roles\n\nTwo **category** roles:\n\n- `bug` — something is broken\n- `enhancement` — new feature or improvement\n\nFive **state** roles:\n\n- `needs-triage` — maintainer needs to evaluate\n- `needs-info` — waiting on reporter for more information\n- `ready-for-agent` — fully specified, ready for an AFK agent\n- `ready-for-human` — needs human implementation\n- `wontfix` — will not be actioned\n\nFor a PR, the same states read against the attached code: `ready-for-agent` means a brief is attached and an agent should take the next step on the diff; `ready-for-human` means it's ready for a human to merge.\n\nEvery triaged issue should carry exactly one category role and one state role. If state roles conflict, flag it and ask the maintainer before doing anything else.\n\nThese are canonical role names — the actual label strings used in the issue tracker may differ. The mapping should have been provided to you - run `\u002Fsetup-matt-pocock-skills` if not.\n\nState transitions: an unlabeled issue normally goes to `needs-triage` first; from there it moves to `needs-info`, `ready-for-agent`, `ready-for-human`, or `wontfix`. `needs-info` returns to `needs-triage` once the reporter replies. The maintainer can override at any time — flag transitions that look unusual and ask before proceeding.\n\n## Invocation\n\nThe maintainer invokes `\u002Ftriage` and describes what they want in natural language. Interpret the request and act. Examples:\n\n- \"Show me anything that needs my attention\"\n- \"Let's look at #42\" (issue or PR)\n- \"Move #42 to ready-for-agent\"\n- \"What's ready for agents to pick up?\"\n\n## Show what needs attention\n\nQuery the issue tracker and present three buckets, oldest first:\n\n1. **Unlabeled** — never triaged.\n2. **`needs-triage`** — evaluation in progress.\n3. **`needs-info` with reporter activity since the last triage notes** — needs re-evaluation.\n\nWhen PRs are in scope, include external PRs in these buckets and tag each line `[PR]` or `[issue]`. Discovery surfaces only *external* PRs (the tracker config defines who counts as external) — a collaborator's in-flight PR is not triage work. This filter is discovery-only; an explicitly named PR is always triaged regardless of author.\n\nShow counts and a one-line summary per item. Let the maintainer pick.\n\n## Triage a specific issue or PR\n\n1. **Gather context.** Read the full issue or PR (body, comments, labels, author, dates; for a PR, the diff too). Parse any prior triage notes so you don't re-ask resolved questions. Explore the codebase using the project's domain glossary, respecting ADRs in the area. Run two checks against the codebase: (a) **redundancy** — search for an existing implementation of the requested behavior by domain concept (not just the request's wording), and report where you looked. If found, it's an already-implemented `wontfix` (step 5). (b) **prior rejection** — read `.out-of-scope\u002F*.md` and surface any that resembles this request.\n\n2. **Recommend.** Tell the maintainer your category and state recommendation with reasoning, plus a brief codebase summary relevant to the request — including whether it's already implemented. Wait for direction.\n\n3. **Verify the claim.** Before any grilling, check that the claim holds up. For a bug, reproduce it from the reporter's steps. For a PR, confirm the diff does what it claims — check it out, run the relevant tests or commands. Report what happened: confirmed (with code path), failed, or insufficient detail (a strong `needs-info` signal). A confirmed verification makes a much stronger agent brief.\n\n4. **Grill (if needed).** If the request needs fleshing out, run repository-aware `\u002Fgrill-me` — sharpen it in dependency-aware rounds while its internal domain-modeling specialist updates `CONTEXT.md`\u002FADRs as decisions land.\n\n5. **Apply the outcome:**\n   - `ready-for-agent` — post an agent brief comment ([AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md)).\n   - `ready-for-human` — same structure as an agent brief, but note why it can't be delegated (judgment calls, external access, design decisions, manual testing).\n   - `needs-info` — post triage notes (template below).\n   - `wontfix` — close, with the comment depending on *why*:\n     - **Already implemented** — the change already exists in the codebase. Point to where it lives; do **not** write to `.out-of-scope\u002F` (that KB is for *rejected* requests, not built ones).\n     - **Rejected (bug)** — polite explanation, then close.\n     - **Rejected (enhancement)** — write to `.out-of-scope\u002F`, link to it from a comment, then close ([OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md)).\n   - `needs-triage` — apply the role. Optional comment if there's partial progress.\n\n## Quick state override\n\nIf the maintainer says \"move #42 to ready-for-agent\", trust them and apply the role directly. Confirm what you're about to do (role changes, comment, close), then act. Skip grilling. If moving to `ready-for-agent` without a grilling session, ask whether they want to write an agent brief.