[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6QAZHE89PHD2RF8C2AW0TR2":3,"skill-same:01M6QAZHE89PHD2RF8C2AW0TR2":79},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":23,"publishedAt":44,"linkOnly":45,"markdownContent":46,"markdownBody":47,"frontMatter":48,"refName":56,"commitSha":57,"skillDirectory":58,"forksCount":14,"repositoryHtmlUrl":59,"repositoryHomepageUrl":60,"ownerHtmlUrl":61,"ownerBlogUrl":62,"ownerDescription":63,"updatedAt":64,"install":65,"resources":78},"01M6QAZHE89PHD2RF8C2AW0TR2","board-meeting",null,"Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollination), critic analysis, synthesis, founder review, and decision extraction. Use when the user invokes \u002Fcs:boardroom, calls a board meeting, or wants structured multi-perspective executive deliberation on a strategic question.","Tashima-Tarsh\u002FDisha6.6","Tashima-Tarsh","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F269906498?v=4","01M6PBH98X03XERH0HFT4PFB1P","NITISH KUMAR","01M6PBH9DA0M6KM3Z12P848F0K",0,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FTashima-Tarsh\u002FDisha6.6\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fboard-meeting\u002FSKILL.md",[18],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000034","行政与办公人员","PROFESSION","适用职业",[24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43],"board meeting","board","meeting","use","phase","suite","for","layer","calls","strategic","loading","deliberation","review","context","question","decision","multi-agent","critic","analysis","memory","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: \"board-meeting\"\ndescription: \"Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollination), critic analysis, synthesis, founder review, and decision extraction. Use when the user invokes \u002Fcs:boardroom, calls a board meeting, or wants structured multi-perspective executive deliberation on a strategic question.\"\nlicense: MIT\nmetadata:\n  version: 1.0.0\n  author: Alireza Rezvani\n  category: c-level\n  domain: board-protocol\n  updated: 2026-03-05\n  frameworks: 6-phase-board, two-layer-memory, independent-contributions\n---\n\n# Board Meeting Protocol\n\nStructured multi-agent deliberation that prevents groupthink, captures minority views, and produces clean, actionable decisions.\n\n## Keywords\nboard meeting, executive deliberation, strategic decision, C-suite, multi-agent, \u002Fcs:boardroom, founder review, decision extraction, independent perspectives\n\n## Invoke\n`\u002Fcs:boardroom [topic]` — e.g. `\u002Fcs:boardroom Should we expand to Spain in Q3?`\n\n---\n\n## The 6-Phase Protocol\n\n### PHASE 1: Context Gathering\n1. Load `~\u002F.claude\u002Fcompany-context.md`\n2. Load Layer 2 approved decisions from `~\u002F.claude\u002Fdecisions\u002Fapproved\u002F` **(Layer 2 ONLY — never raw transcripts)**\n3. Reset session state — no bleed from previous conversations\n4. Present agenda + activated roles → wait for founder confirmation\n\n**Chief of Staff selects relevant roles** based on topic (not all 14 every time):\n| Topic | Activate |\n|-------|----------|\n| Market expansion | CEO, CMO, CFO, CRO, COO |\n| Product direction | CEO, CPO, CTO, CMO |\n| Hiring\u002Forg | CEO, CHRO, CFO, COO (+ VPE for eng hiring) |\n| Pricing | CMO, CFO, CRO, CPO |\n| Technology | CTO, CPO, CFO, CISO |\n| Contracts \u002F term sheets \u002F legal exposure | GC, CEO, CFO |\n| Data strategy \u002F training-data rights | CDO, CAIO, GC, CISO |\n| AI strategy \u002F model selection \u002F AI risk | CAIO, CTO, CDO, CFO |\n| Retention \u002F churn \u002F customer success | CCO, CRO, CPO |\n| Eng delivery \u002F DORA \u002F team structure | VPE, CTO, CHRO, CFO |\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 2: Independent Contributions (ISOLATED)\n\n**No cross-pollination. Each agent runs before seeing others' outputs.