kaizen:root-cause-tracing
Use when errors occur deep in execution and you need to trace back to find the original trigger - systematically traces bugs backward through call stack, adding instrumentation when needed, to identify source of invalid data or incorrect behavior
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-05-29
- Stars
- ★ 1
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- kaizen:root-cause-tracing
- description
- Use when errors occur deep in execution and you need to trace back to find the original trigger - systematically traces bugs backward through call stack, adding instrumentation when needed, to identify source of invalid data or incorrect behavior
03 SKILL.md 正文
Root Cause Tracing
Overview
Bugs often manifest deep in the call stack (git init in wrong directory, file created in wrong location, database opened with wrong path). Your instinct is to fix where the error appears, but that's treating a symptom.
Core principle: Trace backward through the call chain until you find the original trigger, then fix at the source.
When to Use
digraph when_to_use {
"Bug appears deep in stack?" [shape=diamond];
"Can trace backwards?" [shape=diamond];
"Fix at symptom point" [shape=box];
"Trace to original trigger" [shape=box];
"BETTER: Also add defense-in-depth" [shape=box];
"Bug appears deep in stack?" -> "Can trace backwards?" [label="yes"];
"Can trace backwards?" -> "Trace to original trigger" [label="yes"];
"Can trace backwards?" -> "Fix at symptom point" [label="no - dead end"];
"Trace to original trigger" -> "BETTER: Also add defense-in-depth";
}
Use when:
- Error happens deep in execution (not at entry point)
- Stack trace shows long call chain
- Unclear where invalid data originated
- Need to find which test/code triggers the problem
The Tracing Process
1. Observe the Symptom
Error: git init failed in /Users/jesse/project/packages/core
2. Find Immediate Cause
What code directly causes this?
await execFileAsync('git', ['init'], { cwd: projectDir });
3. Ask: What Called This?
WorktreeManager.createSessionWorktree(projectDir, sessionId)
→ called by Session.initializeWorkspace()
→ called by Session.create()
→ called by test at Project.create()
4. Keep Tracing Up
What value was passed?
projectDir = ''(empty string!)- Empty string as
cwdresolves toprocess.cwd() - That's the source code directory!
5. Find Original Trigger
Where did empty string come from?
const context = setupCoreTest(); // Returns { tempDir: '' }
Project.create('name', context.tempDir); // Accessed before beforeEach!
Adding Stack Traces
When you can't trace manually, add instrumentation:
// Before the problematic operation
async function gitInit(directory: string) {
const stack = new Error().stack;
console.error('DEBUG git init:', {
directory,
cwd: process.cwd(),
nodeEnv: process.env.NODE_ENV,
stack,
});
await execFileAsync('git', ['init'], { cwd: directory });
}
Critical: Use console.error() in tests (not logger - may not show)
Run and capture:
npm test 2>&1 | grep 'DEBUG git init'
Analyze stack traces:
- Look for test file names
- Find the line number triggering the call
- Identify the pattern (same test? same parameter?)
Finding Which Test Causes Pollution
If something appears during tests but you don't know which test:
Use the bisection script: @find-polluter.sh
./find-polluter.sh '.git' 'src/**/*.test.ts'
Runs tests one-by-one, stops at first polluter. See script for usage.
Real Example: Empty projectDir
Symptom: .git created in packages/core/ (source code)
Trace chain:
git initruns inprocess.cwd()← empty cwd parameter- WorktreeManager called with empty projectDir
- Session.create() passed empty string
- Test accessed
context.tempDirbefore beforeEach - setupCoreTest() returns
{ tempDir: '' }initially
Root cause: Top-level variable initialization accessing empty value
Fix: Made tempDir a getter that throws if accessed before beforeEach
Also added defense-in-depth:
- Layer 1: Project.create() validates directory
- Layer 2: WorkspaceManager validates not empty
- Layer 3: NODE_ENV guard refuses git init outside tmpdir
- Layer 4: Stack trace logging before git init
Key Principle
digraph principle {
"Found immediate cause" [shape=ellipse];
"Can trace one level up?" [shape=diamond];
"Trace backwards" [shape=box];
"Is this the source?" [shape=diamond];
"Fix at source" [shape=box];
"Add validation at each layer" [shape=box];
"Bug impossible" [shape=doublecircle];
"NEVER fix just the symptom" [shape=octagon, style=filled, fillcolor=red, fontcolor=white];
"Found immediate cause" -> "Can trace one level up?";
"Can trace one level up?" -> "Trace backwards" [label="yes"];
"Can trace one level up?" -> "NEVER fix just the symptom" [label="no"];
"Trace backwards" -> "Is this the source?";
"Is this the source?" -> "Trace backwards" [label="no - keeps going"];
"Is this the source?" -> "Fix at source" [label="yes"];
"Fix at source" -> "Add validation at each layer";
"Add validation at each layer" -> "Bug impossible";
}
NEVER fix just where the error appears. Trace back to find the original trigger.
Stack Trace Tips
In tests: Use console.error() not logger - logger may be suppressed
Before operation: Log before the dangerous operation, not after it fails
Include context: Directory, cwd, environment variables, timestamps
Capture stack: new Error().stack shows complete call chain
Real-World Impact
From debugging session (2025-10-03):
- Found root cause through 5-level trace
- Fixed at source (getter validation)
- Added 4 layers of defense
- 1847 tests passed, zero pollution
04 同仓库更多 Skills
writing-clearly-and-concisely
Use when writing prose humans will read—documentation, commit messages, error messages, explanations, reports, or UI text. Applies Strunk's timeless rules for clearer, stronger, more professional writing.
crafting-effective-readmes
Use when writing or improving README files. Not all READMEs are the same — provides templates and guidance matched to your audience and project type.
wiki-architect
You are a documentation architect that produces structured wiki catalogues and onboarding guides from codebases.
readme
You are an expert technical writer creating comprehensive project documentation. Your goal is to write a README.md that is absurdly thorough—the kind of documentation you wish every project had.
ubiquitous-language
Extract a DDD-style ubiquitous language glossary from the current conversation, flagging ambiguities and proposing canonical terms. Saves to UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.md. Use when user wants to define domain terms, build a glossary, harden terminology, create a ubiquitous language, or mentions "domain model" or "DDD".
technical-writing-style
Enforce clear, direct writing in software development documents including OKRs, PRDs, tech specs, architecture decision records (ADRs), git commit messages, PR descriptions, READMEs, changelogs, runbooks, incident postmortems, API docs, and onboarding guides. Trigger whenever a user asks to write, edit, revise, or review any of these document types. Also trigger when the user says writing "sounds like AI", "feels robotic", "needs polish", or asks to "make it sound more natural" in the context of technical or professional prose. Do not trigger for fiction, poetry, creative writing, academic papers, or legal documents unless the user explicitly asks for a more natural tone.