\n\n## Needs-info template\n\n```markdown\n## Triage Notes\n\n**What we've established so far:**\n\n- point 1\n- point 2\n\n**What we still need from you (@reporter):**\n\n- question 1\n- question 2\n```\n\nCapture everything resolved during grilling under \"established so far\" so the work isn't lost. Questions must be specific and actionable, not \"please provide more info\".\n\n## Resuming a previous session\n\nIf prior triage notes exist on the issue or PR, read them, check whether the reporter has answered any outstanding questions, and present an updated picture before continuing. Don't re-ask resolved questions.\n","# Triage\n\nMove issues on the project issue tracker through a small state machine of triage roles.\n\nIf this repo treats external pull requests as a request surface (see the issue-tracker config), triage covers them too: **a PR is an issue with attached code** — same roles, same states, same machine, with a few deltas marked \"for a PR\" below. Resolve a bare `#42` to an issue or PR per the tracker config.\n\nEvery comment or issue posted to the issue tracker during triage **must** start with this disclaimer:\n\n```\n> *This was generated by AI during triage.*\n```\n\n## Reference docs\n\n- [AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md) — how to write durable agent briefs\n- [OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md) — how the `.out-of-scope\u002F` knowledge base works\n\n## Roles\n\nTwo **category** roles:\n\n- `bug` — something is broken\n- `enhancement` — new feature or improvement\n\nFive **state** roles:\n\n- `needs-triage` — maintainer needs to evaluate\n- `needs-info` — waiting on reporter for more information\n- `ready-for-agent` — fully specified, ready for an AFK agent\n- `ready-for-human` — needs human implementation\n- `wontfix` — will not be actioned\n\nFor a PR, the same states read against the attached code: `ready-for-agent` means a brief is attached and an agent should take the next step on the diff; `ready-for-human` means it's ready for a human to merge.\n\nEvery triaged issue should carry exactly one category role and one state role. If state roles conflict, flag it and ask the maintainer before doing anything else.\n\nThese are canonical role names — the actual label strings used in the issue tracker may differ. The mapping should have been provided to you - run `\u002Fsetup-matt-pocock-skills` if not.\n\nState transitions: an unlabeled issue normally goes to `needs-triage` first; from there it moves to `needs-info`, `ready-for-agent`, `ready-for-human`, or `wontfix`. `needs-info` returns to `needs-triage` once the reporter replies. The maintainer can override at any time — flag transitions that look unusual and ask before proceeding.\n\n## Invocation\n\nThe maintainer invokes `\u002Ftriage` and describes what they want in natural language. Interpret the request and act. Examples:\n\n- \"Show me anything that needs my attention\"\n- \"Let's look at #42\" (issue or PR)\n- \"Move #42 to ready-for-agent\"\n- \"What's ready for agents to pick up?\"\n\n## Show what needs attention\n\nQuery the issue tracker and present three buckets, oldest first:\n\n1. **Unlabeled** — never triaged.\n2. **`needs-triage`** — evaluation in progress.\n3. **`needs-info` with reporter activity since the last triage notes** — needs re-evaluation.\n\nWhen PRs are in scope, include external PRs in these buckets and tag each line `[PR]` or `[issue]`. Discovery surfaces only *external* PRs (the tracker config defines who counts as external) — a collaborator's in-flight PR is not triage work. This filter is discovery-only; an explicitly named PR is always triaged regardless of author.\n\nShow counts and a one-line summary per item. Let the maintainer pick.\n\n## Triage a specific issue or PR\n\n1. **Gather context.** Read the full issue or PR (body, comments, labels, author, dates; for a PR, the diff too). Parse any prior triage notes so you don't re-ask resolved questions. Explore the codebase using the project's domain glossary, respecting ADRs in the area. Run two checks against the codebase: (a) **redundancy** — search for an existing implementation of the requested behavior by domain concept (not just the request's wording), and report where you looked. If found, it's an already-implemented `wontfix` (step 5). (b) **prior rejection** — read `.out-of-scope\u002F*.md` and surface any that resembles this request.\n\n2. **Recommend.** Tell the maintainer your category and state recommendation with reasoning, plus a brief codebase summary relevant to the request — including whether it's already implemented. Wait for direction.\n\n3. **Verify the claim.** Before any grilling, check that the claim holds up. For a bug, reproduce it from the reporter's steps. For a PR, confirm the diff does what it claims — check it out, run the relevant tests or commands. Report what happened: confirmed (with code path), failed, or insufficient detail (a strong `needs-info` signal). A confirmed verification makes a much stronger agent brief.