report-check
暂无简介
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-11
- Stars
- ★ 1.6k
- Forks
- 474
02 资源文件 1
- 参考文档TEST-PLAN.md1.4 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Gather Context
!`git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree 2>/dev/null || echo "NO_GIT"`
!`git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo "NO_GIT"`
Report Quality Check
Analyze a review report for quality issues -- noise, false positives, overkill suggestions, and findings that exist to appear thorough rather than to help the developer.
Announce: "Using the report-check skill to audit report quality."
Step 0 -- Validate Input
If $ARGUMENTS is empty, print:
Usage:
/report-check <path-to-review-report.md>Analyzes a review report for quality issues -- noise, false positives, overkill suggestions.
Stop here.
If $ARGUMENTS contains a file path:
- Read the file using the Read tool.
- If the file does not exist or is not readable, print:
Report file not found:
{path}Stop here.
Step 1 -- Read Report
- Read the full report file.
- Extract the branch name from the
## Review Contextsection if present (look for aBranch:line). - Note the report structure: findings grouped by severity, verdict, filtered findings section.
Step 2 -- Reconstruct Diff (optional)
If git is available AND a branch name was extracted from the report:
-
Determine the base branch:
!`git rev-parse --verify main 2>/dev/null || echo "NO_MAIN"`Use
mainif it exists, otherwisemaster. -
Get the diff:
!`git diff {base}...{branch} 2>/dev/null || echo "NO_DIFF"` -
If the diff is non-empty, it will be passed to the agent for cross-referencing.
Print status:
- With diff:
Analyzing report with diff cross-reference... - Without diff:
Analyzing report (no diff available for cross-reference)...
If git is unavailable or no branch info exists, proceed without diff. The agent works report-only -- Phase 2 accuracy checks will be limited.
Step 3 -- Dispatch Agent
Spawn the quiver:report-checker agent with a self-contained prompt containing:
-
The full report content, clearly delimited:
<report> {full report markdown} </report> -
The diff (if available), clearly delimited:
<diff> {full diff output} </diff>If no diff is available, include:
<diff> No diff available for cross-referencing. </diff> -
Instruction: "Audit this review report for quality. Apply all three phases (substance verification, accuracy check, proportionality audit). Return structured findings using your output format."
Step 4 -- Present Results
If agent returns zero issues:
Report passed quality audit -- no issues found.
If agent returns issues, display the structured findings to the user.
Use AskUserQuestion:
Quality audit found {N} issues in the report. What would you like to do?
Buttons:
Apply fixes to the reportShow details onlySkip -- keep as-is
Handle each option:
<!-- SYNC: The apply-fixes procedure below (REMOVE/DOWNGRADE/REWRITE actions + recalculation steps) is duplicated in skills/review/SKILL.md Step 3.5 "Handle results" block. Keep both in sync. --> Apply fixes:
- For each issue with action REMOVE: delete the finding from the report file.
- For each issue with action DOWNGRADE: change the finding's severity and move it to the correct severity section.
- For each issue with action REWRITE: replace the finding's recommendation text with the corrected version. It changes only the recommendation text, so the finding keeps its
Verification:line. - After applying all fixes, recalculate:
- Findings overview counts in
## Review Context - Disposition counts in
## Review Context, and the**Deferred:**line under the fix order table - Severity section contents (move downgraded findings, remove deleted ones)
- Recommended Fix Order table (remove entries for deleted/downgraded findings)
- Verdict line (recompute based on remaining finding severities)
- Findings overview counts in
- Write the updated report back to the same file path.
- Proceed to Step 5.
Show details:
- Print the full audit output.
- Re-ask via
AskUserQuestion:Apply the suggested fixes? Buttons:
Apply fixes/Skip -- keep as-is
Skip: Stop. Report unchanged.
Step 5 -- Verify (if fixes applied)
- Read the modified report file back using the Read tool.
- Confirm no
{placeholder}text remains in the report. - Print:
Report updated: {N} findings removed, {M} downgraded, {K} rewritten.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
migrate-to-e2e
Moves an existing Playwright, Cypress, Selenium, Appium, Detox, Maestro, or TesterArmy suite to e2e one slice at a time, with the old suite running beside the new one until each ported test is proven. Keeps a MIGRATION.md progress file so any later session resumes where the last stopped. Optionally plants a defect to show both suites catch it. Use for /migrate-to-e2e, "migrate our tests to e2e", "port these Maestro flows", "move our TesterArmy tests", or when a project has an e2e config and an older suite still running.
e2e
Writes, runs, and debugs end-to-end tests for web and mobile apps with e2e, the agentic test runner, which mixes agent.act goals with exact locator assertions on a Playwright browser or an iOS or Android device. Also drives a project's running app live over the e2e MCP server to look at a screen, check a UI change, take a screenshot or record a video, and try a locator; and runs bug bashes, parallel e2e explore runs with each bug proven by a repro test. Use when a project depends on e2e or has an e2e.config.ts, when asked for end-to-end, browser, mobile, or agentic UI tests, to check a change in the running app, to QA or bug bash an app or branch, or when an e2e run fails.
create-verification-skill
Generate a project-local verify-<app> skill on top of e2e, so any coding agent can launch the app, check it is worth driving, exercise a feature the way a user does, keep evidence, and bug bash it. Writes the skill, a feature map with one explore charter per feature, and proves it once. Use for /create-verification-skill, "make a verification skill for this repo", or when a project has no scripted way to prove UI behavior.
deja-search
deja-vu memory — search the user's past AI coding sessions with the deja CLI. Holds what they already settled and never wrote into the repo (naming rules, banned or already-tried tools, required checks before merge, preferred values, who owns what). Use before your first edit in a task, before you call a change done or ready to merge, before you recommend a tool, library, design or reviewer, before re-debugging an error that may already be solved, when they say 'didn't we fix this before', 'what did we decide about X' or 'I already have that', and before telling them something on this machine does not exist.
deja-reflect
End-of-session reflection and memory curation with deja-vu. Review what was decided, what commands broke and what repaired them, and record durable project rules or decisions with deja remember so the next session starts with them.
revid
Make, edit, export and post AI videos with Revid (revid.ai) through the Revid MCP server. Use whenever the user wants a short-form or long-form video made (from an idea, a script, a URL, an article, a PDF, a tweet, a product page, their own clips, or a song), wants to find what is going viral on TikTok, YouTube, Instagram or X before making something, wants to edit or re-export an existing Revid project, generate a standalone AI image or clip, make a series episode, or publish and schedule a finished video to connected social accounts. Covers setup (hosted MCP with OAuth, or an API key), the 36 tools, credits, polling and the rules for publishing. Routes to the more specific revid-* skills when one fits.