scenario-war-room
Cross-functional what-if modeling for cascading multi-variable scenarios. Unlike single-assumption stress testing, this models compound adversity across all business functions simultaneously. Use when facing complex risk scenarios, strategic decisions with major downside, or when the user asks 'what if X AND Y both happen?'
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-06-24
- Stars
- ★ 3
- Forks
- 1
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- scenario-war-room
- tags
- [ "domain/agents", "artifact/skill", "source/skills-claude" ]
- license
- MIT
- metadata
- { "author": "Alireza Rezvani", "domain": "strategic-planning", "updated": 1772668800000, "version": "1.0.0", "category": "c-level", "frameworks": "scenario-planning", "python-tools": "scenario_modeler.py" }
- description
- Cross-functional what-if modeling for cascading multi-variable scenarios. Unlike single-assumption stress testing, this models compound adversity across all business functions simultaneously. Use when facing complex risk scenarios, strategic decisions with major downside, or when the user asks 'what if X AND Y both happen?'
02 资源文件 2
- 参考文档references/scenario-planning.md8.0 KB
- 脚本scripts/scenario_modeler.py17.3 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Scenario War Room
Model cascading what-if scenarios across all business functions. Not single-assumption stress tests — compound adversity that shows how one problem creates the next.
Keywords
scenario planning, war room, what-if analysis, risk modeling, cascading effects, compound risk, adversity planning, contingency planning, stress test, crisis planning, multi-variable scenario, pre-mortem
Quick Start
python scripts/scenario_modeler.py # Interactive scenario builder with cascade modeling
Or describe the scenario:
/war-room "What if we lose our top customer AND miss the Q3 fundraise?"
/war-room "What if 3 engineers quit AND we need to ship by Q3?"
/war-room "What if our market shrinks 30% AND a competitor raises $50M?"
What This Is Not
- Not a single-assumption stress test (that's
/em:stress-test) - Not financial modeling only — every function gets modeled
- Not worst-case-only — models 3 severity levels
- Not paralysis by analysis — outputs concrete hedges and triggers
Framework: 6-Step Cascade Model
Step 1: Define Scenario Variables (max 3)
State each variable with:
- What changes — specific, quantified if possible
- Probability — your best estimate
- Timeline — when it hits
Variable A: Top customer (28% ARR) gives 60-day termination notice
Probability: 15% | Timeline: Within 90 days
Variable B: Series A fundraise delayed 6 months beyond target close
Probability: 25% | Timeline: Q3
Variable C: Lead engineer resigns
Probability: 20% | Timeline: Unknown
Step 2: Domain Impact Mapping
For each variable, each relevant role models impact:
| Domain | Owner | Models |
|---|---|---|
| Cash & runway | CFO | Burn impact, runway change, bridge options |
| Revenue | CRO | ARR gap, churn cascade risk, pipeline |
| Product | CPO | Roadmap impact, PMF risk |
| Engineering | CTO | Velocity impact, key person risk |
| People | CHRO | Attrition cascade, hiring freeze implications |
| Operations | COO | Capacity, OKR impact, process risk |
| Security | CISO | Compliance timeline risk |
| Market | CMO | CAC impact, competitive exposure |
Step 3: Cascade Effect Mapping
This is the core. Show how Variable A triggers consequences in domains that trigger Variable B's effects:
TRIGGER: Customer churn ($560K ARR)
↓
CFO: Runway drops 14 → 8 months
↓
CHRO: Hiring freeze; retention risk increases (morale hit)
↓
CTO: 3 open engineering reqs frozen; roadmap slips
↓
CPO: Q4 feature launch delayed → customer retention risk
↓
CRO: NRR drops; existing accounts see reduced velocity → more churn risk
↓
CFO: [Secondary cascade — potential death spiral if not interrupted]
Name the cascade explicitly. Show where it can be interrupted.
Step 4: Severity Matrix
Model three scenarios:
| Scenario | Definition | Recovery |
|---|---|---|
| Base | One variable hits; others don't | Manageable with plan |
| Stress | Two variables hit simultaneously | Requires significant response |
| Severe | All variables hit; full cascade | Existential; requires board intervention |
For each severity level:
- Runway impact
- ARR impact
- Headcount impact
- Timeline to unacceptable state (trigger point)
Step 5: Trigger Points (Early Warning Signals)
Define the measurable signal that tells you a scenario is unfolding before it's confirmed:
Trigger for Customer Churn Risk:
- Sponsor goes dark for >3 weeks
- Usage drops >25% MoM
- No Q1 QBR confirmed by Dec 1
Trigger for Fundraise Delay:
- <3 term sheets after 60 days of process
- Lead investor requests >30-day extension on DD
- Competitor raises at lower valuation (market signal)
Trigger for Engineering Attrition:
- Glassdoor activity from engineering team
- 2+ referral interview requests from engineers
- Above-market offer counter-required in last 3 months
Step 6: Hedging Strategies
For each scenario: actions to take now (before the scenario materializes) that reduce impact if it does.
| Hedge | Cost | Impact | Owner | Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Establish $500K credit line | $5K/year | Buys 3 months if churn hits | CFO | 60 days |
| 12-month retention bonus for 3 key engineers | $90K | Locks team through fundraise | CHRO | 30 days |
| Diversify to <20% revenue concentration per customer | Sales effort | Reduces single-customer risk | CRO | 2 quarters |
| Compress fundraise timeline, start parallel process | CEO time | Closes before runways merge | CEO | Immediate |
Output Format
Every war room session produces:
SCENARIO: [Name]
Variables: [A, B, C]
Most likely path: [which combination actually plays out, with probability]
SEVERITY LEVELS
Base (A only): [runway/ARR impact] — recovery: [X actions]
Stress (A+B): [runway/ARR impact] — recovery: [X actions]
Severe (A+B+C): [runway/ARR impact] — existential risk: [yes/no]
CASCADE MAP
[A → domain impact → B trigger → domain impact → end state]
EARLY WARNING SIGNALS
- [Signal 1 → which scenario it indicates]
- [Signal 2 → which scenario it indicates]
- [Signal 3 → which scenario it indicates]
HEDGES (take these actions now)
1. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]
2. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]
3. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]
RECOMMENDED DECISION
[One paragraph. What to do, in what order, and why.]
