executing-plans
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-05-29
- Stars
- ★ 1
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- executing-plans
- description
- Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
03 SKILL.md 正文
Executing Plans
Overview
Load plan, review critically, execute all tasks, report when complete.
Announce at start: "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan."
Note: Tell your human partner that Superpowers works much better with access to subagents. The quality of its work will be significantly higher if run on a platform with subagent support (such as Claude Code or Codex). If subagents are available, use superpowers:subagent-driven-development instead of this skill.
The Process
Step 1: Load and Review Plan
- Read plan file
- Review critically - identify any questions or concerns about the plan
- If concerns: Raise them with your human partner before starting
- If no concerns: Create TodoWrite and proceed
Step 2: Execute Tasks
For each task:
- Mark as in_progress
- Follow each step exactly (plan has bite-sized steps)
- Run verifications as specified
- Mark as completed
Step 3: Complete Development
After all tasks complete and verified:
- Announce: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
- REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch
- Follow that skill to verify tests, present options, execute choice
When to Stop and Ask for Help
STOP executing immediately when:
- Hit a blocker (missing dependency, test fails, instruction unclear)
- Plan has critical gaps preventing starting
- You don't understand an instruction
- Verification fails repeatedly
Ask for clarification rather than guessing.
When to Revisit Earlier Steps
Return to Review (Step 1) when:
- Partner updates the plan based on your feedback
- Fundamental approach needs rethinking
Don't force through blockers - stop and ask.
Remember
- Review plan critically first
- Follow plan steps exactly
- Don't skip verifications
- Reference skills when plan says to
- Stop when blocked, don't guess
- Never start implementation on main/master branch without explicit user consent
Integration
Required workflow skills:
- superpowers:using-git-worktrees - REQUIRED: Set up isolated workspace before starting
- superpowers:writing-plans - Creates the plan this skill executes
- superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch - Complete development after all tasks
04 同仓库更多 Skills
writing-clearly-and-concisely
Use when writing prose humans will read—documentation, commit messages, error messages, explanations, reports, or UI text. Applies Strunk's timeless rules for clearer, stronger, more professional writing.
crafting-effective-readmes
Use when writing or improving README files. Not all READMEs are the same — provides templates and guidance matched to your audience and project type.
wiki-architect
You are a documentation architect that produces structured wiki catalogues and onboarding guides from codebases.
readme
You are an expert technical writer creating comprehensive project documentation. Your goal is to write a README.md that is absurdly thorough—the kind of documentation you wish every project had.
ubiquitous-language
Extract a DDD-style ubiquitous language glossary from the current conversation, flagging ambiguities and proposing canonical terms. Saves to UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.md. Use when user wants to define domain terms, build a glossary, harden terminology, create a ubiquitous language, or mentions "domain model" or "DDD".
technical-writing-style
Enforce clear, direct writing in software development documents including OKRs, PRDs, tech specs, architecture decision records (ADRs), git commit messages, PR descriptions, READMEs, changelogs, runbooks, incident postmortems, API docs, and onboarding guides. Trigger whenever a user asks to write, edit, revise, or review any of these document types. Also trigger when the user says writing "sounds like AI", "feels robotic", "needs polish", or asks to "make it sound more natural" in the context of technical or professional prose. Do not trigger for fiction, poetry, creative writing, academic papers, or legal documents unless the user explicitly asks for a more natural tone.