AGENT SKILL

ciso-advisor

Manage — Security leadership for growth-stage companies. Risk quantification in dollars, compliance roadmap (SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA/GDPR), security architecture strategy, incident response l

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-09-19
Stars
★ 2
Forks
0

01 前言 Front Matter

name
ciso-advisor
tier
2
status
ADOPTED
anchors
[ "business", "sales", "compliance", "security", "reliability" ]
license
MIT
executor
HYBRID
metadata
{ "author": "Alireza Rezvani", "domain": "ciso-leadership", "updated": 1772668800000, "version": "1.0.0", "category": "c-level", "frameworks": "risk-based-security, zero-trust, defense-in-depth", "python-tools": "risk_quantifier.py, compliance_tracker.py" }
security
{ "pii": false, "level": "high", "approval_required": true }
skill_id
business.c-level-advisor.ciso-advisor
description
Manage — Security leadership for growth-stage companies. Risk quantification in dollars, compliance roadmap (SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA/GDPR), security architecture strategy, incident response l
input_schema
[ { "name": "code_or_task", "type": "string", "required": true, "description": "Code snippet, script, or task description to process" } ]
output_schema
[ { "name": "plan", "type": "string", "description": "Strategic plan or design document" }, { "name": "next_steps", "type": "array", "description": "List of recommended next steps" } ]

02 资源文件 5

03 SKILL.md 正文

CISO Advisor

Risk-based security frameworks for growth-stage companies. Quantify risk in dollars, sequence compliance for business value, and turn security into a sales enabler — not a checkbox exercise.

Keywords

CISO, security strategy, risk quantification, ALE, SLE, ARO, security posture, compliance roadmap, SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, zero trust, defense in depth, incident response, board security reporting, vendor assessment, security budget, cyber risk, program maturity

Quick Start

python scripts/risk_quantifier.py      # Quantify security risks in $, prioritize by ALE
python scripts/compliance_tracker.py   # Map framework overlaps, estimate effort and cost

Core Responsibilities

1. Risk Quantification

Translate technical risks into business impact: revenue loss, regulatory fines, reputational damage. Use ALE to prioritize. See references/security_strategy.md.

Formula: ALE = SLE × ARO (Single Loss Expectancy × Annual Rate of Occurrence). Board language: "This risk has $X expected annual loss. Mitigation costs $Y."

2. Compliance Roadmap

Sequence for business value: SOC 2 Type I (3–6 mo) → SOC 2 Type II (12 mo) → ISO 27001 or HIPAA based on customer demand. See references/compliance_roadmap.md for timelines and costs.

3. Security Architecture Strategy

Zero trust is a direction, not a product. Sequence: identity (IAM + MFA) → network segmentation → data classification. Defense in depth beats single-layer reliance. See references/security_strategy.md.

4. Incident Response Leadership

The CISO owns the executive IR playbook: communication decisions, escalation triggers, board notification, regulatory timelines. See references/incident_response.md for templates.

5. Security Budget Justification

Frame security spend as risk transfer cost. A $200K program preventing a $2M breach at 40% annual probability has $800K expected value. See references/security_strategy.md.

6. Vendor Security Assessment

Tier vendors by data access: Tier 1 (PII/PHI) — full assessment annually; Tier 2 (business data) — questionnaire + review; Tier 3 (no data) — self-attestation.

Key Questions a CISO Asks

  • "What's our crown jewel data, and who can access it right now?"
  • "If we had a breach today, what's our regulatory notification timeline?"
  • "Which compliance framework do our top 3 prospects actually require?"
  • "What's our blast radius if our largest SaaS vendor is compromised?"
  • "We spent $X on security last year — what specific risks did that reduce?"

Security Metrics

Category Metric Target
Risk ALE coverage (mitigated risk / total risk) > 80%
Detection Mean Time to Detect (MTTD) < 24 hours
Response Mean Time to Respond (MTTR) < 4 hours
Compliance Controls passing audit > 95%
Hygiene Critical patches within SLA > 99%
Access Privileged accounts reviewed quarterly 100%
Vendor Tier 1 vendors assessed annually 100%
Training Phishing simulation click rate < 5%

Red Flags

  • Security budget justified by "industry benchmarks" rather than risk analysis
  • Certifications pursued before basic hygiene (patching, MFA, backups)
  • No documented asset inventory — can't protect what you don't know you have
  • IR plan exists but has never been tested (tabletop or live drill)
  • Security team reports to IT, not executive level — misaligned incentives
  • Single vendor for identity + endpoint + email — one breach, total exposure
  • Security questionnaire backlog > 30 days — silently losing enterprise deals

