principle-foundational-thinking
Apply before writing logic: choosing core types and data structures, sequencing scaffold-vs-feature work, asking what concurrent actors share. Get the data structures right so downstream code becomes obvious.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-10-23
- Stars
- ★ 0
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- principle-foundational-thinking
- description
- Apply before writing logic: choosing core types and data structures, sequencing scaffold-vs-feature work, asking what concurrent actors share. Get the data structures right so downstream code becomes obvious.
- disable-model-invocation
- true
02 资源文件 2
- 参考文档agents/openai.yaml43 B
- 许可证LICENSE1.0 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Foundational Thinking
Structural decisions protect option value. Code-level decisions protect simplicity.
Data structures first. Get the data shape right before writing logic. Define core types early, trace every access pattern, and choose structures that match the dominant paths.
At code level, DRY the structure, not every line. Types and data models should converge. Three similar statements still beat a premature abstraction. Prefer explicit over clever. Test behavior and edge cases, not line counts.
Concurrency corollary. Before sharing state between actors, ask "what happens if another actor modifies this concurrently?" If not "nothing", isolate.
Scaffold first. If something helps every later phase, do it first. Ask "does every subsequent phase benefit from this existing?" CI, linting, test infrastructure, and shared types are scaffold. Sequence for option value: setup before features, tests before fixes. Keep commits small and single-purpose.
Each increment should land a coherent abstraction or deepen one that exists. Do not spread a new capability across callers as special-case coordination.
Subtraction comes before scaffolding. Remove dead code first, then lay foundations.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
sample-skill
暂无简介
synthetic-review-candidate
Candidate for smoke testing an evaluation runner only.
synthetic-review-baseline
Baseline for smoke testing an evaluation runner only.
review
Run the existing user-invoked review bundle and independently adjudicate its findings.
review-adjudication
Verify generated or human review findings before fixing, defending, replying, resolving, or reusing them as learned guidance. Use within a review, review-comment fix, monitor, or readiness workflow.
monitor-mr
Monitor review findings and CI using the shared adjudication procedure.