debugging-strategies
Master systematic debugging techniques, profiling tools, and root cause analysis to efficiently track down bugs across any codebase or technology stack. Use when investigating bugs, performance issues, or unexpected behavior.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-11
- Stars
- ★ 6
- Forks
- 1
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- debugging-strategies
- description
- Master systematic debugging techniques, profiling tools, and root cause analysis to efficiently track down bugs across any codebase or technology stack. Use when investigating bugs, performance issues, or unexpected behavior.
02 资源文件 1
- 参考文档references/tools-and-profiling.md2.5 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Debugging Strategies
Origin: Techniques refined through systematic debugging of concurrent test failures in a large TypeScript codebase (2025).
Transform debugging from frustrating guesswork into systematic problem-solving with proven strategies, powerful tools, and methodical approaches.
When to Use This Skill
- Tracking down elusive bugs
- Investigating performance issues
- Understanding unfamiliar codebases
- Debugging production issues
- Analyzing crash dumps and stack traces
- Profiling application performance
- Investigating memory leaks
- Debugging distributed systems
Core Principles
1. The Scientific Method
1. Observe: What's the actual behavior? 2. Hypothesize: What could be causing it? 3. Experiment: Test your hypothesis 4. Analyze: Did it prove/disprove your theory? 5. Repeat: Until you find the root cause
2. Debugging Mindset
Don't Assume:
- "It can't be X" - Yes it can
- "I didn't change Y" - Check anyway
- "It works on my machine" - Find out why
Do:
- Reproduce consistently
- Isolate the problem
- Keep detailed notes
- Question everything
- Take breaks when stuck
3. Rubber Duck Debugging
Explain your code and problem out loud (to a rubber duck, colleague, or yourself). Often reveals the issue.
Systematic Debugging Process
Phase 1: Reproduce
## Reproduction Checklist
1. **Can you reproduce it?**
- Always? Sometimes? Randomly?
- Specific conditions needed?
- Can others reproduce it?
2. **Create minimal reproduction**
- Simplify to smallest example
- Remove unrelated code
- Isolate the problem
3. **Document steps**
- Write down exact steps
- Note environment details
- Capture error messages
Phase 2: Gather Information
## Information Collection
1. **Error Messages**
- Full stack trace
- Error codes
- Console/log output
2. **Environment**
- OS version
- Language/runtime version
- Dependencies versions
- Environment variables
3. **Recent Changes**
- Git history
- Deployment timeline
- Configuration changes
4. **Scope**
- Affects all users or specific ones?
- All browsers or specific ones?
- Production only or also dev?
Phase 3: Form Hypothesis
## Hypothesis Formation
Based on gathered info, ask:
1. **What changed?**
- Recent code changes
- Dependency updates
- Infrastructure changes
2. **What's different?**
- Working vs broken environment
- Working vs broken user
- Before vs after
3. **Where could this fail?**
- Input validation
- Business logic
- Data layer
- External services
Phase 4: Test & Verify
## Testing Strategies
1. **Binary Search**
- Comment out half the code
- Narrow down problematic section
- Repeat until found
2. **Add Logging**
- Strategic console.log/print
- Track variable values
- Trace execution flow
3. **Isolate Components**
- Test each piece separately
- Mock dependencies
- Remove complexity
4. **Compare Working vs Broken**
- Diff configurations
- Diff environments
- Diff data
Debugging Tools
JavaScript/TypeScript Debugging
// Chrome DevTools Debugger
function processOrder(order: Order) {
debugger; // Execution pauses here
const total = calculateTotal(order);
console.log('Total:', total);
// Conditional breakpoint
if (order.items.length > 10) {
debugger; // Only breaks if condition true
}
return total;
}
// Console debugging techniques
console.log('Value:', value); // Basic
console.table(arrayOfObjects); // Table format
console.time('operation'); /* code */ console.timeEnd('operation'); // Timing
console.trace(); // Stack trace
console.assert(value > 0, 'Value must be positive'); // Assertion
// Performance profiling