**\n\nOrder: Research (if needed) → CMO → CFO → CEO → CTO → COO → CHRO → CRO → CISO → CPO → GC → CDO → CAIO → CCO → VPE (activated roles only)\n\n**Reasoning techniques:** CEO: Tree of Thought (3 futures) | CFO: Chain of Thought (show the math) | CMO: Recursion of Thought (draft→critique→refine) | CPO: First Principles | CRO: Chain of Thought (pipeline math) | COO: Step by Step (process map) | CTO: ReAct (research→analyze→act) | CISO: Risk-Based (P×I) | CHRO: Empathy + Data | GC: Risk-Based (clause exposure) | CDO: Decision-Driven (what decision does this data drive) | CAIO: Eval-Demanding (no eval, no ship) | CCO: Retention-Obsessed (GRR over NRR) | VPE: Throughput-First (cycle-time math)\n\n**Contribution format (max 5 key points, self-verified):**\n```\n## [ROLE] — [DATE]\n\nKey points (max 5):\n• [Finding] — [VERIFIED\u002FASSUMED] — ?\u002F?\u002F?\n• [Finding] — [VERIFIED\u002FASSUMED] — ?\u002F?\u002F?\n\nRecommendation: [clear position]\nConfidence: High \u002F Medium \u002F Low\nSource: [where the data came from]\nWhat would change my mind: [specific condition]\n```\n\nEach agent self-verifies before contributing: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring. No untagged claims.\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 3: Critic Analysis\nExecutive Mentor receives ALL Phase 2 outputs simultaneously. Role: adversarial reviewer, not synthesizer.\n\nChecklist:\n- Where did agents agree too easily? (suspicious consensus = red flag)\n- What assumptions are shared but unvalidated?\n- Who is missing from the room? (customer voice? front-line ops?)\n- What risk has nobody mentioned?\n- Which agent operated outside their domain?\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 4: Synthesis\nChief of Staff delivers using the **Board Meeting Output** format (defined in `..\u002Fagent-protocol\u002FSKILL.md`):\n- Decision Required (one sentence)\n- Perspectives (one line per contributing role)\n- Where They Agree \u002F Where They Disagree\n- Critic's View (the uncomfortable truth)\n- Recommended Decision + Action Items (owners, deadlines)\n- Your Call (options if founder disagrees)\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 5: Human in the Loop ⏸️\n\n**Full stop. Wait for the founder.**\n\n```\n⏸️ FOUNDER REVIEW — [Paste synthesis]\n\nOptions: ✅ Approve | ✏️ Modify | ❌ Reject | ❓ Ask follow-up\n```\n\n**Rules:**\n- User corrections OVERRIDE agent proposals. No pushback. No \"but the CFO said...\"\n- 30-min inactivity → auto-close as \"pending review\"\n- Reopen any time with `\u002Fcs:boardroom resume`\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 6: Decision Extraction\nAfter founder approval:\n- **Layer 1:** Write full transcript → `~\u002F.claude\u002Fdecisions\u002Fraw\u002FYYYY-MM-DD-\u003Cslug>.md`\n- **Layer 2:** Write approved decision record → `~\u002F.claude\u002Fdecisions\u002Fapproved\u002FYYYY-MM-DD-\u003Cslug>.md` and append to the index `~\u002F.claude\u002Fdecisions\u002Fapproved\u002Fdecisions.md`\n- Mark rejected proposals `[DO_NOT_RESURFACE]`\n- Confirm to founder with count of decisions logged, actions tracked, flags added\n\n---\n\n## Memory Structure\n\nUses the canonical two-layer decision memory (see `..\u002Fagent-protocol\u002FSKILL.md` → \"Decision Memory (Canonical Layout)\"):\n\n```\n~\u002F.claude\u002Fdecisions\u002F\n├── raw\u002FYYYY-MM-DD-\u003Cslug>.md        # Layer 1 — full transcripts (never auto-loaded)\n├── raw\u002Farchive\u002FYYYY\u002F               # Raw transcripts after 90 days\n├── approved\u002FYYYY-MM-DD-\u003Cslug>.md   # Layer 2 — founder-approved records (Phase 1 loads these)\n└── approved\u002Fdecisions.md           # Layer 2 index — append-only\n```\n\n**Future meetings load Layer 2 only.** Never Layer 1. This prevents hallucinated consensus.