orgx-initiative-ops
Use when Codex is working on a repo or task that is scoped to an OrgX initiative, workstream, milestone, task, blocker, or decision and needs to use OrgX MCP as the source of truth.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-11
- Stars
- ★ 1.6k
- Forks
- 468
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- orgx-initiative-ops
- description
- Use when Codex is working on a repo or task that is scoped to an OrgX initiative, workstream, milestone, task, blocker, or decision and needs to use OrgX MCP as the source of truth.
03 SKILL.md 正文
OrgX Initiative Ops
Use this skill when the task is tied to OrgX execution state rather than just local code.
The bundled MCP connection requests the explicit commander runtime
profile. Use only tools actually exposed in that connection. A missing
tool may need connection refresh or a coordinated plugin/server update. Report
that tracking limitation and continue independent authorized repo work; never
invent an alias or weaken an autonomous run's signed schema policy.
Workflow
- Orient when OrgX state is relevant:
- Read the relevant workspace or initiative summary before changing OrgX state or relying on its status. Reuse context already read in this session when it is sufficient; local edits do not require a new OrgX read.
- For broad status/reporting questions, prefer
get_operator_chroniclefirst when available; it is the canonical decision, artifact, PR, goal, gap, and priority readout. - If the hosted OrgX MCP bootstrap advertises
get_operator_chroniclebut the active AI client session has a stale callable tool list, immediately useorgx_recommendonly when that name is actually callable, withmode: "morning_brief", and report the returnedchronicle.reportingNarrative.briefMarkdown. Do not wait for the client to reconnect before answering the operator. - If an initiative, workstream, task, blocker, or decision is named, treat OrgX as the source of truth for current status.
- Reuse existing context before creating new structure:
- Query OrgX memory or list the relevant entities first.
- Only scaffold new work when no matching initiative structure already exists.
- Work against the current slice:
- Prefer updating the current task or workstream instead of creating parallel duplicate work.
- Keep your local implementation aligned with the active OrgX entity state.
- Report concrete progress:
- Use OrgX progress/activity tools for real execution milestones.
- Register useful artifacts within the authorized tracking scope. Batch related evidence at a meaningful milestone instead of writing on every file edit.
- Missing IDs or unavailable reporting tools do not block implementation, verification, PR updates, or an otherwise authorized merge. Report pending tracking separately from the actual work outcome.
- Surface decisions explicitly:
- Request a decision only when an unresolved choice needs human authority. Resolve routine implementation choices within the user's scope, and honor approval already given instead of requesting it again.
- Do not bury blockers in prose.
- Only a person settles a decision.
orgx_decidewithaction: "approve"or"reject"never approves or rejects anything: it returns the decision'sreview_urlin OrgX. Give the person that link and report only the dependent work as waiting on them. Continue independent work, and never say a decision was approved or rejected unless OrgX shows it settled.
- Close the loop:
- Launching or spawning work starts it; it does not finish it. Report it as
started, keep the returned run ID, and check it with
orgx_command_status(kind: "run", orkind: "decision"for a decision) before claiming any outcome. Whennext_poll_after_msis a number, check again after that many milliseconds;nullmeans the state is final. Useorgx_inspectfor anything without a run, decision or command ID. - When a task is truly done, verify it first.
- Then update completion state in OrgX if the current task is known.
Quality bar
- Never assume OrgX entity state from memory alone.
- Never mark work complete without verification.
- Prefer one verified task completion over broad unverified status claims.
- If a write's outcome is unclear, reconcile the returned command or run first. Retry only if that operation documents replay support, with identical input and the same idempotency key; never send it through another tool name.
- Use
source_client=codexwhenever the tool supports client attribution.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
deja-search
deja-vu memory — search the user's past AI coding sessions with the deja CLI. Holds what they already settled and never wrote into the repo (naming rules, banned or already-tried tools, required checks before merge, preferred values, who owns what). Use before your first edit in a task, before you call a change done or ready to merge, before you recommend a tool, library, design or reviewer, before re-debugging an error that may already be solved, when they say 'didn't we fix this before', 'what did we decide about X' or 'I already have that', and before telling them something on this machine does not exist.
deja-reflect
End-of-session reflection and memory curation with deja-vu. Review what was decided, what commands broke and what repaired them, and record durable project rules or decisions with deja remember so the next session starts with them.
revid
Make, edit, export and post AI videos with Revid (revid.ai) through the Revid MCP server. Use whenever the user wants a short-form or long-form video made (from an idea, a script, a URL, an article, a PDF, a tweet, a product page, their own clips, or a song), wants to find what is going viral on TikTok, YouTube, Instagram or X before making something, wants to edit or re-export an existing Revid project, generate a standalone AI image or clip, make a series episode, or publish and schedule a finished video to connected social accounts. Covers setup (hosted MCP with OAuth, or an API key), the 36 tools, credits, polling and the rules for publishing. Routes to the more specific revid-* skills when one fits.
review-study
Review a QuestionPunk survey before launch for wording, answer choices, branching, and missing settings. Use for check my survey or review this draft before publishing.
manage-study
Find QuestionPunk studies, check status, publish an explicitly requested draft, or retrieve its participant link. Use for find my survey, publish this study, or how many people responded.
create-study
Create a saved QuestionPunk survey draft from a research brief or edit specified questions. Use for requests such as make a customer feedback survey or shorten my onboarding study.