Rules for Good War Room Sessions
Max 3 variables per scenario. More than 3 is noise — you can't meaningfully prepare for 5-variable collapse. Model the 3 that actually worry you.
Quantify or estimate. "Revenue drops" is not useful. "$420K ARR at risk over 60 days" is. Use ranges if uncertain.
Don't stop at first-order effects. The damage is always in the cascade, not the initial hit.
Model recovery, not just impact. Every scenario should have a "what we do" path.
Separate base case from sensitivity. Don't conflate "what probably happens" with "what could happen."
Don't over-model. 3-4 scenarios per planning cycle is the right number. More creates analysis paralysis.
Common Scenarios by Stage
Seed:
- Co-founder leaves + product misses launch
- Funding runs out + bridge terms unfavorable
Series A:
- Miss ARR target + fundraise delayed
- Key customer churns + competitor raises
Series B:
- Market contraction + burn multiple spikes
- Lead investor wants pivot + team resists
Integration with C-Suite Roles
| Scenario Type | Primary Roles | Cascade To |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue miss | CRO, CFO | CMO (pipeline), COO (cuts), CHRO (layoffs) |
| Key person departure | CHRO, COO | CTO (if eng), CRO (if sales) |
| Fundraise failure | CFO, CEO | COO (runway extension), CHRO (hiring freeze) |
| Security breach | CISO, CTO | CEO (comms), CFO (cost), CRO (customer impact) |
| Market shift | CEO, CPO | CMO (repositioning), CRO (new segments) |
| Competitor move | CMO, CRO | CPO (roadmap response), CEO (strategy) |
References
references/scenario-planning.md— Shell methodology, pre-mortem, Monte Carlo, cascade frameworksscripts/scenario_modeler.py— CLI tool for structured scenario modeling
? Связи
- [[MOC - Skills]] — Skills library
- [[skills/skills-claude]] — Category: skills-claude
- [[MOC - Agents]] — Claude agents
04 同仓库更多 Skills
ckm:ui-styling
Create beautiful, accessible user interfaces with shadcn/ui components (built on Radix UI + Tailwind), Tailwind CSS utility-first styling, and canvas-based visual designs. Use when building user interfaces, implementing design systems, creating responsive layouts, adding accessible components (dialogs, dropdowns, forms, tables), customizing themes and colors, implementing dark mode, generating visual designs and posters, or establishing consistent styling patterns across applications.
ckm:design
Comprehensive design skill: brand identity, design tokens, UI styling, logo generation (55 styles, Gemini AI), corporate identity program (50 deliverables, CIP mockups), HTML presentations (Chart.js), banner design (22 styles, social/ads/web/print), icon design (15 styles, SVG, Gemini 3.1 Pro), social photos (HTML→screenshot, multi-platform). Actions: design logo, create CIP, generate mockups, build slides, design banner, generate icon, create social photos, social media images, brand identity, design system. Platforms: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Instagram, Pinterest, TikTok, Threads, Google Ads.
ckm:design-system
Token architecture, component specifications, and slide generation. Three-layer tokens (primitive→semantic→component), CSS variables, spacing/typography scales, component specs, strategic slide creation. Use for design tokens, systematic design, brand-compliant presentations.
ckm:banner-design
Design banners for social media, ads, website heroes, creative assets, and print. Multiple art direction options with AI-generated visuals. Actions: design, create, generate banner. Platforms: Facebook, Twitter/X, LinkedIn, YouTube, Instagram, Google Display, website hero, print. Styles: minimalist, gradient, bold typography, photo-based, illustrated, geometric, retro, glassmorphism, 3D, neon, duotone, editorial, collage. Uses ui-ux-pro-max, frontend-design, ai-artist, ai-multimodal skills.
seo
Comprehensive SEO analysis for any website or business type. Performs full site audits, single-page deep analysis, technical SEO checks (crawlability, indexability, Core Web Vitals with INP), schema markup detection/validation/generation, content quality assessment (E-E-A-T framework per Dec 2025 update extending to all competitive queries), image optimization, sitemap analysis, and Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) for AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Perplexity citations. Analyzes AI crawler accessibility (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot), llms.txt compliance, brand mention signals, and passage-level citability. Industry detection for SaaS, e-commerce, local business, publishers, agencies. Triggers on: "SEO", "audit", "schema", "Core Web Vitals", "sitemap", "E-E-A-T", "AI Overviews", "GEO", "technical SEO", "content quality", "page speed", "structured data".
seo-technical
Technical SEO audit across 9 categories: crawlability, indexability, security, URL structure, mobile, Core Web Vitals, structured data, JavaScript rendering, and IndexNow protocol. Use when user says "technical SEO", "crawl issues", "robots.txt", "Core Web Vitals", "site speed", or "security headers".