board-meeting
Manage — Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollinati
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-09-19
- Stars
- ★ 2
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- board-meeting
- tier
- 2
- status
- ADOPTED
- anchors
- [ "business", "agent", "design" ]
- license
- MIT
- executor
- LLM_BEHAVIOR
- metadata
- { "author": "Alireza Rezvani", "domain": "board-protocol", "updated": 1772668800000, "version": "1.0.0", "category": "c-level", "frameworks": "6-phase-board, two-layer-memory, independent-contributions" }
- security
- { "pii": false, "level": "standard", "approval_required": false }
- skill_id
- business.c-level-advisor.board-meeting
- description
- Manage — Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollinati
- input_schema
- [ { "name": "code_or_task", "type": "string", "required": true, "description": "Code snippet, script, or task description to process" }, { "name": "context", "type": "string", "required": false, "description": "Additional context or background information" } ]
- output_schema
- [ { "name": "result", "type": "object", "description": "Result from the automated action" }, { "name": "status", "type": "string", "description": "Execution status: success | partial | failure" } ]
02 资源文件 3
- 参考文档references/meeting-facilitation.md8.0 KB
- 参考文档templates/meeting-agenda.md1.9 KB
- 参考文档templates/meeting-minutes.md2.4 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Board Meeting Protocol
Structured multi-agent deliberation that prevents groupthink, captures minority views, and produces clean, actionable decisions.
Keywords
board meeting, executive deliberation, strategic decision, C-suite, multi-agent, /cs:board, founder review, decision extraction, independent perspectives
Invoke
/cs:board [topic] — e.g. /cs:board Should we expand to Spain in Q3?
The 6-Phase Protocol
PHASE 1: Context Gathering
- Load
memory/company-context.md - Load
memory/board-meetings/decisions.md(Layer 2 ONLY — never raw transcripts) - Reset session state — no bleed from previous conversations
- Present agenda + activated roles → wait for founder confirmation
Chief of Staff selects relevant roles based on topic (not all 9 every time):
| Topic | Activate |
|---|---|
| Market expansion | CEO, CMO, CFO, CRO, COO |
| Product direction | CEO, CPO, CTO, CMO |
| Hiring/org | CEO, CHRO, CFO, COO |
| Pricing | CMO, CFO, CRO, CPO |
| Technology | CTO, CPO, CFO, CISO |
PHASE 2: Independent Contributions (ISOLATED)
No cross-pollination. Each agent runs before seeing others' outputs.
Order: Research (if needed) → CMO → CFO → CEO → CTO → COO → CHRO → CRO → CISO → CPO
Reasoning techniques: CEO: Tree of Thought (3 futures) | CFO: Chain of Thought (show the math) | CMO: Recursion of Thought (draft→critique→refine) | CPO: First Principles | CRO: Chain of Thought (pipeline math) | COO: Step by Step (process map) | CTO: ReAct (research→analyze→act) | CISO: Risk-Based (P×I) | CHRO: Empathy + Data
Contribution format (max 5 key points, self-verified):
## [ROLE] — [DATE]
Key points (max 5):
• [Finding] — [VERIFIED/ASSUMED] — ?/?/?
• [Finding] — [VERIFIED/ASSUMED] — ?/?/?
Recommendation: [clear position]
Confidence: High / Medium / Low
Source: [where the data came from]
What would change my mind: [specific condition]
Each agent self-verifies before contributing: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring. No untagged claims.
PHASE 3: Critic Analysis
Executive Mentor receives ALL Phase 2 outputs simultaneously. Role: adversarial reviewer, not synthesizer.
Checklist:
- Where did agents agree too easily? (suspicious consensus = red flag)
- What assumptions are shared but unvalidated?
- Who is missing from the room? (customer voice? front-line ops?)
- What risk has nobody mentioned?
- Which agent operated outside their domain?