\n\n4. **Grill (if needed).** If the request needs fleshing out, run repository-aware `\u002Fgrill-me` — sharpen it in dependency-aware rounds while its internal domain-modeling specialist updates `CONTEXT.md`\u002FADRs as decisions land.\n\n5. **Apply the outcome:**\n   - `ready-for-agent` — post an agent brief comment ([AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md)).\n   - `ready-for-human` — same structure as an agent brief, but note why it can't be delegated (judgment calls, external access, design decisions, manual testing).\n   - `needs-info` — post triage notes (template below).\n   - `wontfix` — close, with the comment depending on *why*:\n     - **Already implemented** — the change already exists in the codebase. Point to where it lives; do **not** write to `.out-of-scope\u002F` (that KB is for *rejected* requests, not built ones).\n     - **Rejected (bug)** — polite explanation, then close.\n     - **Rejected (enhancement)** — write to `.out-of-scope\u002F`, link to it from a comment, then close ([OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md)).\n   - `needs-triage` — apply the role. Optional comment if there's partial progress.\n\n## Quick state override\n\nIf the maintainer says \"move #42 to ready-for-agent\", trust them and apply the role directly. Confirm what you're about to do (role changes, comment, close), then act. Skip grilling. If moving to `ready-for-agent` without a grilling session, ask whether they want to write an agent brief.\n\n## Needs-info template\n\n```markdown\n## Triage Notes\n\n**What we've established so far:**\n\n- point 1\n- point 2\n\n**What we still need from you (@reporter):**\n\n- question 1\n- question 2\n```\n\nCapture everything resolved during grilling under \"established so far\" so the work isn't lost. Questions must be specific and actionable, not \"please provide more info\".\n\n## Resuming a previous session\n\nIf prior triage notes exist on the issue or PR, read them, check whether the reporter has answered any outstanding questions, and present an updated picture before continuing. Don't re-ask resolved questions.\n",{"name":5,"description":7,"disable-model-invocation":37},true,"main","c9d0c408715983e993b2f9ebffdbfa7f10153bcb","engineering\u002Ftriage",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FNairon-AI\u002Fagentic-starter-pack","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FNairon-AI","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.naironai.com\u002F","Building the future of Work","2026-09-20 17:40:05",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":48,"prompt":58,"zipAvailable":37},[49,52,55],{"tool":50,"command":51},"npx","npx skills add Nairon-AI\u002Fagentic-starter-pack --skill triage",{"tool":53,"command":54},"bunx","bunx skills add Nairon-AI\u002Fagentic-starter-pack --skill triage",{"tool":56,"command":57},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add Nairon-AI\u002Fagentic-starter-pack --skill triage","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FNairon-AI\u002Fagentic-starter-pack\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fengineering\u002Ftriage\u002FSKILL.md",[60,66],{"path":61,"resourceType":62,"resourceTypeDesc":63,"sizeBytes":64,"sourceHtmlUrl":65},"AGENT-BRIEF.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",7972,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FNairon-AI\u002Fagentic-starter-pack\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fengineering\u002Ftriage\u002FAGENT-BRIEF.md",{"path":67,"resourceType":62,"resourceTypeDesc":63,"sizeBytes":68,"sourceHtmlUrl":69},"OUT-OF-SCOPE.md",4712,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FNairon-AI\u002Fagentic-starter-pack\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fengineering\u002Ftriage\u002FOUT-OF-SCOPE.md",[71,108,130,150,170,192],{"skillNo":72,"name":73,"nameZh":6,"description":74,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":75,"categories":76,"keywords":87,"publishedAt":32},"01M6RBCG630Y8X99XWR9Q4GYNY","writing-shape","Take a markdown file of raw material and shape it into an article through a conversational session — drafting candidate openings, growing the piece paragraph by paragraph, arguing about format (lists, tables, callouts, quotes) at each step. Use when the user has a pile of notes, fragments, or a rough draft and wants help turning it into something publishable.