performance.mark('start-operation');
// ... operation code
performance.mark('end-operation');
performance.measure('operation', 'start-operation', 'end-operation');
console.log(performance.getEntriesByType('measure'));
VS Code Debugger Configuration:
// .vscode/launch.json
{
"version": "0.2.0",
"configurations": [
{
"type": "node",
"request": "launch",
"name": "Debug Program",
"program": "${workspaceFolder}/src/index.ts",
"preLaunchTask": "tsc: build - tsconfig.json",
"outFiles": ["${workspaceFolder}/dist/**/*.js"],
"skipFiles": ["<node_internals>/**"]
},
{
"type": "node",
"request": "launch",
"name": "Debug Tests",
"program": "${workspaceFolder}/node_modules/jest/bin/jest",
"args": ["--runInBand", "--no-cache"],
"console": "integratedTerminal"
}
]
}
Python Debugging
# Built-in debugger (pdb)
import pdb
def calculate_total(items):
total = 0
pdb.set_trace() # Debugger starts here
for item in items:
total += item.price * item.quantity
return total
# Breakpoint (Python 3.7+)
def process_order(order):
breakpoint() # More convenient than pdb.set_trace()
# ... code
# Post-mortem debugging
try:
risky_operation()
except Exception:
import pdb
pdb.post_mortem() # Debug at exception point
# IPython debugging (ipdb)
from ipdb import set_trace
set_trace() # Better interface than pdb
# Logging for debugging
import logging
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG)
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
def fetch_user(user_id):
logger.debug(f'Fetching user: {user_id}')
user = db.query(User).get(user_id)
logger.debug(f'Found user: {user}')
return user
# Profile performance
import cProfile
import pstats
cProfile.run('slow_function()', 'profile_stats')
stats = pstats.Stats('profile_stats')
stats.sort_stats('cumulative')
stats.print_stats(10) # Top 10 slowest
Go Debugging
// Delve debugger
// Install: go install github.com/go-delve/delve/cmd/dlv@latest
// Run: dlv debug main.go
import (
"fmt"
"runtime"
"runtime/debug"
)
// Print stack trace
func debugStack() {
debug.PrintStack()
}
// Panic recovery with debugging
func processRequest() {
defer func() {
if r := recover(); r != nil {
fmt.Println("Panic:", r)
debug.PrintStack()
}
}()
// ... code that might panic
}
// Memory profiling
import _ "net/http/pprof"
// Visit http://localhost:6060/debug/pprof/
// CPU profiling
import (
"os"
"runtime/pprof"
)
f, _ := os.Create("cpu.prof")
pprof.StartCPUProfile(f)
defer pprof.StopCPUProfile()
// ... code to profile
Advanced Debugging Techniques
Technique 0: AST-Based Code Tracing
When sg (ast-grep) is available, use structural search for precise code tracing:
# Trace all exception raise/catch patterns
sg run -p 'raise $EXCEPTION' -l python src/
sg run -p 'except $TYPE as $VAR:' -l python src/
# Find all assignments to a variable (track state mutations)
sg run -p '$TARGET = $VALUE' -l python src/module/
# Map async call chains (find all await expressions)
sg run -p 'await $EXPR' -l python src/
# Find all callers of a suspect function
sg run -p 'suspect_function($$$ARGS)' -l python src/
# Find all error handler paths
sg run -p 'except $TYPE:
$$$BODY' -l python src/
# Trace decorator usage (find wrapped functions)
sg run -p '@$DECORATOR
def $NAME($$$):' -l python src/
When to prefer sg over Grep for debugging:
- Multiline patterns (function calls spanning lines)
- Structural patterns (all try/except, all async/await)
- Precise matching (function calls vs string mentions)
- If
sgis unavailable, fall back to Grep + manual verification
Technique 1: Binary Search Debugging
# Git bisect for finding regression
git bisect start
git bisect bad # Current commit is bad
git bisect good v1.0.0 # v1.0.0 was good
# Git checks out middle commit
# Test it, then:
git bisect good # if it works
git bisect bad # if it's broken
# Continue until bug found
git bisect reset # when done
Technique 2: Differential Debugging
Compare working vs broken:
## What's Different?
| Aspect | Working | Broken |
|--------------|-----------------|-----------------|
| Environment | Development | Production |
| Node version | 18.16.0 | 18.15.0 |
| Data | Empty DB | 1M records |
| User | Admin | Regular user |
| Browser | Chrome | Safari |
| Time | During day | After midnight |
Hypothesis: Time-based issue? Check timezone handling.