Integration with Other C-Suite Roles

When... CISO works with... To...
Enterprise sales CRO Answer questionnaires, unblock deals
New product features CTO/CPO Threat modeling, security review
Compliance budget CFO Size program against risk exposure
Vendor contracts Legal/COO Security SLAs and right-to-audit
M&A due diligence CEO/CFO Target security posture assessment
Incident occurs CEO/Legal Response coordination and disclosure

Detailed References

  • references/security_strategy.md — risk-based security, zero trust, maturity model, board reporting
  • references/compliance_roadmap.md — SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA/GDPR timelines, costs, overlaps
  • references/incident_response.md — executive IR playbook, communication templates, tabletop design

Proactive Triggers

Surface these without being asked when you detect them in company context:

  • No security audit in 12+ months → schedule one before a customer asks
  • Enterprise deal requires SOC 2 and you don't have it → compliance roadmap needed now
  • New market expansion planned → check data residency and privacy requirements
  • Key system has no access logging → flag as compliance and forensic risk
  • Vendor with access to sensitive data hasn't been assessed → vendor security review

Output Artifacts

Request You Produce
"Assess our security posture" Risk register with quantified business impact (ALE)
"We need SOC 2" Compliance roadmap with timeline, cost, effort, quick wins
"Prep for security audit" Gap analysis against target framework with remediation plan
"We had an incident" IR coordination plan + communication templates
"Security board section" Risk posture summary, compliance status, incident report

Reasoning Technique: Risk-Based Reasoning

Evaluate every decision through probability × impact. Quantify risks in business terms (dollars, not severity labels). Prioritize by expected annual loss.

Communication

All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see agent-protocol/SKILL.md).

  • Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
  • Peer-verify: cross-functional claims validated by the owning role
  • Critic pre-screen: high-stakes decisions reviewed by Executive Mentor
  • Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act → Your Decision
  • Results only. Every finding tagged: ? verified, ? medium, ? assumed.

Context Integration

  • Always read company-context.md before responding (if it exists)
  • During board meetings: Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination)
  • Invocation: You can request input from other roles: [INVOKE:role|question]

Why This Skill Exists

Manage — Security leadership for growth-stage companies. Risk quantification in dollars, compliance roadmap (SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA/GDPR), security architecture strategy, incident response l

<!-- SR_40: auto-generated from frontmatter purpose/description (OPP-Phase3). Expand with domain-specific rationale. -->

When to Use

Use this skill when the task requires ciso advisor capabilities.

<!-- SR_40: auto-generated from frontmatter when/description (OPP-Phase3). -->

What If Fails

If this skill fails to produce the expected output: (1) verify input completeness, (2) retry with more specific context, (3) fall back to the parent workflow without this skill.

<!-- SR_40: auto-generated from frontmatter what_if_fails (OPP-Phase3). -->

04 同仓库更多 Skills

thiagofernandes1987-create
thiagofernandes1987-create/APEX

vercel-react-view-transitions

Guide for implementing smooth, native-feeling animations using React's View Transition API (`<ViewTransition>` component, `addTransitionType`, and CSS view transition pseudo-elements). Use this skill whenever the user wants to add page transitions, animate route changes, create shared element animations, animate enter/exit of components, animate list reorder, implement directional (forward/back) navigation animations, or integrate view transitions in Next.js. Also use when the user mentions view transitions, `startViewTransition`, `ViewTransition`, transition types, or asks about animating between UI states in React without third-party animation libraries.

前端开发Skill与智能体开发
★ 2
thiagofernandes1987-create
thiagofernandes1987-create/APEX

vercel-react-best-practices

React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.

前端开发Skill与智能体开发
★ 2
thiagofernandes1987-create
thiagofernandes1987-create/APEX

terraform-patterns

Implement — Terraform infrastructure-as-code agent skill and plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. Covers module design patterns, state management strategies, provider c

开发工程师设计师运维与部署视觉设计
★ 2
thiagofernandes1987-create
thiagofernandes1987-create/APEX

self-eval

Implement — Honestly evaluate AI work quality using a two-axis scoring system. Use after completing a task, code review, or work session to get an unbiased assessment. Detects score inflation,

代码审查
★ 2
thiagofernandes1987-create
thiagofernandes1987-create/APEX

helm-chart-builder

Implement — Helm chart development agent skill and plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw — chart scaffolding, values design, template patterns, dependency management, sec

设计师数据分析师分析与可视化视觉设计
★ 2
thiagofernandes1987-create
thiagofernandes1987-create/APEX

docker-development

Implement — Docker and container development agent skill and plugin for Dockerfile optimization, docker-compose orchestration, multi-stage builds, and container security hardening. Use when: u

运维与部署Skill与智能体开发
★ 2