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FNairon-AI\u002Fagentic-starter-pack\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fwriting\u002Fwriting-shape\u002FSKILL.md",[77,82],{"categoryNo":78,"categoryName":79,"taxonomyType":80,"taxonomyTypeDesc":81},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000018","写作与文案","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":83,"categoryName":84,"taxonomyType":85,"taxonomyTypeDesc":86},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000036","内容创作者","PROFESSION","适用职业",[88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107],"writing","writing shape","shape","notes","help","file","markdown","format","session","use","take","draft","article","material","it","about","quotes","at","candidate","when",{"skillNo":109,"name":110,"nameZh":6,"description":111,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":112,"categories":113,"keywords":116,"publishedAt":32},"01M6RBCCCB1KMF01P5SYGFWBSW","writing-fragments","Grilling session that mines the user for fragments — heterogeneous nuggets of writing (claims, vignettes, sharp sentences, half-thoughts) — and appends them to a single document as raw material for a future article. Use when the user wants to develop ideas before imposing structure, or mentions \"fragments\", \"ideate\", or \"raw material\" for writing.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FNairon-AI\u002Fagentic-starter-pack\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fwriting\u002Fwriting-fragments\u002FSKILL.md",[114,115],{"categoryNo":78,"categoryName":79,"taxonomyType":80,"taxonomyTypeDesc":81},{"categoryNo":83,"categoryName":84,"taxonomyType":85,"taxonomyTypeDesc":86},[88,117,118,119,120,121,96,97,122,123,124,100,125,101,126,127,128,129,107],"writing fragments","grilling","ideate","develop","user","document","structure","ideas","as","sharp","claims","for","single",{"skillNo":131,"name":132,"nameZh":6,"description":133,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":134,"categories":135,"keywords":138,"publishedAt":32},"01M6RBC8V7NHHKMTAZB4BPXVYQ","writing-beats","Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FNairon-AI\u002Fagentic-starter-pack\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fwriting\u002Fwriting-beats\u002FSKILL.md",[136,137],{"categoryNo":78,"categoryName":79,"taxonomyType":80,"taxonomyTypeDesc":81},{"categoryNo":83,"categoryName":84,"taxonomyType":85,"taxonomyTypeDesc":86},[88,139,140,22,97,141,142,90,143,144,145,100,146,125,147,101,148,149,128,107],"writing beats","choose","assemble","only","journey","next","options","end","style","narrative","argument",{"skillNo":151,"name":152,"nameZh":6,"description":153,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":154,"categories":155,"keywords":158,"publishedAt":32},"01M6RBC58SG5Y5SC4ZV4ZNEFHC","stop-slop","Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FNairon-AI\u002Fagentic-starter-pack\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fwriting\u002Fstop-slop\u002FSKILL.md",[156,157],{"categoryNo":78,"categoryName":79,"taxonomyType":80,"taxonomyTypeDesc":81},{"categoryNo":83,"categoryName":84,"taxonomyType":85,"taxonomyTypeDesc":86},[159,160,161,88,162,163,164,165,166,97,167,168,169,128,107],"stop","stop slop","slop","content","https","text","editing","remove","prose","patterns","drafts",{"skillNo":171,"name":172,"nameZh":6,"description":173,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":174,"categories":175,"keywords":178,"publishedAt":32},"01M6RBBJTTCJ7KZCP16G9JDFZH","humanizer","Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing\ntext to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's\ncomprehensive \"Signs of AI writing\" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including:\ninflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague\nattributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, passive\nvoice, negative parallelisms, and filler phrases.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FNairon-AI\u002Fagentic-starter-pack\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fwriting\u002Fhumanizer\u002FSKILL.md",[176,177],{"categoryNo":78,"categoryName":79,"taxonomyType":80,"taxonomyTypeDesc":81},{"categoryNo":83,"categoryName":84,"taxonomyType":85,"taxonomyTypeDesc":86},[172,88,179,180,164,181,22,182,183,166,184,185,168,186,187,188,189,190,191,107],"code","em dash","read","edit","generated","guide","opencode","three","human","make","wikipedia","vague","dash",{"skillNo":193,"name":194,"nameZh":6,"description":195,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":196,"categories":197,"keywords":198,"publishedAt":32},"01M6RBBEQKJ5HRH8AV9J85QB1T","feedback","Prepare, deliver, and debrief timely interpersonal feedback using a question-first coaching flow, observable behavior, owned experience, and concrete impact. Use when drafting feedback, coaching managers, rehearsing a feedback conversation, praising specific behavior, or reviewing whether feedback landed.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FNairon-AI\u002Fagentic-starter-pack\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fwriting\u002Ffeedback\u002FSKILL.md",[],[194,199,200,201,202,203,97,204,205,206,207,208,107,209],"prepare","flow","first","question","behavior","conversation","coaching","debrief","impact","managers","deliver"]