PHASE 4: Synthesis
Chief of Staff delivers using the Board Meeting Output format (defined in agent-protocol/SKILL.md):
- Decision Required (one sentence)
- Perspectives (one line per contributing role)
- Where They Agree / Where They Disagree
- Critic's View (the uncomfortable truth)
- Recommended Decision + Action Items (owners, deadlines)
- Your Call (options if founder disagrees)
PHASE 5: Human in the Loop ⏸️
Full stop. Wait for the founder.
⏸️ FOUNDER REVIEW — [Paste synthesis]
Options: ✅ Approve | ✏️ Modify | ❌ Reject | ❓ Ask follow-up
Rules:
- User corrections OVERRIDE agent proposals. No pushback. No "but the CFO said..."
- 30-min inactivity → auto-close as "pending review"
- Reopen any time with
/cs:board resume
PHASE 6: Decision Extraction
After founder approval:
- Layer 1: Write full transcript →
memory/board-meetings/YYYY-MM-DD-raw.md - Layer 2: Append approved decisions →
memory/board-meetings/decisions.md - Mark rejected proposals
[DO_NOT_RESURFACE] - Confirm to founder with count of decisions logged, actions tracked, flags added
Memory Structure
memory/board-meetings/
├── decisions.md # Layer 2 — founder-approved only (Phase 1 loads this)
├── YYYY-MM-DD-raw.md # Layer 1 — full transcripts (never auto-loaded)
└── archive/YYYY/ # Raw transcripts after 90 days
Future meetings load Layer 2 only. Never Layer 1. This prevents hallucinated consensus.
Failure Mode Quick Reference
| Failure | Fix |
|---|---|
| Groupthink (all agree) | Re-run Phase 2 isolated; force "strongest argument against" |
| Analysis paralysis | Cap at 5 points; force recommendation even with Low confidence |
| Bikeshedding | Log as async action item; return to main agenda |
| Role bleed (CFO making product calls) | Critic flags; exclude from synthesis |
| Layer contamination | Phase 1 loads decisions.md only — hard rule |
References
templates/meeting-agenda.md— agenda formattemplates/meeting-minutes.md— final output formatreferences/meeting-facilitation.md— conflict handling, timing, failure modes
Why This Skill Exists
Manage — Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollinati
<!-- SR_40: auto-generated from frontmatter purpose/description (OPP-Phase3). Expand with domain-specific rationale. -->
When to Use
Use this skill when the task requires board meeting capabilities.
<!-- SR_40: auto-generated from frontmatter when/description (OPP-Phase3). -->
What If Fails
If this skill fails to produce the expected output: (1) verify input completeness, (2) retry with more specific context, (3) fall back to the parent workflow without this skill.
<!-- SR_40: auto-generated from frontmatter what_if_fails (OPP-Phase3). -->
04 同仓库更多 Skills
vercel-react-view-transitions
Guide for implementing smooth, native-feeling animations using React's View Transition API (`<ViewTransition>` component, `addTransitionType`, and CSS view transition pseudo-elements). Use this skill whenever the user wants to add page transitions, animate route changes, create shared element animations, animate enter/exit of components, animate list reorder, implement directional (forward/back) navigation animations, or integrate view transitions in Next.js. Also use when the user mentions view transitions, `startViewTransition`, `ViewTransition`, transition types, or asks about animating between UI states in React without third-party animation libraries.
vercel-react-best-practices
React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.
terraform-patterns
Implement — Terraform infrastructure-as-code agent skill and plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. Covers module design patterns, state management strategies, provider c
self-eval
Implement — Honestly evaluate AI work quality using a two-axis scoring system. Use after completing a task, code review, or work session to get an unbiased assessment. Detects score inflation,
helm-chart-builder
Implement — Helm chart development agent skill and plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw — chart scaffolding, values design, template patterns, dependency management, sec
docker-development
Implement — Docker and container development agent skill and plugin for Dockerfile optimization, docker-compose orchestration, multi-stage builds, and container security hardening. Use when: u