\n\nMigration: a legacy `memory\u002Fboard-meetings\u002F` folder may exist from earlier versions; read it for history but write new transcripts and decisions to `~\u002F.claude\u002Fdecisions\u002F`.\n\n---\n\n## Failure Mode Quick Reference\n| Failure | Fix |\n|---------|-----|\n| Groupthink (all agree) | Re-run Phase 2 isolated; force \"strongest argument against\" |\n| Analysis paralysis | Cap at 5 points; force recommendation even with Low confidence |\n| Bikeshedding | Log as async action item; return to main agenda |\n| Role bleed (CFO making product calls) | Critic flags; exclude from synthesis |\n| Layer contamination | Phase 1 loads `~\u002F.claude\u002Fdecisions\u002Fapproved\u002F` only — hard rule |\n\n---\n\n## References\n- `templates\u002Fmeeting-agenda.md` — agenda format\n- `templates\u002Fmeeting-minutes.md` — final output format\n- `references\u002Fmeeting-facilitation.md` — conflict handling, timing, failure modes\n","# Board Meeting Protocol\n\nStructured multi-agent deliberation that prevents groupthink, captures minority views, and produces clean, actionable decisions.\n\n## Keywords\nboard meeting, executive deliberation, strategic decision, C-suite, multi-agent, \u002Fcs:boardroom, founder review, decision extraction, independent perspectives\n\n## Invoke\n`\u002Fcs:boardroom [topic]` — e.g. `\u002Fcs:boardroom Should we expand to Spain in Q3?`\n\n---\n\n## The 6-Phase Protocol\n\n### PHASE 1: Context Gathering\n1. Load `~\u002F.claude\u002Fcompany-context.md`\n2. Load Layer 2 approved decisions from `~\u002F.claude\u002Fdecisions\u002Fapproved\u002F` **(Layer 2 ONLY — never raw transcripts)**\n3. Reset session state — no bleed from previous conversations\n4. Present agenda + activated roles → wait for founder confirmation\n\n**Chief of Staff selects relevant roles** based on topic (not all 14 every time):\n| Topic | Activate |\n|-------|----------|\n| Market expansion | CEO, CMO, CFO, CRO, COO |\n| Product direction | CEO, CPO, CTO, CMO |\n| Hiring\u002Forg | CEO, CHRO, CFO, COO (+ VPE for eng hiring) |\n| Pricing | CMO, CFO, CRO, CPO |\n| Technology | CTO, CPO, CFO, CISO |\n| Contracts \u002F term sheets \u002F legal exposure | GC, CEO, CFO |\n| Data strategy \u002F training-data rights | CDO, CAIO, GC, CISO |\n| AI strategy \u002F model selection \u002F AI risk | CAIO, CTO, CDO, CFO |\n| Retention \u002F churn \u002F customer success | CCO, CRO, CPO |\n| Eng delivery \u002F DORA \u002F team structure | VPE, CTO, CHRO, CFO |\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 2: Independent Contributions (ISOLATED)\n\n**No cross-pollination. Each agent runs before seeing others' outputs.**\n\nOrder: Research (if needed) → CMO → CFO → CEO → CTO → COO → CHRO → CRO → CISO → CPO → GC → CDO → CAIO → CCO → VPE (activated roles only)\n\n**Reasoning techniques:** CEO: Tree of Thought (3 futures) | CFO: Chain of Thought (show the math) | CMO: Recursion of Thought (draft→critique→refine) | CPO: First Principles | CRO: Chain of Thought (pipeline math) | COO: Step by Step (process map) | CTO: ReAct (research→analyze→act) | CISO: Risk-Based (P×I) | CHRO: Empathy + Data | GC: Risk-Based (clause exposure) | CDO: Decision-Driven (what decision does this data drive) | CAIO: Eval-Demanding (no eval, no ship) | CCO: Retention-Obsessed (GRR over NRR) | VPE: Throughput-First (cycle-time math)\n\n**Contribution format (max 5 key points, self-verified):**\n```\n## [ROLE] — [DATE]\n\nKey points (max 5):\n• [Finding] — [VERIFIED\u002FASSUMED] — ?\u002F?\u002F?\n• [Finding] — [VERIFIED\u002FASSUMED] — ?\u002F?\u002F?\n\nRecommendation: [clear position]\nConfidence: High \u002F Medium \u002F Low\nSource: [where the data came from]\nWhat would change my mind: [specific condition]\n```\n\nEach agent self-verifies before contributing: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring. No untagged claims.