Technique 3: Trace Debugging
// Function call tracing
function trace(target: any, propertyKey: string, descriptor: PropertyDescriptor) {
const originalMethod = descriptor.value;
descriptor.value = function(...args: any[]) {
console.log(`Calling ${propertyKey} with args:`, args);
const result = originalMethod.apply(this, args);
console.log(`${propertyKey} returned:`, result);
return result;
};
return descriptor;
}
class OrderService {
@trace
calculateTotal(items: Item[]): number {
return items.reduce((sum, item) => sum + item.price, 0);
}
}
Technique 4: Memory Leak Detection
// Chrome DevTools Memory Profiler
// 1. Take heap snapshot
// 2. Perform action
// 3. Take another snapshot
// 4. Compare snapshots
// Node.js memory debugging
if (process.memoryUsage().heapUsed > 500 * 1024 * 1024) {
console.warn('High memory usage:', process.memoryUsage());
// Generate heap dump
require('v8').writeHeapSnapshot();
}
// Find memory leaks in tests
let beforeMemory: number;
beforeEach(() => {
beforeMemory = process.memoryUsage().heapUsed;
});
afterEach(() => {
const afterMemory = process.memoryUsage().heapUsed;
const diff = afterMemory - beforeMemory;
if (diff > 10 * 1024 * 1024) { // 10MB threshold
console.warn(`Possible memory leak: ${diff / 1024 / 1024}MB`);
}
});
Debugging Patterns by Issue Type
Pattern 1: Intermittent Bugs
## Strategies for Flaky Bugs
1. **Add extensive logging**
- Log timing information
- Log all state transitions
- Log external interactions
2. **Look for race conditions**
- Concurrent access to shared state
- Async operations completing out of order
- Missing synchronization
3. **Check timing dependencies**
- setTimeout/setInterval
- Promise resolution order
- Animation frame timing
4. **Stress test**
- Run many times
- Vary timing
- Simulate load
Pattern 2: Performance Issues
## Reference Files
For detailed patterns and code examples, see [references/tools-and-profiling.md](references/tools-and-profiling.md).
04 同仓库更多 Skills
deploy-helper
You can use this to help with deploy stuff, deploying, deployments, releases, shipping, pushing to prod, going live, rollouts.
writing-for-agents
Writing documents for agents. Use when creating or editing skills, or modifying AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md.
verify-plan
Slash entry for plan verification: runs plan-verification on an existing AA-MA plan, writes [task]-verification.md, and with --iterate loops until the plan converges. Use when the user types /verify-plan or wants the verification report saved.
verify-impl
Post-impl adversarial review symmetric to /verify-plan. Dispatches up to 5 parallel audit agents (code-reviewer, security-auditor, tdd-sequence-auditor, context7-evidence-auditor, future-proofing-auditor) based on the milestone's plan-declared Audit-Profile. CRITICAL findings surface via AskUserQuestion accept/dispute/defer panel before §7.3 user authorization. Introduced in v0.8.0 per ADR-0005. Invoked by Phase 6.8 of /execute-aa-ma-milestone.
understand-codebase
Onboard to a new, inherited, or shared codebase. Read it, understand it, map it, and learn its conventions, versioning, tests, tech stack, rules (AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md / .cursorrules / etc.), build/run/CI, integrations, security posture, and repo health — then produce an honest pros/cons verdict, a "contribute safely" playbook, and an "add a feature" playbook, written to ONBOARDING.md at the repo root plus a .claude/onboarding/ set of deep-dives — and optionally author an AGENTS.md if one is missing, or review and propose improvements to an existing one. Tiered (Quick / Standard / Deep). Reuses codemem (index + diagrams), gsd-map-codebase, system-mapping, code-intelligence, impact-analysis rather than re-implementing them; Deep tier runs a TeamCreate agent-team. Keywords: new codebase, shared codebase, inherited code, onboard, understand this repo, how do I contribute, how do I add a feature, ramp up, get oriented, ONBOARDING.md, AGENTS.md, codebase walkthrough, joining a project.
token-compression
Output token compression for AA-MA workflows. Reduces response tokens by 40-75% while preserving full technical accuracy. Three intensity levels mapped to execution modes: lite (HITL), full (general), ultra (AFK). Auto-activates during AA-MA execution based on task Mode field. Manual activation via /compress lite|full|ultra.