\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 3: Critic Analysis\nExecutive Mentor receives ALL Phase 2 outputs simultaneously. Role: adversarial reviewer, not synthesizer.\n\nChecklist:\n- Where did agents agree too easily? (suspicious consensus = red flag)\n- What assumptions are shared but unvalidated?\n- Who is missing from the room? (customer voice? front-line ops?)\n- What risk has nobody mentioned?\n- Which agent operated outside their domain?\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 4: Synthesis\nChief of Staff delivers using the **Board Meeting Output** format (defined in `..\u002Fagent-protocol\u002FSKILL.md`):\n- Decision Required (one sentence)\n- Perspectives (one line per contributing role)\n- Where They Agree \u002F Where They Disagree\n- Critic's View (the uncomfortable truth)\n- Recommended Decision + Action Items (owners, deadlines)\n- Your Call (options if founder disagrees)\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 5: Human in the Loop ⏸️\n\n**Full stop. Wait for the founder.**\n\n```\n⏸️ FOUNDER REVIEW — [Paste synthesis]\n\nOptions: ✅ Approve | ✏️ Modify | ❌ Reject | ❓ Ask follow-up\n```\n\n**Rules:**\n- User corrections OVERRIDE agent proposals. No pushback. No \"but the CFO said...\"\n- 30-min inactivity → auto-close as \"pending review\"\n- Reopen any time with `\u002Fcs:boardroom resume`\n\n---\n\n### PHASE 6: Decision Extraction\nAfter founder approval:\n- **Layer 1:** Write full transcript → `~\u002F.claude\u002Fdecisions\u002Fraw\u002FYYYY-MM-DD-\u003Cslug>.md`\n- **Layer 2:** Write approved decision record → `~\u002F.claude\u002Fdecisions\u002Fapproved\u002FYYYY-MM-DD-\u003Cslug>.md` and append to the index `~\u002F.claude\u002Fdecisions\u002Fapproved\u002Fdecisions.md`\n- Mark rejected proposals `[DO_NOT_RESURFACE]`\n- Confirm to founder with count of decisions logged, actions tracked, flags added\n\n---\n\n## Memory Structure\n\nUses the canonical two-layer decision memory (see `..\u002Fagent-protocol\u002FSKILL.md` → \"Decision Memory (Canonical Layout)\"):\n\n```\n~\u002F.claude\u002Fdecisions\u002F\n├── raw\u002FYYYY-MM-DD-\u003Cslug>.md        # Layer 1 — full transcripts (never auto-loaded)\n├── raw\u002Farchive\u002FYYYY\u002F               # Raw transcripts after 90 days\n├── approved\u002FYYYY-MM-DD-\u003Cslug>.md   # Layer 2 — founder-approved records (Phase 1 loads these)\n└── approved\u002Fdecisions.md           # Layer 2 index — append-only\n```\n\n**Future meetings load Layer 2 only.** Never Layer 1. This prevents hallucinated consensus.\n\nMigration: a legacy `memory\u002Fboard-meetings\u002F` folder may exist from earlier versions; read it for history but write new transcripts and decisions to `~\u002F.claude\u002Fdecisions\u002F`.\n\n---\n\n## Failure Mode Quick Reference\n| Failure | Fix |\n|---------|-----|\n| Groupthink (all agree) | Re-run Phase 2 isolated; force \"strongest argument against\" |\n| Analysis paralysis | Cap at 5 points; force recommendation even with Low confidence |\n| Bikeshedding | Log as async action item; return to main agenda |\n| Role bleed (CFO making product calls) | Critic flags; exclude from synthesis |\n| Layer contamination | Phase 1 loads `~\u002F.claude\u002Fdecisions\u002Fapproved\u002F` only — hard rule |\n\n---\n\n## References\n- `templates\u002Fmeeting-agenda.md` — agenda format\n- `templates\u002Fmeeting-minutes.md` — final output format\n- `references\u002Fmeeting-facilitation.md` — conflict handling, timing, failure modes\n",{"name":5,"license":15,"metadata":49,"description":7},{"author":50,"domain":51,"updated":52,"version":53,"category":54,"frameworks":55},"Alireza Rezvani","board-protocol",1772668800000,"1.0.0","c-level","6-phase-board, two-layer-memory, independent-contributions","main","0da4485785ee599388900be50db1635489d53056",".agents\u002Fskills\u002Fboard-meeting","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FTashima-Tarsh\u002FDisha6.6","https:\u002F\u002Fdisha6.6.thenitishkr.in\u002F","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FTashima-Tarsh","www.thenitishkr","thenitishkr | AI • Cyber-security • Research\r\n","2026-11-08 03:33:25",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":66,"prompt":76,"zipAvailable":77},[67,70,73],{"tool":68,"command":69},"npx","npx skills add Tashima-Tarsh\u002FDisha6.6 --skill board-meeting",{"tool":71,"command":72},"bunx","bunx skills add Tashima-Tarsh\u002FDisha6.6 --skill board-meeting",{"tool":74,"command":75},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add Tashima-Tarsh\u002FDisha6.6 --skill board-meeting","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FTashima-Tarsh\u002FDisha6.6\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fboard-meeting\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[80,111,135,162,186,208],{"skillNo":81,"name":82,"nameZh":6,"description":83,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":84,"categories":85,"keywords":91,"publishedAt":44},"01M6QRD07D4TGNDK6VJ4EHF8BV","youtube-full","Use when the user needs YouTube transcripts, video search, channel browsing, playlist extraction, or content monitoring. Trigger phrases: 'get the transcript for', 'search YouTube for', 'what are the latest videos on', 'list this playlist', 'monitor this channel', or any request involving a YouTube URL, video ID, or @handle. Do NOT use for downloading video or audio files, YouTube engagement data (likes, comments), or private\u002Fage-restricted videos.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FTashima-Tarsh\u002FDisha6.6\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fyoutube-full\u002FSKILL.md",[86],{"categoryNo":87,"categoryName":88,"taxonomyType":89,"taxonomyTypeDesc":90},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000016","图像与多媒体","SCENARIO","使用场景",[92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,30,108,109,110],"youtube full","youtube","full","transcript","search","monitoring","data","Video","Audio","list","files","do","get","age","trigger","URL","browsing","request","youtube transcripts",{"skillNo":112,"name":113,"nameZh":6,"description":114,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":115,"categories":116,"keywords":117,"publishedAt":44},"01M6QRCJ3112VYPA97YG7KGMC2","x-twitter-growth","X\u002FTwitter growth engine for building audience, crafting viral content, and analyzing engagement. Use when the user wants to grow on X\u002FTwitter, write tweets or threads, analyze their X profile, research competitors on X, plan a posting strategy, or optimize engagement. Complements social-content (generic multi-platform) with X-specific depth: algorithm mechanics, thread engineering, reply strategy, profile optimization, and competitive intelligence via web search.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FTashima-Tarsh\u002FDisha6.6\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fx-twitter-growth\u002FSKILL.md",[],[118,119,120,121,96,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,27,131,132,133,134,30],"twitter","x twitter growth","growth","research","content","engineering","plan","web search","competitors","analyze","engine","write","strategy","platform","grow","posting","competitive",{"skillNo":136,"name":137,"nameZh":6,"description":138,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":139,"categories":140,"keywords":144,"publishedAt":44},"01M6QRBN3EHQNJY42RERP7A149","write-a-skill","Create new agent skills with proper structure, progressive disclosure, and bundled resources. Use when user wants to create, write, build, or author a new skill.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FTashima-Tarsh\u002FDisha6.6\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fwrite-a-skill\u002FSKILL.md",[141],{"categoryNo":142,"categoryName":143,"taxonomyType":89,"taxonomyTypeDesc":90},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",[145,129,146,147,148,149,150,151,27,152,153,56,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161],"write a skill","github","create","https","productivity","matt pocock","direct","example","build","new skill","structure","new agent","resources","with","tree","progressive disclosure","author",{"skillNo":163,"name":164,"nameZh":6,"description":165,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":166,"categories":167,"keywords":168,"publishedAt":44},"01M6QRB6G8P33PNGAF9Y69EJ9T","wrap-up","Close out a launched Claude Managed Agent — recap every primitive the founder now owns, regenerate the single-file overview page, and suggest the next 1-2 upgrades. Use when the user says \"wrap up\", \"close this out\", \"what do I own now\", \"give me the summary\", \"recap the agent\", or when the orchestrator routes phase=wrap-up. primitives_inventory.py tables everything owned (agent, environment, session, memory, outcome, deployment); overview_page.py regenerates a self-contained .\u002Fmy-agent\u002Fagent-overview.html; upgrade_suggester.py ranks the next moves from recorded deferrals plus standing hardening steps. Companion to run-without-you; the last stop before phase=done.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FTashima-Tarsh\u002FDisha6.6\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fwrap-up\u002FSKILL.md",[],[169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,27,178,103,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,28],"wrap up","up","wrap","gemini","deployment","run","file","hardening","closeout","stop","upgrade","founder","close","companion","you","tables","directions",{"skillNo":187,"name":188,"nameZh":6,"description":189,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":190,"categories":191,"keywords":193,"publishedAt":44},"01M6QRA5AYC1RBFZ39GTWGS3N8","workflow-builder","Design and write deterministic multi-agent workflow scripts (.js files in .claude\u002Fworkflows\u002F) for Claude Code's Workflow tool. Use when a user wants to build, create, author, scaffold, or run a custom Claude Code workflow, orchestrate sub-agents (fan-out, pipeline, loop, judge-panel), or automate a repeatable multi-step task across fresh-context agents.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FTashima-Tarsh\u002FDisha6.6\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-builder\u002FSKILL.md",[192],{"categoryNo":142,"categoryName":143,"taxonomyType":89,"taxonomyTypeDesc":90},[194,195,196,197,198,147,174,199,200,201,202,40,129,37,102,203,204,205,206,207],"workflow","workflow builder","builder","design","workflows","code","orchestrate","pipeline","loop","across","fresh","scripts","judge","claude code workflow",{"skillNo":209,"name":210,"nameZh":6,"description":211,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":212,"categories":213,"keywords":214,"publishedAt":44},"01M6QR7QMCZESKQA0ERW1E657M","weekly-review","Use when someone wants to run a weekly review, close open loops, audit stalled projects and commitments, get their system back to trusted, restart a lapsed review habit, or says \"\u002Fcs:weekly-review\". Walks David Allen's three-phase loop — GET CLEAR, GET CURRENT, GET CREATIVE — with deterministic scripts that inventory open loops, gate the checklist with named gaps, and score commitment health 0-100.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FTashima-Tarsh\u002FDisha6.6\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fweekly-review\u002FSKILL.md",[],[36,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,202,223,224,225,226,227,228,104,229,230,28],"weekly review","weekly","deterministic scripts","reflect","feeds","inventory","open","team","projects","project-management","scanner","conversation","back","project","sprint","cadence"]